2.1

Object

Representation ID: 5809

Received: 07/09/2021

Respondent: Mr Glen Moore

Agent: Phillips Planning Services

The Vision sets out general planning aims, and we have no particular comments to make on the Borough becoming more sustainable, the delivery of good design, or improved transport options etc. However, it is surprising that the Vision does not make any stronger statements on growth, where it will be located, or make a commitment to delivering the required number of new dwellings, and employment land as identified in the remainder of the Draft Plan.
Given the emerging focus on the delivery of the Oxford - Cambridge Arc as identified in the document, and the current consultation on priorities for the Spatial Framework, it seems a missed opportunity for the plan not to take a lead in setting out a how it could play an important role in delivering the vision. The statement at paragraph 1.11 appears to read as “we will do what have to”, rather than seeking to embrace the ambitions that Government has for development within the Arc.
In particular it would seem sensible for the plan to make some provision for the possibility of an uplift in housing and employment growth that may emerge through the preparation of the Arc’s Spatial Framework. The current consultation on “Creating a Vision for the Oxford-Cambridge Arc”, states that the Government is:
“concerned about the affordability and availability of housing in the Arc, and what this will mean for the Arc’s communities, economy and environment. Development of new homes is already happening in the Arc, but in the main centres this has not kept up with need. We also know people are being priced out of the area, increasing the need to make more polluting journeys for work and leisure, and making home ownership less likely for many.”
Our emphasis
At paragraph 5.8 of the consultation, it adds:
“In parallel to the development of the Spatial Framework, the government is also exploring options to speed up new housing and infrastructure development in the Arc to help meet its ambitions, where evidence supports it. This includes examining (and where appropriate, developing) the case for new and/or expanded settlements in the Arc, including options informed by possible East West Rail stations between Bedford and Cambridge and growth options at Cambridge itself.
Our emphasis
While it is acknowledged that the Local Plan review and the Spatial Framework will be prepared in parallel, it is clear that the emerging vision is targeting a more advanced and robust form of growth. Therefore, for the Plan to be “positively prepared”, we would contend that the Local Plan Review should allow for some uplift whether that be 10 or even 20%. If the Spatial Framework is adopted at the same time as the plan, there is likely to be the added pressure to consider another urgent review to keep pace with the changing policy context, therefore allowing for some uplift would pre-empt this and help towards reducing the burden going forward.

This important point is supported by updated guidance in the revised National Planning Policy Framework (2021); and, while it is accepted that this Consultation was developed in advance of the publication of the revised Framework, we must highlight that under paragraph 22 it states that where Local Plans are to include new settlements or significant extensions to towns and villages, then it should be set within a vision which looks at least 30 years ahead. As the transitional arrangements at paragraph 221 of Annex 1 confirm this applies to plans that have not reached Regulation 19 stage; then, no matter which strategy is chosen, the Bedford Local Plan 2040, must expand its “vision” to set out how it will accommodate growth beyond 2040 and deliver on the ambitions of the Arc.

Object

Representation ID: 5853

Received: 08/09/2021

Respondent: Mr Norman Hoy

This is an important statement for the Council. I recognise the growth challenges faced by the Council, specifically when attempting to align with the Oxford-Cambridge Arc. That said, the Council’s statement would appear contrary should the proposed new settlement of Dennybrook (land west of Wyboston site 977) or the other large sites in the parish be taken forward. Other large sites are 997 (Cobholden), 455 (Manor Farm), Flints Field (930) or 931 (Top Homes). The parish of Staploe is the epitome of intrinsic character and beauty, and it is considered that there are valued local landscapes that would be eroded by such urbanised development. Accordingly, the ‘draft vision’ can only be taken at face value if it is not upheld.
100 word summary
The Council’s statement would appear contradictory should the proposed new settlement of Dennybrook (land west of Wyboston site 977) or the other large sites in the parish be taken forward. Other large sites are 997 (Cobholden), 455 (Manor Farm), Flints Field (930) or 931 (Top Homes). The parish of Staploe is the epitome of intrinsic character and beauty, and it is considered that there are valued local landscapes that would be eroded by such urbanised development. Accordingly, the ‘draft vision’ can only be taken at face value if it is not upheld.

Support

Representation ID: 5928

Received: 08/09/2021

Respondent: Mr Tom Tagg

This is an important statement for the Council.
I support:
• the emphasis on maintaining the green environment, landscape character and tackling climate change.
• Well planned growth – this needs to be integrated with Central Beds and Hunts DC.
• Rejuvenation of the town centre.
• Recognition of the benefits of the Bedford to Milton Keynes Waterway.
I would like to see more emphasis on the use of brownfield land for development in advance of greenfield land, with the use of high quality agricultural land avoided, to support the UK’s food production needs.
While I recognise the growth challenges faced by the Council, specifically when attempting to align with the Oxford-Cambridge Arc, I do not consider that development at Wyboston/Dennybrook will meet many of the objectives in the Vision – I detail this in my comments at item 3.17, Option 2b, Dennybrook.
For Dennybrook to therefore be selected by BBC as a component of their emerging preferred options therefore appears to cast doubt on BBC’s commitment to honour their Vision?

