Object
Site Assessment Pro Formas
Representation ID: 5096
Received: 02/09/2021
Respondent: Ms Ginny Ford
Representation Summary:
The development, when considered with allocations Elstow sites 3233 and 634 , would mean no gap between Wilstead and Elstow- that's unacceptable coalescence in the rural setting and landscape of these eastern clay vale villages and contrary to development guidelines in the Landscape Character assessment for Landscape 5E to retain open setting and prevent coalescence etc . The site also sustains good habitat for farmland birds.