4.6
Object
Local Plan 2040 Draft Plan - Strategy options and draft policies consultation
Representation ID: 3966
Received: 29/08/2021
Respondent: Mr Mark Potts
I consider that option 2b with a new settlement at Little Barford is the best
option. The East West rail station south of St Neots will provide a truly sustainable form of
development at Little Barford. It will be better connected to the new station than Dennybrook. The
latter does not provide a suitable alternative – too far from the rail station, risk of coalescence, good
agricultural land. Our second preference if Little Barford were deemed unsuitable would be
Twinwoods at Thurleigh as a significant part of the site is brownfield land. See above and site
assessments for reasons
I consider that option 2b with a new settlement at Little Barford is the best
option. The East West rail station south of St Neots will provide a truly sustainable form of
development at Little Barford. It will be better connected to the new station than Dennybrook. The
latter does not provide a suitable alternative – too far from the rail station, risk of coalescence, good
agricultural land. Our second preference if Little Barford were deemed unsuitable would be
Twinwoods at Thurleigh as a significant part of the site is brownfield land. See above and site
assessments for reasons
Object
Local Plan 2040 Draft Plan - Strategy options and draft policies consultation
Representation ID: 3997
Received: 29/08/2021
Respondent: Mrs MARGARET TURNER
If a new settlement is required then Little Barford should be the preferred option as it is close to the
East West rail station. Dennybrook should be discounted because there is a risk of coalescence with
St Neots, the local roads are unsuitable, the traffic modelling was inadequate, it would engulf
existing hamlets and fundamentally change the rural nature of the parish, it would use high quality
agricultural land and it is too far from the proposed E-W rail station to be sustainable. Alternatives would be Twinwoods or Colworth
If a new settlement is required then Little Barford should be the preferred option as it is close to the
East West rail station. Dennybrook should be discounted because there is a risk of coalescence with
St Neots, the local roads are unsuitable, the traffic modelling was inadequate, it would engulf
existing hamlets and fundamentally change the rural nature of the parish, it would use high quality
agricultural land and it is too far from the proposed E-W rail station to be sustainable.
If Little Barford is not suitable then a new settlement at Twinwoods or Colmworth of 2500 homes would be the next best option. Twinwoods includes a significant proportion of Brownfield site and Colworth includes lower grade(3) agricultural land. Both these sites would support Bedford town Centre and Colworth was supported in the 2035 plan which was later reviewed. as the A6 was not considered sufficiently problematic then, its hard to understand how it is now?
Object
Local Plan 2040 Draft Plan - Strategy options and draft policies consultation
Representation ID: 4103
Received: 30/08/2021
Respondent: Mr Keith Turner
Little Barford the preferred option it is close to the East West rail station. Dennybrook should be discounted too close to StNeots far too many houses, the local roads are unsuitable, the traffic modelling was inadequate, change the rural nature of the parish, use high quality agricultural land. Too far from the proposed E-W rail station to be sustainable. A new settlement at Twinwoods or Colworth would be the next best option. Twinwoods includes a significant proportion of Brownfield site and Colworth includes lower gradeagriculturalland. Both these sites would support Bedford town and Colworth was supported in the 2035 plan
If a new settlement is required then Little Barford should be the preferred option as it is close to the East West rail station. Dennybrook should be discounted because there is a risk of coalescence with St Neots and far too many houses for the 2040 plan, the local roads are unsuitable, the traffic modelling was inadequate, it would engulf existing hamlets and fundamentally change the rural nature of the parish, it would use high quality agricultural land and it is too far from the proposed E-W rail station to be sustainable. If Little Barford is not suitable then a new settlement at Twinwoods or Colworth of 2500 homes would be the next best option. Twinwoods includes a significant proportion of Brownfield site and Colworth includes lower grade(3) agricultural land. Both these sites would support Bedford town Centre and Colworth was supported in the 2035 plan which was later reviewed. as the A6 was not considered sufficiently problematic then, its hard to understand how it is now?
Object
Local Plan 2040 Draft Plan - Strategy options and draft policies consultation
Representation ID: 4118
Received: 30/08/2021
Respondent: Mr paul giles
If a new settlement is required then Little Barford should be the preferred option as it is close to the East West rail station. Dennybrook should be discounted because there is a risk of coalescence with St Neots, the local roads are unsuitable, the traffic modelling was inadequate, it would engulf existing hamlets and fundamentally change the rural nature of the parish, it would use high quality agricultural land and it is too far from the proposed E-W rail station to be sustainable. Our second choice option would be at Twinwoods as there is a significant proportion of brownfield land.
As part of the preferred strategy, it is clear that should a new settlement be required in order to meet the Council’s Local Housing Needs Assessment (LHN), dated May 2021, then the proposed settlement of Little Barford is considered appropriate, and for the reasons set out in paragraph 3.17. The alternative site at land west of Wyboston (Dennybrook (site 977)) is considered the least preferred option and should be discounted as a sustainable location for development by Bedford Borough Council. The following comments and observations relate to the Call for Sites submission by Taylor Wimpey for a ‘new settlement’.
Under form ID: 977, submissions have been made for a new settlement covering around 750 Hectares of land, and providing between 7,500 – 10.150 dwellings (35 dph). BBC have identified the site as a potential ‘new settlement’ though providing around 2,500 new homes.
As previously noted under paragraph 3.17, the proposed site at Dennybrook (site 977) falls mostly within the Parish of Staploe which is very rural in character. Clearly, any significant development within the Parish would make a permanent change to the landscape and the setting of the small hamlets and rural nature in the locality. Such physical changes cannot be reversed, and the Council would need to be satisfied through a thorough review of the supporting documents to the site submissions that adequately address the impacts, and in terms of achieving sustainable development – in line with Paragraph 16 of the NPPF and section 39(2) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004.
Housing need has been identified through the Council’s LHN. Using the process set out in the Planning Practice Guidance “Housing and economic needs assessment” (MHCLG – updated December 2020) the minimum annual LHN figure is 1,305 dwellings per annum. This equates to 26,100 dwellings across the period 2020 – 2040. However, existing committed sites and windfall provide a figure of 13,000 new homes. This provides a figure of 13,100 additional dwellings over the plan period. It is noted that Bedford Borough Council have stated that the housing need is 12,500 as a minimum. Regardless which of the two figures are proposed, the strategy applied within paragraph 3.17 of these representations exceed the Council’s housing requirement and negates the need for Dennybrook (site 977) as a new settlement.
When looking at the spatial approach to locating new development, the proposed site at Dennybrook would be located within close proximity to St Neots, with a possible merging into Wyboston. Given the scale of the proposed development at Dennybrook, even at 2,500 dwellings, there would a potential coalescence to the existing settlement of St Neots. Spatially, this would be contrary to the Council’s adopted Local Plan which seeks to prevent coalescence of settlements. In addition, policy 37 of the Council’s adopted Local Plan makes clear that developments need to ‘Protect the landscape setting and contribute to maintaining the individual and distinct character, and separate identities of settlements by preventing coalescence…’. It should also be taken into consideration that St Neots is experiencing its own strategic growth with an eastern extension 3,265 dwelling and 20 Ha of employment land over the plan period. Therefore, a new settlement directly to the west of the existing settlement of 2,500 would significantly increase the size of St Neots and may effect delivery rates for housing due to competing sites.
The transport impacts are acutely felt for this proposed new settlement. It is clear that the proposed development at Dennybrook (site 977) would be a car reliant settlement. The proposal will not benefit from a choice of sustainable modes of transport as opposed to other developments, such as urban extensions and the proposed development at Little Barford. Little Barford offers a varied choice of sustainable modes of public transport, including the possible linkage to the East West rail station south of St Neots. It is anticipated that there will be limited employment associated with the Dennybrook (site 977) with commuting considered necessary to nearby employment areas, for example, south of St Neots, Bedford or Cambridge via train. This would be contrary to sustainability objectives identified by BBC, and contrary to paragraphs 73, 104, 105, 106, and 110 of the NPPF, not to mention existing policies within the adopted Local Plan, namely Policies 2S, 87, 88, and 90S. In addition, the Dennybrook site does not align with a strategic transport corridor growth strategy, including rail.
In highways terms, it has been identified previously that Parish of Staploe is rural in character, with most of the road network narrow and single track. The inclusion of 2,500 dwellings (or over 10,000 according to the site promoted) would require significant infrastructure interventions, including the substantial widening of existing roads and junctions, which would lead to an urbanised appearance it what is a tranquil and idyllic countryside setting. Bedford Borough Council confirm within their assessment of the site submissions, that junction or highway capacity issues are a ‘serious capacity constraint’.
These representations are supported by a Highways Technical Note which has reviewed the Transport Modelling undertaken by AECOM in support of the strategic options in the Draft Local Plan 2040. The Technical Note considers that the Transport Modelling is fundamentally flawed. In summary, no validation or calibration of the traffic model has been undertaken, leading to significant discrepancies. Furthermore, within the Transport Model documents, it is quoted that average departing trips are 20 to 25 vehicles. When looking at the development scenario with the transport model of 2,500 – 10,150 dwellings, and using a departure rate of 0.25 departure trip rate, this results in 625 to 2,538 departing trips all of which would be home based departure trips. The model assumes 5 loading zones which therefore means there could be 125 to 508 vehicles per loading zone. This is significantly higher than the 20 to 25 outbound vehicles used by the AECOM model, assuming they have loaded it per node. AECOM may argue that the reduction is due to sustainable modes of transport being used. However, it is made clear within paragraph 4.6 that the site offers very little in terms of alternative sustainable means of transport. Accordingly, the Transport Modelling by AECOM cannot be wholly relied upon.
The landscape setting for the Parish of Staploe is one of a rural character, containing small hamlets, interspersed agricultural buildings, small holdings and arable agricultural land. As mentioned above, the roads are narrow and winding, and contribute to the rural setting. This form of land extends from the A1 to the east to Church End (Colmworth) to the east, down to Colesden to the south, and up to Little Staughton Airfield to the north. The landscape character is depicted within the Council’s Landscape Character Assessment (LCA), updated October 2020. The wider Parish of Staploe falls within the Thurleigh Clay Farmland character area (1D). Within the ‘evaluation’ section at page 55 of the LCA it notes that potential future change could include Small scale development in villages which could lead to loss their distinctive character/ ‘Ends’; Road upgrades affecting rural road character; Suburbanisation of villages. This would suggest that even relatively small changes would affect the rural setting of the area. Moreover, the proposed landscape strategy for the area as identified within the LCA is to ‘enhance’ elements of the landscape. The introduction of 2,500 new dwellings would significantly and permanently erode the rural character of the Parish, contrary to Paragraphs 20, 153, 174, and 175 of the NPPF and policy 37 of the adopted Local Plan.
There are also several Grade II Listed Buildings located within the Parish of Staploe, and would be affected by the proposed development at Dennybrook (site 977). It is evident that the Council’s assessment to Call for Site states ‘The proposal has the potential to cause harm to heritage assets. This harm may range from low to high. There may be options to avoid, reduce or mitigate this harm and where sites have not been ruled out altogether for other reasons, further assessment will be undertaken to more fully explore impacts on significance and options for harm reduction and mitigation. This further assessment may ultimately lead to the conclusion that the site should not be allocated.’ It is assumed by the above comments that further assessments are required before the site can be considered further as an allocation. It is clear that the existing Listed Buildings are dispersed throughout the area of the proposed development, causing potential impacts to their setting.
A further point to consider is that most of the land covered by the Parish of Staploe is Grade 2 agricultural land as identified by the Agricultural Land Classification. Paragraph 174 (b) of the NPPF makes clear that planning policies should contribute to and enhance the natural and local environment by: ‘recognising the intrinsic character and beauty of the countryside, and the wider benefits from natural capital and ecosystem services – including the economic and other benefits of the best and most versatile agricultural land, and of trees and woodland…’. Grade 2 agricultural land is considered to be the best and most versatile agricultural land and would be applicable in this instance.
In addition to the above, the Sustainability Appraisal scoring for the proposed new settlement of Dennybrook (site 977) identifies it as scoring lower than Spatial Option 3a. this spatial option was effectively discounted at the ‘Issues and Options’ consultation stage.
Overall, the land west of Wyboston (Dennybrook) does not offer a truly sustainable form of development, and thereby contrary to policies contained within the NPPF and of the Council’s adopted Local Plan. Accordingly, the proposed new settlement should be discounted when considering sites for allocation going forward to the pre-submission draft Local Plan.
If Little Barford is deemed unsuitable our second preferred option would be a new settlement of 2,500 homes at Twinwoods or Colworth. The Parish Council believe that the problems on the A6 north of Bedford are going to need to be resolved anyway in order to support the housing development proposed in the 2030 plan and for residents to access the east west rail station in the centre of the town. We believe that development of a new settlement of up to 3,000 homes at Twinwoods (site 883) or Colworth (site 1002) could provide the infrastructure funding to support improvements to the A6 which have long been needed and provide residents with access to the east west rail station in Bedford. A northern parkway station could be considered in future to provide sustainable transport for those in the north of the Borough. Twinwoods would include a significant proportion of brownfield land and Colworth includes lower quality (grade 3) agricultural land and so would comply with the NPPF requirement to utilise brownfield land or lower quality agricultural land before high quality agricultural land. These sites would also support Bedford Town Centre. Colworth was the site supported in the 2035 plan which was later reviewed. The A6 was not a considered sufficiently problematic to prevent this site being adopted so we find it hard to understand why the A6 is deemed such an insurmountable problem now.
Object
Local Plan 2040 Draft Plan - Strategy options and draft policies consultation
Representation ID: 4201
Received: 30/08/2021
Respondent: Mrs Gail Browning
With reference to Option 2B if a new settlement is required then Little Barford should be the preferred location as it is close to the East West rail station. Dennybrook (977) should be discounted because there is a risk of coalescence with St Neots, local roads are unsuitable, the traffic modelling was inadequate, it would engulf existing hamlets and fundamentally change the rural nature of the parish, it would use high quality agricultural land and it is too far from the proposed E-W rail station to be sustainable.
Browns sites such as Twinwoods or Colworth would be better alternative sites.
With reference to Option 2B if a new settlement is required then Little Barford should be the preferred location as it is close to the East West rail station. Dennybrook (977) should be discounted because there is a risk of coalescence with St Neots, local roads are unsuitable, the traffic modelling was inadequate, it would engulf existing hamlets and fundamentally change the rural nature of the parish, it would use high quality agricultural land and it is too far from the proposed E-W rail station to be sustainable.
Browns sites such as Twinwoods or Colworth would be better alternative sites.
Object
Local Plan 2040 Draft Plan - Strategy options and draft policies consultation
Representation ID: 4487
Received: 31/08/2021
Respondent: Mrs Lucy Crawford
If a new settlement is required then Little Barford should be the preferred option as it is close to the East West rail station. Dennybrook should be discounted because there is a risk of coalescence with St Neots, the local roads are unsuitable, the traffic modelling was inadequate, it would engulf existing hamlets and fundamentally change the rural nature of the parish, it would use high quality agricultural land and it is too far from the proposed E-W rail station to be sustainable. Our second choice option would be at Twinwoods as there is a significant proportion of brownfield land.
There is a preferred option that I consider to be the most suitable strategy for Bedford Borough Council to employ when going forward to the next stage of the Local Plan process. As part of the preferred strategy, it is clear that should a new settlement be required in order to meet the Council’s Local Housing Needs Assessment (LHN), dated May 2021, then the proposed settlement of Little Barford is considered appropriate, and for the reasons set out in paragraph 3.17. The alternative site at land west of Wyboston (Dennybrook (site 977)) is considered the least preferred option and should be discounted as a sustainable location for development by Bedford Borough Council. The following comments and observations relate to the Call for Sites submission by Taylor Wimpey for a ‘new settlement’.
Under form ID: 977, submissions have been made for a new settlement covering around 750 Hectares of land, and providing between 7,500 – 10.150 dwellings (35 dph). BBC have identified the site as a potential ‘new settlement’ though providing around 2,500 new homes.
As previously noted under paragraph 3.17, the proposed site at Dennybrook (site 977) falls mostly within the Parish of Staploe which is very rural in character. Clearly, any significant development within the Parish would make a permanent change to the landscape and the setting of the small hamlets and rural nature in the locality. Such physical changes cannot be reversed, and the Council would need to be satisfied through a thorough review of the supporting documents to the site submissions that adequately address the impacts, and in terms of achieving sustainable development – in line with Paragraph 16 of the NPPF and section 39(2) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004.
Housing need has been identified through the Council’s LHN. Using the process set out in the Planning Practice Guidance “Housing and economic needs assessment” (MHCLG – updated December 2020) the minimum annual LHN figure is 1,305 dwellings per annum. This equates to 26,100 dwellings across the period 2020 – 2040. However, existing committed sites and windfall provide a figure of 13,000 new homes. This provides a figure of 13,100 additional dwellings over the plan period. It is noted that Bedford Borough Council have stated that the housing need is 12,500 as a minimum. Regardless which of the two figures are proposed, the strategy applied within paragraph 3.17 of these representations exceed the Council’s housing requirement and negates the need for Dennybrook (site 977) as a new settlement.
When looking at the spatial approach to locating new development, the proposed site at Dennybrook would be located within close proximity to St Neots, with a possible merging into Wyboston. Given the scale of the proposed development at Dennybrook, even at 2,500 dwellings, there would a potential coalescence to the existing settlement of St Neots. Spatially, this would be contrary to the Council’s adopted Local Plan which seeks to prevent coalescence of settlements. In addition, policy 37 of the Council’s adopted Local Plan makes clear that developments need to ‘Protect the landscape setting and contribute to maintaining the individual and distinct character, and separate identities of settlements by preventing coalescence…’. It should also be taken into consideration that St Neots is experiencing its own strategic growth with an eastern extension 3,265 dwelling and 20 Ha of employment land over the plan period. Therefore, a new settlement directly to the west of the existing settlement of 2,500 would significantly increase the size of St Neots and may effect delivery rates for housing due to competing sites.
The transport impacts are acutely felt for this proposed new settlement. It is clear that the proposed development at Dennybrook (site 977) would be a car reliant settlement. The proposal will not benefit from a choice of sustainable modes of transport as opposed to other developments, such as urban extensions and the proposed development at Little Barford. Little Barford offers a varied choice of sustainable modes of public transport, including the possible linkage to the East West rail station south of St Neots. It is anticipated that there will be limited employment associated with the Dennybrook (site 977) with commuting considered necessary to nearby employment areas, for example, south of St Neots, Bedford or Cambridge via train. This would be contrary to sustainability objectives identified by BBC, and contrary to paragraphs 73, 104, 105, 106, and 110 of the NPPF, not to mention existing policies within the adopted Local Plan, namely Policies 2S, 87, 88, and 90S. In addition, the Dennybrook site does not align with a strategic transport corridor growth strategy, including rail.
In highways terms, it has been identified previously that Parish of Staploe is rural in character, with most of the road network narrow and single track. The inclusion of 2,500 dwellings (or over 10,000 according to the site promoted) would require significant infrastructure interventions, including the substantial widening of existing roads and junctions, which would lead to an urbanised appearance it what is a tranquil and idyllic countryside setting. Bedford Borough Council confirm within their assessment of the site submissions, that junction or highway capacity issues are a ‘serious capacity constraint’.
These representations are supported by a Highways Technical Note which has reviewed the Transport Modelling undertaken by AECOM in support of the strategic options in the Draft Local Plan 2040. The Technical Note considers that the Transport Modelling is fundamentally flawed. In summary, no validation or calibration of the traffic model has been undertaken, leading to significant discrepancies. Furthermore, within the Transport Model documents, it is quoted that average departing trips are 20 to 25 vehicles. When looking at the development scenario with the transport model of 2,500 – 10,150 dwellings, and using a departure rate of 0.25 departure trip rate, this results in 625 to 2,538 departing trips all of which would be home based departure trips. The model assumes 5 loading zones which therefore means there could be 125 to 508 vehicles per loading zone. This is significantly higher than the 20 to 25 outbound vehicles used by the AECOM model, assuming they have loaded it per node. AECOM may argue that the reduction is due to sustainable modes of transport being used. However, it is made clear within paragraph 4.6 that the site offers very little in terms of alternative sustainable means of transport. Accordingly, the Transport Modelling by AECOM cannot be wholly relied upon.
The landscape setting for the Parish of Staploe is one of a rural character, containing small hamlets, interspersed agricultural buildings, small holdings and arable agricultural land. As mentioned above, the roads are narrow and winding, and contribute to the rural setting. This form of land extends from the A1 to the east to Church End (Colmworth) to the east, down to Colesden to the south, and up to Little Staughton Airfield to the north. The landscape character is depicted within the Council’s Landscape Character Assessment (LCA), updated October 2020. The wider Parish of Staploe falls within the Thurleigh Clay Farmland character area (1D). Within the ‘evaluation’ section at page 55 of the LCA it notes that potential future change could include Small scale development in villages which could lead to loss their distinctive character/ ‘Ends’; Road upgrades affecting rural road character; Suburbanisation of villages. This would suggest that even relatively small changes would affect the rural setting of the area. Moreover, the proposed landscape strategy for the area as identified within the LCA is to ‘enhance’ elements of the landscape. The introduction of 2,500 new dwellings would significantly and permanently erode the rural character of the Parish, contrary to Paragraphs 20, 153, 174, and 175 of the NPPF and policy 37 of the adopted Local Plan.
There are also several Grade II Listed Buildings located within the Parish of Staploe, and would be affected by the proposed development at Dennybrook (site 977). It is evident that the Council’s assessment to Call for Site states ‘The proposal has the potential to cause harm to heritage assets. This harm may range from low to high. There may be options to avoid, reduce or mitigate this harm and where sites have not been ruled out altogether for other reasons, further assessment will be undertaken to more fully explore impacts on significance and options for harm reduction and mitigation. This further assessment may ultimately lead to the conclusion that the site should not be allocated.’ It is assumed by the above comments that further assessments are required before the site can be considered further as an allocation. It is clear that the existing Listed Buildings are dispersed throughout the area of the proposed development, causing potential impacts to their setting.
A further point to consider is that most of the land covered by the Parish of Staploe is Grade 2 agricultural land as identified by the Agricultural Land Classification. Paragraph 174 (b) of the NPPF makes clear that planning policies should contribute to and enhance the natural and local environment by: ‘recognising the intrinsic character and beauty of the countryside, and the wider benefits from natural capital and ecosystem services – including the economic and other benefits of the best and most versatile agricultural land, and of trees and woodland…’. Grade 2 agricultural land is considered to be the best and most versatile agricultural land and would be applicable in this instance.
In addition to the above, the Sustainability Appraisal scoring for the proposed new settlement of Dennybrook (site 977) identifies it as scoring lower than Spatial Option 3a. this spatial option was effectively discounted at the ‘Issues and Options’ consultation stage.
