Call for Sites Form

Form ID: 263

Land owner

No answer given

N/A

Pertenhall Road Keysoe Bedford MK44 2HR

Map 1233
Show full map

Agricultural

Agriculture

Agriculture

Agriculture

Residential

No

Housing

Nothing chosen

1

Self-build/Custom build homes

2 and 3 bedroom houses would be inconsistant in local invironment. Propose larger and unique familly dwelling.

2/Ha.

Other

An exceptional house mirroring the converted brick barns opposite the site.

No answer given

Nothing chosen

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

Suitable access is achievable

An existing entrance in North West corner of the site. Very good visibility lines in both directions onto the highway.

Yes

No

No

No

1

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

2024

The site is approximatley 0.5Ha which will allow ground source heating. A large dwelling is proposed which will provide good roof area for solar elecricity generation and room for battery storage. The site is within walking or cycling distance of Keysoe bus stop and could reduce car use.

No uploaded files for public display

0.45

Above

Site not in accordance with the emerging development strategy

Exclude from further assessment

Nothing chosen

Nothing chosen

x The site is not within or adjoining the urban area or a defined settlement policy area, or within the built form of a small settlement

xx A site accessibility score of 0 is recorded where 0 is more than 30 minutes’ walk.

xx A site accessibility score of 0 is recorded where 0 is more than 30 minutes’ walk.

Nothing chosen

+ The site is not within or adjoining the air quality management area.

+ The site is not within or adjoining a site of nature conservation importance

? Uncertain or insufficient information.

? Uncertain or insufficient information

0 The site is not within or adjoining the green infrastructure opportunity network or the impact of the proposal is neutral.

+ Opportunity area for 3 or more ecosystem services covers less than 25% of the site.

0 No renewable energy generation scheme included and efficiency standards that meet normal standards.

? The site is within or adjoining a defined settlement policy area or within the built form of a small settlement.

xx A site accessibility score of 0 is recorded where 0 is more than 30 minutes’ walk.

xx A site accessibility score of 0 is recorded where 0 is more than 30 minutes’ walk.

xx There is no public transport within 10 minutes’ walk to enable access to a major employer.

x The proposal has the potential to cause harm to heritage assets. This harm may range from low to high. There may be options to avoid, reduce or mitigate this harm and where sites have not been ruled out altogether for other reasons, further assessment will be undertaken to more fully explore impacts on significance and options for harm reduction and mitigation. This further assessment may ultimately lead to the conclusion that the site should not be allocated.

0 Proposal is not employment related.

0 Proposal does not include a main town centre use.

x The proposal does not include and is not within 400m walking distance of a publicly accessible open space.

x The proposal does not include and is not within 800m of a publicly accessible sports facility

? It is uncertain what effect the proposal is likely to have on the landscape / more information is required.

x The site is separated from a defined settlement policy area or the built form of a small settlement.

x The site is not previously developed land as defined in the NPPF.

x All or a majority of the site is best and most versatile agricultural land as defined in the NPPF.

+ The site is not located in a source protection zone.

? Part of a site is within flood zone 2 or 3 but the area proposed for development is in flood zone 1.

x The site is unlikely to provide a mix of housing and/or is unlikely to include affordable housing.

x The development will not meet identified needs eg elderly, care, travellers.

+ The site is within 800m of a facility where cultural or social activities can be accessed.

0 Neutral.

? Uncertain or insufficient information.

x The site is not within or adjoining the urban area or a defined settlement policy area, or within the built form of a small settlement

xx A site accessibility score of 0 is recorded where 0 is more than 30 minutes’ walk.

xx A site accessibility score of 0 is recorded where 0 is more than 30 minutes’ walk.

xx There is no public transport within 10 minutes’ walk to enable access to a major employer.

+ No access constraints

+ No capacity issues

The site located east of Perenhall Road in the village of Keysoe approximately 11 miles north of Bedford town centre. Access to the site is possible in North West corner of the site. The proposal would not cause significant traffic problems to the network. The closest bus stop located 800m north of the site. There are no footways and formal cycleways serving the site. Cycling is possible by using the road surface. Pedestrian footway development to connect to Keysoe not likely to be feasible for only one dwelling. Consider marking on-street cycle lanes in Perenhall Road.

Nothing chosen

no noise issues

Entire site falls within the boundary of a MSA.

The site has been excluded from further assessment at Stage 1 because its location is not in accordance with the development strategy.