Object

Representation ID: 5974

Received: 08/09/2021

Respondent: Staploe Parish Council

This is an important statement for the Council. I recognise the growth challenges faced by the Council, specifically when attempting to align with the Oxford-Cambridge Arc. That said, the Council’s statement would appear contrary should the proposed new settlement of Dennybrook (land west of Wyboston site 977) or the other large sites in the parish be taken forward. Other large sites are 997 (Cobholden), 455 (Manor Farm), Flints Field (930) or 931 (Top Homes). The parish of Staploe is the epitome of intrinsic character and beauty, and it is considered that there are valued local landscapes including protected wildlife that would be eroded by such urbanised development. Accordingly, the ‘draft vision’ can only be taken at face value if it is not upheld.


2.1 100 word summary

The Council’s statement would appear contradictory should the proposed new settlement of Dennybrook (land west of Wyboston site 977) or the other large sites in the parish be taken forward. Other large sites are 997 (Cobholden), 455 (Manor Farm), Flints Field (930) or 931 (Top Homes). The parish of Staploe is the epitome of intrinsic character and beauty, and it is considered that there are valued local landscapes including protected wildlife that would be eroded by such urbanised development. Accordingly, the ‘draft vision’ can only be taken at face value if it is not upheld. We seem to have a significant amount of proposed houses developments on our parish compared to the rest of Bedfordshire, if you review all the call for sites above 455/930/931/997etc

Object

Representation ID: 6022

Received: 08/09/2021

Respondent: Mrs Christina Farmer

This is an important statement for the Council. I recognise the growth challenges faced by the Council, specifically when attempting to align with the Oxford-Cambridge Arc. That said, the Council’s statement would appear contrary should the proposed new settlement of Dennybrook (land west of Wyboston site 977) or the other large sites in the parish be taken forward. Other large sites are 997 (Cobholden), 455 (Manor Farm), Flints Field (930) or 931 (Top Homes). The parish of Staploe is the epitome of intrinsic character and beauty, and it is considered that there are valued local landscapes that would be eroded by such urbanised development. Accordingly, the ‘draft vision’ can only be taken at face value if it is not upheld.

Object

Representation ID: 6048

Received: 09/09/2021

Respondent: x Gates/Kitchiner

Agent: Phillips Planning Services

The Vision sets out general planning aims, and we have no particular comments to make on the Borough becoming more sustainable, the delivery of good design, or improved transport options etc. However, it is surprising that the Vision does not make any stronger statements on growth, where it will be located, or make a commitment to delivering the required number of new dwellings, and employment land as identified in the remainder of the Draft Plan.
Given the emerging focus on the delivery of the Oxford - Cambridge Arc as identified in the document, and the current consultation on priorities for the Spatial Framework, it seems a missed opportunity for the plan not to take a lead in setting out a how it could play an important role in delivering the vision. The statement at paragraph 1.11 appears to read as “we will do what have to”, rather than seeking to embrace the ambitions that Government has for development within the Arc.
In particular it would seem sensible for the plan to make some provision for the possibility of an uplift in housing and employment growth that may emerge through the preparation of the Arc’s Spatial Framework. The current consultation on “Creating a Vision for the Oxford-Cambridge Arc”, states that the Government is:
“concerned about the affordability and availability of housing in the Arc, and what this will mean for the Arc’s communities, economy and environment. Development of new homes is already happening in the Arc, but in the main centres this has not kept up with need. We also know people are being priced out of the area, increasing the need to make more polluting journeys for work and leisure, and making home ownership less likely for many.”
Our emphasis
At paragraph 5.8 of the consultation, it adds:
“In parallel to the development of the Spatial Framework, the government is also exploring options to speed up new housing and infrastructure development in the Arc to help meet its ambitions, where evidence supports it. This includes examining (and where appropriate, developing) the case for new and/or expanded settlements in the Arc, including options informed by possible East West Rail stations between Bedford and Cambridge and growth options at Cambridge itself.
Our emphasis
While it is acknowledged that the Local Plan review and the Spatial Framework will be prepared in parallel, it is clear that the emerging vision is targeting a more advanced and robust form of growth. Therefore, for the Plan to be “positively prepared”, we would contend that the Local Plan Review should allow for some uplift whether that be 10 or even 20%. If the Spatial Framework is adopted at the same time as the plan, there is likely to be the added pressure to consider another urgent review to keep pace with the changing policy context, therefore allowing for some uplift would pre-empt this and help towards reducing the burden going forward.
This important point is supported by updated guidance in the revised National Planning Policy Framework (2021); and, while it is accepted that this Consultation was developed in advance of the publication of the revised Framework, we must highlight that under paragraph 22 it states that where Local Plans are to include new settlements or significant extensions to towns and villages, then it should be set within a vision which looks at least 30 years ahead. As the transitional arrangements at paragraph 221 of Annex 1 confirm this applies to plans that have not reached Regulation 19 stage; then, no matter which strategy is chosen, the Bedford Local Plan 2040, must expand its “vision” to set out how it will accommodate growth beyond 2040 and deliver on the ambitions of the Arc.

Object

Representation ID: 6056

Received: 09/09/2021

Respondent: Mrs V Bates

Agent: Phillips Planning Services

The Vision sets out general planning aims, and we have no particular comments to make on the Borough becoming more sustainable, the delivery of good design, or improved transport options etc. However, it is surprising that the Vision does not make any stronger statements on growth, where it will be located, or make a commitment to delivering the required number of new dwellings, and employment land as identified in the remainder of the Draft Plan.

Given the emerging focus on the delivery of the Oxford - Cambridge Arc as identified in the document, and the current consultation on priorities for the Spatial Framework, it seems a missed opportunity for the plan not to take a lead in setting out a how it could play an important role in delivering the vision. The statement at paragraph 1.11 appears to read as “we will do what have to”, rather than seeking to embrace the ambitions that Government has for development within the Arc.

