Site ID: 836

Showing comments and forms 1 to 8 of 8

Object

Site Assessment Pro Formas

Representation ID: 3747

Received: 21/08/2021

Respondent: Elizabeth Corkery

Representation Summary:

Inadequate roads

Object

Site Assessment Pro Formas

Representation ID: 3761

Received: 23/08/2021

Respondent: Carlton and Chellington Parish Council

Representation Summary:

PDF manual document sent in with response as 100 words is to short

Object

Site Assessment Pro Formas

Representation ID: 3844

Received: 26/08/2021

Respondent: Carlton and Chellington Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Part 1
This site is too far away from the village, with no pavement on a busy road. The Highways comments are noted with some amazement by the Parish Council who comment as follows:
- The road is a well used road as a cut through via Felmersham and Milton Ernest to the A6.
- It is also the only road that can be used on occasions when the bridges flood, so to say there is ‘some light traffic’ is considered an understatement.

Object

Site Assessment Pro Formas

Representation ID: 3845

Received: 26/08/2021

Respondent: Carlton and Chellington Parish Council

Representation Summary:

part 2
- The Crossroads (Bridgend/Pavenham Road etc) is in reality only 1.5 lanes wide, with several incidents of houses being hit.
- The bus service is along Bridgend. Whilst mention is made of using the public footpath via Chellington Church drive, past the sewage works into the village we comment as follows:
o This is a very muddy path in winter across fields
o It would take twice as long as walking down the road
o It would never be suitable for those with mobility issues.
o It exits on Bridgend on a sharp bend

Object

Site Assessment Pro Formas

Representation ID: 3846

Received: 26/08/2021

Respondent: Carlton and Chellington Parish Council

Representation Summary:

part 3

In addition any housing at this site would impact on the Grade 1 listed church. Carlton NDP clearly states the requirement to conserve existing heritage. In addition policy CC1 (f) would be contravened by building here as it will be on the skyline.

Object

Site Assessment Pro Formas

Representation ID: 4304

Received: 31/08/2021

Respondent: None

Representation Summary:

Not sustainable. Unacceptable development in completely open space.

Support

Site Assessment Pro Formas

Representation ID: 5308

Received: 03/09/2021

Respondent: Mr Tim Collings

Agent: Robinson and Hall LLP

Representation Summary:

This site is put forward for a housing allocation of 20-25 homes, to the south of Felmersham Road, Chellington. The site is located adjacent to Hill Farm and to the north of Carlton and Chellington. Access into the site is via two existing field access points from Felmersham Road. The site is free from physical constraints and could come forward for development within 5-10 years of the emerging Plan being adopted.

Object

Site Assessment Pro Formas

Representation ID: 6076

Received: 09/09/2021

Respondent: Carlton and Chellington Parish Council

Representation Summary:

This site is too far away from the village, with no pavement on a busy road. The Highways comments are noted with some amazement by the Parish Council who comment as follows:
- The road is a well used road as a cut through via Felmersham and Milton Ernest to the A6.
- It is also the only road that can be used on occasions when the bridges flood, so to say there is ‘some light traffic’ is considered an understatement.
- The Crossroads ( Bridgend/Pavenham Road/The Causeway/ Felmersham Road) is in reality only 1.5 lanes wide and there have been several incidents of the house on the corner being hit by lorries and buses turning
- The bus service is along Bridgend so residents would need to walk down Felmersham Road. Whilst mention is made of using the public footpath via Chellington Church drive, and past the sewage works into the village we comment as follows:
o This is a very muddy path in winter across fields
o It would take twice as long as walking down the road
o It would never be suitable for those with mobility issues.
o It exits on Bridgend on a sharp bend which is considered quite dangerous
In addition any housing at this site would impact on the Grade 1 listed church. Carlton NDP clearly states the requirement to conserve existing heritage. In addition policy CC1 (f) would be contravened by building here as it will be on the skyline.