Object

Site Assessment Pro Formas

Representation ID: 5096

Received: 02/09/2021

Respondent: Ms Ginny Ford

Representation Summary:

The development, when considered with allocations Elstow sites 3233 and 634 , would mean no gap between Wilstead and Elstow- that's unacceptable coalescence in the rural setting and landscape of these eastern clay vale villages and contrary to development guidelines in the Landscape Character assessment for Landscape 5E to retain open setting and prevent coalescence etc . The site also sustains good habitat for farmland birds.