In particular it would seem sensible for the plan to make some provision for the possibility of an uplift in housing and employment growth that may emerge through the preparation of the Arc’s Spatial Framework. The current consultation on “Creating a Vision for the Oxford-Cambridge Arc”, states that the Government is:

“concerned about the affordability and availability of housing in the Arc, and what this will mean for the Arc’s communities, economy and environment. Development of new homes is already happening in the Arc, but in the main centres this has not kept up with need. We also know people are being priced out of the area, increasing the need to make more polluting journeys for work and leisure, and making home ownership less likely for many.”
Our emphasis

At paragraph 5.8 of the consultation, it adds:

“In parallel to the development of the Spatial Framework, the government is also exploring options to speed up new housing and infrastructure development in the Arc to help meet its ambitions, where evidence supports it. This includes examining (and where appropriate, developing) the case for new and/or expanded settlements in the Arc, including options informed by possible East West Rail stations between Bedford and Cambridge and growth options at Cambridge itself.
Our emphasis


While it is acknowledged that the Local Plan review and the Spatial Framework will be prepared in parallel, it is clear that the emerging vision is targeting a more advanced and robust form of growth. Therefore, for the Plan to be “positively prepared”, we would contend that the Local Plan Review should allow for some uplift whether that be 10 or even 20%. If the Spatial Framework is adopted at the same time as the plan, there is likely to be the added pressure to consider another urgent review to keep pace with the changing policy context, therefore allowing for some uplift would pre-empt this and help towards reducing the burden going forward.

This important point is supported by updated guidance in the revised National Planning Policy Framework (2021); and, while it is accepted that this Consultation was developed in advance of the publication of the revised Framework, we must highlight that under paragraph 22 it states that where Local Plans are to include new settlements or significant extensions to towns and villages, then it should be set within a vision which looks at least 30 years ahead. As the transitional arrangements at paragraph 221 of Annex 1 confirm this applies to plans that have not reached Regulation 19 stage; then, no matter which strategy is chosen, the Bedford Local Plan 2040, must expand its “vision” to set out how it will accommodate growth beyond 2040 and deliver on the ambitions of the Arc.

Object

Representation ID: 6064

Received: 09/09/2021

Respondent: Ms Sharman, Mrs Banks, Huntingdon Freemen’s Charity, Mr Russell and the Rowanmoor Trustees Limited

Agent: Bidwells

1.3 The Strategy Options document that is being consulted on was prepared ahead of the publication of the revised National Planning Policy Framework 2021 (NPPF). A requirement was introduced within Paragraph 22 of the revised NPPF for Local Plans proposing new settlements or urban extensions to towns/villages to be set within a vision which looks at least 30 years ahead. Paragraph 22 will apply to the Bedford Borough Local Plan based on the transitional arrangements that have been put in place and as a result, the Council will need to undertake additional work to establish a longer-term vision for the Local Plan 2040.

Object

Representation ID: 6067

Received: 09/09/2021

Respondent: Countryside Properties

Agent: Phillips Planning Services

3.2. The Vision sets out general planning aims, and we have no particular comments to make on the Borough becoming more sustainable, the delivery of good design, or improved transport options etc. However, it is surprising that the Vision does not make any stronger statements on growth, where it will be located, or make a commitment to delivering the required number of new dwellings, and employment land as identified in the remainder of the Draft Plan.

3.3. Given the emerging focus on the delivery of the Oxford - Cambridge Arc as identified in the document, and the current consultation on priorities for the Spatial Framework, it seems a missed opportunity for the plan not to take a lead in setting out how it could play an important role in delivering the vision. The statement at paragraph 1.11 appears to read as “we will do what we have to”, rather than seeking to embrace the ambitions that Government has for development within the Arc.

3.4. In particular it would seem sensible for the plan to make some provision for the possibility of an uplift in housing and employment growth that may emerge through the preparation of the Arc’s Spatial Framework. The current consultation on “Creating a Vision for the Oxford-Cambridge Arc”, states that the Government is:

“concerned about the affordability and availability of housing in the Arc, and what this will mean for the Arc’s communities, economy and environment. Development of new homes is already happening in the Arc, but in the main centres this has not kept up with need. We also know people are being priced out of the area, increasing the need to make more polluting journeys for work and leisure, and making home ownership less likely for many.”
Our emphasis

3.5. At paragraph 5.8 of the consultation, it adds:

“In parallel to the development of the Spatial Framework, the government is also exploring options to speed up new housing and infrastructure development in the Arc to help meet its ambitions, where evidence supports it. This includes examining (and where appropriate, developing) the case for new and/or expanded settlements in the Arc, including options informed by possible East West Rail stations between Bedford and Cambridge and growth options at Cambridge itself.
Our emphasis


While it is acknowledged that the Local Plan review and the Spatial Framework will be prepared in parallel, it is clear that the emerging vision is targeting a more advanced and robust form of growth. Therefore, for the Plan to be “positively prepared”, we would contend that the Local Plan Review should allow for some uplift whether that be 10 or even 20%. If the Spatial Framework is adopted at the same time as the plan, there is likely to be the added pressure to consider another urgent review to keep pace with the changing policy context, therefore allowing for some uplift would pre-empt this and help towards reducing the burden going forward.