Overall, the land west of Wyboston (Dennybrook) does not offer a truly sustainable form of development, and thereby contrary to policies contained within the NPPF and of the Council’s adopted Local Plan. Accordingly, the proposed new settlement should be discounted when considering sites for allocation going forward to the pre-submission draft Local Plan.
If Little Barford is deemed unsuitable our second preferred option would be a new settlement of 2,500 homes at Twinwoods or Colworth. The Parish Council believe that the problems on the A6 north of Bedford are going to need to be resolved anyway in order to support the housing development proposed in the 2030 plan and for residents to access the east west rail station in the centre of the town. We believe that development of a new settlement of up to 3,000 homes at Twinwoods (site 883) or Colworth (site 1002) could provide the infrastructure funding to support improvements to the A6 which have long been needed and provide residents with access to the east west rail station in Bedford. A northern parkway station could be considered in future to provide sustainable transport for those in the north of the Borough. Twinwoods would include a significant proportion of brownfield land and Colworth includes lower quality (grade 3) agricultural land and so would comply with the NPPF requirement to utilise brownfield land or lower quality agricultural land before high quality agricultural land. These sites would also support Bedford Town Centre. Colworth was the site supported in the 2035 plan which was later reviewed. The A6 was not a considered sufficiently problematic to prevent this site being adopted so I find it hard to understand why the A6 is deemed such an insurmountable problem now.
Object
Local Plan 2040 Draft Plan - Strategy options and draft policies consultation
Representation ID: 4555
Received: 01/09/2021
Respondent: Mrs Kathryn Smith
If a new settlement is required then Little Barford should be an option as it is close to the East West rail station. Dennybrook should be discounted because there is a risk of coalescence with St Neots, the local roads are unsuitable, the traffic modelling was inadequate, it would engulf existing hamlets and fundamentally change the rural nature of the parish, it would use high quality
agricultural land and it is too far from the proposed E-W rail station to be sustainable. Alternative option would be at Twinwoods as there is a significant proportion of brownfield land.
When looking at the spatial approach to locating new development, the proposed site at Dennybrook would be located within close proximity to St Neots, with a possible merging into Wyboston. Given the scale of the proposed development at Dennybrook, even at 2,500 dwellings, there would a potential coalescence to the existing settlement of St Neots. Spatially, this would be contrary to the Council’s adopted Local Plan which seeks to prevent coalescence of settlements. In addition, policy 37 of the Council’s adopted Local Plan makes clear that developments need to ‘Protect the landscape setting and contribute to maintaining the individual and distinct character,
and separate identities of settlements by preventing coalescence…
’The transport impacts are acutely felt for this proposed new settlement. It is clear that the proposed development at Dennybrook (site 977) would be a car reliant settlement
The landscape setting for the Parish of Staploe is one of a rural character, containing small hamlets, interspersed agricultural buildings, small holdings and arable agricultural land. The roads are narrow and winding, and contribute to the rural setting. This form of land extends from the A1 to the east to Church End (Colmworth) to the west, down to Colesden to the south, and
up to Little Staughton Airfield to the north. The landscape character is depicted within the Council’s Landscape Character Assessment (LCA), updated October 2020. The wider Parish of Staploe falls within the Thurleigh Clay Farmland character area (1D). Within the ‘evaluation’ section at page 55 of the LCA it notes that potential future change could include Small scale development in villages which
could lead to loss their distinctive character/ ‘Ends’; Road upgrades affecting rural road character; Suburbanisation of villages. This would suggest that even relatively small changes would affect the rural setting of the area. Moreover, the proposed landscape strategy for the area as identified within the LCA is to ‘enhance’ elements of the landscape. The introduction of 2,500 new dwellings would
significantly and permanently erode the rural character of the Parish, contrary to Paragraphs 20, 153, 174, and 175 of the NPPF and policy 37 of the adopted Local Plan.
Object
Local Plan 2040 Draft Plan - Strategy options and draft policies consultation
Representation ID: 4570
Received: 01/09/2021
Respondent: Miss Andrea Witham
See above
I have read, understood and wholly support the comments made by Staploe Parish Council in their separate submission.
To summarise:
If a new settlement is required then Little Barford should be the preferred option as it is close to the East West rail station. Dennybrook should be discounted because there is a risk of coalescence with St Neots, the local roads are unsuitable, the traffic modelling was inadequate, it would engulf existing hamlets and fundamentally change the rural nature of the parish, it would use high quality
agricultural land and it is too far from the proposed E-W rail station to be sustainable
Object
Local Plan 2040 Draft Plan - Strategy options and draft policies consultation
Representation ID: 4660
Received: 01/09/2021
Respondent: Mr Melvyn Chase
If a new settlement is required then Little Barford should be the preferred option as it is close to the East West rail station. Dennybrook should be discounted because there is a risk of coalescence with St Neots, the local roads are unsuitable, the traffic modelling was inadequate, it would engulf existing hamlets and fundamentally change the rural nature of the parish, it would use high quality agricultural land and it is too far from the proposed E-W rail station to be sustainable. Our second choice option would be at Twinwoods as there is a significant proportion of brownfield land.
I have severe Parkinson’s and cannot type easily. Please duplicate all of Lucy Crawford’s responses for my views. Her email address is Lucy_crawford@hotmail.com and she lives at 33, Staploe PE19 5JA
Object
Local Plan 2040 Draft Plan - Strategy options and draft policies consultation
Representation ID: 4711
Received: 01/09/2021
Respondent: Mr Joshua Zwetsloot
There is a preferred option that Staploe Parish Council consider to be the most suitable strategy for Bedford Borough Council to employ when going forward to the next stage of the Local Plan process. As part of the preferred strategy, it is clear that should a new settlement be required in order to meet the Council’s Local Housing Needs Assessment (LHN), dated May 2021, then the proposed settlement of Little Barford is considered appropriate, and for the reasons set out in paragraph 3.17. The alternative site at land west of Wyboston (Dennybrook (site 977)) is considered the least preferred option and should be discounted as a sustainable location for development by Bedford Borough Council. The following comments and observations relate to the Call for Sites submission by Taylor Wimpey for a ‘new settlement’.
Under form ID: 977, submissions have been made for a new settlement covering around 750 Hectares of land, and providing between 7,500 – 10.150 dwellings (35 dph). BBC have identified the site as a potential ‘new settlement’ though providing around 2,500 new homes.
As previously noted under paragraph 3.17, the proposed site at Dennybrook (site 977) falls mostly within the Parish of Staploe which is very rural in character. Clearly, any significant development within the Parish would make a permanent change to the landscape and the setting of the small hamlets and rural nature in the locality. Such physical changes cannot be reversed, and the Council would need to be satisfied through a thorough review of the supporting documents to the site submissions that adequately address the impacts, and in terms of achieving sustainable development – in line with Paragraph 16 of the NPPF and section 39(2) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004.
Housing need has been identified through the Council’s LHN. Using the process set out in the Planning Practice Guidance “Housing and economic needs assessment” (MHCLG – updated December 2020) the minimum annual LHN figure is 1,305 dwellings per annum. This equates to 26,100 dwellings across the period 2020 – 2040. However, existing committed sites and windfall provide a figure of 13,000 new homes. This provides a figure of 13,100 additional dwellings over the plan period. It is noted that Bedford Borough Council have stated that the housing need is 12,500 as a minimum. Regardless which of the two figures are proposed, the strategy applied within paragraph 3.17 of these representations exceed the Council’s housing requirement and negates the need for Dennybrook (site 977) as a new settlement.
When looking at the spatial approach to locating new development, the proposed site at Dennybrook would be located within close proximity to St Neots, with a possible merging into Wyboston. Given the scale of the proposed development at Dennybrook, even at 2,500 dwellings, there would a potential coalescence to the existing settlement of St Neots. Spatially, this would be contrary to the Council’s adopted Local Plan which seeks to prevent coalescence of settlements. In addition, policy 37 of the Council’s adopted Local Plan makes clear that developments need to ‘Protect the landscape setting and contribute to maintaining the individual and distinct character, and separate identities of settlements by preventing coalescence…’. It should also be taken into consideration that St Neots is experiencing its own strategic growth with an eastern extension 3,265 dwelling and 20 Ha of employment land over the plan period. Therefore, a new settlement directly to the west of the existing settlement of 2,500 would significantly increase the size of St Neots and may effect delivery rates for housing due to competing sites.
The transport impacts are acutely felt for this proposed new settlement. It is clear that the proposed development at Dennybrook (site 977) would be a car reliant settlement. The proposal will not benefit from a choice of sustainable modes of transport as opposed to other developments, such as urban extensions and the proposed development at Little Barford. Little Barford offers a varied choice of sustainable modes of public transport, including the possible linkage to the East West rail station south of St Neots. It is anticipated that there will be limited employment associated with the Dennybrook (site 977) with commuting considered necessary to nearby employment areas, for example, south of St Neots, Bedford or Cambridge via train. This would be contrary to sustainability objectives identified by BBC, and contrary to paragraphs 73, 104, 105, 106, and 110 of the NPPF, not to mention existing policies within the adopted Local Plan, namely Policies 2S, 87, 88, and 90S. In addition, the Dennybrook site does not align with a strategic transport corridor growth strategy, including rail.
In highways terms, it has been identified previously that Parish of Staploe is rural in character, with most of the road network narrow and single track. The inclusion of 2,500 dwellings (or over 10,000 according to the site promoted) would require significant infrastructure interventions, including the substantial widening of existing roads and junctions, which would lead to an urbanised appearance it what is a tranquil and idyllic countryside setting.
Bedford Borough Council confirm within their assessment of the site submissions, that junction or highway capacity issues are a ‘serious capacity constraint’.
These representations are supported by a Highways Technical Note which has reviewed the Transport Modelling undertaken by AECOM in support of the strategic options in the Draft Local Plan 2040. The Technical Note considers that the Transport Modelling is fundamentally flawed. In summary, no validation or calibration of the traffic model has been undertaken, leading to significant discrepancies. Furthermore, within the Transport Model documents, it is quoted that average departing trips are 20 to 25 vehicles. When looking at the development scenario with the transport model of 2,500 – 10,150 dwellings, and using a departure rate of 0.25 departure trip rate, this results in 625 to 2,538 departing trips all of which would be home based departure trips. The model assumes 5 loading zones which therefore means there could be 125 to 508 vehicles per loading zone. This is significantly higher than the 20 to 25 outbound vehicles used by the AECOM model, assuming they have loaded it per node. AECOM may argue that the reduction is due to sustainable modes of transport being used. However, it is made clear within paragraph 4.6 that the site offers very little in terms of alternative sustainable means of transport. Accordingly, the Transport Modelling by AECOM cannot be wholly relied upon.
The landscape setting for the Parish of Staploe is one of a rural character, containing small hamlets, interspersed agricultural buildings, small holdings and arable agricultural land. As mentioned above, the roads are narrow and winding, and contribute to the rural setting. This form of land extends from the A1 to the east to Church End (Colmworth) to the east, down to Colesden to the south, and up to Little Staughton Airfield to the north. The landscape character is depicted within the Council’s Landscape Character Assessment (LCA), updated October 2020. The wider Parish of Staploe falls within the Thurleigh Clay Farmland character area (1D). Within the ‘evaluation’ section at page 55 of the LCA it notes that potential future change could include Small scale development in villages which could lead to loss their distinctive character/ ‘Ends’; Road upgrades affecting rural road character; Suburbanisation of villages. This would suggest that even relatively small changes would affect the rural setting of the area. Moreover, the proposed landscape strategy for the area as identified within the LCA is to ‘enhance’ elements of the landscape. The introduction of 2,500 new dwellings would significantly and permanently erode the rural character of the Parish, contrary to Paragraphs 20, 153, 174, and 175 of the NPPF and policy 37 of the adopted Local Plan.
There are also several Grade II Listed Buildings located within the Parish of Staploe, and would be affected by the proposed development at Dennybrook (site 977). It is evident that the Council’s assessment to Call for Site states ‘The proposal has the potential to cause harm to heritage assets. This harm may range from low to high. There may be options to avoid, reduce or mitigate this harm and where sites have not been ruled out altogether for other reasons, further assessment will be undertaken to more fully explore impacts on significance and options for harm reduction and mitigation. This further assessment may ultimately lead to the conclusion that the site should not be allocated.’ It is assumed by the above comments that further assessments are required before the site can be considered further as an allocation. It is clear that the existing Listed Buildings are dispersed throughout the area of the proposed development, causing potential impacts to their setting.
A further point to consider is that most of the land covered by the Parish of Staploe is Grade 2 agricultural land as identified by the Agricultural Land Classification. Paragraph 174 (b) of the NPPF makes clear that planning policies should contribute to and enhance the natural and local environment by: ‘recognising the intrinsic character and beauty of the countryside, and the wider benefits from natural capital and ecosystem services – including the economic and other benefits of the best and most versatile agricultural land, and of trees and woodland…’. Grade 2 agricultural land is considered to be the best and most versatile agricultural land and would be applicable in this instance.
In addition to the above, the Sustainability Appraisal scoring for the proposed new settlement of Dennybrook (site 977) identifies it as scoring lower than Spatial Option 3a. this spatial option was effectively discounted at the ‘Issues and Options’ consultation stage.
Overall, the land west of Wyboston (Dennybrook) does not offer a truly sustainable form of development, and thereby contrary to policies contained within the NPPF and of the Council’s adopted Local Plan. Accordingly, the proposed new settlement should be discounted when considering sites for allocation going forward to the pre-submission draft Local Plan.
If Little Barford is deemed unsuitable our second preferred option would be a new settlement of 2,500 homes at Twinwoods or Colworth. The Parish Council believe that the problems on the A6 north of Bedford are going to need to be resolved anyway in order to support the housing development proposed in the 2030 plan and for residents to access the east west rail station in the centre of the town. We believe that development of a new settlement of up to 3,000 homes at Twinwoods (site 883) or Colworth (site 1002) could provide the infrastructure funding to support improvements to the A6 which have long been needed and provide residents with access to the east west rail station in Bedford. A northern parkway station could be considered in future to provide sustainable transport for those in the north of the Borough. Twinwoods would include a significant proportion of brownfield land and Colworth includes lower quality (grade 3) agricultural land and so would comply with the NPPF requirement to utilise brownfield land or lower quality agricultural land before high quality agricultural land. These sites would also support Bedford Town Centre.
Colworth was the site supported in the 2035 plan which was later reviewed. The A6 was not a considered sufficiently problematic to prevent this site being adopted so we find it hard to understand why the A6 is deemed such an insurmountable problem now.
Object
Local Plan 2040 Draft Plan - Strategy options and draft policies consultation
Representation ID: 4764
Received: 01/09/2021
Respondent: Mrs Gerardine Meola
If new settlement required then Little Barford should be preferred option it will be closer to EWR station
Land west of Wyboston (Dennybrook) should be discounted as it would coalesce with St Neots by 2050. Local roads around Dennybrook are unsuitable for thousands of houses proposed development would engulf existing villages, would change the character of this rural area, which has an intrinsic character would be built on high grade agricultural land - once lost, lost forever.
No development in Duloe any small site would be estate in character and not be in keeping with the character of the hamlet
If new settlement required then Little Barford should be preferred option it will be closer to EWR station
Land west of Wyboston (Dennybrook) should be discounted as it would coalesce with St Neots by 2050. Local roads around Dennybrook are unsuitable for thousands of houses proposed development would engulf existing villages, would change the character of this rural area, which has an intrinsic character would be built on high grade agricultural land - once lost, lost forever.
No development in Duloe any small site would be estate in character and not be in keeping with the character of the hamlet
Object
Local Plan 2040 Draft Plan - Strategy options and draft policies consultation
Representation ID: 5040
Received: 02/09/2021
Respondent: Mrs Julia Willison
Dennybrook should be discounted as the roads are unsuitable, the traffic modelling was inadequate. It would engulf the existing hamlets and totally change the rural nature of the parish. It would use high quality agricultural land and is too far from the proposed E-W rail station to be sustainable.
Dennybrook should be discounted as the roads are unsuitable, the traffic modelling was inadequate. It would engulf the existing hamlets and totally change the rural nature of the parish. It would use high quality agricultural land and is too far from the proposed E-W rail station to be sustainable.
Support
Local Plan 2040 Draft Plan - Strategy options and draft policies consultation
Representation ID: 5169
Received: 03/09/2021
Respondent: Mr Chris Giles
There is a preferred option that Staploe Parish Council consider to be the most suitable strategy for Bedford Borough Council to employ when going forward to the next stage of the Local Plan process. As part of the preferred strategy, it is clear that should a new settlement be required in order to meet the Council’s Local Housing Needs Assessment (LHN), dated May 2021, then the proposed settlement of Little Barford is considered appropriate, and for the reasons set out in paragraph 3.17. The alternative site at land west of Wyboston (Dennybrook (site 977)) is considered the least preferred option and should be discounted as a sustainable location for development by Bedford Borough Council. The following comments and observations relate to the Call for Sites submission by Taylor Wimpey for a ‘new settlement’.
Under form ID: 977, submissions have been made for a new settlement covering around 750 Hectares of land, and providing between 7,500 – 10.150 dwellings (35 dph). BBC have identified the site as a potential ‘new settlement’ though providing around 2,500 new homes.
As previously noted under paragraph 3.17, the proposed site at Dennybrook (site 977) falls mostly within the Parish of Staploe which is very rural in character. Clearly, any significant development within the Parish would make a permanent change to the landscape and the setting of the small hamlets and rural nature in the locality. Such physical changes cannot be reversed, and the Council would need to be satisfied through a thorough review of the supporting documents to the site submissions that adequately address the impacts, and in terms of achieving sustainable development – in line with Paragraph 16 of the NPPF and section 39(2) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004.
Housing need has been identified through the Council’s LHN. Using the process set out in the Planning Practice Guidance “Housing and economic needs assessment” (MHCLG – updated December 2020) the minimum annual LHN figure is 1,305 dwellings per annum. This equates to 26,100 dwellings across the period 2020 – 2040. However, existing committed sites and windfall provide a figure of 13,000 new homes. This provides a figure of 13,100 additional dwellings over the plan period. It is noted that Bedford Borough Council have stated that the housing need is 12,500 as a minimum. Regardless which of the two figures are proposed, the strategy applied within paragraph 3.17 of these representations exceed the Council’s housing requirement and negates the need for Dennybrook (site 977) as a new settlement.
When looking at the spatial approach to locating new development, the proposed site at Dennybrook would be located within close proximity to St Neots, with a possible merging into Wyboston. Given the scale of the proposed development at Dennybrook, even at 2,500 dwellings, there would a potential coalescence to the existing settlement of St Neots. Spatially, this would be contrary to the Council’s adopted Local Plan which seeks to prevent coalescence of settlements. In addition, policy 37 of the Council’s adopted Local Plan makes clear that developments need to ‘Protect the landscape setting and contribute to maintaining the individual and distinct character, and separate identities of settlements by preventing coalescence…’. It should also be taken into consideration that St Neots is experiencing its own strategic growth with an eastern extension 3,265 dwelling and 20 Ha of employment land over the plan period. Therefore, a new settlement directly to the west of the existing settlement of 2,500 would significantly increase the size of St Neots and may effect delivery rates for housing due to competing sites.
The transport impacts are acutely felt for this proposed new settlement. It is clear that the proposed development at Dennybrook (site 977) would be a car reliant settlement. The proposal will not benefit from a choice of sustainable modes of transport as opposed to other developments, such as urban extensions and the proposed development at Little Barford. Little Barford offers a varied choice of sustainable modes of public transport, including the possible linkage to the East West rail station south of St Neots. It is anticipated that there will be limited employment associated with the Dennybrook (site 977) with commuting considered necessary to nearby employment areas, for example, south of St Neots, Bedford or Cambridge via train. This would be contrary to sustainability objectives identified by BBC, and contrary to paragraphs 73, 104, 105, 106, and 110 of the NPPF, not to mention existing policies within the adopted Local Plan, namely Policies 2S, 87, 88, and 90S. In addition, the Dennybrook site does not align with a strategic transport corridor growth strategy, including rail.
In highways terms, it has been identified previously that Parish of Staploe is rural in character, with most of the road network narrow and single track. The inclusion of 2,500 dwellings (or over 10,000 according to the site promoted) would require significant infrastructure interventions, including the substantial widening of existing roads and junctions, which would lead to an urbanised appearance it what is a tranquil and idyllic countryside setting.
Bedford Borough Council confirm within their assessment of the site submissions, that junction or highway capacity issues are a ‘serious capacity constraint’.
These representations are supported by a Highways Technical Note which has reviewed the Transport Modelling undertaken by AECOM in support of the strategic options in the Draft Local Plan 2040. The Technical Note considers that the Transport Modelling is fundamentally flawed. In summary, no validation or calibration of the traffic model has been undertaken, leading to significant discrepancies. Furthermore, within the Transport Model documents, it is quoted that average departing trips are 20 to 25 vehicles. When looking at the development scenario with the transport model of 2,500 – 10,150 dwellings, and using a departure rate of 0.25 departure trip rate, this results in 625 to 2,538 departing trips all of which would be home based departure trips. The model assumes 5 loading zones which therefore means there could be 125 to 508 vehicles per loading zone. This is significantly higher than the 20 to 25 outbound vehicles used by the AECOM model, assuming they have loaded it per node. AECOM may argue that the reduction is due to sustainable modes of transport being used. However, it is made clear within paragraph 4.6 that the site offers very little in terms of alternative sustainable means of transport. Accordingly, the Transport Modelling by AECOM cannot be wholly relied upon.
The landscape setting for the Parish of Staploe is one of a rural character, containing small hamlets, interspersed agricultural buildings, small holdings and arable agricultural land. As mentioned above, the roads are narrow and winding, and contribute to the rural setting. This form of land extends from the A1 to the east to Church End (Colmworth) to the east, down to Colesden to the south, and up to Little Staughton Airfield to the north. The landscape character is depicted within the Council’s Landscape Character Assessment (LCA), updated October 2020. The wider Parish of Staploe falls within the Thurleigh Clay Farmland character area (1D). Within the ‘evaluation’ section at page 55 of the LCA it notes that potential future change could include Small scale development in villages which could lead to loss their distinctive character/ ‘Ends’; Road upgrades affecting rural road character; Suburbanisation of villages. This would suggest that even relatively small changes would affect the rural setting of the area. Moreover, the proposed landscape strategy for the area as identified within the LCA is to ‘enhance’ elements of the landscape. The introduction of 2,500 new dwellings would significantly and permanently erode the rural character of the Parish, contrary to Paragraphs 20, 153, 174, and 175 of the NPPF and policy 37 of the adopted Local Plan.
