Call for Sites

Search form responses

Results for Bedfordia Developments Ltd and Bedfordshire Charitable Trust Ltd search

New search New search
Form ID: 832

Other (please specify)

Agent

Yes

Land at Station Road, Oakley

Map 1233

Agricultural land and an area of school playing fields belonging to Lincroft School

Commercial uses

Highway / residential

Railway embankment / housing

Highway / education / residential

No

Housing

All other types

200-250 Units (inc of Neighbourhood Plan allocation)

Family houses

No answer given

27-33 dwellings per net ha (based on up to 50% of gross site)

Market housing - Owner occupied , Affordable Housing - Affordable rent , Affordable Housing - Shared ownership

No answer given

No answer given

Nothing chosen

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

c. 4.3 ha – Relocation of Lovell Road Sports Pitches c. 2ha Oakley NP Allocated Site c.7ha Further Residential Development Balance of Gross Site area to be provided as open space, landscaping and route of distributor road

In addition to the proposed residential development of the land, including that related to the NP designated area, and the proposed residential development of the current Lincroft School recreation land (under an agreement for a ‘land swap’ with the Sharnbrook Academy Federation – SAF), the development proposal will create a new, self-contained Lincroft School Campus. This will provide for a dedicated school access thus relieving current traffic congestion and environmental issues associated with the current access provision at Oakley, together with additional parking (cars and coaches//buses) and circulation space, expanded, new sports facilities, inc new teaching space (for sports) changing facilities etc). The existing school sports facilities are separated from the School which is disruptive and has safety implications. The development of the land would also allow for the provision of a new highways/movement corridor and significantly better traffic management (as set out on master plan) which will have significant environmental and amenity benefits

Suitable access is achievable

Station Road, north of Lincroft School and Lovell Road, south of Lincroft School playing pitches.

Yes

No

No

No

200-250

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

2025/26 - Submission and determination of application – Q1 2024 - Sale of Site – Q3 2024 - Reserved Matters Application – Q4 2024 - Commencement Q1 2025 Development timeframe assumes full build out by 2028/29 Note that the northern portion of the site (c.2ha) is allocated for development under Policy HG1 of the Oakley Neighbourhood Plan and proposals for this area could proceed in advance of the indicative timeframes set out

The site is wholly contained by development or built infrastructure and is very well located to the structure, from and character of the village. Additionally, we consider Oakley to be a sustainable location for new development on the basis of the services and facilities it currently offers and its proximity to the urban area of Bedford (and the larger village of Clapham). The village’s contribution towards meeting the needs of the wider rural area exceeds that of other settlements classified as Rural Service Centres. Furthermore, the proposed development would offer the opportunity to complement and enhance these existing facilities by enabling the existing, well-established and popular Lincroft School to both improve to better meet the needs of its pupils and staff and increase capacity to enable the school to meet the increased demands arising from planned growth within its catchment area (notably the level of growth currently planned at Bromham, Clapham and Oakley). The proposal would also provide the opportunity for the school to offer its sports facilities for community use whereas now the facilities are unlit and unsuitable for such use. Development of this site would have particular regard to the environment and biodiversity within it and through suitable mitigation measures would ensure the site is future proofed. Additionally, proposals would incorporate landscaping and open spaces, including suitable tree planting and through design, layout and orientation maximise the principles of sustainable design.

15.17

Above

Site not in accordance with the emerging development strategy , Site already allocated in development plan

Exclude from further assessment

Nothing chosen

Nothing chosen

? The site is within or adjoining a defined settlement policy area or within the built form of a small settlement.

++ A site accessibility score of 8 is recorded where 8 is 0 – 10 minutes’ walk.

++ A site accessibility score of 8 is recorded where 8 is 0 – 10 minutes’ walk.

+ The site is within 10 minutes’ walk of a bus stop with a regular bus service (at least hourly) which enables travel 8am-6pm Monday to Friday to a major employer or it is possible to walk to a major employer within 10 minutes.

+ The site is not within or adjoining the air quality management area.

+ The site is not within or adjoining a site of nature conservation importance

? Uncertain or insufficient information.

? Uncertain or insufficient information

0 The site is not within or adjoining the green infrastructure opportunity network or the impact of the proposal is neutral.

+ Opportunity area for 3 or more ecosystem services covers less than 25% of the site.

0 No renewable energy generation scheme included and efficiency standards that meet normal standards.

? The site is within or adjoining a defined settlement policy area or within the built form of a small settlement.

