Call for Sites Form

Form ID: 1014

Interest in land

Other (please specify)

Specify 'other' land interest

Please contact the agent

If you are not the landowner of the site you are submitting, do you have permission to submit?

Yes

Address of site

Land at to the east of Newton Lane, Turvey

Location plan

Show full map

Current use of land

The site currently comprises agricultural land and scrubland associated with the historic allotment site. The site has been the subject of a previous planning application; the technical reports and responses from statutory consultees confirm no constraints to delivery of the site.

Adjoining use to the north

The northern boundary comprises a Public Right of Way (PRoW) with open space beyond.

Adjoining use to the south

The southern boundary comprises proposed new tree planting to reflect the planting to the west.

Adjoining use to the east

Woodland planting bounds to the site to the east.

Adjoining use to the west

Planting to the west of Newton Lane with agricultural land beyond.

Has the site been developed previously?

Proposed primary use

Housing

Other uses proposed

Nothing chosen

Number of dwellings proposed

Up to 80 dwellings.

Type of housing proposed

Family houses

Other type of housing

No answer given

Density proposed

22 dwellings per hectare (dph). This seeks to reflect the density of the existing built form in Turvey which ranges from 17dph to 28dph. If it was felt appropriate to increase the density the site could accommodate additional dwellings.

Proposed tenures

Market housing - Owner occupied , Affordable Housing - Affordable rent , Affordable Housing - Shared ownership

Other tenures proposed

No answer given

Permanent or transit?

No answer given

Site privately owned?

Nothing chosen

Number of plots proposed

No answer given

Proposed type of employment

No answer given

Gross floorspace proposed

No answer given

Proposed type of retail

No answer given

Net floorspace proposed

No answer given

Gross floorspace proposed

No answer given

Number of hotel rooms proposed

No answer given

Amount of development proposed

No answer given

Description

No answer given

Can suitable access be achieved for the site?

Suitable access is achievable

Where will the site’s access point(s) be?

Access to the site is proposed by a simple priority junction to Newton Lane. The access is proposed to be located within the 30mph speed limit and positioned equidistant between Tandy’s Close and Bakers Close junctions. The access and the impact of the development on Newton Lane has been reviewed previously by the Highways Authority who have confirmed no objection to the proposal. The site is located in close proximity to a network of PRoW which the site can connect into. The opportunity exists to extend the footpaths through the site to provide a new looped pedestrian route.

Is the site available for development now?

Yes

Is the site currently subject to a planning application?

Is the site currently being marketed?

Are you aware of any issues that might affect the viability of developing the site?

1-5 years (2024/25-2028/29)

The site is immediately deliverable and could deliver now well ahead of the Plan being adopted. The site could deliver in full within the first three years of the Plan being adopted 2023 – 2026.

6-10 years (2029/30-2033/34)

No answer given

11-15 years (2034/35-2039/40)

No answer given

16+ years (2040 onwards)

No answer given

What year, post adoption of the plan, would you expect development to start on site?

2024 if a planning application is progressed in parallel to the Plan being prepared.

The council has declared a climate emergency. How the proposal will respond to climate change

The site is located within walking distance of services, facilities and sustainable transport modes which will lessen reliance on private vehicle travel and promote modal shift. All units proposed will be built to create high levels of thermal performance to reduce energy need and where possible will be orientated to take advantage of passive solar gains. It is intended to create a good level of air tightness which will prevent the loss of warm air from the new units and greatly improve loss from the existing building, thereby reducing heating needs/demand. The level of insulation affects the ability to maintain a comfortable internal temperature Good levels of insulation will be used to prevent heat loss from inside to outside in the winter, and heat gain from outside to inside in the summer Low water usage within the dwellings will be achieved through the following: • Efficient washing machines • Dual flush cisterns • Low usage fittings restrictors on taps, showers etc Extensive open space is proposed on the site comprising a water meadow and parkland also provide opportunities to support future climate change initiatives.

Attachments

File: Land East of Newton Lane Site Promotion Document 2020.pdf

File: Covering letter redacted

Site size (ha)

6.17

Site size threshold

Above

Overriding constraint?

Site not in accordance with the emerging development strategy

Stage1 conclusion

Exclude from further assessment

Stage 2 Assessment of suitability, availability & achievability

Nothing chosen

Stage 2 conclusion

Nothing chosen

1a. Within or adjoining UAB SPA or built form of a small settlement

? The site is within or adjoining a defined settlement policy area or within the built form of a small settlement.

1b. Accessible on foot to a food store?

++ A site accessibility score of 8 is recorded where 8 is 0 – 10 minutes’ walk.

1c. Accessible on foot to a primary school?

++ A site accessibility score of 8 is recorded where 8 is 0 – 10 minutes’ walk.

1d. Accessible on foot or by bus to a major employer?

+ The site is within 10 minutes’ walk of a bus stop with a regular bus service (at least hourly) which enables travel 8am-6pm Monday to Friday to a major employer or it is possible to walk to a major employer within 10 minutes.

1e. Outside, adjoining or within the air quality management area?

+ The site is not within or adjoining the air quality management area.

