Call for Sites Form

Form ID: 879

Other (please specify)

Please contact Agent: Shannon Hubbard, Robinson & Hall LLP

Yes

Land to the South of 30 Ivy Lane (West of Ivy Lane), Wilstead. 0.2 ha.

Map 1233
Show full map

The site currently comprises grassland/scrubland and is bounded by a tree/hedgerow.

Residential Dwellings (No. 30 immediately adjacent) and Business

Residential Dwelling (No. 26 Ivy Lane)

Agricultural Land

Agricultural Land

No

Housing

Nothing chosen

2

Family houses , Self-build/Custom build homes

No answer given

The density assumed is based on 10 dwellings per hectare and considers the surrounding character area of Ivy Lane and the village. It is considered that any more than 2 dwellings at this site would be disproportionate.

Market housing - Owner occupied

No answer given

No answer given

Nothing chosen

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

The current access is unsuitable/requires improvement

irect access onto the site can be achieved from Ivy Lane to the east as shown on the accompanying plan reference 48130-1. An access currently exists to the south adjacent to 26 Ivy Lane. The site would contribute to the delivery of much-needed local housing within Wilstead and will form infill development along the existing built form of Ivy Lane. The proposed dwellings shall be position in a way to ensure residential amenity and present a sustainable development of 2 dwellings.

Yes

No

No

No

1 - 2

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

It is anticipated that this site could come forward within 2 years of the plan being adopted subject to a planning application being submitted to the site, development could start in mid-late 2024 with anticipated completion by early 2026.

Any scheme at the site will seek to reduce greenhouse gas emissions throughout both the construction and operational phases of development. Renewable energy will be considered as part of the detailed design process of the proposed dwellings.

No uploaded files for public display

0.20

Below - exclude at stage 1

Site not in accordance with the emerging development strategy

Exclude from further assessment

Nothing chosen

Nothing chosen

x The site is not within or adjoining the urban area or a defined settlement policy area, or within the built form of a small settlement

+ A site accessibility score of 6 is recorded where 6 is 11 – 20 minutes’ walk.

+ A site accessibility score of 6 is recorded where 6 is 11 – 20 minutes’ walk.

xx There is no public transport within 10 minutes’ walk to enable access to a major employer

+ The site is not within or adjoining the air quality management area.

+ The site is not within or adjoining a site of nature conservation importance

? Uncertain or insufficient information.

? Uncertain or insufficient information

0 The site is not within or adjoining the green infrastructure opportunity network or the impact of the proposal is neutral.

++ Opportunity area for fewer than 3 ecosystem services.

0 No renewable energy generation scheme included and efficiency standards that meet normal standards.

x The site is not within or adjoining the urban area or a defined settlement policy area, or within the built form of a small settlement

+ A site accessibility score of 6 is recorded where 6 is 11 – 20 minutes’ walk.

+ A site accessibility score of 6 is recorded where 6 is 11 – 20 minutes’ walk

xx There is no public transport within 10 minutes’ walk to enable access to a major employer.

0 The proposal appears to have no impact on heritage assets and their significance.

0 Proposal is not employment related.

0 Proposal does not include a main town centre use.

x The proposal does not include and is not within 400m walking distance of a publicly accessible open space.

x The proposal does not include and is not within 800m of a publicly accessible sports facility

0 The proposal is likely to have a neutral effect on the landscape.

x The site is separated from a defined settlement policy area or the built form of a small settlement.

x The site is not previously developed land as defined in the NPPF.

? The classification of the site is not known or it is not clear whether is classified as grade 3a or 3b.

+ The site is not located in a source protection zone.

+ The site is within flood zone 1 (areas that have been shown to be at less than 0.1% chance of flooding in any year).

x The site is unlikely to provide a mix of housing and/or is unlikely to include affordable housing.

x The development will not meet identified needs eg elderly, care, travellers.

+ The site is within 800m of a facility where cultural or social activities can be accessed.

0 Neutral.

+ The development is likely to increase public surveillance or increase activity.

x The site is not within or adjoining the urban area or a defined settlement policy area, or within the built form of a small settlement

+ A site accessibility score of 6 is recorded where 6 is 11 – 20 minutes’ walk.

+ A site accessibility score of 6 is recorded where 6 is 11 – 20 minutes’ walk

xx There is no public transport within 10 minutes’ walk to enable access to a major employer.

? Potential access requiring mitigation

+ No capacity issues

See Site 877, located in close proximity. There is an existing access serving the site from the corner adjacent to Ivy Lane No. 33 to the South, though vehicle access would require work. The area and Cotton End Road have low/moderate traffic peak conditions, but no significant impact expected from one additional dwelling. The bus stop is 230m from the site, at the corner of Ivy Lane and Cotton End Road, with service of 1 bus per hour - route 9. Ivy Lane has no footway and it is not wide enough to introduce a footway. The location and cul de sac nature of the road would allow for pedestrian trips to the bus stops on Cotton End Rd. Scale of development unlikely warrants cost of mitigations/improvements

Nothing chosen

No answer given

Site does not fall within the boundary of a MSA.

The site has been excluded from further assessment at Stage 1 because its location is not in accordance with the development strategy.