3.6. This important point is supported by updated guidance in the revised National Planning Policy Framework (2021); and, while it is accepted that this Consultation was developed in advance of the publication of the revised Framework, we must highlight that under paragraph 22 it states that where Local Plans are to include new settlements or significant extensions to towns and villages, then it should be set within a vision which looks at least 30 years ahead. As the transitional arrangements at paragraph 221 of Annex 1 confirm this applies to plans that have not reached Regulation 19 stage; then, no matter which strategy is chosen, the Bedford Local Plan 2040, must expand its “vision” to set out how it will accommodate growth beyond 2040 and deliver on the ambitions of the Arc.

Object

Representation ID: 6079

Received: 09/09/2021

Respondent: Mr J Wright

Agent: Phillips Planning Services

The Vision sets out general planning aims, and we have no particular comments to make on the Borough becoming more sustainable, the delivery of good design, or improved transport options etc. However, it is surprising that the Vision does not make any stronger statements on growth, where it will be located, or make a commitment to delivering the required number of new dwellings, and employment land as identified in the remainder of the Draft Plan.

Given the emerging focus on the delivery of the Oxford - Cambridge Arc as identified in the document, and the current consultation on priorities for the Spatial Framework, it seems a missed opportunity for the plan not to take a lead in setting out a how it could play an important role in delivering the vision. The statement at paragraph 1.11 appears to read as “we will do what we have to”, rather than seeking to embrace the ambitions that Government has for development within the Arc.

In particular it would seem sensible for the plan to make some provision for the possibility of an uplift in housing and employment growth that may emerge through the preparation of the Arc’s Spatial Framework. The current consultation on “Creating a Vision for the Oxford-Cambridge Arc”, states that the Government is:

“concerned about the affordability and availability of housing in the Arc, and what this will mean for the Arc’s communities, economy and environment. Development of new homes is already happening in the Arc, but in the main centres this has not kept up with need. We also know people are being priced out of the area, increasing the need to make more polluting journeys for work and leisure, and making home ownership less likely for many.”
Our emphasis

At paragraph 5.8 of the consultation, it adds:

“In parallel to the development of the Spatial Framework, the government is also exploring options to speed up new housing and infrastructure development in the Arc to help meet its ambitions, where evidence supports it. This includes examining (and where appropriate, developing) the case for new and/or expanded settlements in the Arc, including options informed by possible East West Rail stations between Bedford and Cambridge and growth options at Cambridge itself.
Our emphasis


While it is acknowledged that the Local Plan review and the Spatial Framework will be prepared in parallel, it is clear that the emerging vision is targeting a more advanced and robust form of growth. Therefore, for the Plan to be “positively prepared”, we would contend that the Local Plan Review should allow for some uplift whether that be 10 or even 20%. If the Spatial Framework is adopted at the same time as the plan, there is likely to be the added pressure to consider another urgent review to keep pace with the changing policy context, therefore allowing for some uplift would pre-empt this and help towards reducing the burden going forward.

This important point is supported by updated guidance in the revised National Planning Policy Framework (2021); and, while it is accepted that this Consultation was developed in advance of the publication of the revised Framework, we must highlight that under paragraph 22 it states that where Local Plans are to include new settlements or significant extensions to towns and villages, then it should be set within a vision which looks at least 30 years ahead. As the transitional arrangements at paragraph 221 of Annex 1 confirm this applies to plans that have not reached Regulation 19 stage; then, no matter which strategy is chosen, the Bedford Local Plan 2040, must expand its “vision” to set out how it will accommodate growth beyond 2040 and deliver on the ambitions of the Arc.

Object

Representation ID: 6111

Received: 09/09/2021

Respondent: Jen Giles

This is an important statement for the Council. Staploe Parish Council recognise the growth challenges faced by the Council, specifically when attempting to align with the Oxford-Cambridge Arc. That said, the Council’s statement would appear contrary should the proposed new settlement of Dennybrook (land west of Wyboston site 977) or the other large sites in the parish be taken forward. Other large sites are 997 (Cobholden), 455 (Manor Farm), Flints Field (930) or 931 (Top Homes). The parish of Staploe is the epitome of intrinsic character and beauty, and it is considered that there are valued local landscapes that would be eroded by such urbanised development. Accordingly, the ‘draft vision’ can only be taken at face value if it is not upheld.

Object

Representation ID: 6156

Received: 09/09/2021

Respondent: Savills

Agent: Savills

Vision and Objectives
The vision to the end of the plan period, which we assume is 2040 as this is not stated in the vision, is overly
long and needs to be refined.
Paragraph 15 of the NPPF requires succinct and up-to-date plans that provide a positive vision for the future
of each area; a framework for addressing housing needs and other economic, social and environmental
priorities; and a platform for local people to shape their surroundings. More should be made of local
distinctiveness in the vision for the Borough in 20 plus years from now.
We would expect to see inclusion of provision of new homes for all including the provision of affordable
homes within the vision.

Object

Representation ID: 6166

Received: 09/09/2021

Respondent: Mrs Sandie Tusting

This is an important statement for the Council. Staploe Parish Council recognise the growth challenges faced by the Council, specifically when attempting to align with the Oxford-Cambridge Arc. That said, the Council’s statement would appear contrary should the proposed new settlement of Dennybrook (land west of Wyboston site 977) or the other large sites in the parish be taken forward. Other large sites are 997 (Cobholden), 455 (Manor Farm), Flints Field (930) or 931 (Top Homes). The parish of Staploe is the epitome of intrinsic character and beauty, and it is considered that there are valued local landscapes that would be eroded by such urbanised development. Accordingly, the ‘draft vision’ can only be taken at face value if it is not upheld.