++ A site accessibility score of 8 is recorded where 8 is 0 – 10 minutes’ walk.

++ A site accessibility score of 8 is recorded where 8 is 0 – 10 minutes’ walk.

+ The site is within 10 minutes’ walk of a bus stop with a regular bus service (at least hourly) which enables travel 8am-6pm Monday to Friday to a major employer or it is possible to walk to a major employer within 10 minutes.

x The proposal has the potential to cause harm to heritage assets. This harm may range from low to high. There may be options to avoid, reduce or mitigate this harm and where sites have not been ruled out altogether for other reasons, further assessment will be undertaken to more fully explore impacts on significance and options for harm reduction and mitigation. This further assessment may ultimately lead to the conclusion that the site should not be allocated.

0 Proposal is not employment related.

0 Proposal does not include a main town centre use.

+ The proposal includes or is within 400m walking distance of a publicly accessible open space that includes an equipped children’s play area of at least 200m2 .

x The proposal does not include and is not within 800m of a publicly accessible sports facility

? It is uncertain what effect the proposal is likely to have on the landscape / more information is required.

+ The site adjoins a defined settlement policy area or the built form of a small settlement.

x The site is not previously developed land as defined in the NPPF.

x All or a majority of the site is best and most versatile agricultural land as defined in the NPPF.

0 The site is located within a source protection zone but the proposed use is unlikely to be a risk to water supplies.

+ The site is within flood zone 1 (areas that have been shown to be at less than 0.1% chance of flooding in any year).

+ The site is likely to provide a mix of housing and include affordable housing.

x The development will not meet identified needs eg elderly, care, travellers.

+ The site is within 800m of a facility where cultural or social activities can be accessed.

+ The proposal is for or includes a community use or is likely to promote community collaboration and social interaction eg cultural, social, leisure and sporting uses.

+ The development is likely to increase public surveillance or increase activity.

? The site is within or adjoining a defined settlement policy area or within the built form of a small settlement.

++ A site accessibility score of 8 is recorded where 8 is 0 – 10 minutes’ walk.

++ A site accessibility score of 8 is recorded where 8 is 0 – 10 minutes’ walk

+ The site is within 10 minutes’ walk of a bus stop with a regular bus service (at least hourly) which enables travel 8am-6pm Monday to Friday to a major employer or it is possible to walk to a major employer within 10 minutes.

? Potential access requiring mitigation

x Serious capacity constraint

The site is located on land North of Lovell Road and East of Station Road between Oakley and Clapham. Access would be provided via Lovell Road and Station Road, adopted and classified roads comprising of a 6-6.6m wide single carriageway with grass verge outside the site but footway on the opposite side. Lovell Road normally carries light traffic, however, Station Road is often congested throughout the day but particularly at peak times. The footpath on the other side of the road is fairly wide but not of the best quality on Lovell Road, while on Station Road it is fairly good quality. The Lovell Road one isn't suitable for wheelchairs. There is no cycle path in the vicinity. The closest bus stop on both roads are right in front of the site, serving buses 25 and 51 to Bedford, Rushden and Pavenham, at 3 times per hour frequency. A Transport Assessment should be developed to assess the impact of the development on the road network. The amount of extra traffic would likely cause increased congestion, particularly on Station Road. Cycle connection improvements would be recommended as well as improvement of the pedestrian facilities, such as improving the quality of the footpath on Lovell Road. Pedestrian crossings should be provided. Both roads are narrow so any mitigation requiring extra road capacity might be an issue.

Nothing chosen

predominant concern is railway noise

Site does not fall within the boundary of a MSA.

The site has been excluded from further assessment at Stage 1. Part of the site is already allocated for residential development in the Oakley Neighbourhood Plan. The remainder of the site is not in a location that is in accordance with the development strategy.

Form ID: 1000

Other (please specify)

Agent

Yes

Land adjacent to Highfield Road, Oakley

Map 1233

Unused agricultural land

Commercial uses/residential

Agricultural land

Commercial uses / agricultural land

Midland Railway Line

No

Employment

Nothing chosen

No answer given

Nothing chosen

No answer given

No answer given

Nothing chosen

No answer given

No answer given

Nothing chosen

No answer given

Bi (a-c), high calibre employment site. B2/B8 uses appropriate to the scale of the site and surrounding area

TBC - Commensurate to 3ha gross site area

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

Suitable access is achievable

Access is via Highfield Road, located to the north of the site.