There are also several Grade II Listed Buildings located within the Parish of Staploe, and would be affected by the proposed development at Dennybrook (site 977). It is evident that the Council’s assessment to Call for Site states ‘The proposal has the potential to cause harm to heritage assets. This harm may range from low to high. There may be options to avoid, reduce or mitigate this harm and where sites have not been ruled out altogether for other reasons, further assessment will be undertaken to more fully explore impacts on significance and options for harm reduction and mitigation. This further assessment may ultimately lead to the conclusion that the site should not be allocated.’ It is assumed by the above comments that further assessments are required before the site can be considered further as an allocation. It is clear that the existing Listed Buildings are dispersed throughout the area of the proposed development, causing potential impacts to their setting.
A further point to consider is that most of the land covered by the Parish of Staploe is Grade 2 agricultural land as identified by the Agricultural Land Classification. Paragraph 174 (b) of the NPPF makes clear that planning policies should contribute to and enhance the natural and local environment by: ‘recognising the intrinsic character and beauty of the countryside, and the wider benefits from natural capital and ecosystem services – including the economic and other benefits of the best and most versatile agricultural land, and of trees and woodland…’. Grade 2 agricultural land is considered to be the best and most versatile agricultural land and would be applicable in this instance.
In addition to the above, the Sustainability Appraisal scoring for the proposed new settlement of Dennybrook (site 977) identifies it as scoring lower than Spatial Option 3a. this spatial option was effectively discounted at the ‘Issues and Options’ consultation stage.
Overall, the land west of Wyboston (Dennybrook) does not offer a truly sustainable form of development, and thereby contrary to policies contained within the NPPF and of the Council’s adopted Local Plan. Accordingly, the proposed new settlement should be discounted when considering sites for allocation going forward to the pre-submission draft Local Plan.
If Little Barford is deemed unsuitable our second preferred option would be a new settlement of 2,500 homes at Twinwoods or Colworth. The Parish Council believe that the problems on the A6 north of Bedford are going to need to be resolved anyway in order to support the housing development proposed in the 2030 plan and for residents to access the east west rail station in the centre of the town. We believe that development of a new settlement of up to 3,000 homes at Twinwoods (site 883) or Colworth (site 1002) could provide the infrastructure funding to support improvements to the A6 which have long been needed and provide residents with access to the east west rail station in Bedford. A northern parkway station could be considered in future to provide sustainable transport for those in the north of the Borough. Twinwoods would include a significant proportion of brownfield land and Colworth includes lower quality (grade 3) agricultural land and so would comply with the NPPF requirement to utilise brownfield land or lower quality agricultural land before high quality agricultural land. These sites would also support Bedford Town Centre.
Colworth was the site supported in the 2035 plan which was later reviewed. The A6 was not a considered sufficiently problematic to prevent this site being adopted so we find it hard to understand why the A6 is deemed such an insurmountable problem now.
Support
Local Plan 2040 Draft Plan - Strategy options and draft policies consultation
Representation ID: 5170
Received: 03/09/2021
Respondent: Mr Chris Giles
There is a preferred option that Staploe Parish Council consider to be the most suitable strategy for Bedford Borough Council to employ when going forward to the next stage of the Local Plan process. As part of the preferred strategy, it is clear that should a new settlement be required in order to meet the Council’s Local Housing Needs Assessment (LHN), dated May 2021, then the proposed settlement of Little Barford is considered appropriate, and for the reasons set out in paragraph 3.17. The alternative site at land west of Wyboston (Dennybrook (site 977)) is considered the least preferred option and should be discounted as a sustainable location for development by Bedford Borough Council. The following comments and observations relate to the Call for Sites submission by Taylor Wimpey for a ‘new settlement’.
Under form ID: 977, submissions have been made for a new settlement covering around 750 Hectares of land, and providing between 7,500 – 10.150 dwellings (35 dph). BBC have identified the site as a potential ‘new settlement’ though providing around 2,500 new homes.
As previously noted under paragraph 3.17, the proposed site at Dennybrook (site 977) falls mostly within the Parish of Staploe which is very rural in character. Clearly, any significant development within the Parish would make a permanent change to the landscape and the setting of the small hamlets and rural nature in the locality. Such physical changes cannot be reversed, and the Council would need to be satisfied through a thorough review of the supporting documents to the site submissions that adequately address the impacts, and in terms of achieving sustainable development – in line with Paragraph 16 of the NPPF and section 39(2) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004.
Housing need has been identified through the Council’s LHN. Using the process set out in the Planning Practice Guidance “Housing and economic needs assessment” (MHCLG – updated December 2020) the minimum annual LHN figure is 1,305 dwellings per annum. This equates to 26,100 dwellings across the period 2020 – 2040. However, existing committed sites and windfall provide a figure of 13,000 new homes. This provides a figure of 13,100 additional dwellings over the plan period. It is noted that Bedford Borough Council have stated that the housing need is 12,500 as a minimum. Regardless which of the two figures are proposed, the strategy applied within paragraph 3.17 of these representations exceed the Council’s housing requirement and negates the need for Dennybrook (site 977) as a new settlement.
When looking at the spatial approach to locating new development, the proposed site at Dennybrook would be located within close proximity to St Neots, with a possible merging into Wyboston. Given the scale of the proposed development at Dennybrook, even at 2,500 dwellings, there would a potential coalescence to the existing settlement of St Neots. Spatially, this would be contrary to the Council’s adopted Local Plan which seeks to prevent coalescence of settlements. In addition, policy 37 of the Council’s adopted Local Plan makes clear that developments need to ‘Protect the landscape setting and contribute to maintaining the individual and distinct character, and separate identities of settlements by preventing coalescence…’. It should also be taken into consideration that St Neots is experiencing its own strategic growth with an eastern extension 3,265 dwelling and 20 Ha of employment land over the plan period. Therefore, a new settlement directly to the west of the existing settlement of 2,500 would significantly increase the size of St Neots and may effect delivery rates for housing due to competing sites.
The transport impacts are acutely felt for this proposed new settlement. It is clear that the proposed development at Dennybrook (site 977) would be a car reliant settlement. The proposal will not benefit from a choice of sustainable modes of transport as opposed to other developments, such as urban extensions and the proposed development at Little Barford. Little Barford offers a varied choice of sustainable modes of public transport, including the possible linkage to the East West rail station south of St Neots. It is anticipated that there will be limited employment associated with the Dennybrook (site 977) with commuting considered necessary to nearby employment areas, for example, south of St Neots, Bedford or Cambridge via train. This would be contrary to sustainability objectives identified by BBC, and contrary to paragraphs 73, 104, 105, 106, and 110 of the NPPF, not to mention existing policies within the adopted Local Plan, namely Policies 2S, 87, 88, and 90S. In addition, the Dennybrook site does not align with a strategic transport corridor growth strategy, including rail.
In highways terms, it has been identified previously that Parish of Staploe is rural in character, with most of the road network narrow and single track. The inclusion of 2,500 dwellings (or over 10,000 according to the site promoted) would require significant infrastructure interventions, including the substantial widening of existing roads and junctions, which would lead to an urbanised appearance it what is a tranquil and idyllic countryside setting.
Bedford Borough Council confirm within their assessment of the site submissions, that junction or highway capacity issues are a ‘serious capacity constraint’.
These representations are supported by a Highways Technical Note which has reviewed the Transport Modelling undertaken by AECOM in support of the strategic options in the Draft Local Plan 2040. The Technical Note considers that the Transport Modelling is fundamentally flawed. In summary, no validation or calibration of the traffic model has been undertaken, leading to significant discrepancies. Furthermore, within the Transport Model documents, it is quoted that average departing trips are 20 to 25 vehicles. When looking at the development scenario with the transport model of 2,500 – 10,150 dwellings, and using a departure rate of 0.25 departure trip rate, this results in 625 to 2,538 departing trips all of which would be home based departure trips. The model assumes 5 loading zones which therefore means there could be 125 to 508 vehicles per loading zone. This is significantly higher than the 20 to 25 outbound vehicles used by the AECOM model, assuming they have loaded it per node. AECOM may argue that the reduction is due to sustainable modes of transport being used. However, it is made clear within paragraph 4.6 that the site offers very little in terms of alternative sustainable means of transport. Accordingly, the Transport Modelling by AECOM cannot be wholly relied upon.
The landscape setting for the Parish of Staploe is one of a rural character, containing small hamlets, interspersed agricultural buildings, small holdings and arable agricultural land. As mentioned above, the roads are narrow and winding, and contribute to the rural setting. This form of land extends from the A1 to the east to Church End (Colmworth) to the east, down to Colesden to the south, and up to Little Staughton Airfield to the north. The landscape character is depicted within the Council’s Landscape Character Assessment (LCA), updated October 2020. The wider Parish of Staploe falls within the Thurleigh Clay Farmland character area (1D). Within the ‘evaluation’ section at page 55 of the LCA it notes that potential future change could include Small scale development in villages which could lead to loss their distinctive character/ ‘Ends’; Road upgrades affecting rural road character; Suburbanisation of villages. This would suggest that even relatively small changes would affect the rural setting of the area. Moreover, the proposed landscape strategy for the area as identified within the LCA is to ‘enhance’ elements of the landscape. The introduction of 2,500 new dwellings would significantly and permanently erode the rural character of the Parish, contrary to Paragraphs 20, 153, 174, and 175 of the NPPF and policy 37 of the adopted Local Plan.
There are also several Grade II Listed Buildings located within the Parish of Staploe, and would be affected by the proposed development at Dennybrook (site 977). It is evident that the Council’s assessment to Call for Site states ‘The proposal has the potential to cause harm to heritage assets. This harm may range from low to high. There may be options to avoid, reduce or mitigate this harm and where sites have not been ruled out altogether for other reasons, further assessment will be undertaken to more fully explore impacts on significance and options for harm reduction and mitigation. This further assessment may ultimately lead to the conclusion that the site should not be allocated.’ It is assumed by the above comments that further assessments are required before the site can be considered further as an allocation. It is clear that the existing Listed Buildings are dispersed throughout the area of the proposed development, causing potential impacts to their setting.
A further point to consider is that most of the land covered by the Parish of Staploe is Grade 2 agricultural land as identified by the Agricultural Land Classification. Paragraph 174 (b) of the NPPF makes clear that planning policies should contribute to and enhance the natural and local environment by: ‘recognising the intrinsic character and beauty of the countryside, and the wider benefits from natural capital and ecosystem services – including the economic and other benefits of the best and most versatile agricultural land, and of trees and woodland…’. Grade 2 agricultural land is considered to be the best and most versatile agricultural land and would be applicable in this instance.
In addition to the above, the Sustainability Appraisal scoring for the proposed new settlement of Dennybrook (site 977) identifies it as scoring lower than Spatial Option 3a. this spatial option was effectively discounted at the ‘Issues and Options’ consultation stage.
Overall, the land west of Wyboston (Dennybrook) does not offer a truly sustainable form of development, and thereby contrary to policies contained within the NPPF and of the Council’s adopted Local Plan. Accordingly, the proposed new settlement should be discounted when considering sites for allocation going forward to the pre-submission draft Local Plan.
If Little Barford is deemed unsuitable our second preferred option would be a new settlement of 2,500 homes at Twinwoods or Colworth. The Parish Council believe that the problems on the A6 north of Bedford are going to need to be resolved anyway in order to support the housing development proposed in the 2030 plan and for residents to access the east west rail station in the centre of the town. We believe that development of a new settlement of up to 3,000 homes at Twinwoods (site 883) or Colworth (site 1002) could provide the infrastructure funding to support improvements to the A6 which have long been needed and provide residents with access to the east west rail station in Bedford. A northern parkway station could be considered in future to provide sustainable transport for those in the north of the Borough. Twinwoods would include a significant proportion of brownfield land and Colworth includes lower quality (grade 3) agricultural land and so would comply with the NPPF requirement to utilise brownfield land or lower quality agricultural land before high quality agricultural land. These sites would also support Bedford Town Centre.
Colworth was the site supported in the 2035 plan which was later reviewed. The A6 was not a considered sufficiently problematic to prevent this site being adopted so we find it hard to understand why the A6 is deemed such an insurmountable problem now.
Support
Local Plan 2040 Draft Plan - Strategy options and draft policies consultation
Representation ID: 5193
Received: 03/09/2021
Respondent: Mr Ian Francis
If a new settlement is required then Little Barford should be the preferred option as it is close to the East West rail
station. Dennybrook should be discounted because there is a risk of coalescence with St Neots, the local roads are
unsuitable, the traffic modelling was inadequate, it would engulf existing hamlets and fundamentally change the rural
nature of the parish, it would use high quality agricultural land and it is too far from the proposed E-W rail station to be
sustainable. Second choice option would be at Twinwoods as there is a significant proportion of brownfield land.
Overall, the land west of Wyboston (Dennybrook) does not offer a truly sustainable form of development, and thereby
contrary to policies contained within the NPPF and of the Council’s adopted Local Plan. Accordingly, the proposed
new settlement should be discounted when considering sites for allocation going forward to the pre-submission draft
Local Plan.
If Little Barford is deemed unsuitable our second preferred option would be a new settlement of 2,500 homes at
Twinwoods or Colworth. I believe that the problems on the A6 north of Bedford are going to need to
be resolved anyway in order to support the housing development proposed in the 2030 plan and for residents to
access the east west rail station in the centre of the town. The development of a new settlement of up to
3,000 homes at Twinwoods (site 883) or Colworth (site 1002) could provide the infrastructure funding to support
improvements to the A6 which have long been needed and provide residents with access to the east west rail station
in Bedford. A northern parkway station could be considered in future to provide sustainable transport for those in the
north of the Borough. Twinwoods would include a significant proportion of brownfield land and Colworth includes
lower quality (grade 3) agricultural land and so would comply with the NPPF requirement to utilise brownfield land or
lower quality agricultural land before high quality agricultural land. These sites would also support Bedford Town
Centre. Colworth was the site supported in the 2035 plan which was later reviewed. The A6 was not a considered
sufficiently problematic to prevent this site being adopted so we find it hard to understand why the A6 is deemed such
an insurmountable problem now.
Support
Local Plan 2040 Draft Plan - Strategy options and draft policies consultation
Representation ID: 5601
Received: 06/09/2021
Respondent: Mrs Julie Kilby
There is a preferred option that I consider to be the most suitable strategy for Bedford Borough Council to employ when going forward to the next stage of the Local Plan process. As part of the preferred strategy, it is clear that should a new settlement be required in order to meet the Council’s Local Housing Needs Assessment (LHN), dated May 2021, then the proposed settlement of Little Barford is considered appropriate, and for the reasons set out in paragraph 3.17. The alternative site at land west of Wyboston (Dennybrook (site 977)) is considered the least preferred option and should be discounted as a sustainable location for development by Bedford Borough Council. The following comments and observations relate to the Call for Sites submission by Taylor Wimpey for a ‘new settlement’.
Under form ID: 977, submissions have been made for a new settlement covering around 750 Hectares of land, and providing between 7,500 – 10.150 dwellings (35 dph). BBC have identified the site as a potential ‘new settlement’ though providing around 2,500 new homes.
As previously noted under paragraph 3.17, the proposed site at Dennybrook (site 977) falls mostly within the Parish of Staploe which is very rural in character. Clearly, any significant development within the Parish would make a permanent change to the landscape and the setting of the small hamlets and rural nature in the locality. Such physical changes cannot be reversed, and the Council would need to be satisfied through a thorough review of the supporting documents to the site submissions that adequately address the impacts, and in terms of achieving sustainable development – in line with Paragraph 16 of the NPPF and section 39(2) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004.
Housing need has been identified through the Council’s LHN. Using the process set out in the Planning Practice Guidance “Housing and economic needs assessment” (MHCLG – updated December 2020) the minimum annual LHN figure is 1,305 dwellings per annum. This equates to 26,100 dwellings across the period 2020 – 2040. However, existing committed sites and windfall provide a figure of 13,000 new homes. This provides a figure of 13,100 additional dwellings over the plan period. It is noted that Bedford Borough Council have stated that the housing need is 12,500 as a minimum. Regardless which of the two figures are proposed, the strategy applied within paragraph 3.17 of these representations exceed the Council’s housing requirement and negates the need for Dennybrook (site 977) as a new settlement.
When looking at the spatial approach to locating new development, the proposed site at Dennybrook would be located within close proximity to St Neots, with a possible merging into Wyboston. Given the scale of the proposed development at Dennybrook, even at 2,500 dwellings, there would a potential coalescence to the existing settlement of St Neots. Spatially, this would be contrary to the Council’s adopted Local Plan which seeks to prevent coalescence of settlements. In addition, policy 37 of the Council’s adopted Local Plan makes clear that developments need to ‘Protect the landscape setting and contribute to maintaining the individual and distinct character, and separate identities of settlements by preventing coalescence…’. It should also be taken into consideration that St Neots is experiencing its own strategic growth with an eastern extension 3,265 dwelling and 20 Ha of employment land over the plan period. Therefore, a new settlement directly to the west of the existing settlement of 2,500 would significantly increase the size of St Neots and may effect delivery rates for housing due to competing sites.
The transport impacts are acutely felt for this proposed new settlement. It is clear that the proposed development at Dennybrook (site 977) would be a car reliant settlement. The proposal will not benefit from a choice of sustainable modes of transport as opposed to other developments, such as urban extensions and the proposed development at Little Barford. Little Barford offers a varied choice of sustainable modes of public transport, including the possible linkage to the East West rail station south of St Neots. It is anticipated that there will be limited employment associated with the Dennybrook (site 977) with commuting considered necessary to nearby employment areas, for example, south of St Neots, Bedford or Cambridge via train. This would be contrary to sustainability objectives identified by BBC, and contrary to paragraphs 73, 104, 105, 106, and 110 of the NPPF, not to mention existing policies within the adopted Local Plan, namely Policies 2S, 87, 88, and 90S. In addition, the Dennybrook site does not align with a strategic transport corridor growth strategy, including rail.
In highways terms, it has been identified previously that Parish of Staploe is rural in character, with most of the road network narrow and single track. The inclusion of 2,500 dwellings (or over 10,000 according to the site promoted) would require significant infrastructure interventions, including the substantial widening of existing roads and junctions, which would lead to an urbanised appearance it what is a tranquil and idyllic countryside setting. Bedford Borough Council confirm within their assessment of the site submissions, that junction or highway capacity issues are a ‘serious capacity constraint’.
These representations are supported by a Highways Technical Note which has reviewed the Transport Modelling undertaken by AECOM in support of the strategic options in the Draft Local Plan 2040. The Technical Note considers that the Transport Modelling is fundamentally flawed. In summary, no validation or calibration of the traffic model has been undertaken, leading to significant discrepancies. Furthermore, within the Transport Model documents, it is quoted that average departing trips are 20 to 25 vehicles. When looking at the development scenario with the transport model of 2,500 – 10,150 dwellings, and using a departure rate of 0.25 departure trip rate, this results in 625 to 2,538 departing trips all of which would be home based departure trips. The model assumes 5 loading zones which therefore means there could be 125 to 508 vehicles per loading zone. This is significantly higher than the 20 to 25 outbound vehicles used by the AECOM model, assuming they have loaded it per node. AECOM may argue that the reduction is due to sustainable modes of transport being used. However, it is made clear within paragraph 4.6 that the site offers very little in terms of alternative sustainable means of transport. Accordingly, the Transport Modelling by AECOM cannot be wholly relied upon.
The landscape setting for the Parish of Staploe is one of a rural character, containing small hamlets, interspersed agricultural buildings, small holdings and arable agricultural land. As mentioned above, the roads are narrow and winding, and contribute to the rural setting. This form of land extends from the A1 to the east to Church End (Colmworth) to the east, down to Colesden to the south, and up to Little Staughton Airfield to the north. The landscape character is depicted within the Council’s Landscape Character Assessment (LCA), updated October 2020. The wider Parish of Staploe falls within the Thurleigh Clay Farmland character area (1D). Within the ‘evaluation’ section at page 55 of the LCA it notes that potential future change could include Small scale development in villages which could lead to loss their distinctive character/ ‘Ends’; Road upgrades affecting rural road character; Suburbanisation of villages. This would suggest that even relatively small changes would affect the rural setting of the area. Moreover, the proposed landscape strategy for the area as identified within the LCA is to ‘enhance’ elements of the landscape. The introduction of 2,500 new dwellings would significantly and permanently erode the rural character of the Parish, contrary to Paragraphs 20, 153, 174, and 175 of the NPPF and policy 37 of the adopted Local Plan.
There are also several Grade II Listed Buildings located within the Parish of Staploe, and would be affected by the proposed development at Dennybrook (site 977). It is evident that the Council’s assessment to Call for Site states ‘The proposal has the potential to cause harm to heritage assets. This harm may range from low to high. There may be options to avoid, reduce or mitigate this harm and where sites have not been ruled out altogether for other reasons, further assessment will be undertaken to more fully explore impacts on significance and options for harm reduction and mitigation. This further assessment may ultimately lead to the conclusion that the site should not be allocated.’ It is assumed by the above comments that further assessments are required before the site can be considered further as an allocation. It is clear that the existing Listed Buildings are dispersed throughout the area of the proposed development, causing potential impacts to their setting.
A further point to consider is that most of the land covered by the Parish of Staploe is Grade 2 agricultural land as identified by the Agricultural Land Classification. Paragraph 174 (b) of the NPPF makes clear that planning policies should contribute to and enhance the natural and local environment by: ‘recognising the intrinsic character and beauty of the countryside, and the wider benefits from natural capital and ecosystem services – including the economic and other benefits of the best and most versatile agricultural land, and of trees and woodland…’. Grade 2 agricultural land is considered to be the best and most versatile agricultural land and would be applicable in this instance.
In addition to the above, the Sustainability Appraisal scoring for the proposed new settlement of Dennybrook (site 977) identifies it as scoring lower than Spatial Option 3a. this spatial option was effectively discounted at the ‘Issues and Options’ consultation stage.
Overall, the land west of Wyboston (Dennybrook) does not offer a truly sustainable form of development, and thereby contrary to policies contained within the NPPF and of the Council’s adopted Local Plan. Accordingly, the proposed new settlement should be discounted when considering sites for allocation going forward to the pre-submission draft Local Plan.
If Little Barford is deemed unsuitable our second preferred option would be a new settlement of 2,500 homes at Twinwoods or Colworth. The Parish Council believe that the problems on the A6 north of Bedford are going to need to be resolved anyway in order to support the housing development proposed in the 2030 plan and for residents to access the east west rail station in the centre of the town. We believe that development of a new settlement of up to 3,000 homes at Twinwoods (site 883) or Colworth (site 1002) could provide the infrastructure funding to support improvements to the A6 which have long been needed and provide residents with access to the east west rail station in Bedford. A northern parkway station could be considered in future to provide sustainable transport for those in the north of the Borough. Twinwoods would include a significant proportion of brownfield land and Colworth includes lower quality (grade 3) agricultural land and so would comply with the NPPF requirement to utilise brownfield land or lower quality agricultural land before high quality agricultural land. These sites would also support Bedford Town Centre. Colworth was the site supported in the 2035 plan which was later reviewed. The A6 was not a considered sufficiently problematic to prevent this site being adopted so we find it hard to understand why the A6 is deemed such an insurmountable problem now.
