Comment

Representation ID: 9623

Received: 26/07/2022

Respondent: Clapham Parish Council

CPC has no objection to the Vision and Objectives of the proposed local plan noting that it aims for the requisite infrastructure is in place when the proposed growth is brought forward for delivery. To that end, of the total allocation of 27,100 dwellings 1700 dwellings are to be delivered post 2030. This is sensible.

The required supporting infrastructure is set out in the Infrastructure Delivery Plan. This includes the completion of East-West Rail (EWR) by 2030. This is important to note as it provides for the required modal shift to give resilience to the highway network. However, CPC has some concerns that given the complexity of the project EWR, it will not be completed by 2030.
EWR is at an early stage of development and has not commenced its statutory process and which through examination may significantly change its form, location and deliverability. Given this uncertainty, CPC has significant concerns in allocating housing and employment to sites which may ultimately not be facilitated by EWR in a timely manner.

CPC therefore considers the plan is not legally sound, credible or flexible. To make the plan sound, CPC considers the policy should have a fallback position, so if EWR does not come forward, is delayed, or there is a change in routeing, then either the allocated sites are not implemented until it is in place, or sufficient alternative infrastructure or other sustainable measures are identified to support the development sites.

CPC consider not taking this action, will potentially result in intolerable levels of highway congestion and delay to movements around Bedford, including to the residents of Clapham wishing to access Bedford or the A421 corridor.