Object

Representation ID: 6212

Received: 09/09/2021

Respondent: Peter Coles

This is an important statement for the Council. Staploe Parish Council recognise the growth challenges faced by the Council, specifically when attempting to align with the Oxford-Cambridge Arc. That said, the Council’s statement would appear contrary should the proposed new settlement of Dennybrook (land west of Wyboston site 977) or the other large sites in the parish be taken forward. Other large sites are 997 (Cobholden), 455 (Manor Farm), Flints Field (930) or 931 (Top Homes). The parish of Staploe is the epitome of intrinsic character and beauty, and it is considered that there are valued local landscapes that would be eroded by such urbanised development. Accordingly, the ‘draft vision’ can only be taken at face value if it is not upheld.

Support

Representation ID: 6243

Received: 09/09/2021

Respondent: IM Land

Agent: Barton Willmore

Paragraphs 2.1 to 2.3 set out the vision and objectives of the Local Plan 2040. We agree with the vision and the four themes (‘Greener’, ‘More Accessible’, ‘More Prosperous’ and ‘Better Places’) that feed into the overall vision.

Support

Representation ID: 6257

Received: 10/09/2021

Respondent: Mr A Sarro

Agent: Phillips Planning Services

The Vision sets out general planning aims, and we have no particular comments to make on the Borough becoming more sustainable, the delivery of good design, or improved transport options etc. However, it is surprising that the Vision does not make any stronger statements on growth, where it will be located, or make a commitment to delivering the required number of new dwellings, and employment land as identified in the remainder of the Draft Plan.

Given the emerging focus on the delivery of the Oxford - Cambridge Arc as identified in the document, and the current consultation on priorities for the Spatial Framework, it seems a missed opportunity for the plan not to take a lead in setting out a how it could play an important role in delivering the vision. The statement at paragraph 1.11 appears to read as “we will do what have to”, rather than seeking to embrace the ambitions that Government has for development within the Arc.

In particular it would seem sensible for the plan to make some provision for the possibility of an uplift in housing and employment growth that may emerge through the preparation of the Arc’s Spatial Framework. The current consultation on “Creating a Vision for the Oxford-Cambridge Arc”, states that the Government is:

“concerned about the affordability and availability of housing in the Arc, and what this will mean for the Arc’s communities, economy and environment. Development of new homes is already happening in the Arc, but in the main centres this has not kept up with need. We also know people are being priced out of the area, increasing the need to make more polluting journeys for work and leisure, and making home ownership less likely for many.”

At paragraph 5.8 of the consultation, it adds:

“In parallel to the development of the Spatial Framework, the government is also exploring options to speed up new housing and infrastructure development in the Arc to help meet its ambitions, where evidence supports it. This includes examining (and where appropriate, developing) the case for new and/or expanded settlements in the Arc, including options informed by possible East West Rail stations between Bedford and Cambridge and growth options at Cambridge itself.

While it is acknowledged that the Local Plan review and the Spatial Framework will be prepared in parallel, it is clear that the emerging vision is targeting a more advanced and robust form of growth. Therefore, for the Plan to be “positively prepared”, we would contend that the Local Plan Review should allow for some uplift whether that be 10 or even 20%. If the Spatial Framework is adopted at the same time as the plan, there is likely to be the added pressure to consider another urgent review to keep pace with the changing policy context, therefore allowing for some uplift would pre-empt this and help towards reducing the burden going forward.

This important point is supported by updated guidance in the revised National Planning Policy Framework (2021); and, while it is accepted that this Consultation was developed in advance of the publication of the revised Framework, we must highlight that under paragraph 22 it states that where Local Plans are to include new settlements or significant extensions to towns and villages, then it should be set within a vision which looks at least 30 years ahead. As the transitional arrangements at paragraph 221 of Annex 1 confirm this applies to plans that have not reached Regulation 19 stage; then, no matter which strategy is chosen, the Bedford Local Plan 2040, must expand its “vision” to set out how it will accommodate growth beyond 2040 and deliver on the ambitions of the Arc.

Object

Representation ID: 6270

Received: 10/09/2021

Respondent: Mr Bernard Cornwell

Agent: Phillips Planning Services

The Vision sets out general planning aims, and we have no particular comments to make on the Borough becoming more sustainable, the delivery of good design, or improved transport options etc. However, it is surprising that the Vision does not make any stronger statements on growth, where it will be located, or make a commitment to delivering the required number of new dwellings, and employment land as identified in the remainder of the Draft Plan.

Given the emerging focus on the delivery of the Oxford - Cambridge Arc as identified in the document, and the current consultation on priorities for the Spatial Framework, it seems a missed opportunity for the plan not to take a lead in setting out a how it could play an important role in delivering the vision. The statement at paragraph 1.11 appears to read as “we will do what have to”, rather than seeking to embrace the ambitions that Government has for development within the Arc.

In particular it would seem sensible for the plan to make some provision for the possibility of an uplift in housing and employment growth that may emerge through the preparation of the Arc’s Spatial Framework. The current consultation on “Creating a Vision for the Oxford-Cambridge Arc”, states that the Government is:

“concerned about the affordability and availability of housing in the Arc, and what this will mean for the Arc’s communities, economy and environment. Development of new homes is already happening in the Arc, but in the main centres this has not kept up with need. We also know people are being priced out of the area, increasing the need to make more polluting journeys for work and leisure, and making home ownership less likely for many.”