Yes

No

No

No

B uses

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

2027/28 Timeframe based on a three-year period for marketing, establishing occupier requirements and formal planning stages.

The site is under-utilised agricultural land and is very well located to the structure, from and character of the village and adjacent commercial uses. Additionally, we consider Oakley to be a sustainable location for new development on the basis of the services and facilities it currently offers. Development of this site would have particular regard to the environment and biodiversity within it and through suitable mitigation measures would ensure the site is future-proofed. Additionally, proposals would incorporate landscaping and open spaces, including suitable tree planting and through design, layout and orientation maximise the principles of sustainable design.

4.99

Above

Site not in accordance with the emerging development strategy

Exclude from further assessment

Nothing chosen

Nothing chosen

x The site is not within or adjoining the urban area or a defined settlement policy area, or within the built form of a small settlement

++ A site accessibility score of 8 is recorded where 8 is 0 – 10 minutes’ walk.

+ A site accessibility score of 6 is recorded where 6 is 11 – 20 minutes’ walk.

+ The site is within 10 minutes’ walk of a bus stop with a regular bus service (at least hourly) which enables travel 8am-6pm Monday to Friday to a major employer or it is possible to walk to a major employer within 10 minutes.

+ The site is not within or adjoining the air quality management area.

+ The site is not within or adjoining a site of nature conservation importance

? Uncertain or insufficient information.

? Uncertain or insufficient information

0 The site is not within or adjoining the green infrastructure opportunity network or the impact of the proposal is neutral.

x Opportunity area for 3 or more ecosystem services covers 25-50% of the site.

0 No renewable energy generation scheme included and efficiency standards that meet normal standards.

x The site is not within or adjoining the urban area or a defined settlement policy area, or within the built form of a small settlement

++ A site accessibility score of 8 is recorded where 8 is 0 – 10 minutes’ walk.

+ A site accessibility score of 6 is recorded where 6 is 11 – 20 minutes’ walk

+ The site is within 10 minutes’ walk of a bus stop with a regular bus service (at least hourly) which enables travel 8am-6pm Monday to Friday to a major employer or it is possible to walk to a major employer within 10 minutes.

x The proposal has the potential to cause harm to heritage assets. This harm may range from low to high. There may be options to avoid, reduce or mitigate this harm and where sites have not been ruled out altogether for other reasons, further assessment will be undertaken to more fully explore impacts on significance and options for harm reduction and mitigation. This further assessment may ultimately lead to the conclusion that the site should not be allocated.

+ Proposal includes permanent economic and employment opportunities.

0 Proposal does not include a main town centre use.

x The proposal does not include and is not within 400m walking distance of a publicly accessible open space.

x The proposal does not include and is not within 800m of a publicly accessible sports facility

? It is uncertain what effect the proposal is likely to have on the landscape / more information is required.

+ The site adjoins a defined settlement policy area or the built form of a small settlement.

x The site is not previously developed land as defined in the NPPF.

x All or a majority of the site is best and most versatile agricultural land as defined in the NPPF.

x The site is located within a source protection zone and the proposed use could harm water supplies eg because it is an industrial use

+ The site is within flood zone 1 (areas that have been shown to be at less than 0.1% chance of flooding in any year).

0 Residential development not proposed.

0 Residential development not proposed.

+ The site is within 800m of a facility where cultural or social activities can be accessed.

0 Neutral.

+ The development is likely to increase public surveillance or increase activity.

x The site is not within or adjoining the urban area or a defined settlement policy area, or within the built form of a small settlement

++ A site accessibility score of 8 is recorded where 8 is 0 – 10 minutes’ walk.

+ A site accessibility score of 6 is recorded where 6 is 11 – 20 minutes’ walk

+ The site is within 10 minutes’ walk of a bus stop with a regular bus service (at least hourly) which enables travel 8am-6pm Monday to Friday to a major employer or it is possible to walk to a major employer within 10 minutes.