Support
Local Plan 2040 Draft Plan - Strategy options and draft policies consultation
Representation ID: 5652
Received: 07/09/2021
Respondent: Mr Phillip Yockney
If a new settlement is required then Little Barford should be the preferred option as it is close to the East West rail station. Dennybrook should be discounted because there is a risk of coalescence with St Neots, the local roads are unsuitable, the traffic modelling was inadequate, it would engulf existing hamlets and fundamentally change the rural nature of the parish, it would use high quality agricultural land and it is too far from the proposed E-W rail station to be sustainable. Our second choice option would be at Twinwoods as there is a significant proportion of brownfield land. See above for more detail.
Object
Local Plan 2040 Draft Plan - Strategy options and draft policies consultation
Representation ID: 5703
Received: 07/09/2021
Respondent: Miss amber scally
There is a preferred option that Staploe Parish Council consider to be the most suitable strategy for Bedford Borough Council to employ when going forward to the next stage of the Local Plan process. As part of the preferred strategy, it is clear that should a new settlement be required in order to meet the Council’s Local Housing Needs Assessment (LHN), dated May 2021, then the proposed settlement of Little Barford is considered appropriate, and for the reasons set out in paragraph 3.17. The alternative site at land west of Wyboston (Dennybrook (site 977)) is considered the least preferred option and should be discounted as a sustainable location for development by Bedford Borough Council. The following comments and observations relate to the Call for Sites submission by Taylor Wimpey for a ‘new settlement’.
Under form ID: 977, submissions have been made for a new settlement covering around 750 Hectares of land, and providing between 7,500 – 10.150 dwellings (35 dph). BBC have identified the site as a potential ‘new settlement’ though providing around 2,500 new homes.
As previously noted under paragraph 3.17, the proposed site at Dennybrook (site 977) falls mostly within the Parish of Staploe which is very rural in character. Clearly, any significant development within the Parish would make a permanent change to the landscape and the setting of the small hamlets and rural nature in the locality. Such physical changes cannot be reversed, and the Council would need to be satisfied through a thorough review of the supporting documents to the site submissions that adequately address the impacts, and in terms of achieving sustainable development – in line with Paragraph 16 of the NPPF and section 39(2) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004.
Housing need has been identified through the Council’s LHN. Using the process set out in the Planning Practice Guidance “Housing and economic needs assessment” (MHCLG – updated December 2020) the minimum annual LHN figure is 1,305 dwellings per annum. This equates to 26,100 dwellings across the period 2020 – 2040. However, existing committed sites and windfall provide a figure of 13,000 new homes. This provides a figure of 13,100 additional dwellings over the plan period. It is noted that Bedford Borough Council have stated that the housing need is 12,500 as a minimum. Regardless which of the two figures are proposed, the strategy applied within paragraph 3.17 of these representations exceed the Council’s housing requirement and negates the need for Dennybrook (site 977) as a new settlement.
When looking at the spatial approach to locating new development, the proposed site at Dennybrook would be located within close proximity to St Neots, with a possible merging into Wyboston. Given the scale of the proposed development at Dennybrook, even at 2,500 dwellings, there would a potential coalescence to the existing settlement of St Neots. Spatially, this would be contrary to the Council’s adopted Local Plan which seeks to prevent coalescence of settlements. In addition, policy 37 of the Council’s adopted Local Plan makes clear that developments need to ‘Protect the landscape setting and contribute to maintaining the individual and distinct character, and separate identities of settlements by preventing coalescence…’. It should also be taken into consideration that St Neots is experiencing its own strategic growth with an eastern extension 3,265 dwelling and 20 Ha of employment land over the plan period. Therefore, a new settlement directly to the west of the existing settlement of 2,500 would significantly increase the size of St Neots and may effect delivery rates for housing due to competing sites.
The transport impacts are acutely felt for this proposed new settlement. It is clear that the proposed development at Dennybrook (site 977) would be a car reliant settlement. The proposal will not benefit from a choice of sustainable modes of transport as opposed to other developments, such as urban extensions and the proposed development at Little Barford. Little Barford offers a varied choice of sustainable modes of public transport, including the possible linkage to the East West rail station south of St Neots. It is anticipated that there will be limited employment associated with the Dennybrook (site 977) with commuting considered necessary to nearby employment areas, for example, south of St Neots, Bedford or Cambridge via train. This would be contrary to sustainability objectives identified by BBC, and contrary to paragraphs 73, 104, 105, 106, and 110 of the NPPF, not to mention existing policies within the adopted Local Plan, namely Policies 2S, 87, 88, and 90S. In addition, the Dennybrook site does not align with a strategic transport corridor growth strategy, including rail.
In highways terms, it has been identified previously that Parish of Staploe is rural in character, with most of the road network narrow and single track. The inclusion of 2,500 dwellings (or over 10,000 according to the site promoted) would require significant infrastructure interventions, including the substantial widening of existing roads and junctions, which would lead to an urbanised appearance it what is a tranquil and idyllic countryside setting. Bedford Borough Council confirm within their assessment of the site submissions, that junction or highway capacity issues are a ‘serious capacity constraint’.
These representations are supported by a Highways Technical Note which has reviewed the Transport Modelling undertaken by AECOM in support of the strategic options in the Draft Local Plan 2040. The Technical Note considers that the Transport Modelling is fundamentally flawed. In summary, no validation or calibration of the traffic model has been undertaken, leading to significant discrepancies. Furthermore, within the Transport Model documents, it is quoted that average departing trips are 20 to 25 vehicles. When looking at the development scenario with the transport model of 2,500 – 10,150 dwellings, and using a departure rate of 0.25 departure trip rate, this results in 625 to 2,538 departing trips all of which would be home based departure trips. The model assumes 5 loading zones which therefore means there could be 125 to 508 vehicles per loading zone. This is significantly higher than the 20 to 25 outbound vehicles used by the AECOM model, assuming they have loaded it per node. AECOM may argue that the reduction is due to sustainable modes of transport being used. However, it is made clear within paragraph 4.6 that the site offers very little in terms of alternative sustainable means of transport. Accordingly, the Transport Modelling by AECOM cannot be wholly relied upon.
The landscape setting for the Parish of Staploe is one of a rural character, containing small hamlets, interspersed agricultural buildings, small holdings and arable agricultural land. As mentioned above, the roads are narrow and winding, and contribute to the rural setting. This form of land extends from the A1 to the east to Church End (Colmworth) to the east, down to Colesden to the south, and up to Little Staughton Airfield to the north. The landscape character is depicted within the Council’s Landscape Character Assessment (LCA), updated October 2020. The wider Parish of Staploe falls within the Thurleigh Clay Farmland character area (1D). Within the ‘evaluation’ section at page 55 of the LCA it notes that potential future change could include Small scale development in villages which could lead to loss their distinctive character/ ‘Ends’; Road upgrades affecting rural road character; Suburbanisation of villages. This would suggest that even relatively small changes would affect the rural setting of the area. Moreover, the proposed landscape strategy for the area as identified within the LCA is to ‘enhance’ elements of the landscape. The introduction of 2,500 new dwellings would significantly and permanently erode the rural character of the Parish, contrary to Paragraphs 20, 153, 174, and 175 of the NPPF and policy 37 of the adopted Local Plan.
There are also several Grade II Listed Buildings located within the Parish of Staploe, and would be affected by the proposed development at Dennybrook (site 977). It is evident that the Council’s assessment to Call for Site states ‘The proposal has the potential to cause harm to heritage assets. This harm may range from low to high. There may be options to avoid, reduce or mitigate this harm and where sites have not been ruled out altogether for other reasons, further assessment will be undertaken to more fully explore impacts on significance and options for harm reduction and mitigation. This further assessment may ultimately lead to the conclusion that the site should not be allocated.’ It is assumed by the above comments that further assessments are required before the site can be considered further as an allocation. It is clear that the existing Listed Buildings are dispersed throughout the area of the proposed development, causing potential impacts to their setting.
A further point to consider is that most of the land covered by the Parish of Staploe is Grade 2 agricultural land as identified by the Agricultural Land Classification. Paragraph 174 (b) of the NPPF makes clear that planning policies should contribute to and enhance the natural and local environment by: ‘recognising the intrinsic character and beauty of the countryside, and the wider benefits from natural capital and ecosystem services – including the economic and other benefits of the best and most versatile agricultural land, and of trees and woodland…’. Grade 2 agricultural land is considered to be the best and most versatile agricultural land and would be applicable in this instance.
In addition to the above, the Sustainability Appraisal scoring for the proposed new settlement of Dennybrook (site 977) identifies it as scoring lower than Spatial Option 3a. this spatial option was effectively discounted at the ‘Issues and Options’ consultation stage.
Overall, the land west of Wyboston (Dennybrook) does not offer a truly sustainable form of development, and thereby contrary to policies contained within the NPPF and of the Council’s adopted Local Plan. Accordingly, the proposed new settlement should be discounted when considering sites for allocation going forward to the pre-submission draft Local Plan.
If Little Barford is deemed unsuitable our second preferred option would be a new settlement of 2,500 homes at Twinwoods or Colworth. The Parish Council believe that the problems on the A6 north of Bedford are going to need to be resolved anyway in order to support the housing development proposed in the 2030 plan and for residents to access the east west rail station in the centre of the town. We believe that development of a new settlement of up to 3,000 homes at Twinwoods (site 883) or Colworth (site 1002) could provide the infrastructure funding to support improvements to the A6 which have long been needed and provide residents with access to the east west rail station in Bedford. A northern parkway station could be considered in future to provide sustainable transport for those in the north of the Borough. Twinwoods would include a significant proportion of brownfield land and Colworth includes lower quality (grade 3) agricultural land and so would comply with the NPPF requirement to utilise brownfield land or lower quality agricultural land before high quality agricultural land. These sites would also support Bedford Town Centre. Colworth was the site supported in the 2035 plan which was later reviewed. The A6 was not a considered sufficiently problematic to prevent this site being adopted so we find it hard to understand why the A6 is deemed such an insurmountable problem now.
Support
Local Plan 2040 Draft Plan - Strategy options and draft policies consultation
Representation ID: 5766
Received: 07/09/2021
Respondent: Miss Hannah Hambleton-Jewell
There is a preferred option that I consider to be the most suitable strategy for Bedford Borough Council to employ when going forward to the next stage of the Local Plan process. As part of the preferred strategy, it is clear that should a new settlement be required in order to meet the Council’s Local Housing Needs Assessment (LHN), dated May 2021, then the proposed settlement of Little Barford is considered appropriate, and for the reasons set out in paragraph 3.17. The alternative site at land west of Wyboston (Dennybrook (site 977)) is considered the least preferred option and should be discounted as a sustainable location for development by Bedford Borough Council. The following comments and observations relate to the Call for Sites submission by Taylor Wimpey for a ‘new settlement’.
Under form ID: 977, submissions have been made for a new settlement covering around 750 Hectares of land, and providing between 7,500 – 10.150 dwellings (35 dph). BBC have identified the site as a potential ‘new settlement’ though providing around 2,500 new homes.
As previously noted under paragraph 3.17, the proposed site at Dennybrook (site 977) falls mostly within the Parish of Staploe which is very rural in character. Clearly, any significant development within the Parish would make a permanent change to the landscape and the setting of the small hamlets and rural nature in the locality. Such physical changes cannot be reversed, and the Council would need to be satisfied through a thorough review of the supporting documents to the site submissions that adequately address the impacts, and in terms of achieving sustainable development – in line with Paragraph 16 of the NPPF and section 39(2) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004.
Housing need has been identified through the Council’s LHN. Using the process set out in the Planning Practice Guidance “Housing and economic needs assessment” (MHCLG – updated December 2020) the minimum annual LHN figure is 1,305 dwellings per annum. This equates to 26,100 dwellings across the period 2020 – 2040. However, existing committed sites and windfall provide a figure of 13,000 new homes. This provides a figure of 13,100 additional dwellings over the plan period. It is noted that Bedford Borough Council have stated that the housing need is 12,500 as a minimum. Regardless which of the two figures are proposed, the strategy applied within paragraph 3.17 of these representations exceed the Council’s housing requirement and negates the need for Dennybrook (site 977) as a new settlement.
When looking at the spatial approach to locating new development, the proposed site at Dennybrook would be located within close proximity to St Neots, with a possible merging into Wyboston. Given the scale of the proposed development at Dennybrook, even at 2,500 dwellings, there would a potential coalescence to the existing settlement of St Neots. Spatially, this would be contrary to the Council’s adopted Local Plan which seeks to prevent coalescence of settlements. In addition, policy 37 of the Council’s adopted Local Plan makes clear that developments need to ‘Protect the landscape setting and contribute to maintaining the individual and distinct character, and separate identities of settlements by preventing coalescence…’. It should also be taken into consideration that St Neots is experiencing its own strategic growth with an eastern extension 3,265 dwelling and 20 Ha of employment land over the plan period. Therefore, a new settlement directly to the west of the existing settlement of 2,500 would significantly increase the size of St Neots and may effect delivery rates for housing due to competing sites.
The transport impacts are acutely felt for this proposed new settlement. It is clear that the proposed development at Dennybrook (site 977) would be a car reliant settlement. The proposal will not benefit from a choice of sustainable modes of transport as opposed to other developments, such as urban extensions and the proposed development at Little Barford. Little Barford offers a varied choice of sustainable modes of public transport, including the possible linkage to the East West rail station south of St Neots. It is anticipated that there will be limited employment associated with the Dennybrook (site 977) with commuting considered necessary to nearby employment areas, for example, south of St Neots, Bedford or Cambridge via train. This would be contrary to sustainability objectives identified by BBC, and contrary to paragraphs 73, 104, 105, 106, and 110 of the NPPF, not to mention existing policies within the adopted Local Plan, namely Policies 2S, 87, 88, and 90S. In addition, the Dennybrook site does not align with a strategic transport corridor growth strategy, including rail.
In highways terms, it has been identified previously that Parish of Staploe is rural in character, with most of the road network narrow and single track. The inclusion of 2,500 dwellings (or over 10,000 according to the site promoted) would require significant infrastructure interventions, including the substantial widening of existing roads and junctions, which would lead to an urbanised appearance it what is a tranquil and idyllic countryside setting. Bedford Borough Council confirm within their assessment of the site submissions, that junction or highway capacity issues are a ‘serious capacity constraint’.
These representations are supported by a Highways Technical Note which has reviewed the Transport Modelling undertaken by AECOM in support of the strategic options in the Draft Local Plan 2040. The Technical Note considers that the Transport Modelling is fundamentally flawed. In summary, no validation or calibration of the traffic model has been undertaken, leading to significant discrepancies. Furthermore, within the Transport Model documents, it is quoted that average departing trips are 20 to 25 vehicles. When looking at the development scenario with the transport model of 2,500 – 10,150 dwellings, and using a departure rate of 0.25 departure trip rate, this results in 625 to 2,538 departing trips all of which would be home based departure trips. The model assumes 5 loading zones which therefore means there could be 125 to 508 vehicles per loading zone. This is significantly higher than the 20 to 25 outbound vehicles used by the AECOM model, assuming they have loaded it per node. AECOM may argue that the reduction is due to sustainable modes of transport being used. However, it is made clear within paragraph 4.6 that the site offers very little in terms of alternative sustainable means of transport. Accordingly, the Transport Modelling by AECOM cannot be wholly relied upon.
The landscape setting for the Parish of Staploe is one of a rural character, containing small hamlets, interspersed agricultural buildings, small holdings and arable agricultural land. As mentioned above, the roads are narrow and winding, and contribute to the rural setting. This form of land extends from the A1 to the east to Church End (Colmworth) to the east, down to Colesden to the south, and up to Little Staughton Airfield to the north. The landscape character is depicted within the Council’s Landscape Character Assessment (LCA), updated October 2020. The wider Parish of Staploe falls within the Thurleigh Clay Farmland character area (1D). Within the ‘evaluation’ section at page 55 of the LCA it notes that potential future change could include Small scale development in villages which could lead to loss their distinctive character/ ‘Ends’; Road upgrades affecting rural road character; Suburbanisation of villages. This would suggest that even relatively small changes would affect the rural setting of the area. Moreover, the proposed landscape strategy for the area as identified within the LCA is to ‘enhance’ elements of the landscape. The introduction of 2,500 new dwellings would significantly and permanently erode the rural character of the Parish, contrary to Paragraphs 20, 153, 174, and 175 of the NPPF and policy 37 of the adopted Local Plan.
There are also several Grade II Listed Buildings located within the Parish of Staploe, and would be affected by the proposed development at Dennybrook (site 977). It is evident that the Council’s assessment to Call for Site states ‘The proposal has the potential to cause harm to heritage assets. This harm may range from low to high. There may be options to avoid, reduce or mitigate this harm and where sites have not been ruled out altogether for other reasons, further assessment will be undertaken to more fully explore impacts on significance and options for harm reduction and mitigation. This further assessment may ultimately lead to the conclusion that the site should not be allocated.’ It is assumed by the above comments that further assessments are required before the site can be considered further as an allocation. It is clear that the existing Listed Buildings are dispersed throughout the area of the proposed development, causing potential impacts to their setting.
A further point to consider is that most of the land covered by the Parish of Staploe is Grade 2 agricultural land as identified by the Agricultural Land Classification. Paragraph 174 (b) of the NPPF makes clear that planning policies should contribute to and enhance the natural and local environment by: ‘recognising the intrinsic character and beauty of the countryside, and the wider benefits from natural capital and ecosystem services – including the economic and other benefits of the best and most versatile agricultural land, and of trees and woodland…’. Grade 2 agricultural land is considered to be the best and most versatile agricultural land and would be applicable in this instance.
In addition to the above, the Sustainability Appraisal scoring for the proposed new settlement of Dennybrook (site 977) identifies it as scoring lower than Spatial Option 3a. this spatial option was effectively discounted at the ‘Issues and Options’ consultation stage.
Overall, the land west of Wyboston (Dennybrook) does not offer a truly sustainable form of development, and thereby contrary to policies contained within the NPPF and of the Council’s adopted Local Plan. Accordingly, the proposed new settlement should be discounted when considering sites for allocation going forward to the pre-submission draft Local Plan.
If Little Barford is deemed unsuitable our second preferred option would be a new settlement of 2,500 homes at Twinwoods or Colworth. The Parish Council believe that the problems on the A6 north of Bedford are going to need to be resolved anyway in order to support the housing development proposed in the 2030 plan and for residents to access the east west rail station in the centre of the town. We believe that development of a new settlement of up to 3,000 homes at Twinwoods (site 883) or Colworth (site 1002) could provide the infrastructure funding to support improvements to the A6 which have long been needed and provide residents with access to the east west rail station in Bedford. A northern parkway station could be considered in future to provide sustainable transport for those in the north of the Borough. Twinwoods would include a significant proportion of brownfield land and Colworth includes lower quality (grade 3) agricultural land and so would comply with the NPPF requirement to utilise brownfield land or lower quality agricultural land before high quality agricultural land. These sites would also support Bedford Town Centre. Colworth was the site supported in the 2035 plan which was later reviewed. The A6 was not a considered sufficiently problematic to prevent this site being adopted so we find it hard to understand why the A6 is deemed such an insurmountable problem now.
Object
Local Plan 2040 Draft Plan - Strategy options and draft policies consultation
Representation ID: 5802
Received: 07/09/2021
Respondent: Mrs Gillian Tagg
There is a preferred option that I consider to be the most suitable strategy for Bedford Borough Council to employ when going forward to the next stage of the Local Plan process. As part of the preferred strategy, it is clear that should a new settlement be required in order to meet the Council’s Local Housing Needs Assessment (LHN), dated May 2021, then the proposed settlement of Little Barford is considered appropriate, and for the reasons set out in paragraph 3.17.
The alternative site at land west of Wyboston (Dennybrook (site 977)) is considered the least preferred option and should be discounted as a sustainable location for development by Bedford Borough Council. The following comments and observations relate to the Call for Sites submission by Taylor Wimpey for a ‘new settlement’.
Under form ID: 977, submissions have been made for a new settlement covering around 750 Hectares of land and providing between 7,500 – 10.150 dwellings (35 dph). BBC have identified the site as a potential ‘new settlement’ though providing around 2,500 new homes.
As previously noted under paragraph 3.17, the proposed site at Dennybrook (site 977) falls mostly within the Parish of Staploe which is very rural in character. Clearly, any significant development within the Parish would make a permanent change to the landscape and the setting of the small hamlets and rural nature in the locality. Such physical changes cannot be reversed, and the Council would need to be satisfied through a thorough review of the supporting documents to the site submissions that they adequately address the impacts, and in terms of achieving sustainable development – in line with Paragraph 16 of the NPPF and section 39(2) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004.
Housing need has been identified through the Council’s LHN. Using the process set out in the Planning Practice Guidance “Housing and economic needs assessment” (MHCLG – updated December 2020) the minimum annual LHN figure is 1,305 dwellings per annum. This equates to 26,100 dwellings across the period 2020 – 2040. However, existing committed sites and windfall provide a figure of 13,000 new homes. This provides a figure of 13,100 additional dwellings over the plan period. It is noted that Bedford Borough Council have stated that the housing need is 12,500 as a minimum. Regardless which of the two figures are proposed, the strategy applied within paragraph 3.17 of these representations exceed the Council’s housing requirement and negates the need for Dennybrook (site 977) as a new settlement.
When looking at the spatial approach to locating new development, the proposed site at Dennybrook would be located in close proximity to St Neots, with a possible merging into Wyboston. Given the scale of the proposed development at Dennybrook, even at 2,500 dwellings, there would a potential coalescence to the existing settlement of St Neots. Spatially, this would be contrary to the Council’s adopted Local Plan which seeks to prevent coalescence of settlements. In addition, policy 37 of the Council’s adopted Local Plan makes clear that developments need to ‘Protect the landscape setting and contribute to maintaining the individual and distinct character, and separate identities of settlements by preventing coalescence…’. It should also be taken into consideration that St Neots is experiencing its own strategic growth with an eastern extension of 3,265 dwellings and 20 Ha of employment land over the plan period. Therefore, a new settlement directly to the west of the existing settlement of 2,500 would significantly increase the size of St Neots and may affect delivery rates for housing due to competing sites.
The transport impacts are acutely felt for this proposed new settlement. It is clear that the proposed development at Dennybrook (site 977) would be a car reliant settlement. The proposal will not benefit from a choice of sustainable modes of transport as opposed to other developments, such as urban extensions and the proposed development at Little Barford. Little Barford offers a varied choice of sustainable modes of public transport, including the possible linkage to the East West rail station south of St Neots.