At paragraph 5.8 of the consultation, it adds:

“In parallel to the development of the Spatial Framework, the government is also exploring options to speed up new housing and infrastructure development in the Arc to help meet its ambitions, where evidence supports it. This includes examining (and where appropriate, developing) the case for new and/or expanded settlements in the Arc, including options informed by possible East West Rail stations between Bedford and Cambridge and growth options at Cambridge itself.

While it is acknowledged that the Local Plan review and the Spatial Framework will be prepared in parallel, it is clear that the emerging vision is targeting a more advanced and robust form of growth. Therefore, for the Plan to be “positively prepared”, we would contend that the Local Plan Review should allow for some uplift whether that be 10 or even 20%. If the Spatial Framework is adopted at the same time as the plan, there is likely to be the added pressure to consider another urgent review to keep pace with the changing policy context, therefore allowing for some uplift would pre-empt this and help towards reducing the burden going forward.

This important point is supported by updated guidance in the revised National Planning Policy Framework (2021); and, while it is accepted that this Consultation was developed in advance of the publication of the revised Framework, we must highlight that under paragraph 22 it states that where Local Plans are to include new settlements or significant extensions to towns and villages, then it should be set within a vision which looks at least 30 years ahead. As the transitional arrangements at paragraph 221 of Annex 1 confirm this applies to plans that have not reached Regulation 19 stage; then, no matter which strategy is chosen, the Bedford Local Plan 2040, must expand its “vision” to set out how it will accommodate growth beyond 2040 and deliver on the ambitions of the Arc.

Object

Representation ID: 6303

Received: 10/09/2021

Respondent: Messrs A Porter, H Fowler, W Salsbury Ltd

Agent: DLP Planning Limited

Our client has the following comments to make on the draft vision.
The draft Vision sets out:
“Additional town centre living will encourage sustainable methods of travel, enhance vitality and viability of the town centre and support for local businesses”.
This aspect of the Vision is supported by our client; however, it is not proposed to allocate small housing sites in the plan and the concern is expressed that this will delay housing delivery in the early part of the plan period.
Theme 4 (Better Places) of the Council’s proposed Objectives for the Local Plan 2040 sets out:
“Where it is viable and sustainable to do so, encourage the re-use of land that has been previously developed.
Provide appropriate amounts and types of housing to meet the needs of the borough’s urban and rural communities over the lifetime of the Plan making the housing stock more adaptable and resilient
Achieve a borough where everybody has appropriate access to high quality health and social care, as well as everyday essential services and community facilities where social and cultural wellbeing are supported, enabling all residents to lead healthy and independent lives.”
The principle of these objectives is supported particularly in relation to the re-use of land that has been previously developed.
Please refer to our supporting representations for further information.

Object

Representation ID: 6313

Received: 10/09/2021

Respondent: Mr Paul Zwetsloot

This is an important statement for the Council. Staploe Parish Council recognise the growth challenges faced by the Council, specifically when attempting to align with the Oxford-Cambridge Arc. That said, the Council’s statement would appear contrary should the proposed new settlement of Dennybrook (land west of Wyboston site 977) or the other large sites in the parish be taken forward. Other large sites are 997 (Cobholden), 455 (Manor Farm), Flints Field (930) or 931 (Top Homes). The parish of Staploe is the epitome of intrinsic character and beauty, and it is considered that there are valued local landscapes that would be eroded by such urbanised development. Accordingly, the ‘draft vision’ can only be taken at face value if it is not upheld.

Object

Representation ID: 6369

Received: 13/09/2021

Respondent: CPRE Bedfordshire

Para 2.1 – OBJECT

CPRE Bedfordshire believe that the Council’s vision is unacceptable because, as stated earlier, the uncertainties resulting from the timing of the emerging Oxford to Cambridge Arc Spatial Framework undermine the credibility of the draft plan. We believe the Council should act with urgency to reach agreement with the government to suspend the submission date for this local plan until the requirements of the Spatial Framework are made known. Without such an agreement, the ability of the Council and local communities to maintain control over the selection of locations for growth through this local plan is seriously compromised.

The Local Plan Vision fails to recognise the importance of the "River Great Ouse and its Valley Area" right across the Borough from its point of entry near Turvey to where it exits the Borough in the east. This is a serious omission that should be remedied.

The river and valley area is the single most important environmental feature in the Borough bar none, and an area where very substantial biodiversity improvement can be achieved very quickly. It is the "Jewel in the Borough's Crown" across its entire length in the Borough, and not simply as a feature of the Town Centre as is often stated by Borough policy makers.
The absence of any recognition of this in the Local Plan gives the strong impression that the Council is preparing, as part of its Ox-Cam commitments, to allow substantial developments in or near the river and valley area.

The Council should state clearly and positively in the Local Plan 2040 that the "Protection and Enhancement of the River Great Ouse and its Valley Area" right across the Borough is one of its key objectives and that biodiversity improvement in the river valley area will be a primary focus of its Environmental and Climate Emergency strategy.

Object

Representation ID: 6371

Received: 13/09/2021

Respondent: Mr Sandy Gery

Agent: Phillips Planning Services

The Vision sets out general planning aims, and we have no particular comments to make on the Borough becoming more sustainable, the delivery of good design, or improved transport options etc. However, it is surprising that the Vision does not make any stronger statements on growth, where it will be located, or make a commitment to delivering the required number of new dwellings, and employment land as identified in the remainder of the Draft Plan.