2a. Within or adjoining site of nature conservation importance

x The site is within or adjoining a site of nature conservation importance

2b. In an area where protected species are known or likely to exist?

x Protected species could be affected.

2c. Potentially able to achieve a net gain in biodiversity?

? Uncertain or insufficient information

2d. Able to link into the green infrastructure opportunity network?

+ The site is within or adjoining the green infrastructure opportunity network and able to enhance the network.

2e. Likely to impact on an area currently providing ecosystem services.

x Opportunity area for 3 or more ecosystem services covers 25-50% of the site.

3a. Proposing a renewable energy scheme or extra energy efficiency standards?

0 No renewable energy generation scheme included and efficiency standards that meet normal standards.

3b. Within or adjoining the urban area, a defined settlement policy area or the built form of a small settlement?

? The site is within or adjoining a defined settlement policy area or within the built form of a small settlement.

3c. Accessible on foot to a food store?

++ A site accessibility score of 8 is recorded where 8 is 0 – 10 minutes’ walk.

3d. Accessible on foot to a primary school?

++ A site accessibility score of 8 is recorded where 8 is 0 – 10 minutes’ walk.

3e. Accessible on foot or by bus to a major employer?

4a. Likely to impact on designated or nondesignated heritage assets or their settings? For more detailed assessment see HELAA supporting document. www.bedford.gov.uk/LocalPlan2040

x The proposal has the potential to cause harm to heritage assets. This harm may range from low to high. There may be options to avoid, reduce or mitigate this harm and where sites have not been ruled out altogether for other reasons, further assessment will be undertaken to more fully explore impacts on significance and options for harm reduction and mitigation. This further assessment may ultimately lead to the conclusion that the site should not be allocated.

5a. Likely to increase future economic and employment opportunities?

0 Proposal is not employment related.

6a. Proposing a main town centre use in, on the edge or outside of a town centre?

0 Proposal does not include a main town centre use.

7a. Within 400m of an existing open space or proposing open space within it?

x The proposal does not include and is not within 400m walking distance of a publicly accessible open space.

7b. Within 800m of a sports facility or proposing a sports facility within it?

x The proposal does not include and is not within 800m of a publicly accessible sports facility

8a. Likely to have a significant adverse impact on the surrounding landscape?

? It is uncertain what effect the proposal is likely to have on the landscape / more information is required.

8b. Within the existing settlement form?

+ The site adjoins a defined settlement policy area or the built form of a small settlement.

9a. On previously developed land?

x The site is not previously developed land as defined in the NPPF.

9b. On best and most versatile agricultural land ie grades, 1, 2 or 3a?

? The classification of the site is not known or it is not clear whether is classified as grade 3a or 3b.

10a. Within a groundwater source protection zone?

+ The site is not located in a source protection zone.

11a. At risk of flooding?

? Part of a site is within flood zone 2 or 3 but the area proposed for development is in flood zone 1.

12a. Likely to provide a mix of housing, including affordable housing?

+ The site is likely to provide a mix of housing and include affordable housing.

12b. Able to address a particular housing need?

x The development will not meet identified needs eg elderly, care, travellers.

13a. Within 800m of a facility where cultural or social activities can be accessed?

+ The site is within 800m of a facility where cultural or social activities can be accessed.

14a. Likely to encourage social cohesion?

0 Neutral.

14b. Likely to help make the area safer? +

+ The development is likely to increase public surveillance or increase activity.

15a. Within or adjoining the urban area, a defined settlement policy area or the built form of a small settlement?

? The site is within or adjoining a defined settlement policy area or within the built form of a small settlement.

15b. Accessible on foot to a food store?

++ A site accessibility score of 8 is recorded where 8 is 0 – 10 minutes’ walk.

15c. Accessible on foot to a primary school?

++ A site accessibility score of 8 is recorded where 8 is 0 – 10 minutes’ walk

15d. Accessible on foot or by bus to a major employer?

15e. Connect highway without constraint?

+ No access constraints

15f. Highway or junction capacity issues

+ No capacity issues

Highway comments. For more detailed assessment see HELAA supporting document. www.bedford.gov.uk/LocalPlan2040

The site is located on the east side of Newton Lane in the village of Turney approximately 7.9 miles west of Bedford town centre. Access to the site is proposed from a simple priority junction taken from Newton Lane. The access is proposed to be located within the 30mph speed limit and positioned equidistant between Tandy’s Close and Bakers Close junctions. There is moderate traffic congestion in the area.. The nearest bus stop is located approximately 300m south of the site on High Street. There is no formal footway serving the site. Cycling is feasible on-road. A Transport Assessment will be required to identify the impact of traffic from the proposed development. The proposal will require a road to adoptable standards in accordance with Bedford Borough Council's highway standards in terms of accommodating the carriageway/footway widths and the required radius kerbs. Reduction of the speed limit to 30mph along the whole frontage of the site should be investigated as an option. Development of footways in order to connect to the PROW network. A new looped pedestrian route could be created.

Contaminated Land

Nothing chosen

Environmental Health note

no noise concerns

Mineral Safeguarding Area

Site does not fall within the boundary of a MSA.

Site assessment conclusions

The site has been excluded from further assessment at Stage 1 because its location is not in accordance with the development strategy.