It is anticipated that there will be limited employment associated with the Dennybrook (site 977) with commuting considered necessary to nearby employment areas, for example, south of St Neots, Bedford or Cambridge via train. This would be contrary to sustainability objectives identified by BBC, and contrary to paragraphs 73, 104, 105, 106, and 110 of the NPPF, not to mention existing policies within the adopted Local Plan, namely Policies 2S, 87, 88, and 90S. In addition, the Dennybrook site does not align with a strategic transport corridor growth strategy, including rail.
In highways terms, it has been identified previously that Parish of Staploe is rural in character, with most of the road network narrow and single track. The inclusion of 2,500 dwellings (or over 10,000 according to the site promoted) would require significant infrastructure interventions, including the substantial widening of existing roads and junctions, which would lead to an urbanised appearance it what is a tranquil and idyllic countryside setting. Bedford Borough Council confirm within their assessment of the site submissions, that junction or highway capacity issues are a ‘serious capacity constraint’.
These representations are supported by a Highways Technical Note which has reviewed the Transport Modelling undertaken by AECOM in support of the strategic options in the Draft Local Plan 2040. The Technical Note considers that the Transport Modelling is fundamentally flawed. In summary, no validation or calibration of the traffic model has been undertaken, leading to significant discrepancies. Furthermore, within the Transport Model documents, it is quoted that average departing trips are 20 to 25 vehicles. When looking at the development scenario with the transport model of 2,500 – 10,150 dwellings and using a departure rate of 0.25 departure trip rate, this results in 625 to 2,538 departing trips all of which would be home based departure trips. The model assumes 5 loading zones which therefore means there could be 125 to 508 vehicles per loading zone. This is significantly higher than the 20 to 25 outbound vehicles used by the AECOM model, assuming they have loaded it per node. AECOM may argue that the reduction is due to sustainable modes of transport being used. However, it is made clear within paragraph 4.6 that the site offers very little in terms of alternative sustainable means of transport. Accordingly, the Transport Modelling by AECOM cannot be wholly relied upon.
The landscape setting for the Parish of Staploe is one of a rural character, containing small hamlets, interspersed agricultural buildings, small holdings and arable agricultural land. As mentioned above, the roads are narrow and winding, and contribute to the rural setting. This form of land extends from the A1 to the east to Church End (Colmworth) to the east, down to Colesden to the south, and up to Little Staughton Airfield to the north. The landscape character is depicted within the Council’s Landscape Character Assessment (LCA), updated October 2020. The wider Parish of Staploe falls within the Thurleigh Clay Farmland character area (1D). Within the ‘evaluation’ section at page 55 of the LCA it notes that potential future change could include Small scale development in villages which could lead to loss their distinctive character/ ‘Ends’; Road upgrades affecting rural road character; Suburbanisation of villages. This would suggest that even relatively small changes would affect the rural setting of the area. Moreover, the proposed landscape strategy for the area as identified within the LCA is to ‘enhance’ elements of the landscape. The introduction of 2,500 new dwellings would significantly and permanently erode the rural character of the Parish, contrary to Paragraphs 20, 153, 174, and 175 of the NPPF and policy 37 of the adopted Local Plan.
There are also several Grade II Listed Buildings located within the Parish of Staploe which would be affected by the proposed development at Dennybrook (site 977). It is evident that the Council’s assessment to Call for Site states ‘The proposal has the potential to cause harm to heritage assets. This harm may range from low to high. There may be options to avoid, reduce or mitigate this harm and where sites have not been ruled out altogether for other reasons, further assessment will be undertaken to more fully explore impacts on significance and options for harm reduction and mitigation. This further assessment may ultimately lead to the conclusion that the site should not be allocated.’ It is assumed by the above comments that further assessments are required before the site can be considered further as an allocation. It is clear that the existing Listed Buildings are dispersed throughout the area of the proposed development, causing potential impacts to their setting.
A further key point to consider is that most of the land covered by the Parish of Staploe is Grade 2 agricultural land as identified by the Agricultural Land Classification. Paragraph 174 (b) of the NPPF makes clear that planning policies should contribute to and enhance the natural and local environment by: ‘recognising the intrinsic character and beauty of the countryside, and the wider benefits from natural capital and ecosystem services – including the economic and other benefits of the best and most versatile agricultural land, and of trees and woodland…’. Grade 2 agricultural land is considered to be the best and most versatile agricultural land and would be applicable in this instance.
In addition to the above, the Sustainability Appraisal scoring for the proposed new settlement of Dennybrook (site 977) identifies it as scoring lower than Spatial Option 3a. this spatial option was effectively discounted at the ‘Issues and Options’ consultation stage.
Overall, the land west of Wyboston (Dennybrook) does not offer a truly sustainable form of development, and thereby contrary to policies contained within the NPPF and of the Council’s adopted Local Plan. Accordingly, the proposed new settlement should be discounted when considering sites for allocation going forward to the pre-submission draft Local Plan.
If Little Barford is deemed unsuitable my second preferred option would be a new settlement of 2,500 homes at Twinwoods or Colworth. I believe that the problems on the A6 north of Bedford are going to need to be resolved anyway in order to support the housing development proposed in the 2030 plan and for residents to access the east west rail station in the centre of the town. I believe that development of a new settlement of up to 3,000 homes at Twinwoods (site 883) or Colworth (site 1002) could provide the infrastructure funding to support improvements to the A6 which have long been needed and provide residents with access to the east west rail station in Bedford. A northern parkway station could be considered in future to provide sustainable transport for those in the north of the Borough. Twinwoods would include a significant proportion of brownfield land and Colworth includes lower quality (grade 3) agricultural land and so would comply with the NPPF requirement to utilise brownfield land or lower quality agricultural land before high quality agricultural land. These sites would also support Bedford Town Centre. Colworth was the site supported in the 2035 plan which was later reviewed. The A6 was not a considered sufficiently problematic to prevent this site being adopted so I find it hard to understand why the A6 is deemed such an insurmountable problem now.
100-word Summary
If a new settlement is required, then Little Barford should be the preferred option as it is close to the East West rail station. Dennybrook should be discounted because there is a risk of coalescence with St Neots, the local roads are unsuitable, the traffic modelling was inadequate, it would engulf existing hamlets and fundamentally change the rural nature of the parish, it would use high quality agricultural land and it is too far from the proposed E-W rail station to be sustainable. My second-choice option would be at Twinwoods as there is a significant proportion of brownfield land. See above for more detail.
Object
Local Plan 2040 Draft Plan - Strategy options and draft policies consultation
Representation ID: 5863
Received: 08/09/2021
Respondent: Mr Norman Hoy
There is a preferred option that I consider to be the most suitable strategy for Bedford Borough Council to employ when going forward to the next stage of the Local Plan process. As part of the preferred strategy, it is clear that should a new settlement be required in order to meet the Council’s Local Housing Needs Assessment (LHN), dated May 2021, then the proposed settlement of Little Barford is considered appropriate, and for the reasons set out in paragraph 3.17. The alternative site at land west of Wyboston (Dennybrook (site 977)) is considered the least preferred option and should be discounted as a sustainable location for development by Bedford Borough Council. The following comments and observations relate to the Call for Sites submission by Taylor Wimpey for a ‘new settlement’.
Under form ID: 977, submissions have been made for a new settlement covering around 750 Hectares of land, and providing between 7,500 – 10.150 dwellings (35 dph). BBC have identified the site as a potential ‘new settlement’ though providing around 2,500 new homes.
As previously noted under paragraph 3.17, the proposed site at Dennybrook (site 977) falls mostly within the Parish of Staploe which is very rural in character. Clearly, any significant development within the Parish would make a permanent change to the landscape and the setting of the small hamlets and rural nature in the locality. Such physical changes cannot be reversed, and the Council would need to be satisfied through a thorough review of the supporting documents to the site submissions that adequately address the impacts, and in terms of achieving sustainable development – in line with Paragraph 16 of the NPPF and section 39(2) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004.
Housing need has been identified through the Council’s LHN. Using the process set out in the Planning Practice Guidance “Housing and economic needs assessment” (MHCLG – updated December 2020) the minimum annual LHN figure is 1,305 dwellings per annum. This equates to 26,100 dwellings across the period 2020 – 2040. However, existing committed sites and windfall provide a figure of 13,000 new homes. This provides a figure of 13,100 additional dwellings over the plan period. It is noted that Bedford Borough Council have stated that the housing need is 12,500 as a minimum. Regardless which of the two figures are proposed, the strategy applied within paragraph 3.17 of these representations exceed the Council’s housing requirement and negates the need for Dennybrook (site 977) as a new settlement.
When looking at the spatial approach to locating new development, the proposed site at Dennybrook would be located within close proximity to St Neots, with a possible merging into Wyboston. Given the scale of the proposed development at Dennybrook, even at 2,500 dwellings, there would a potential coalescence to the existing settlement of St Neots. Spatially, this would be contrary to the Council’s adopted Local Plan which seeks to prevent coalescence of settlements. In addition, policy 37 of the Council’s adopted Local Plan makes clear that developments need to ‘Protect the landscape setting and contribute to maintaining the individual and distinct character, and separate identities of settlements by preventing coalescence…’. It should also be taken into consideration that St Neots is experiencing its own strategic growth with an eastern extension 3,265 dwelling and 20 Ha of employment land over the plan period. Therefore, a new settlement directly to the west of the existing settlement of 2,500 would significantly increase the size of St Neots and may effect delivery rates for housing due to competing sites.
The transport impacts are acutely felt for this proposed new settlement. It is clear that the proposed development at Dennybrook (site 977) would be a car reliant settlement. The proposal will not benefit from a choice of sustainable modes of transport as opposed to other developments, such as urban extensions and the proposed development at Little Barford. Little Barford offers a varied choice of sustainable modes of public transport, including the possible linkage to the East West rail station south of St Neots. It is anticipated that there will be limited employment associated with the Dennybrook (site 977) with commuting considered necessary to nearby employment areas, for example, south of St Neots, Bedford or Cambridge via train. This would be contrary to sustainability objectives identified by BBC, and contrary to paragraphs 73, 104, 105, 106, and 110 of the NPPF, not to mention existing policies within the adopted Local Plan, namely Policies 2S, 87, 88, and 90S. In addition, the Dennybrook site does not align with a strategic transport corridor growth strategy, including rail.
In highways terms, it has been identified previously that Parish of Staploe is rural in character, with most of the road network narrow and single track. The inclusion of 2,500 dwellings (or over 10,000 according to the site promoted) would require significant infrastructure interventions, including the substantial widening of existing roads and junctions, which would lead to an urbanised appearance it what is a tranquil and idyllic countryside setting. Bedford Borough Council confirm within their assessment of the site submissions, that junction or highway capacity issues are a ‘serious capacity constraint’.
These representations are supported by a Highways Technical Note which has reviewed the Transport Modelling undertaken by AECOM in support of the strategic options in the Draft Local Plan 2040. The Technical Note considers that the Transport Modelling is fundamentally flawed. In summary, no validation or calibration of the traffic model has been undertaken, leading to significant discrepancies. Furthermore, within the Transport Model documents, it is quoted that average departing trips are 20 to 25 vehicles. When looking at the development scenario with the transport model of 2,500 – 10,150 dwellings, and using a departure rate of 0.25 departure trip rate, this results in 625 to 2,538 departing trips all of which would be home based departure trips. The model assumes 5 loading zones which therefore means there could be 125 to 508 vehicles per loading zone. This is significantly higher than the 20 to 25 outbound vehicles used by the AECOM model, assuming they have loaded it per node. AECOM may argue that the reduction is due to sustainable modes of transport being used. However, it is made clear within paragraph 4.6 that the site offers very little in terms of alternative sustainable means of transport. Accordingly, the Transport Modelling by AECOM cannot be wholly relied upon.
The landscape setting for the Parish of Staploe is one of a rural character, containing small hamlets, interspersed agricultural buildings, small holdings and arable agricultural land. As mentioned above, the roads are narrow and winding, and contribute to the rural setting. This form of land extends from the A1 to the east to Church End (Colmworth) to the east, down to Colesden to the south, and up to Little Staughton Airfield to the north. The landscape character is depicted within the Council’s Landscape Character Assessment (LCA), updated October 2020. The wider Parish of Staploe falls within the Thurleigh Clay Farmland character area (1D). Within the ‘evaluation’ section at page 55 of the LCA it notes that potential future change could include Small scale development in villages which could lead to loss their distinctive character/ ‘Ends’; Road upgrades affecting rural road character; Suburbanisation of villages. This would suggest that even relatively small changes would affect the rural setting of the area. Moreover, the proposed landscape strategy for the area as identified within the LCA is to ‘enhance’ elements of the landscape. The introduction of 2,500 new dwellings would significantly and permanently erode the rural character of the Parish, contrary to Paragraphs 20, 153, 174, and 175 of the NPPF and policy 37 of the adopted Local Plan.
There are also several Grade II Listed Buildings located within the Parish of Staploe, and would be affected by the proposed development at Dennybrook (site 977). It is evident that the Council’s assessment to Call for Site states ‘The proposal has the potential to cause harm to heritage assets. This harm may range from low to high. There may be options to avoid, reduce or mitigate this harm and where sites have not been ruled out altogether for other reasons, further assessment will be undertaken to more fully explore impacts on significance and options for harm reduction and mitigation. This further assessment may ultimately lead to the conclusion that the site should not be allocated.’ It is assumed by the above comments that further assessments are required before the site can be considered further as an allocation. It is clear that the existing Listed Buildings are dispersed throughout the area of the proposed development, causing potential impacts to their setting.
A further point to consider is that most of the land covered by the Parish of Staploe is Grade 2 agricultural land as identified by the Agricultural Land Classification. Paragraph 174 (b) of the NPPF makes clear that planning policies should contribute to and enhance the natural and local environment by: ‘recognising the intrinsic character and beauty of the countryside, and the wider benefits from natural capital and ecosystem services – including the economic and other benefits of the best and most versatile agricultural land, and of trees and woodland…’. Grade 2 agricultural land is considered to be the best and most versatile agricultural land and would be applicable in this instance.
In addition to the above, the Sustainability Appraisal scoring for the proposed new settlement of Dennybrook (site 977) identifies it as scoring lower than Spatial Option 3a. this spatial option was effectively discounted at the ‘Issues and Options’ consultation stage.
Overall, the land west of Wyboston (Dennybrook) does not offer a truly sustainable form of development, and thereby contrary to policies contained within the NPPF and of the Council’s adopted Local Plan. Accordingly, the proposed new settlement should be discounted when considering sites for allocation going forward to the pre-submission draft Local Plan.
If Little Barford is deemed unsuitable our second preferred option would be a new settlement of 2,500 homes at Twinwoods or Colworth. The Parish Council believe that the problems on the A6 north of Bedford are going to need to be resolved anyway in order to support the housing development proposed in the 2030 plan and for residents to access the east west rail station in the centre of the town. We believe that development of a new settlement of up to 3,000 homes at Twinwoods (site 883) or Colworth (site 1002) could provide the infrastructure funding to support improvements to the A6 which have long been needed and provide residents with access to the east west rail station in Bedford. A northern parkway station could be considered in future to provide sustainable transport for those in the north of the Borough. Twinwoods would include a significant proportion of brownfield land and Colworth includes lower quality (grade 3) agricultural land and so would comply with the NPPF requirement to utilise brownfield land or lower quality agricultural land before high quality agricultural land. These sites would also support Bedford Town Centre. Colworth was the site supported in the 2035 plan which was later reviewed. The A6 was not a considered sufficiently problematic to prevent this site being adopted so we find it hard to understand why the A6 is deemed such an insurmountable problem now.
100 word summary
If a new settlement is required then Little Barford should be the preferred option as it is close to the East West rail station. Dennybrook should be discounted because there is a risk of coalescence with St Neots, the local roads are unsuitable, the traffic modelling was inadequate, it would engulf existing hamlets and fundamentally change the rural nature of the parish, it would use high quality agricultural land and it is too far from the proposed E-W rail station to be sustainable. Our second choice option would be at Twinwoods as there is a significant proportion of brownfield land. See above for more detail.
Object
Local Plan 2040 Draft Plan - Strategy options and draft policies consultation
Representation ID: 5985
Received: 08/09/2021
Respondent: Staploe Parish Council
There is a preferred option that I consider to be the most suitable strategy for Bedford Borough Council to employ when going forward to the next stage of the Local Plan process. As part of the preferred strategy, it is clear that should a new settlement be required in order to meet the Council’s Local Housing Needs Assessment (LHN), dated May 2021, then the proposed settlement of Little Barford is considered appropriate, and for the reasons set out in paragraph 3.17. The alternative site at land west of Wyboston (Dennybrook (site 977)) is considered the least preferred option and should be discounted as a sustainable location for development by Bedford Borough Council. The following comments and observations relate to the Call for Sites submission by Taylor Wimpey for a ‘new settlement’.
Under form ID: 977, submissions have been made for a new settlement covering around 750 Hectares of land, and providing between 7,500 – 10.150 dwellings (35 dph). BBC have identified the site as a potential ‘new settlement’ though providing around 2,500 new homes.
As previously noted under paragraph 3.17, the proposed site at Dennybrook (site 977) falls mostly within the Parish of Staploe which is very rural in character. Clearly, any significant development within the Parish would make a permanent change to the landscape, destroy wildlife habitats, massively impact pollution re noise and light, plus local emergency services will be immensely under pressure with the extra houses and residents. and the setting of the small hamlets and rural nature in the locality. Such physical changes cannot be reversed, and the Council would need to be satisfied through a thorough review of the supporting documents to the site submissions that adequately address the impacts, and in terms of achieving sustainable development – in line with Paragraph 16 of the NPPF and section 39(2) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004.
Housing need has been identified through the Council’s LHN. Using the process set out in the Planning Practice Guidance “Housing and economic needs assessment” (MHCLG – updated December 2020) the minimum annual LHN figure is 1,305 dwellings per annum. This equates to 26,100 dwellings across the period 2020 – 2040. However, existing committed sites and windfall provide a figure of 13,000 new homes. This provides a figure of 13,100 additional dwellings over the plan period. It is noted that Bedford Borough Council have stated that the housing need is 12,500 as a minimum. Regardless which of the two figures are proposed, the strategy applied within paragraph 3.17 of these representations exceed the Council’s housing requirement and negates the need for Dennybrook (site 977) as a new settlement.
When looking at the spatial approach to locating new development, the proposed site at Dennybrook would be located within close proximity to St Neots, with a possible merging into Wyboston. Given the scale of the proposed development at Dennybrook, even at 2,500 dwellings, there would a potential coalescence to the existing settlement of St Neots. Spatially, this would be contrary to the Council’s adopted Local Plan which seeks to prevent coalescence of settlements. In addition, policy 37 of the Council’s adopted Local Plan makes clear that developments need to ‘Protect the landscape setting and contribute to maintaining the individual and distinct character, and separate identities of settlements by preventing coalescence…’. It should also be taken into consideration that St Neots is experiencing its own strategic growth with an eastern extension 3,265 dwelling and 20 Ha of employment land over the plan period. Therefore, a new settlement directly to the west of the existing settlement of 2,500 would significantly increase the size of St Neots and may effect delivery rates for housing due to competing sites.
The transport impacts are acutely felt for this proposed new settlement. It is clear that the proposed development at Dennybrook (site 977) would be a car reliant settlement. The proposal will not benefit from a choice of sustainable modes of transport as opposed to other developments, such as urban extensions and the proposed development at Little Barford. Little Barford offers a varied choice of sustainable modes of public transport, including the possible linkage to the East West rail station south of St Neots. It is anticipated that there will be limited employment associated with the Dennybrook (site 977) with commuting considered necessary to nearby employment areas, for example, south of St Neots, Bedford or Cambridge via train. This would be contrary to sustainability objectives identified by BBC, and contrary to paragraphs 73, 104, 105, 106, and 110 of the NPPF, not to mention existing policies within the adopted Local Plan, namely Policies 2S, 87, 88, and 90S. In addition, the Dennybrook site does not align with a strategic transport corridor growth strategy, including rail.
In highways terms, it has been identified previously that Parish of Staploe is rural in character, with most of the road network narrow and single track. The inclusion of 2,500 dwellings (or over 10,000 according to the site promoted) would require significant infrastructure interventions, including the substantial widening of existing roads and junctions, which would lead to an urbanised appearance it what is a tranquil and idyllic countryside setting. Bedford Borough Council confirm within their assessment of the site submissions, that junction or highway capacity issues are a ‘serious capacity constraint’.
These representations are supported by a Highways Technical Note which has reviewed the Transport Modelling undertaken by AECOM in support of the strategic options in the Draft Local Plan 2040. The Technical Note considers that the Transport Modelling is fundamentally flawed. In summary, no validation or calibration of the traffic model has been undertaken, leading to significant discrepancies. Furthermore, within the Transport Model documents, it is quoted that average departing trips are 20 to 25 vehicles. When looking at the development scenario with the transport model of 2,500 – 10,150 dwellings, and using a departure rate of 0.25 departure trip rate, this results in 625 to 2,538 departing trips all of which would be home based departure trips. The model assumes 5 loading zones which therefore means there could be 125 to 508 vehicles per loading zone. This is significantly higher than the 20 to 25 outbound vehicles used by the AECOM model, assuming they have loaded it per node. AECOM may argue that the reduction is due to sustainable modes of transport being used. However, it is made clear within paragraph 4.6 that the site offers very little in terms of alternative sustainable means of transport. Accordingly, the Transport Modelling by AECOM cannot be wholly relied upon.
The landscape setting for the Parish of Staploe is one of a rural character, containing small hamlets, interspersed agricultural buildings, small holdings and arable agricultural land. As mentioned above, the roads are narrow and winding, and contribute to the rural setting. This form of land extends from the A1 to the east to Church End (Colmworth) to the east, down to Colesden to the south, and up to Little Staughton Airfield to the north. The landscape character is depicted within the Council’s Landscape Character Assessment (LCA), updated October 2020. The wider Parish of Staploe falls within the Thurleigh Clay Farmland character area (1D). Within the ‘evaluation’ section at page 55 of the LCA it notes that potential future change could include Small scale development in villages which could lead to loss their distinctive character/ ‘Ends’; Road upgrades affecting rural road character; Suburbanisation of villages. This would suggest that even relatively small changes would affect the rural setting of the area. Moreover, the proposed landscape strategy for the area as identified within the LCA is to ‘enhance’ elements of the landscape. The introduction of 2,500 new dwellings would significantly and permanently erode the rural character of the Parish, contrary to Paragraphs 20, 153, 174, and 175 of the NPPF and policy 37 of the adopted Local Plan.
There are also several Grade II Listed Buildings located within the Parish of Staploe, and would be affected by the proposed development at Dennybrook (site 977). It is evident that the Council’s assessment to Call for Site states ‘The proposal has the potential to cause harm to heritage assets. This harm may range from low to high. There may be options to avoid, reduce or mitigate this harm and where sites have not been ruled out altogether for other reasons, further assessment will be undertaken to more fully explore impacts on significance and options for harm reduction and mitigation. This further assessment may ultimately lead to the conclusion that the site should not be allocated.’ It is assumed by the above comments that further assessments are required before the site can be considered further as an allocation. It is clear that the existing Listed Buildings are dispersed throughout the area of the proposed development, causing potential impacts to their setting.
