Site ID: 877

Showing comments and forms 1 to 3 of 3

Object

Site Assessment Pro Formas

Representation ID: 3585

Received: 14/08/2021

Respondent: Mr R W Harland

Representation Summary:

Ivy Lane is full to overcapacity. In June 2021 the Bedford Highways department objected to application (21/00734/OUT).
The Highways objection stated: “It is considered that Ivy Lane is at more than its capacity as a shared use space and narrow country lane” & “Therefore it is considered that Ivy Lane is not suitable for an increase in traffic levels.”

It is clear that Ivy Lane cannot take any additional traffic.

This site should be removed from the Site Assessment list.

Support

Site Assessment Pro Formas

Representation ID: 3734

Received: 21/08/2021

Respondent: Elizabeth Corkery

Representation Summary:

Wildlife - fewer protected species compared to Denybrooke

Agricultural land - poor quality than Denybrooke

Transport - closer to bedford town centre, promotes growth and fewer car journeys

Amenities - closer to amenities already in place

Size - smaller site so less impact to local pollution compared to large scale Denybrooke

Timing - quicker to complete phases and overall project compared to Denybrooke

Object

Site Assessment Pro Formas

Representation ID: 4227

Received: 30/08/2021

Respondent: Mr Mark Wooding

Representation Summary:

Oppose further housing development that will increase traffic flow along Cotton End Road.
Road is already too busy, too fast and becoming dangerous in the absence of average speed cameras.

Any further development should be on the periphery of the village.