Site Assessment Pro Formas

Object

Representation ID: 4278

Received: 31/08/2021

Respondent: None

This site is unsustainable and has been refused planning permission many times. Not suitable for development.

Support

Representation ID: 4279

Received: 31/08/2021

Respondent: None

Good development site because it's infill and replaces redundant buildings.

Object

Representation ID: 4280

Received: 31/08/2021

Respondent: None

Not sustainable development and outside the village envelope.

Object

Representation ID: 4282

Received: 31/08/2021

Respondent: None

Unsustainable. Too many houses in such a small village.

Object

Representation ID: 4283

Received: 31/08/2021

Respondent: None

Not sustainable. Orchard Lane cannot cope with so many new houses.

Object

Representation ID: 4284

Received: 31/08/2021

Respondent: None

Not sustainable. Village cannot support so many new houses.

Object

Representation ID: 4285

Received: 31/08/2021

Respondent: None

Not sustainable. Blighted by Santa Pod. Loss of renewable energy site unacceptable. Cynical attempt to open up green fields for development as a solar farm only to switch to housing as soon as the opportunity arises.

Object

Representation ID: 4286

Received: 31/08/2021

Respondent: None

Not sustainable. Blighted by Santa Pod. Loss of renewable energy site unacceptable. Cynical attempt to open up green fields for development as a solar farm only to switch to housing as soon as the opportunity arises.

Object

Representation ID: 4287

Received: 31/08/2021

Respondent: None

Not sustainable. Blighted by Santa Pod.

Support

Representation ID: 4289

Received: 31/08/2021

Respondent: None

Sustainable site close to town centre and all amenities. Good re-use of redundant building site.