A further point to consider is that most of the land covered by the Parish of Staploe is Grade 2 agricultural land as identified by the Agricultural Land Classification. Paragraph 174 (b) of the NPPF makes clear that planning policies should contribute to and enhance the natural and local environment by: ‘recognising the intrinsic character and beauty of the countryside, and the wider benefits from natural capital and ecosystem services – including the economic and other benefits of the best and most versatile agricultural land, and of trees and woodland…’. Grade 2 agricultural land is considered to be the best and most versatile agricultural land and would be applicable in this instance.
In addition to the above, the Sustainability Appraisal scoring for the proposed new settlement of Dennybrook (site 977) identifies it as scoring lower than Spatial Option 3a. this spatial option was effectively discounted at the ‘Issues and Options’ consultation stage.
Overall, the land west of Wyboston (Dennybrook) does not offer a truly sustainable form of development, and thereby contrary to policies contained within the NPPF and of the Council’s adopted Local Plan. Accordingly, the proposed new settlement should be discounted when considering sites for allocation going forward to the pre-submission draft Local Plan.
If Little Barford is deemed unsuitable our second preferred option would be a new settlement of 2,500 homes at Twinwoods or Colworth. The Parish Council believe that the problems on the A6 north of Bedford are going to need to be resolved anyway in order to support the housing development proposed in the 2030 plan and for residents to access the east west rail station in the centre of the town. We believe that development of a new settlement of up to 3,000 homes at Twinwoods (site 883) or Colworth (site 1002) could provide the infrastructure funding to support improvements to the A6 which have long been needed and provide residents with access to the east west rail station in Bedford. A northern parkway station could be considered in future to provide sustainable transport for those in the north of the Borough. Twinwoods would include a significant proportion of brownfield land and Colworth includes lower quality (grade 3) agricultural land and so would comply with the NPPF requirement to utilise brownfield land or lower quality agricultural land before high quality agricultural land. These sites would also support Bedford Town Centre. Colworth was the site supported in the 2035 plan which was later reviewed. The A6 was not a considered sufficiently problematic to prevent this site being adopted so we find it hard to understand why the A6 is deemed such an insurmountable problem now.
100 word summary
If a new settlement is required then Little Barford should be the preferred option as it is close to the East West rail station. Dennybrook should be discounted because there is a risk of coalescence with St Neots, the local roads are unsuitable, the traffic modelling was inadequate, it would engulf existing hamlets and fundamentally change the rural nature of the parish, it would use high quality agricultural land and it is too far from the proposed E-W rail station to be sustainable. Our second choice option would be at Twinwoods as there is a significant proportion of brownfield land. See above for more detail.
Support
Local Plan 2040 Draft Plan - Strategy options and draft policies consultation
Representation ID: 6032
Received: 08/09/2021
Respondent: Mrs Christina Farmer
There is a preferred option that I consider to be the most suitable strategy for Bedford Borough Council to employ when going forward to the next stage of the Local Plan process. As part of the preferred strategy, it is clear that should a new settlement be required in order to meet the Council’s Local Housing Needs Assessment (LHN), dated May 2021, then the proposed settlement of Little Barford is considered appropriate, and for the reasons set out in paragraph 3.17. The alternative site at land west of Wyboston (Dennybrook (site 977)) is considered the least preferred option and should be discounted as a sustainable location for development by Bedford Borough Council. The following comments and observations relate to the Call for Sites submission by Taylor Wimpey for a ‘new settlement’.
Under form ID: 977, submissions have been made for a new settlement covering around 750 Hectares of land, and providing between 7,500 – 10.150 dwellings (35 dph). BBC have identified the site as a potential ‘new settlement’ though providing around 2,500 new homes.
As previously noted under paragraph 3.17, the proposed site at Dennybrook (site 977) falls mostly within the Parish of Staploe which is very rural in character. Clearly, any significant development within the Parish would make a permanent change to the landscape and the setting of the small hamlets and rural nature in the locality. Such physical changes cannot be reversed, and the Council would need to be satisfied through a thorough review of the supporting documents to the site submissions that adequately address the impacts, and in terms of achieving sustainable development – in line with Paragraph 16 of the NPPF and section 39(2) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004.
Housing need has been identified through the Council’s LHN. Using the process set out in the Planning Practice Guidance “Housing and economic needs assessment” (MHCLG – updated December 2020) the minimum annual LHN figure is 1,305 dwellings per annum. This equates to 26,100 dwellings across the period 2020 – 2040. However, existing committed sites and windfall provide a figure of 13,000 new homes. This provides a figure of 13,100 additional dwellings over the plan period. It is noted that Bedford Borough Council have stated that the housing need is 12,500 as a minimum. Regardless which of the two figures are proposed, the strategy applied within paragraph 3.17 of these representations exceed the Council’s housing requirement and negates the need for Dennybrook (site 977) as a new settlement.
When looking at the spatial approach to locating new development, the proposed site at Dennybrook would be located within close proximity to St Neots, with a possible merging into Wyboston. Given the scale of the proposed development at Dennybrook, even at 2,500 dwellings, there would a potential coalescence to the existing settlement of St Neots. Spatially, this would be contrary to the Council’s adopted Local Plan which seeks to prevent coalescence of settlements. In addition, policy 37 of the Council’s adopted Local Plan makes clear that developments need to ‘Protect the landscape setting and contribute to maintaining the individual and distinct character, and separate identities of settlements by preventing coalescence…’. It should also be taken into consideration that St Neots is experiencing its own strategic growth with an eastern extension 3,265 dwelling and 20 Ha of employment land over the plan period. Therefore, a new settlement directly to the west of the existing settlement of 2,500 would significantly increase the size of St Neots and may effect delivery rates for housing due to competing sites.
The transport impacts are acutely felt for this proposed new settlement. It is clear that the proposed development at Dennybrook (site 977) would be a car reliant settlement. The proposal will not benefit from a choice of sustainable modes of transport as opposed to other developments, such as urban extensions and the proposed development at Little Barford. Little Barford offers a varied choice of sustainable modes of public transport, including the possible linkage to the East West rail station south of St Neots. It is anticipated that there will be limited employment associated with the Dennybrook (site 977) with commuting considered necessary to nearby employment areas, for example, south of St Neots, Bedford or Cambridge via train. This would be contrary to sustainability objectives identified by BBC, and contrary to paragraphs 73, 104, 105, 106, and 110 of the NPPF, not to mention existing policies within the adopted Local Plan, namely Policies 2S, 87, 88, and 90S. In addition, the Dennybrook site does not align with a strategic transport corridor growth strategy, including rail.
In highways terms, it has been identified previously that Parish of Staploe is rural in character, with most of the road network narrow and single track. The inclusion of 2,500 dwellings (or over 10,000 according to the site promoted) would require significant infrastructure interventions, including the substantial widening of existing roads and junctions, which would lead to an urbanised appearance it what is a tranquil and idyllic countryside setting. Bedford Borough Council confirm within their assessment of the site submissions, that junction or highway capacity issues are a ‘serious capacity constraint’.
These representations are supported by a Highways Technical Note which has reviewed the Transport Modelling undertaken by AECOM in support of the strategic options in the Draft Local Plan 2040. The Technical Note considers that the Transport Modelling is fundamentally flawed. In summary, no validation or calibration of the traffic model has been undertaken, leading to significant discrepancies. Furthermore, within the Transport Model documents, it is quoted that average departing trips are 20 to 25 vehicles. When looking at the development scenario with the transport model of 2,500 – 10,150 dwellings, and using a departure rate of 0.25 departure trip rate, this results in 625 to 2,538 departing trips all of which would be home based departure trips. The model assumes 5 loading zones which therefore means there could be 125 to 508 vehicles per loading zone. This is significantly higher than the 20 to 25 outbound vehicles used by the AECOM model, assuming they have loaded it per node. AECOM may argue that the reduction is due to sustainable modes of transport being used. However, it is made clear within paragraph 4.6 that the site offers very little in terms of alternative sustainable means of transport. Accordingly, the Transport Modelling by AECOM cannot be wholly relied upon.
The landscape setting for the Parish of Staploe is one of a rural character, containing small hamlets, interspersed agricultural buildings, small holdings and arable agricultural land. As mentioned above, the roads are narrow and winding, and contribute to the rural setting. This form of land extends from the A1 to the east to Church End (Colmworth) to the east, down to Colesden to the south, and up to Little Staughton Airfield to the north. The landscape character is depicted within the Council’s Landscape Character Assessment (LCA), updated October 2020. The wider Parish of Staploe falls within the Thurleigh Clay Farmland character area (1D). Within the ‘evaluation’ section at page 55 of the LCA it notes that potential future change could include Small scale development in villages which could lead to loss their distinctive character/ ‘Ends’; Road upgrades affecting rural road character; Suburbanisation of villages. This would suggest that even relatively small changes would affect the rural setting of the area. Moreover, the proposed landscape strategy for the area as identified within the LCA is to ‘enhance’ elements of the landscape. The introduction of 2,500 new dwellings would significantly and permanently erode the rural character of the Parish, contrary to Paragraphs 20, 153, 174, and 175 of the NPPF and policy 37 of the adopted Local Plan.
There are also several Grade II Listed Buildings located within the Parish of Staploe, and would be affected by the proposed development at Dennybrook (site 977). It is evident that the Council’s assessment to Call for Site states ‘The proposal has the potential to cause harm to heritage assets. This harm may range from low to high. There may be options to avoid, reduce or mitigate this harm and where sites have not been ruled out altogether for other reasons, further assessment will be undertaken to more fully explore impacts on significance and options for harm reduction and mitigation. This further assessment may ultimately lead to the conclusion that the site should not be allocated.’ It is assumed by the above comments that further assessments are required before the site can be considered further as an allocation. It is clear that the existing Listed Buildings are dispersed throughout the area of the proposed development, causing potential impacts to their setting.
A further point to consider is that most of the land covered by the Parish of Staploe is Grade 2 agricultural land as identified by the Agricultural Land Classification. Paragraph 174 (b) of the NPPF makes clear that planning policies should contribute to and enhance the natural and local environment by: ‘recognising the intrinsic character and beauty of the countryside, and the wider benefits from natural capital and ecosystem services – including the economic and other benefits of the best and most versatile agricultural land, and of trees and woodland…’. Grade 2 agricultural land is considered to be the best and most versatile agricultural land and would be applicable in this instance.
In addition to the above, the Sustainability Appraisal scoring for the proposed new settlement of Dennybrook (site 977) identifies it as scoring lower than Spatial Option 3a. this spatial option was effectively discounted at the ‘Issues and Options’ consultation stage.
Overall, the land west of Wyboston (Dennybrook) does not offer a truly sustainable form of development, and thereby contrary to policies contained within the NPPF and of the Council’s adopted Local Plan. Accordingly, the proposed new settlement should be discounted when considering sites for allocation going forward to the pre-submission draft Local Plan.
If Little Barford is deemed unsuitable our second preferred option would be a new settlement of 2,500 homes at Twinwoods or Colworth. The Parish Council believe that the problems on the A6 north of Bedford are going to need to be resolved anyway in order to support the housing development proposed in the 2030 plan and for residents to access the east west rail station in the centre of the town. We believe that development of a new settlement of up to 3,000 homes at Twinwoods (site 883) or Colworth (site 1002) could provide the infrastructure funding to support improvements to the A6 which have long been needed and provide residents with access to the east west rail station in Bedford. A northern parkway station could be considered in future to provide sustainable transport for those in the north of the Borough. Twinwoods would include a significant proportion of brownfield land and Colworth includes lower quality (grade 3) agricultural land and so would comply with the NPPF requirement to utilise brownfield land or lower quality agricultural land before high quality agricultural land. These sites would also support Bedford Town Centre. Colworth was the site supported in the 2035 plan which was later reviewed. The A6 was not a considered sufficiently problematic to prevent this site being adopted so we find it hard to understand why the A6 is deemed such an insurmountable problem now.
Object
Local Plan 2040 Draft Plan - Strategy options and draft policies consultation
Representation ID: 6122
Received: 09/09/2021
Respondent: Jen Giles
There is a preferred option that Staploe Parish Council consider to be the most suitable strategy for Bedford Borough Council to employ when going forward to the next stage of the Local Plan process. As part of the preferred strategy, it is clear that should a new settlement be required in order to meet the Council’s Local Housing Needs Assessment (LHN), dated May 2021, then the proposed settlement of Little Barford is considered appropriate, and for the reasons set out in paragraph 3.17. The alternative site at land west of Wyboston (Dennybrook (site 977)) is considered the least preferred option and should be discounted as a sustainable location for development by Bedford Borough Council. The following comments and observations relate to the Call for Sites submission by Taylor Wimpey for a ‘new settlement’.
Under form ID: 977, submissions have been made for a new settlement covering around 750 Hectares of land, and providing between 7,500 – 10.150 dwellings (35 dph). BBC have identified the site as a potential ‘new settlement’ though providing around 2,500 new homes.
As previously noted under paragraph 3.17, the proposed site at Dennybrook (site 977) falls mostly within the Parish of Staploe which is very rural in character. Clearly, any significant development within the Parish would make a permanent change to the landscape and the setting of the small hamlets and rural nature in the locality. Such physical changes cannot be reversed, and the Council would need to be satisfied through a thorough review of the supporting documents to the site submissions that adequately address the impacts, and in terms of achieving sustainable development – in line with Paragraph 16 of the NPPF and section 39(2) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004.
Housing need has been identified through the Council’s LHN. Using the process set out in the Planning Practice Guidance “Housing and economic needs assessment” (MHCLG – updated December 2020) the minimum annual LHN figure is 1,305 dwellings per annum. This equates to 26,100 dwellings across the period 2020 – 2040. However, existing committed sites and windfall provide a figure of 13,000 new homes. This provides a figure of 13,100 additional dwellings over the plan period. It is noted that Bedford Borough Council have stated that the housing need is 12,500 as a minimum. Regardless which of the two figures are proposed, the strategy applied within paragraph 3.17 of these representations exceed the Council’s housing requirement and negates the need for Dennybrook (site 977) as a new settlement.
When looking at the spatial approach to locating new development, the proposed site at Dennybrook would be located within close proximity to St Neots, with a possible merging into Wyboston. Given the scale of the proposed development at Dennybrook, even at 2,500 dwellings, there would a potential coalescence to the existing settlement of St Neots. Spatially, this would be contrary to the Council’s adopted Local Plan which seeks to prevent coalescence of settlements. In addition, policy 37 of the Council’s adopted Local Plan makes clear that developments need to ‘Protect the landscape setting and contribute to maintaining the individual and distinct character, and separate identities of settlements by preventing coalescence…’. It should also be taken into consideration that St Neots is experiencing its own strategic growth with an eastern extension 3,265 dwelling and 20 Ha of employment land over the plan period. Therefore, a new settlement directly to the west of the existing settlement of 2,500 would significantly increase the size of St Neots and may effect delivery rates for housing due to competing sites.
The transport impacts are acutely felt for this proposed new settlement. It is clear that the proposed development at Dennybrook (site 977) would be a car reliant settlement. The proposal will not benefit from a choice of sustainable modes of transport as opposed to other developments, such as urban extensions and the proposed development at Little Barford. Little Barford offers a varied choice of sustainable modes of public transport, including the possible linkage to the East West rail station south of St Neots. It is anticipated that there will be limited employment associated with the Dennybrook (site 977) with commuting considered necessary to nearby employment areas, for example, south of St Neots, Bedford or Cambridge via train. This would be contrary to sustainability objectives identified by BBC, and contrary to paragraphs 73, 104, 105, 106, and 110 of the NPPF, not to mention existing policies within the adopted Local Plan, namely Policies 2S, 87, 88, and 90S. In addition, the Dennybrook site does not align with a strategic transport corridor growth strategy, including rail.
In highways terms, it has been identified previously that Parish of Staploe is rural in character, with most of the road network narrow and single track. The inclusion of 2,500 dwellings (or over 10,000 according to the site promoted) would require significant infrastructure interventions, including the substantial widening of existing roads and junctions, which would lead to an urbanised appearance it what is a tranquil and idyllic countryside setting.
Bedford Borough Council confirm within their assessment of the site submissions, that junction or highway capacity issues are a ‘serious capacity constraint’.
These representations are supported by a Highways Technical Note which has reviewed the Transport Modelling undertaken by AECOM in support of the strategic options in the Draft Local Plan 2040. The Technical Note considers that the Transport Modelling is fundamentally flawed. In summary, no validation or calibration of the traffic model has been undertaken, leading to significant discrepancies. Furthermore, within the Transport Model documents, it is quoted that average departing trips are 20 to 25 vehicles. When looking at the development scenario with the transport model of 2,500 – 10,150 dwellings, and using a departure rate of 0.25 departure trip rate, this results in 625 to 2,538 departing trips all of which would be home based departure trips. The model assumes 5 loading zones which therefore means there could be 125 to 508 vehicles per loading zone. This is significantly higher than the 20 to 25 outbound vehicles used by the AECOM model, assuming they have loaded it per node. AECOM may argue that the reduction is due to sustainable modes of transport being used. However, it is made clear within paragraph 4.6 that the site offers very little in terms of alternative sustainable means of transport. Accordingly, the Transport Modelling by AECOM cannot be wholly relied upon.
The landscape setting for the Parish of Staploe is one of a rural character, containing small hamlets, interspersed agricultural buildings, small holdings and arable agricultural land. As mentioned above, the roads are narrow and winding, and contribute to the rural setting. This form of land extends from the A1 to the east to Church End (Colmworth) to the east, down to Colesden to the south, and up to Little Staughton Airfield to the north. The landscape character is depicted within the Council’s Landscape Character Assessment (LCA), updated October 2020. The wider Parish of Staploe falls within the Thurleigh Clay Farmland character area (1D). Within the ‘evaluation’ section at page 55 of the LCA it notes that potential future change could include Small scale development in villages which could lead to loss their distinctive character/ ‘Ends’; Road upgrades affecting rural road character; Suburbanisation of villages. This would suggest that even relatively small changes would affect the rural setting of the area. Moreover, the proposed landscape strategy for the area as identified within the LCA is to ‘enhance’ elements of the landscape. The introduction of 2,500 new dwellings would significantly and permanently erode the rural character of the Parish, contrary to Paragraphs 20, 153, 174, and 175 of the NPPF and policy 37 of the adopted Local Plan.
There are also several Grade II Listed Buildings located within the Parish of Staploe, and would be affected by the proposed development at Dennybrook (site 977). It is evident that the Council’s assessment to Call for Site states ‘The proposal has the potential to cause harm to heritage assets. This harm may range from low to high. There may be options to avoid, reduce or mitigate this harm and where sites have not been ruled out altogether for other reasons, further assessment will be undertaken to more fully explore impacts on significance and options for harm reduction and mitigation. This further assessment may ultimately lead to the conclusion that the site should not be allocated.’ It is assumed by the above comments that further assessments are required before the site can be considered further as an allocation. It is clear that the existing Listed Buildings are dispersed throughout the area of the proposed development, causing potential impacts to their setting.
A further point to consider is that most of the land covered by the Parish of Staploe is Grade 2 agricultural land as identified by the Agricultural Land Classification. Paragraph 174 (b) of the NPPF makes clear that planning policies should contribute to and enhance the natural and local environment by: ‘recognising the intrinsic character and beauty of the countryside, and the wider benefits from natural capital and ecosystem services – including the economic and other benefits of the best and most versatile agricultural land, and of trees and woodland…’. Grade 2 agricultural land is considered to be the best and most versatile agricultural land and would be applicable in this instance.
In addition to the above, the Sustainability Appraisal scoring for the proposed new settlement of Dennybrook (site 977) identifies it as scoring lower than Spatial Option 3a. this spatial option was effectively discounted at the ‘Issues and Options’ consultation stage.
Overall, the land west of Wyboston (Dennybrook) does not offer a truly sustainable form of development, and thereby contrary to policies contained within the NPPF and of the Council’s adopted Local Plan. Accordingly, the proposed new settlement should be discounted when considering sites for allocation going forward to the pre-submission draft Local Plan.
If Little Barford is deemed unsuitable our second preferred option would be a new settlement of 2,500 homes at Twinwoods or Colworth. The Parish Council believe that the problems on the A6 north of Bedford are going to need to be resolved anyway in order to support the housing development proposed in the 2030 plan and for residents to access the east west rail station in the centre of the town. We believe that development of a new settlement of up to 3,000 homes at Twinwoods (site 883) or Colworth (site 1002) could provide the infrastructure funding to support improvements to the A6 which have long been needed and provide residents with access to the east west rail station in Bedford. A northern parkway station could be considered in future to provide sustainable transport for those in the north of the Borough. Twinwoods would include a significant proportion of brownfield land and Colworth includes lower quality (grade 3) agricultural land and so would comply with the NPPF requirement to utilise brownfield land or lower quality agricultural land before high quality agricultural land. These sites would also support Bedford Town Centre.
Colworth was the site supported in the 2035 plan which was later reviewed. The A6 was not a considered sufficiently problematic to prevent this site being adopted so we find it hard to understand why the A6 is deemed such an insurmountable problem now.
Object
Local Plan 2040 Draft Plan - Strategy options and draft policies consultation
Representation ID: 6222
Received: 09/09/2021
Respondent: Peter Coles
There is a preferred option that Staploe Parish Council consider to be the most suitable strategy for Bedford Borough Council to employ when going forward to the next stage of the Local Plan process. As part of the preferred strategy, it is clear that should a new settlement be required in order to meet the Council’s Local Housing Needs Assessment (LHN), dated May 2021, then the proposed settlement of Little Barford is considered appropriate, and for the reasons set out in paragraph 3.17. The alternative site at land west of Wyboston (Dennybrook (site 977)) is considered the least preferred option and should be discounted as a sustainable location for development by Bedford Borough Council. The following comments and observations relate to the Call for Sites submission by Taylor Wimpey for a ‘new settlement’.
Under form ID: 977, submissions have been made for a new settlement covering around 750 Hectares of land, and providing between 7,500 – 10.150 dwellings (35 dph). BBC have identified the site as a potential ‘new settlement’ though providing around 2,500 new homes.
As previously noted under paragraph 3.17, the proposed site at Dennybrook (site 977) falls mostly within the Parish of Staploe which is very rural in character. Clearly, any significant development within the Parish would make a permanent change to the landscape and the setting of the small hamlets and rural nature in the locality. Such physical changes cannot be reversed, and the Council would need to be satisfied through a thorough review of the supporting documents to the site submissions that adequately address the impacts, and in terms of achieving sustainable development – in line with Paragraph 16 of the NPPF and section 39(2) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004.
