Call for Sites

Search form responses

Results for Arnold White Estates Ltd search

New search New search
Form ID: 745

Other (please specify)

Agent

Yes

Broadmead, Marston Vale

Map 1233

Agricultural

former brickworks

settlement of Stewartby

former quarry

railway line

No

Employment

Nothing chosen

No answer given

Nothing chosen

No answer given

No answer given

Nothing chosen

No answer given

No answer given

Nothing chosen

No answer given

B1 (to become E class)/ B2/B8

approx 335,00 sqm

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

Suitable access is achievable

Site adjoins Broadmead Road to the south and Manor Road to the north

Yes

Yes

No

No

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

2024

Arnold White Estates Ltd have a proven track record of promoting and delivering renewable energy projects. They own and operate the 2.5MW 149m tall wind turbine at Double Arches, Heath & Reach and have permission for an additional turbine at that location. As a strategic employment site, the development can deliver renewable energy via different technologies, but could include roof mounted solar and a local energy park. It can include electric vehicle charging for HGVs as well as employee vehicles. The site is also in a highly sustainable location with access to local sustainable transport methods including rail and bus, as well as being within a practical commutable distance of residential properties at Stewartby, Wootton and the Wixams.

No uploaded files for public display

95.69

Above

None

Include in next stage of assessment

Site is available

Include in next stage of assessment

x The site is not within or adjoining the urban area or a defined settlement policy area, or within the built form of a small settlement

++ A site accessibility score of 8 is recorded where 8 is 0 – 10 minutes’ walk.

+ A site accessibility score of 6 is recorded where 6 is 11 – 20 minutes’ walk.

+ The site is within 10 minutes’ walk of a bus stop with a regular bus service (at least hourly) which enables travel 8am-6pm Monday to Friday to a major employer or it is possible to walk to a major employer within 10 minutes.

+ The site is not within or adjoining the air quality management area.

x The site is within or adjoining a site of nature conservation importance

x Protected species could be affected.

? Uncertain or insufficient information

+ The site is within or adjoining the green infrastructure opportunity network and able to enhance the network.

+ Opportunity area for 3 or more ecosystem services covers less than 25% of the site.

0 No renewable energy generation scheme included and efficiency standards that meet normal standards.

x The site is not within or adjoining the urban area or a defined settlement policy area, or within the built form of a small settlement

++ A site accessibility score of 8 is recorded where 8 is 0 – 10 minutes’ walk.

+ A site accessibility score of 6 is recorded where 6 is 11 – 20 minutes’ walk

+ The site is within 10 minutes’ walk of a bus stop with a regular bus service (at least hourly) which enables travel 8am-6pm Monday to Friday to a major employer or it is possible to walk to a major employer within 10 minutes.

x The proposal has the potential to cause harm to heritage assets. This harm may range from low to high. There may be options to avoid, reduce or mitigate this harm and where sites have not been ruled out altogether for other reasons, further assessment will be undertaken to more fully explore impacts on significance and options for harm reduction and mitigation. This further assessment may ultimately lead to the conclusion that the site should not be allocated.

+ Proposal includes permanent economic and employment opportunities.

0 Proposal does not include a main town centre use.

x The proposal does not include and is not within 400m walking distance of a publicly accessible open space.

x The proposal does not include and is not within 800m of a publicly accessible sports facility

? It is uncertain what effect the proposal is likely to have on the landscape / more information is required.

x The site is separated from a defined settlement policy area or the built form of a small settlement.

x The site is not previously developed land as defined in the NPPF.

+ The site is not on best and most versatile agricultural land as defined in the NPPF.

+ The site is not located in a source protection zone.

+ The site is within flood zone 1 (areas that have been shown to be at less than 0.1% chance of flooding in any year).

0 Residential development not proposed.

0 Residential development not proposed.

+ The site is within 800m of a facility where cultural or social activities can be accessed.

0 Neutral.

+ The development is likely to increase public surveillance or increase activity.

x The site is not within or adjoining the urban area or a defined settlement policy area, or within the built form of a small settlement

++ A site accessibility score of 8 is recorded where 8 is 0 – 10 minutes’ walk.

+ A site accessibility score of 6 is recorded where 6 is 11 – 20 minutes’ walk

+ The site is within 10 minutes’ walk of a bus stop with a regular bus service (at least hourly) which enables travel 8am-6pm Monday to Friday to a major employer or it is possible to walk to a major employer within 10 minutes.

+ No access constraints

? Potential capacity problem requiring mitigation

Access to the site is feasible from Broadmead Road to the south and Manor Road to the north. There is a train Station 'Kempston Hardwick' around 400m distance from the east side of the site. The site lack of accessibility to footways and there is no provision for cyclists. A Transport Assessment (TA) will be required to identify the impact of traffic and for satisfactory facilities for both pedestrians and cyclists.

Nothing chosen

railway line to be considered

Majority of the site falls in MSA.

The site is suitable for allocation as a new settlement to include a mix of uses including residential, business / science campus and innovation hub as part of a larger allocation. Employment uses may be better placed elsewhere within the larger allocation to fit better with the strategy. The larger site has been assessed separately - Site 0004. Site is proposed for allocation in combination with other sites 809, 898, 900, 905 and 1050 - HOU14 Kempston Hardwick new settlement.

Form ID: 10545

Nothing chosen

No answer given

Nothing chosen

Manor Road

Map 1233

Agricultural

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

Nothing chosen

Housing

Nothing chosen

No answer given

Nothing chosen

No answer given

No answer given

Nothing chosen

No answer given

No answer given

Nothing chosen

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No uploaded files for public display

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.