Given the emerging focus on the delivery of the Oxford - Cambridge Arc as identified in the document, and the current consultation on priorities for the Spatial Framework, it seems a missed opportunity for the plan not to take a lead in setting out a how it could play an important role in delivering the vision. The statement at paragraph 1.11 appears to read as “we will do what we have to”, rather than seeking to embrace the ambitions that Government has for development within the Arc.

In particular it would seem sensible for the plan to make some provision for the possibility of an uplift in housing and employment growth that may emerge through the preparation of the Arc’s Spatial Framework. The current consultation on “Creating a Vision for the Oxford-Cambridge Arc”, states that the Government is:

“concerned about the affordability and availability of housing in the Arc, and what this will mean for the Arc’s communities, economy and environment. Development of new homes is already happening in the Arc, but in the main centres this has not kept up with need. We also know people are being priced out of the area, increasing the need to make more polluting journeys for work and leisure, and making home ownership less likely for many.”
Our emphasis

At paragraph 5.8 of the consultation, it adds:

“In parallel to the development of the Spatial Framework, the government is also exploring options to speed up new housing and infrastructure development in the Arc to help meet its ambitions, where evidence supports it. This includes examining (and where appropriate, developing) the case for new and/or expanded settlements in the Arc, including options informed by possible East West Rail stations between Bedford and Cambridge and growth options at Cambridge itself.
Our emphasis


.
While it is acknowledged that the Local Plan review and the Spatial Framework will be prepared in parallel, it is clear that the emerging vision is targeting a more advanced and robust form of growth. Therefore, for the Plan to be “positively prepared”, we would contend that the Local Plan Review should allow for some uplift whether that be 10 or even 20%. If the Spatial Framework is adopted at the same time as the plan, there is likely to be the added pressure to consider another urgent review to keep pace with the changing policy context, therefore allowing for some uplift would pre-empt this and help towards reducing the burden going forward.

This important point is supported by updated guidance in the revised National Planning Policy Framework (2021); and, while it is accepted that this Consultation was developed in advance of the publication of the revised Framework, we must highlight that under paragraph 22 it states that where Local Plans are to include new settlements or significant extensions to towns and villages, then it should be set within a vision which looks at least 30 years ahead. As the transitional arrangements at paragraph 221 of Annex 1 confirm this applies to plans that have not reached Regulation 19 stage; then, no matter which strategy is chosen, the Bedford Local Plan 2040, must expand its “vision” to set out how it will accommodate growth beyond 2040 and deliver on the ambitions of the Arc.

Object

Representation ID: 6439

Received: 13/09/2021

Respondent: Ms Donna Thompson

This is an important statement for the Council. Staploe Parish Council recognise the growth challenges faced by the Council, specifically when attempting to align with the Oxford-Cambridge Arc. That said, the Council’s statement would appear contrary should the proposed new settlement of Dennybrook (land west of Wyboston site 977) or the other large sites in the parish be taken forward. Other large sites are 997 (Cobholden), 455 (Manor Farm), Flints Field (930) or 931 (Top Homes). The parish of Staploe is the epitome of intrinsic character and beauty, and it is considered that there are valued local landscapes that would be eroded by such urbanised development. Accordingly, the ‘draft vision’ can only be taken at face value if it is not upheld.

Support

Representation ID: 6460

Received: 13/09/2021

Respondent: Mr Steven Kent

This is an important statement for the Council. I recognise the growth challenges faced by the Council, specifically when attempting to align with the Oxford-Cambridge Arc. That said, the Council’s statement would appear contrary should the proposed new settlement of Dennybrook (land west of Wyboston site 977) or the other large sites in the parish be taken forward. Other large sites are 997 (Cobholden), 455 (Manor Farm), Flints Field (930) or 931 (Top Homes). The parish of Staploe is the epitome of intrinsic character and beauty, and it is considered that there are valued local landscapes that would be eroded by such urbanised development. Accordingly, the ‘draft vision’ can only be taken at face value if it is not upheld.

Object

Representation ID: 6504

Received: 13/09/2021

Respondent: Manor Oak Homes

Agent: Armstrong Rigg Planning

As part of our response to the I&O Consultation we were critical that the vision for the plan lacked ambition, particularly in light of the need to facilitate a real upwards step change in housing delivery from now onwards. At the time of the I&O document we presented the view that, as written, it could be mistaken as the vision which underpins the current Local Plan 2030, one which includes an aspirational but likely unachievable focus on housing delivery at the Borough’s town centre sites and which dodges the need to identify a wide range of immediately deliverable development opportunities on the fringes of the Bedford urban area. This view is now only amplified in light of the policy included at paragraph 22 of the new NPPF.
Too much on an onus remains in the vision on the delivery of constrained sites in the urban area and on Parish Councils to deliver growth outside of the Bedford / Kempston conurbation through neighbourhood plans. It fails to clarify that in some instances, and despite the presence of a neighbourhood plan within a parish, matters in respect of housing and employment delivery must remain squarely under the control of the Borough Council due to the critical strategic importance to deliver significant levels of growth over the plan period. As worded, we consider it presents a false expectation that rural communities are completely in control of their parish’s development strategy.
By way of an example, our client’s site represents an obvious opportunity to deliver a 400 dwelling proposal accompanied by a significant level of infrastructure at a location which will in time be covered by a neighbourhood plan (it falls within Renhold Parish). The vision must recognise that, in some instances, rural communities will be asked to welcome strategic levels of growth to contribute to the Borough’s overall housing and employment requirement, albeit this growth will bring substantial sustainability benefits to existing residents such as new schools, greater sustainable transport links and a wide variety of open space and recreational opportunities.