Housing need has been identified through the Council’s LHN. Using the process set out in the Planning Practice Guidance “Housing and economic needs assessment” (MHCLG – updated December 2020) the minimum annual LHN figure is 1,305 dwellings per annum. This equates to 26,100 dwellings across the period 2020 – 2040. However, existing committed sites and windfall provide a figure of 13,000 new homes. This provides a figure of 13,100 additional dwellings over the plan period. It is noted that Bedford Borough Council have stated that the housing need is 12,500 as a minimum. Regardless which of the two figures are proposed, the strategy applied within paragraph 3.17 of these representations exceed the Council’s housing requirement and negates the need for Dennybrook (site 977) as a new settlement.
When looking at the spatial approach to locating new development, the proposed site at Dennybrook would be located within close proximity to St Neots, with a possible merging into Wyboston. Given the scale of the proposed development at Dennybrook, even at 2,500 dwellings, there would a potential coalescence to the existing settlement of St Neots. Spatially, this would be contrary to the Council’s adopted Local Plan which seeks to prevent coalescence of settlements. In addition, policy 37 of the Council’s adopted Local Plan makes clear that developments need to ‘Protect the landscape setting and contribute to maintaining the individual and distinct character, and separate identities of settlements by preventing coalescence…’. It should also be taken into consideration that St Neots is experiencing its own strategic growth with an eastern extension 3,265 dwelling and 20 Ha of employment land over the plan period. Therefore, a new settlement directly to the west of the existing settlement of 2,500 would significantly increase the size of St Neots and may effect delivery rates for housing due to competing sites.
The transport impacts are acutely felt for this proposed new settlement. It is clear that the proposed development at Dennybrook (site 977) would be a car reliant settlement. The proposal will not benefit from a choice of sustainable modes of transport as opposed to other developments, such as urban extensions and the proposed development at Little Barford. Little Barford offers a varied choice of sustainable modes of public transport, including the possible linkage to the East West rail station south of St Neots. It is anticipated that there will be limited employment associated with the Dennybrook (site 977) with commuting considered necessary to nearby employment areas, for example, south of St Neots, Bedford or Cambridge via train. This would be contrary to sustainability objectives identified by BBC, and contrary to paragraphs 73, 104, 105, 106, and 110 of the NPPF, not to mention existing policies within the adopted Local Plan, namely Policies 2S, 87, 88, and 90S. In addition, the Dennybrook site does not align with a strategic transport corridor growth strategy, including rail.
In highways terms, it has been identified previously that Parish of Staploe is rural in character, with most of the road network narrow and single track. The inclusion of 2,500 dwellings (or over 10,000 according to the site promoted) would require significant infrastructure interventions, including the substantial widening of existing roads and junctions, which would lead to an urbanised appearance it what is a tranquil and idyllic countryside setting. Bedford Borough Council confirm within their assessment of the site submissions, that junction or highway capacity issues are a ‘serious capacity constraint’.
These representations are supported by a Highways Technical Note which has reviewed the Transport Modelling undertaken by AECOM in support of the strategic options in the Draft Local Plan 2040. The Technical Note considers that the Transport Modelling is fundamentally flawed. In summary, no validation or calibration of the traffic model has been undertaken, leading to significant discrepancies. Furthermore, within the Transport Model documents, it is quoted that average departing trips are 20 to 25 vehicles. When looking at the development scenario with the transport model of 2,500 – 10,150 dwellings, and using a departure rate of 0.25 departure trip rate, this results in 625 to 2,538 departing trips all of which would be home based departure trips. The model assumes 5 loading zones which therefore means there could be 125 to 508 vehicles per loading zone. This is significantly higher than the 20 to 25 outbound vehicles used by the AECOM model, assuming they have loaded it per node. AECOM may argue that the reduction is due to sustainable modes of transport being used. However, it is made clear within paragraph 4.6 that the site offers very little in terms of alternative sustainable means of transport. Accordingly, the Transport Modelling by AECOM cannot be wholly relied upon.
The landscape setting for the Parish of Staploe is one of a rural character, containing small hamlets, interspersed agricultural buildings, small holdings and arable agricultural land. As mentioned above, the roads are narrow and winding, and contribute to the rural setting. This form of land extends from the A1 to the east to Church End (Colmworth) to the east, down to Colesden to the south, and up to Little Staughton Airfield to the north. The landscape character is depicted within the Council’s Landscape Character Assessment (LCA), updated October 2020. The wider Parish of Staploe falls within the Thurleigh Clay Farmland character area (1D). Within the ‘evaluation’ section at page 55 of the LCA it notes that potential future change could include Small scale development in villages which could lead to loss their distinctive character/ ‘Ends’; Road upgrades affecting rural road character; Suburbanisation of villages. This would suggest that even relatively small changes would affect the rural setting of the area. Moreover, the proposed landscape strategy for the area as identified within the LCA is to ‘enhance’ elements of the landscape. The introduction of 2,500 new dwellings would significantly and permanently erode the rural character of the Parish, contrary to Paragraphs 20, 153, 174, and 175 of the NPPF and policy 37 of the adopted Local Plan.
There are also several Grade II Listed Buildings located within the Parish of Staploe, and would be affected by the proposed development at Dennybrook (site 977). It is evident that the Council’s assessment to Call for Site states ‘The proposal has the potential to cause harm to heritage assets. This harm may range from low to high. There may be options to avoid, reduce or mitigate this harm and where sites have not been ruled out altogether for other reasons, further assessment will be undertaken to more fully explore impacts on significance and options for harm reduction and mitigation. This further assessment may ultimately lead to the conclusion that the site should not be allocated.’ It is assumed by the above comments that further assessments are required before the site can be considered further as an allocation. It is clear that the existing Listed Buildings are dispersed throughout the area of the proposed development, causing potential impacts to their setting.
A further point to consider is that most of the land covered by the Parish of Staploe is Grade 2 agricultural land as identified by the Agricultural Land Classification. Paragraph 174 (b) of the NPPF makes clear that planning policies should contribute to and enhance the natural and local environment by: ‘recognising the intrinsic character and beauty of the countryside, and the wider benefits from natural capital and ecosystem services – including the economic and other benefits of the best and most versatile agricultural land, and of trees and woodland…’. Grade 2 agricultural land is considered to be the best and most versatile agricultural land and would be applicable in this instance.
In addition to the above, the Sustainability Appraisal scoring for the proposed new settlement of Dennybrook (site 977) identifies it as scoring lower than Spatial Option 3a. this spatial option was effectively discounted at the ‘Issues and Options’ consultation stage.
Overall, the land west of Wyboston (Dennybrook) does not offer a truly sustainable form of development, and thereby contrary to policies contained within the NPPF and of the Council’s adopted Local Plan. Accordingly, the proposed new settlement should be discounted when considering sites for allocation going forward to the pre-submission draft Local Plan.
If Little Barford is deemed unsuitable our second preferred option would be a new settlement of 2,500 homes at Twinwoods or Colworth. The Parish Council believe that the problems on the A6 north of Bedford are going to need to be resolved anyway in order to support the housing development proposed in the 2030 plan and for residents to access the east west rail station in the centre of the town. We believe that development of a new settlement of up to 3,000 homes at Twinwoods (site 883) or Colworth (site 1002) could provide the infrastructure funding to support improvements to the A6 which have long been needed and provide residents with access to the east west rail station in Bedford. A northern parkway station could be considered in future to provide sustainable transport for those in the north of the Borough. Twinwoods would include a significant proportion of brownfield land and Colworth includes lower quality (grade 3) agricultural land and so would comply with the NPPF requirement to utilise brownfield land or lower quality agricultural land before high quality agricultural land. These sites would also support Bedford Town Centre. Colworth was the site supported in the 2035 plan which was later reviewed. The A6 was not a considered sufficiently problematic to prevent this site being adopted so we find it hard to understand why the A6 is deemed such an insurmountable problem now.
Object
Local Plan 2040 Draft Plan - Strategy options and draft policies consultation
Representation ID: 6323
Received: 10/09/2021
Respondent: Mr Paul Zwetsloot
There is a preferred option that Staploe Parish Council consider to be the most suitable strategy for Bedford Borough Council to employ when going forward to the next stage of the Local Plan process. As part of the preferred strategy, it is clear that should a new settlement be required in order to meet the Council’s Local Housing Needs Assessment (LHN), dated May 2021, then the proposed settlement of Little Barford is considered appropriate, and for the reasons set out in paragraph 3.17. The alternative site at land west of Wyboston (Dennybrook (site 977)) is considered the least preferred option and should be discounted as a sustainable location for development by Bedford Borough Council. The following comments and observations relate to the Call for Sites submission by Taylor Wimpey for a ‘new settlement’.
Under form ID: 977, submissions have been made for a new settlement covering around 750 Hectares of land, and providing between 7,500 – 10.150 dwellings (35 dph). BBC have identified the site as a potential ‘new settlement’ though providing around 2,500 new homes.
As previously noted under paragraph 3.17, the proposed site at Dennybrook (site 977) falls mostly within the Parish of Staploe which is very rural in character. Clearly, any significant development within the Parish would make a permanent change to the landscape and the setting of the small hamlets and rural nature in the locality. Such physical changes cannot be reversed, and the Council would need to be satisfied through a thorough review of the supporting documents to the site submissions that adequately address the impacts, and in terms of achieving sustainable development – in line with Paragraph 16 of the NPPF and section 39(2) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004.
Housing need has been identified through the Council’s LHN. Using the process set out in the Planning Practice Guidance “Housing and economic needs assessment” (MHCLG – updated December 2020) the minimum annual LHN figure is 1,305 dwellings per annum. This equates to 26,100 dwellings across the period 2020 – 2040. However, existing committed sites and windfall provide a figure of 13,000 new homes. This provides a figure of 13,100 additional dwellings over the plan period. It is noted that Bedford Borough Council have stated that the housing need is 12,500 as a minimum. Regardless which of the two figures are proposed, the strategy applied within paragraph 3.17 of these representations exceed the Council’s housing requirement and negates the need for Dennybrook (site 977) as a new settlement.
When looking at the spatial approach to locating new development, the proposed site at Dennybrook would be located within close proximity to St Neots, with a possible merging into Wyboston. Given the scale of the proposed development at Dennybrook, even at 2,500 dwellings, there would a potential coalescence to the existing settlement of St Neots. Spatially, this would be contrary to the Council’s adopted Local Plan which seeks to prevent coalescence of settlements. In addition, policy 37 of the Council’s adopted Local Plan makes clear that developments need to ‘Protect the landscape setting and contribute to maintaining the individual and distinct character, and separate identities of settlements by preventing coalescence…’. It should also be taken into consideration that St Neots is experiencing its own strategic growth with an eastern extension 3,265 dwelling and 20 Ha of employment land over the plan period. Therefore, a new settlement directly to the west of the existing settlement of 2,500 would significantly increase the size of St Neots and may effect delivery rates for housing due to competing sites.
The transport impacts are acutely felt for this proposed new settlement. It is clear that the proposed development at Dennybrook (site 977) would be a car reliant settlement. The proposal will not benefit from a choice of sustainable modes of transport as opposed to other developments, such as urban extensions and the proposed development at Little Barford. Little Barford offers a varied choice of sustainable modes of public transport, including the possible linkage to the East West rail station south of St Neots. It is anticipated that there will be limited employment associated with the Dennybrook (site 977) with commuting considered necessary to nearby employment areas, for example, south of St Neots, Bedford or Cambridge via train. This would be contrary to sustainability objectives identified by BBC, and contrary to paragraphs 73, 104, 105, 106, and 110 of the NPPF, not to mention existing policies within the adopted Local Plan, namely Policies 2S, 87, 88, and 90S. In addition, the Dennybrook site does not align with a strategic transport corridor growth strategy, including rail.
In highways terms, it has been identified previously that Parish of Staploe is rural in character, with most of the road network narrow and single track. The inclusion of 2,500 dwellings (or over 10,000 according to the site promoted) would require significant infrastructure interventions, including the substantial widening of existing roads and junctions, which would lead to an urbanised appearance it what is a tranquil and idyllic countryside setting.
Bedford Borough Council confirm within their assessment of the site submissions, that junction or highway capacity issues are a ‘serious capacity constraint’.
These representations are supported by a Highways Technical Note which has reviewed the Transport Modelling undertaken by AECOM in support of the strategic options in the Draft Local Plan 2040. The Technical Note considers that the Transport Modelling is fundamentally flawed. In summary, no validation or calibration of the traffic model has been undertaken, leading to significant discrepancies. Furthermore, within the Transport Model documents, it is quoted that average departing trips are 20 to 25 vehicles. When looking at the development scenario with the transport model of 2,500 – 10,150 dwellings, and using a departure rate of 0.25 departure trip rate, this results in 625 to 2,538 departing trips all of which would be home based departure trips. The model assumes 5 loading zones which therefore means there could be 125 to 508 vehicles per loading zone. This is significantly higher than the 20 to 25 outbound vehicles used by the AECOM model, assuming they have loaded it per node. AECOM may argue that the reduction is due to sustainable modes of transport being used. However, it is made clear within paragraph 4.6 that the site offers very little in terms of alternative sustainable means of transport. Accordingly, the Transport Modelling by AECOM cannot be wholly relied upon.
The landscape setting for the Parish of Staploe is one of a rural character, containing small hamlets, interspersed agricultural buildings, small holdings and arable agricultural land. As mentioned above, the roads are narrow and winding, and contribute to the rural setting. This form of land extends from the A1 to the east to Church End (Colmworth) to the east, down to Colesden to the south, and up to Little Staughton Airfield to the north. The landscape character is depicted within the Council’s Landscape Character Assessment (LCA), updated October 2020. The wider Parish of Staploe falls within the Thurleigh Clay Farmland character area (1D). Within the ‘evaluation’ section at page 55 of the LCA it notes that potential future change could include Small scale development in villages which could lead to loss their distinctive character/ ‘Ends’; Road upgrades affecting rural road character; Suburbanisation of villages.
This would suggest that even relatively small changes would affect the rural setting of the area. Moreover, the proposed landscape strategy for the area as identified within the LCA is to ‘enhance’ elements of the landscape. The introduction of 2,500 new dwellings would significantly and permanently erode the rural character of the Parish, contrary to Paragraphs 20, 153, 174, and 175 of the NPPF and policy 37 of the adopted Local Plan.
There are also several Grade II Listed Buildings located within the Parish of Staploe, and would be affected by the proposed development at Dennybrook (site 977). It is evident that the Council’s assessment to Call for Site states ‘The proposal has the potential to cause harm to heritage assets. This harm may range from low to high. There may be options to avoid, reduce or mitigate this harm and where sites have not been ruled out altogether for other reasons, further assessment will be undertaken to more fully explore impacts on significance and options for harm reduction and mitigation. This further assessment may ultimately lead to the conclusion that the site should not be allocated.’ It is assumed by the above comments that further assessments are required before the site can be considered further as an allocation. It is clear that the existing Listed Buildings are dispersed throughout the area of the proposed development, causing potential impacts to their setting.
A further point to consider is that most of the land covered by the Parish of Staploe is Grade 2 agricultural land as identified by the Agricultural Land Classification. Paragraph 174 (b) of the NPPF makes clear that planning policies should contribute to and enhance the natural and local environment by: ‘recognising the intrinsic character and beauty of the countryside, and the wider benefits from natural capital and ecosystem services – including the economic and other benefits of the best and most versatile agricultural land, and of trees and woodland…’. Grade 2 agricultural land is considered to be the best and most versatile agricultural land and would be applicable in this instance.
In addition to the above, the Sustainability Appraisal scoring for the proposed new settlement of Dennybrook (site 977) identifies it as scoring lower than Spatial Option 3a. this spatial option was effectively discounted at the ‘Issues and Options’ consultation stage.
Overall, the land west of Wyboston (Dennybrook) does not offer a truly sustainable form of development, and thereby contrary to policies contained within the NPPF and of the Council’s adopted Local Plan. Accordingly, the proposed new settlement should be discounted when considering sites for allocation going forward to the pre-submission draft Local Plan.
If Little Barford is deemed unsuitable our second preferred option would be a new settlement of 2,500 homes at Twinwoods or Colworth. The Parish Council believe that the problems on the A6 north of Bedford are going to need to be resolved anyway in order to support the housing development proposed in the 2030 plan and for residents to access the east west rail station in the centre of the town. We believe that development of a new settlement of up to 3,000 homes at Twinwoods (site 883) or Colworth (site 1002) could provide the infrastructure funding to support improvements to the A6 which have long been needed and provide residents with access to the east west rail station in Bedford. A northern parkway station could be considered in future to provide sustainable transport for those in the north of the Borough. Twinwoods would include a significant proportion of brownfield land and Colworth includes lower quality (grade 3) agricultural land and so would comply with the NPPF requirement to utilise brownfield land or lower quality agricultural land before high quality agricultural land. These sites would also support Bedford Town Centre.
Colworth was the site supported in the 2035 plan which was later reviewed. The A6 was not a considered sufficiently problematic to prevent this site being adopted so we find it hard to understand why the A6 is deemed such an insurmountable problem now.
Support
Local Plan 2040 Draft Plan - Strategy options and draft policies consultation
Representation ID: 6451
Received: 13/09/2021
Respondent: Ms Donna Thompson
There is a preferred option that Staploe Parish Council consider to be the most suitable strategy for Bedford Borough Council to employ when going forward to the next stage of the Local Plan process. As part of the preferred strategy, it is clear that should a new settlement be required in order to meet the Council’s Local Housing Needs Assessment (LHN), dated May 2021, then the proposed settlement of Little Barford is considered appropriate, and for the reasons set out in paragraph 3.17. The alternative site at land west of Wyboston (Dennybrook (site 977)) is considered the least preferred option and should be discounted as a sustainable location for development by Bedford Borough Council. The following comments and observations relate to the Call for Sites submission by Taylor Wimpey for a ‘new settlement’.There is a preferred option that Staploe Parish Council consider to be the most suitable strategy for Bedford Borough Council to employ when going forward to the next stage of the Local Plan process. As part of the preferred strategy, it is clear that should a new settlement be required in order to meet the Council’s Local Housing Needs Assessment (LHN), dated May 2021, then the proposed settlement of Little Barford is considered appropriate, and for the reasons set out in paragraph 3.17. The alternative site at land west of Wyboston (Dennybrook (site 977)) is considered the least preferred option and should be discounted as a sustainable location for development by Bedford Borough Council. The following comments and observations relate to the Call for Sites submission by Taylor Wimpey for a ‘new settlement’.
Object
Local Plan 2040 Draft Plan - Strategy options and draft policies consultation
Representation ID: 6453
Received: 13/09/2021
Respondent: Ms Donna Thompson
Under form ID: 977, submissions have been made for a new settlement covering around 750 Hectares of land, and providing between 7,500 – 10.150 dwellings (35 dph). BBC have identified the site as a potential ‘new settlement’ though providing around 2,500 new homes.
As previously noted under paragraph 3.17, the proposed site at Dennybrook (site 977) falls mostly within the Parish of Staploe which is very rural in character. Clearly, any significant development within the Parish would make a permanent change to the landscape and the setting of the small hamlets and rural nature in the locality. Such physical changes cannot be reversed, and the Council would need to be satisfied through a thorough review of the supporting documents to the site submissions that adequately address the impacts, and in terms of achieving sustainable development – in line with Paragraph 16 of the NPPF and section 39(2) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004.
Housing need has been identified through the Council’s LHN. Using the process set out in the Planning Practice Guidance “Housing and economic needs assessment” (MHCLG – updated December 2020) the minimum annual LHN figure is 1,305 dwellings per annum. This equates to 26,100 dwellings across the period 2020 – 2040. However, existing committed sites and windfall provide a figure of 13,000 new homes. This provides a figure of 13,100 additional dwellings over the plan period. It is noted that Bedford Borough Council have stated that the housing need is 12,500 as a minimum. Regardless which of the two figures are proposed, the strategy applied within paragraph 3.17 of these representations exceed the Council’s housing requirement and negates the need for Dennybrook (site 977) as a new settlement.
When looking at the spatial approach to locating new development, the proposed site at Dennybrook would be located within close proximity to St Neots, with a possible merging into Wyboston. Given the scale of the proposed development at Dennybrook, even at 2,500 dwellings, there would a potential coalescence to the existing settlement of St Neots. Spatially, this would be contrary to the Council’s adopted Local Plan which seeks to prevent coalescence of settlements. In addition, policy 37 of the Council’s adopted Local Plan makes clear that developments need to ‘Protect the landscape setting and contribute to maintaining the individual and distinct character, and separate identities of settlements by preventing coalescence…’. It should also be taken into consideration that St Neots is experiencing its own strategic growth with an eastern extension 3,265 dwelling and 20 Ha of employment land over the plan period. Therefore, a new settlement directly to the west of the existing settlement of 2,500 would significantly increase the size of St Neots and may effect delivery rates for housing due to competing sites.
The transport impacts are acutely felt for this proposed new settlement. It is clear that the proposed development at Dennybrook (site 977) would be a car reliant settlement. The proposal will not benefit from a choice of sustainable modes of transport as opposed to other developments, such as urban extensions and the proposed development at Little Barford. Little Barford offers a varied choice of sustainable modes of public transport, including the possible linkage to the East West rail station south of St Neots. It is anticipated that there will be limited employment associated with the Dennybrook (site 977) with commuting considered necessary to nearby employment areas, for example, south of St Neots, Bedford or Cambridge via train. This would be contrary to sustainability objectives identified by BBC, and contrary to paragraphs 73, 104, 105, 106, and 110 of the NPPF, not to mention existing policies within the adopted Local Plan, namely Policies 2S, 87, 88, and 90S. In addition, the Dennybrook site does not align with a strategic transport corridor growth strategy, including rail.
In highways terms, it has been identified previously that Parish of Staploe is rural in character, with most of the road network narrow and single track. The inclusion of 2,500 dwellings (or over 10,000 according to the site promoted) would require significant infrastructure interventions, including the substantial widening of existing roads and junctions, which would lead to an urbanised appearance it what is a tranquil and idyllic countryside setting. Bedford Borough Council confirm within their assessment of the site submissions, that junction or highway capacity issues are a ‘serious capacity constraint’.
These representations are supported by a Highways Technical Note which has reviewed the Transport Modelling undertaken by AECOM in support of the strategic options in the Draft Local Plan 2040. The Technical Note considers that the Transport Modelling is fundamentally flawed. In summary, no validation or calibration of the traffic model has been undertaken, leading to significant discrepancies. Furthermore, within the Transport Model documents, it is quoted that average departing trips are 20 to 25 vehicles. When looking at the development scenario with the transport model of 2,500 – 10,150 dwellings, and using a departure rate of 0.25 departure trip rate, this results in 625 to 2,538 departing trips all of which would be home based departure trips. The model assumes 5 loading zones which therefore means there could be 125 to 508 vehicles per loading zone. This is significantly higher than the 20 to 25 outbound vehicles used by the AECOM model, assuming they have loaded it per node. AECOM may argue that the reduction is due to sustainable modes of transport being used. However, it is made clear within paragraph 4.6 that the site offers very little in terms of alternative sustainable means of transport. Accordingly, the Transport Modelling by AECOM cannot be wholly relied upon.