Object

Representation ID: 6540

Received: 13/09/2021

Respondent: Mrs Susan Trolley

This is an important statement for the Council. Staploe Parish Council recognise the growth challenges faced by the Council, specifically when attempting to align with the Oxford-Cambridge Arc. That said, the Council’s statement would appear contrary should the proposed new settlement of Dennybrook (land west of Wyboston site 977) or the other large sites in the parish be taken forward. Other large sites are 997 (Cobholden), 455 (Manor Farm), Flints Field (930) or 931 (Top Homes). The parish of Staploe is the epitome of intrinsic character and beauty, and it is considered that there are valued local landscapes that would be eroded by such urbanised development. Accordingly, the ‘draft vision’ can only be taken at face value if it is not upheld.

Object

Representation ID: 6599

Received: 14/09/2021

Respondent: Mr Aiden Farmer

This is an important statement for the Council. I recognise the growth challenges faced by the Council, specifically when attempting to align with the Oxford-Cambridge Arc. That said, the Council’s statement would appear contrary should the proposed new settlement of Dennybrook (land west of Wyboston site 977) or the other large sites in the parish be taken forward. Other large sites are 997 (Cobholden), 455 (Manor Farm), Flints Field (930) or 931 (Top Homes). The parish of Staploe is the epitome of intrinsic character and beauty, and it is considered that there are valued local landscapes that would be eroded by such urbanised development. Accordingly, the ‘draft vision’ can only be taken at face value if it is not upheld.

2.1 100 word summary
The Council’s statement would appear contradictory should the proposed new settlement of Dennybrook (land west of Wyboston site 977) or the other large sites in the parish be taken forward. Other large sites are 997 (Cobholden), 455 (Manor Farm), Flints Field (930) or 931 (Top Homes). The parish of Staploe is the epitome of intrinsic character and beauty, and it is considered that there are valued local landscapes that would be eroded by such urbanised development. Accordingly, the ‘draft vision’ can only be taken at face value if it is not upheld.

Object

Representation ID: 6643

Received: 14/09/2021

Respondent: Bedford Borough Councillor

VISION AND OBJECTIVES
2.1 :
We broadly support the vision as set out although believe that it is too town oriented and is contradicted much of what is included elsewhere. For example, as we will point out later, the several references to sustainability are not consistent with the continued emphasis on rural growth. As the Sustainability Appraisal clearly shows that the most sustainable strategy is that of urban development yet this, as with the 2030 Plan provides only a small part of the total in the options put before residents.

Support

Representation ID: 6656

Received: 14/09/2021

Respondent: Bedfordshire Great Ouse Valley Environmental Trust

Beds GOVET believe the vision and associated themes are good but we have concerns about how Council will achieve this at the same time as the proposed level of housing growth and economic development.
More information is required as to how the net zero borough is to be achieved. In particular details regarding plans for insulation, solar power, heat pumps, electrification of heating cooking and transport.
For transport we need stronger actions to support cycling and pedestrians.
More information is also needed regarding flood risks and how these are to be managed and risk minimized. For example, more detailed consideration needs to be given to the permeability of driveways and road surfaces and the introduction of swales and ponds to reduce flow.
River Great Ouse: The vision, as stated, refers to the River Great Ouse and its riverside villages forming the backbone of the boroughs rich green and blue infrastructure. This comes across as a very weak statement for such a valuable and important County asset. It fails to reflect the historical, cultural, symbolic value and ecological importance not only of the River Great Ouse but the Great Ouse Valley overall across the borough and Bedfordshire. Protection of the river and the Great Ouse Valley is of great concern to all of the parishes along the river.
Protection of the Great Ouse valley should be given the highest priority and made a key objective in the Local Plan 2040. Beds GOVEG urges Bedford borough Council to develop policies and plans now to:
• Protect the river from potential environmental damage from the effects of sewage outflows and agricultural runoff, such as nitrates and phosphates
• Prevent any developments which may cause damage or adversely impact biodiversity in the river and the Valley as a whole along its entire length
• Enhance its role in flood management
• Enhance its value as an amenity which increases the well-being of all communities that use the river.
Council should support actions to enable the Great Ouse Valley to achieve the designation of protected Natural Landscape.

Object

Representation ID: 6660

Received: 14/09/2021

Respondent: Stevington Parish Council

Section 1.6 refers to the governments ambition for growth up to 1million new high-quality homes by 2050. Given current climate change circumstances such an ambition is clearly unsustainable and although the recent parliamentary debate, makes it clear that 1 million homes is not government policy, there is clearly an intention to develop a significant number of new houses to support economic growth in the region. We believe council needs to limit the scale and nature of growth to levels that are environmentally sustainable and enable Net Zero to be achieved at the fastest possible rate. Communities are relying on the Borough Council to make this a high priority.

Object

Representation ID: 6678

Received: 14/09/2021

Respondent: Willington Parish Council

1. The vision states that development will be avoided in areas of high flood risk, however the dominant flood risk in the Borough is to the south and east, which are the areas indicated in the emerging preferred options. In the north where there is little or no flood risk, there is no significant development proposed. [Flood risk map inserted.}
2. The vision also states that the Forest of Marston Vale will continue to grow, however there is also a conflict between this and development being focused in the south and east of the Borough.