The landscape setting for the Parish of Staploe is one of a rural character, containing small hamlets, interspersed agricultural buildings, small holdings and arable agricultural land. As mentioned above, the roads are narrow and winding, and contribute to the rural setting. This form of land extends from the A1 to the east to Church End (Colmworth) to the east, down to Colesden to the south, and up to Little Staughton Airfield to the north. The landscape character is depicted within the Council’s Landscape Character Assessment (LCA), updated October 2020. The wider Parish of Staploe falls within the Thurleigh Clay Farmland character area (1D). Within the ‘evaluation’ section at page 55 of the LCA it notes that potential future change could include Small scale development in villages which could lead to loss their distinctive character/ ‘Ends’; Road upgrades affecting rural road character; Suburbanisation of villages. This would suggest that even relatively small changes would affect the rural setting of the area. Moreover, the proposed landscape strategy for the area as identified within the LCA is to ‘enhance’ elements of the landscape. The introduction of 2,500 new dwellings would significantly and permanently erode the rural character of the Parish, contrary to Paragraphs 20, 153, 174, and 175 of the NPPF and policy 37 of the adopted Local Plan.
There are also several Grade II Listed Buildings located within the Parish of Staploe, and would be affected by the proposed development at Dennybrook (site 977). It is evident that the Council’s assessment to Call for Site states ‘The proposal has the potential to cause harm to heritage assets. This harm may range from low to high. There may be options to avoid, reduce or mitigate this harm and where sites have not been ruled out altogether for other reasons, further assessment will be undertaken to more fully explore impacts on significance and options for harm reduction and mitigation. This further assessment may ultimately lead to the conclusion that the site should not be allocated.’ It is assumed by the above comments that further assessments are required before the site can be considered further as an allocation. It is clear that the existing Listed Buildings are dispersed throughout the area of the proposed development, causing potential impacts to their setting.
A further point to consider is that most of the land covered by the Parish of Staploe is Grade 2 agricultural land as identified by the Agricultural Land Classification. Paragraph 174 (b) of the NPPF makes clear that planning policies should contribute to and enhance the natural and local environment by: ‘recognising the intrinsic character and beauty of the countryside, and the wider benefits from natural capital and ecosystem services – including the economic and other benefits of the best and most versatile agricultural land, and of trees and woodland…’. Grade 2 agricultural land is considered to be the best and most versatile agricultural land and would be applicable in this instance.
In addition to the above, the Sustainability Appraisal scoring for the proposed new settlement of Dennybrook (site 977) identifies it as scoring lower than Spatial Option 3a. this spatial option was effectively discounted at the ‘Issues and Options’ consultation stage.
Overall, the land west of Wyboston (Dennybrook) does not offer a truly sustainable form of development, and thereby contrary to policies contained within the NPPF and of the Council’s adopted Local Plan. Accordingly, the proposed new settlement should be discounted when considering sites for allocation going forward to the pre-submission draft Local Plan.
If Little Barford is deemed unsuitable our second preferred option would be a new settlement of 2,500 homes at Twinwoods or Colworth. The Parish Council believe that the problems on the A6 north of Bedford are going to need to be resolved anyway in order to support the housing development proposed in the 2030 plan and for residents to access the east west rail station in the centre of the town. We believe that development of a new settlement of up to 3,000 homes at Twinwoods (site 883) or Colworth (site 1002) could provide the infrastructure funding to support improvements to the A6 which have long been needed and provide residents with access to the east west rail station in Bedford. A northern parkway station could be considered in future to provide sustainable transport for those in the north of the Borough. Twinwoods would include a significant proportion of brownfield land and Colworth includes lower quality (grade 3) agricultural land and so would comply with the NPPF requirement to utilise brownfield land or lower quality agricultural land before high quality agricultural land. These sites would also support Bedford Town Centre. Colworth was the site supported in the 2035 plan which was later reviewed. The A6 was not a considered sufficiently problematic to prevent this site being adopted so we find it hard to understand why the A6 is deemed such an insurmountable problem now.
Object
Local Plan 2040 Draft Plan - Strategy options and draft policies consultation
Representation ID: 6470
Received: 13/09/2021
Respondent: Mr Steven Kent
There is a preferred option that I consider to be the most suitable strategy for Bedford Borough Council to employ when going forward to the next stage of the Local Plan process. As part of the preferred strategy, it is clear that should a new settlement be required in order to meet the Council’s Local Housing Needs Assessment (LHN), dated May 2021, then the proposed settlement of Little Barford is considered appropriate, and for the reasons set out in paragraph 3.17. The alternative site at land west of Wyboston (Dennybrook (site 977)) is considered the least preferred option and should be discounted as a sustainable location for development by Bedford Borough Council. The following comments and observations relate to the Call for Sites submission by Taylor Wimpey for a ‘new settlement’.
Under form ID: 977, submissions have been made for a new settlement covering around 750 Hectares of land, and providing between 7,500 – 10.150 dwellings (35 dph). BBC have identified the site as a potential ‘new settlement’ though providing around 2,500 new homes.
As previously noted under paragraph 3.17, the proposed site at Dennybrook (site 977) falls mostly within the Parish of Staploe which is very rural in character. Clearly, any significant development within the Parish would make a permanent change to the landscape and the setting of the small hamlets and rural nature in the locality. Such physical changes cannot be reversed, and the Council would need to be satisfied through a thorough review of the supporting documents to the site submissions that adequately address the impacts, and in terms of achieving sustainable development – in line with Paragraph 16 of the NPPF and section 39(2) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004.
Housing need has been identified through the Council’s LHN. Using the process set out in the Planning Practice Guidance “Housing and economic needs assessment” (MHCLG – updated December 2020) the minimum annual LHN figure is 1,305 dwellings per annum. This equates to 26,100 dwellings across the period 2020 – 2040. However, existing committed sites and windfall provide a figure of 13,000 new homes. This provides a figure of 13,100 additional dwellings over the plan period. It is noted that Bedford Borough Council have stated that the housing need is 12,500 as a minimum. Regardless which of the two figures are proposed, the strategy applied within paragraph 3.17 of these representations exceed the Council’s housing requirement and negates the need for Dennybrook (site 977) as a new settlement.
When looking at the spatial approach to locating new development, the proposed site at Dennybrook would be located within close proximity to St Neots, with a possible merging into Wyboston. Given the scale of the proposed development at Dennybrook, even at 2,500 dwellings, there would a potential coalescence to the existing settlement of St Neots. Spatially, this would be contrary to the Council’s adopted Local Plan which
pg. 33 of 23
seeks to prevent coalescence of settlements. In addition, policy 37 of the Council’s adopted Local Plan makes clear that developments need to ‘Protect the landscape setting and contribute to maintaining the individual and distinct character, and separate identities of settlements by preventing coalescence…’. It should also be taken into consideration that St Neots is experiencing its own strategic growth with an eastern extension 3,265 dwelling and 20 Ha of employment land over the plan period. Therefore, a new settlement directly to the west of the existing settlement of 2,500 would significantly increase the size of St Neots and may effect delivery rates for housing due to competing sites.
The transport impacts are acutely felt for this proposed new settlement. It is clear that the proposed development at Dennybrook (site 977) would be a car reliant settlement. The proposal will not benefit from a choice of sustainable modes of transport as opposed to other developments, such as urban extensions and the proposed development at Little Barford. Little Barford offers a varied choice of sustainable modes of public transport, including the possible linkage to the East West rail station south of St Neots. It is anticipated that there will be limited employment associated with the Dennybrook (site 977) with commuting considered necessary to nearby employment areas, for example, south of St Neots, Bedford or Cambridge via train. This would be contrary to sustainability objectives identified by BBC, and contrary to paragraphs 73, 104, 105, 106, and 110 of the NPPF, not to mention existing policies within the adopted Local Plan, namely Policies 2S, 87, 88, and 90S. In addition, the Dennybrook site does not align with a strategic transport corridor growth strategy, including rail.
In highways terms, it has been identified previously that Parish of Staploe is rural in character, with most of the road network narrow and single track. The inclusion of 2,500 dwellings (or over 10,000 according to the site promoted) would require significant infrastructure interventions, including the substantial widening of existing roads and junctions, which would lead to an urbanised appearance it what is a tranquil and idyllic countryside setting. Bedford Borough Council confirm within their assessment of the site submissions, that junction or highway capacity issues are a ‘serious capacity constraint’.
These representations are supported by a Highways Technical Note which has reviewed the Transport Modelling undertaken by AECOM in support of the strategic options in the Draft Local Plan 2040. The Technical Note considers that the Transport Modelling is fundamentally flawed. In summary, no validation or calibration of the traffic model has been undertaken, leading to significant discrepancies. Furthermore, within the Transport Model documents, it is quoted that average departing trips are 20 to 25 vehicles. When looking at the development scenario with the transport model of 2,500 – 10,150 dwellings, and using a departure rate of 0.25 departure trip rate, this results in 625 to 2,538 departing trips all of which would be home based departure trips. The model assumes 5 loading zones which therefore means there could be 125 to 508 vehicles per loading zone. This is significantly higher than the 20 to 25 outbound vehicles used by the AECOM model, assuming they have loaded it per node. AECOM may argue that the reduction is due to sustainable modes of transport being used. However, it is made clear within paragraph 4.6 that the site offers very little in terms of alternative sustainable means of transport. Accordingly, the Transport Modelling by AECOM cannot be wholly relied upon.
The landscape setting for the Parish of Staploe is one of a rural character, containing small hamlets, interspersed agricultural buildings, small holdings and arable agricultural land. As mentioned above, the roads are narrow and winding, and contribute to the rural setting. This form of land extends from the A1 to the east to Church End (Colmworth) to the east, down to Colesden to the south, and up to Little Staughton Airfield to the north. The landscape character is depicted within the Council’s Landscape Character Assessment (LCA), updated October 2020. The wider Parish of Staploe falls within the Thurleigh Clay Farmland character area (1D). Within the ‘evaluation’ section at page 55 of the LCA it notes that potential future change could include Small scale development in villages which could lead to loss their distinctive character/ ‘Ends’; Road upgrades affecting rural road character; Suburbanisation of villages. This would suggest that even relatively small changes would affect the rural setting of the area. Moreover, the proposed landscape strategy for the area as identified within the LCA is to ‘enhance’ elements of the landscape. The introduction of 2,500 new dwellings would significantly and permanently erode the rural character of the Parish, contrary to Paragraphs 20, 153, 174, and 175 of the NPPF and policy 37 of the adopted Local Plan.
There are also several Grade II Listed Buildings located within the Parish of Staploe, and would be affected by the proposed development at Dennybrook (site 977). It is evident that the Council’s assessment to Call for Site states ‘The proposal has the potential to cause harm to heritage assets. This harm may range from low to high. There may be options to avoid, reduce or mitigate this harm and where sites have not been ruled out altogether for other reasons, further assessment will be undertaken to more fully explore impacts on significance and options for harm reduction and mitigation. This further assessment may ultimately lead
to the conclusion that the site should not be allocated.’ It is assumed by the above comments that further assessments are required before the site can be considered further as an allocation. It is clear that the existing Listed Buildings are dispersed throughout the area of the proposed development, causing potential impacts to their setting.
A further point to consider is that most of the land covered by the Parish of Staploe is Grade 2 agricultural land as identified by the Agricultural Land Classification. Paragraph 174 (b) of the NPPF makes clear that planning policies should contribute to and enhance the natural and local environment by: ‘recognising the intrinsic character and beauty of the countryside, and the wider benefits from natural capital and ecosystem services – including the economic and other benefits of the best and most versatile agricultural land, and of trees and woodland…’. Grade 2 agricultural land is considered to be the best and most versatile agricultural land and would be applicable in this instance.
In addition to the above, the Sustainability Appraisal scoring for the proposed new settlement of Dennybrook (site 977) identifies it as scoring lower than Spatial Option 3a. this spatial option was effectively discounted at the ‘Issues and Options’ consultation stage.
Overall, the land west of Wyboston (Dennybrook) does not offer a truly sustainable form of development, and thereby contrary to policies contained within the NPPF and of the Council’s adopted Local Plan. Accordingly, the proposed new settlement should be discounted when considering sites for allocation going forward to the pre-submission draft Local Plan.
If Little Barford is deemed unsuitable our second preferred option would be a new settlement of 2,500 homes at Twinwoods or Colworth. The Parish Council believe that the problems on the A6 north of Bedford are going to need to be resolved anyway in order to support the housing development proposed in the 2030 plan and for residents to access the east west rail station in the centre of the town. We believe that development of a new settlement of up to 3,000 homes at Twinwoods (site 883) or Colworth (site 1002) could provide the infrastructure funding to support improvements to the A6 which have long been needed and provide residents with access to the east west rail station in Bedford. A northern parkway station could be considered in future to provide sustainable transport for those in the north of the Borough. Twinwoods would include a significant proportion of brownfield land and Colworth includes lower quality (grade 3) agricultural land and so would comply with the NPPF requirement to utilise brownfield land or lower quality agricultural land before high quality agricultural land. These sites would also support Bedford Town Centre. Colworth was the site supported in the 2035 plan which was later reviewed. The A6 was not a considered sufficiently problematic to prevent this site being adopted so we find it hard to understand why the A6 is deemed such an insurmountable problem now.
Object
Local Plan 2040 Draft Plan - Strategy options and draft policies consultation
Representation ID: 6554
Received: 13/09/2021
Respondent: Mrs Susan Trolley
There is a preferred option that Staploe Parish Council consider to be the most suitable strategy for Bedford Borough Council to employ when going forward to the next stage of the Local Plan process. As part of the preferred strategy, it is clear that should a new settlement be required in order to meet the Council’s Local Housing Needs Assessment (LHN), dated May 2021, then the proposed settlement of Little Barford is considered appropriate, and for the reasons set out in paragraph 3.17. The alternative site at land west of Wyboston (Dennybrook (site 977)) is considered the least preferred option and should be discounted as a sustainable location for development by Bedford Borough Council. The following comments and observations relate to the Call for Sites submission by Taylor Wimpey for a ‘new settlement’.
Under form ID: 977, submissions have been made for a new settlement covering around 750 Hectares of land, and providing between 7,500 – 10.150 dwellings (35 dph). BBC have identified the site as a potential ‘new settlement’ though providing around 2,500 new homes.
As previously noted under paragraph 3.17, the proposed site at Dennybrook (site 977) falls mostly within the Parish of Staploe which is very rural in character. Clearly, any significant development within the Parish would make a permanent change to the landscape and the setting of the small hamlets and rural nature in the locality. Such physical changes cannot be reversed, and the Council would need to be satisfied through a thorough review of the supporting documents to the site submissions that adequately address the impacts, and in terms of achieving sustainable development – in line with Paragraph 16 of the NPPF and section 39(2) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004.
Housing need has been identified through the Council’s LHN. Using the process set out in the Planning Practice Guidance “Housing and economic needs assessment” (MHCLG – updated December 2020) the minimum annual LHN figure is 1,305 dwellings per annum. This equates to 26,100 dwellings across the period 2020 – 2040. However, existing committed sites and windfall provide a figure of 13,000 new homes. This provides a figure of 13,100 additional dwellings over the plan period. It is noted that Bedford Borough Council have stated that the housing need is 12,500 as a minimum. Regardless which of the two figures are proposed, the strategy applied within paragraph 3.17 of these representations exceed the Council’s housing requirement and negates the need for Dennybrook (site 977) as a new settlement.
When looking at the spatial approach to locating new development, the proposed site at Dennybrook would be located within close proximity to St Neots, with a possible merging into Wyboston. Given the scale of the proposed development at Dennybrook, even at 2,500 dwellings, there would a potential coalescence to the existing settlement of St Neots. Spatially, this would be contrary to the Council’s adopted Local Plan which seeks to prevent coalescence of settlements. In addition, policy 37 of the Council’s adopted Local Plan makes clear that developments need to ‘Protect the landscape setting and contribute to maintaining the individual and distinct character, and separate identities of settlements by preventing coalescence…’. It should also be taken into consideration that St Neots is experiencing its own strategic growth with an eastern extension 3,265 dwelling and 20 Ha of employment land over the plan period. Therefore, a new settlement directly to the west of the existing settlement of 2,500 would significantly increase the size of St Neots and may effect delivery rates for housing due to competing sites.
The transport impacts are acutely felt for this proposed new settlement. It is clear that the proposed development at Dennybrook (site 977) would be a car reliant settlement. The proposal will not benefit from a choice of sustainable modes of transport as opposed to other developments, such as urban extensions and the proposed development at Little Barford. Little Barford offers a varied choice of sustainable modes of public transport, including the possible linkage to the East West rail station south of St Neots. It is anticipated that there will be limited employment associated with the Dennybrook (site 977) with commuting considered necessary to nearby employment areas, for example, south of St Neots, Bedford or Cambridge via train. This would be contrary to sustainability objectives identified by BBC, and contrary to paragraphs 73, 104, 105, 106, and 110 of the NPPF, not to mention existing policies within the adopted Local Plan, namely Policies 2S, 87, 88, and 90S. In addition, the Dennybrook site does not align with a strategic transport corridor growth strategy, including rail.
In highways terms, it has been identified previously that Parish of Staploe is rural in character, with most of the road network narrow and single track. The inclusion of 2,500 dwellings (or over 10,000 according to the site promoted) would require significant infrastructure interventions, including the substantial widening of existing roads and junctions, which would lead to an urbanised appearance it what is a tranquil and idyllic countryside setting. Bedford Borough Council confirm within their assessment of the site submissions, that junction or highway capacity issues are a ‘serious capacity constraint’.
These representations are supported by a Highways Technical Note which has reviewed the Transport Modelling undertaken by AECOM in support of the strategic options in the Draft Local Plan 2040. The Technical Note considers that the Transport Modelling is fundamentally flawed. In summary, no validation or calibration of the traffic model has been undertaken, leading to significant discrepancies. Furthermore, within the Transport Model documents, it is quoted that average departing trips are 20 to 25 vehicles. When looking at the development scenario with the transport model of 2,500 – 10,150 dwellings, and using a departure rate of 0.25 departure trip rate, this results in 625 to 2,538 departing trips all of which would be home based departure trips. The model assumes 5 loading zones which therefore means there could be 125 to 508 vehicles per loading zone. This is significantly higher than the 20 to 25 outbound vehicles used by the AECOM model, assuming they have loaded it per node. AECOM may argue that the reduction is due to sustainable modes of transport being used. However, it is made clear within paragraph 4.6 that the site offers very little in terms of alternative sustainable means of transport. Accordingly, the Transport Modelling by AECOM cannot be wholly relied upon.
The landscape setting for the Parish of Staploe is one of a rural character, containing small hamlets, interspersed agricultural buildings, small holdings and arable agricultural land. As mentioned above, the roads are narrow and winding, and contribute to the rural setting. This form of land extends from the A1 to the east to Church End (Colmworth) to the east, down to Colesden to the south, and up to Little Staughton Airfield to the north. The landscape character is depicted within the Council’s Landscape Character Assessment (LCA), updated October 2020. The wider Parish of Staploe falls within the Thurleigh Clay Farmland character area (1D). Within the ‘evaluation’ section at page 55 of the LCA it notes that potential future change could include Small scale development in villages which could lead to loss their distinctive character/ ‘Ends’; Road upgrades affecting rural road character; Suburbanisation of villages. This would suggest that even relatively small changes would affect the rural setting of the area. Moreover, the proposed landscape strategy for the area as identified within the LCA is to ‘enhance’ elements of the landscape. The introduction of 2,500 new dwellings would significantly and permanently erode the rural character of the Parish, contrary to Paragraphs 20, 153, 174, and 175 of the NPPF and policy 37 of the adopted Local Plan.
There are also several Grade II Listed Buildings located within the Parish of Staploe, and would be affected by the proposed development at Dennybrook (site 977). It is evident that the Council’s assessment to Call for Site states ‘The proposal has the potential to cause harm to heritage assets. This harm may range from low to high. There may be options to avoid, reduce or mitigate this harm and where sites have not been ruled out altogether for other reasons, further assessment will be undertaken to more fully explore impacts on significance and options for harm reduction and mitigation. This further assessment may ultimately lead to the conclusion that the site should not be allocated.’ It is assumed by the above comments that further assessments are required before the site can be considered further as an allocation. It is clear that the existing Listed Buildings are dispersed throughout the area of the proposed development, causing potential impacts to their setting.
A further point to consider is that most of the land covered by the Parish of Staploe is Grade 2 agricultural land as identified by the Agricultural Land Classification. Paragraph 174 (b) of the NPPF makes clear that planning policies should contribute to and enhance the natural and local environment by: ‘recognising the intrinsic character and beauty of the countryside, and the wider benefits from natural capital and ecosystem services – including the economic and other benefits of the best and most versatile agricultural land, and of trees and woodland…’. Grade 2 agricultural land is considered to be the best and most versatile agricultural land and would be applicable in this instance.
In addition to the above, the Sustainability Appraisal scoring for the proposed new settlement of Dennybrook (site 977) identifies it as scoring lower than Spatial Option 3a. this spatial option was effectively discounted at the ‘Issues and Options’ consultation stage.
Overall, the land west of Wyboston (Dennybrook) does not offer a truly sustainable form of development, and thereby contrary to policies contained within the NPPF and of the Council’s adopted Local Plan. Accordingly, the proposed new settlement should be discounted when considering sites for allocation going forward to the pre-submission draft Local Plan.
If Little Barford is deemed unsuitable our second preferred option would be a new settlement of 2,500 homes at Twinwoods or Colworth. The Parish Council believe that the problems on the A6 north of Bedford are going to need to be resolved anyway in order to support the housing development proposed in the 2030 plan and for residents to access the east west rail station in the centre of the town. We believe that development of a new settlement of up to 3,000 homes at Twinwoods (site 883) or Colworth (site 1002) could provide the infrastructure funding to support improvements to the A6 which have long been needed and provide residents with access to the east west rail station in Bedford. A northern parkway station could be considered in future to provide sustainable transport for those in the north of the Borough. Twinwoods would include a significant proportion of brownfield land and Colworth includes lower quality (grade 3) agricultural land and so would comply with the NPPF requirement to utilise brownfield land or lower quality agricultural land before high quality agricultural land. These sites would also support Bedford Town Centre. Colworth was the site supported in the 2035 plan which was later reviewed. The A6 was not a considered sufficiently problematic to prevent this site being adopted so we find it hard to understand why the A6 is deemed such an insurmountable problem now.