? Potential access requiring mitigation

? Potential capacity problem requiring mitigation

The site is located at the south side of Highfield Road and adjacent to the east side of property no. 8 Highfield Road, in village of Oakley approximately 5 miles north-west of Bedford town centre. The site fronts onto Highfield Road at the most northern tip of the site and on the west side of the existing roundabout junction with A6 and also the A6 link road between the roundabout junction and the A6 dual carriageway on the east side. Access would be provided via Highfield Road, a single carriageway with 30mph speed limit and a footpath on the side of the development. The footpath is rather narrow and only extends to the West. There are no cycle paths in the vicinity. Neither Highfield Road or the A6 are normally congested, however, Station Road just to the West often is. Depending on the level of traffic generated, this might cause an issue. The closest bus stop is about 280m from the site, serving buses 50 and 51 to Bedford and Rushden, at 2 times per hour frequency. TA should be developed to assess the impact of the development on the road network. Cycle connection improvements would be recommended as well as improvement of the pedestrian facilities, such as improving the quality / width of the footpath on Highfield Road. It's unclear where the exact access point will be on Highfield Road but it would be good if the pedestrian access wasn't directly onto the roundabout, for safety reasons.

Nothing chosen

no noise concerns for employment use

Site does not fall within the boundary of a MSA.

The site has been excluded from further assessment at Stage 1 because its location is not in accordance with the development strategy.

Form ID: 1245

Land owner

No answer given

Yes

Town Farm, Stocking Lane, Souldrop

Map 1233

Agricultural

Souldrop Road and residential development

undeveloped land

undeveloped land

Residential

Yes

Housing

Housing , Employment

10

Family houses

No answer given

25 dph

Market housing - Owner occupied , Affordable Housing - Affordable rent , Affordable Housing - Shared ownership

No answer given

No answer given

Nothing chosen

No answer given

B1 and B8

tbc

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

Suitable access is achievable

Suitable access can be achieved via Souldrop Road.

Yes

No

No

No

10

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

2024

The site contains a single agricultural building and adjoins the settlement. This site provides a sustainable location which is well related to the existing pattern of development along Sharnbrook Road. Development of this site would have particular regard to the local environmental context and through good design incorporating suitable mitigation measures would ensure the site is future proofed. Additionally, proposals would incorporate landscaping and open spaces, including suitable tree planting and through design, layout and orientation maximise the principles of sustainable design

No uploaded files for public display

0.34

Above

Site not in accordance with the emerging development strategy

Exclude from further assessment

Nothing chosen

Nothing chosen

? The site is within or adjoining a defined settlement policy area or within the built form of a small settlement.

+ A site accessibility score of 6 is recorded where 6 is 11 – 20 minutes’ walk.

xx A site accessibility score of 0 is recorded where 0 is more than 30 minutes’ walk.

x The site is within 10 minutes’ walk of a bus stop with an infrequent bus service (less frequent than hourly each day) which enables travel 8am6pm Monday to Friday to a major employer.

+ The site is not within or adjoining the air quality management area.

+ The site is not within or adjoining a site of nature conservation importance

x Protected species could be affected.

? Uncertain or insufficient information

0 The site is not within or adjoining the green infrastructure opportunity network or the impact of the proposal is neutral.

+ Opportunity area for 3 or more ecosystem services covers less than 25% of the site.

0 No renewable energy generation scheme included and efficiency standards that meet normal standards.

? The site is within or adjoining a defined settlement policy area or within the built form of a small settlement.

+ A site accessibility score of 6 is recorded where 6 is 11 – 20 minutes’ walk.

xx A site accessibility score of 0 is recorded where 0 is more than 30 minutes’ walk.

x The site is within 10 minutes’ walk of a bus stop with an infrequent bus service (less frequent than hourly each day) which enables travel 8am6pm Monday to Friday to a major employer.

x The proposal has the potential to cause harm to heritage assets. This harm may range from low to high. There may be options to avoid, reduce or mitigate this harm and where sites have not been ruled out altogether for other reasons, further assessment will be undertaken to more fully explore impacts on significance and options for harm reduction and mitigation. This further assessment may ultimately lead to the conclusion that the site should not be allocated.

+ Proposal includes permanent economic and employment opportunities.

0 Proposal does not include a main town centre use.

x The proposal does not include and is not within 400m walking distance of a publicly accessible open space.

x The proposal does not include and is not within 800m of a publicly accessible sports facility

? It is uncertain what effect the proposal is likely to have on the landscape / more information is required.

+ The site adjoins a defined settlement policy area or the built form of a small settlement.

x The site is not previously developed land as defined in the NPPF.

x All or a majority of the site is best and most versatile agricultural land as defined in the NPPF.

+ The site is not located in a source protection zone.

+ The site is within flood zone 1 (areas that have been shown to be at less than 0.1% chance of flooding in any year).

+ The site is likely to provide a mix of housing and include affordable housing.

x The development will not meet identified needs eg elderly, care, travellers.

+ The site is within 800m of a facility where cultural or social activities can be accessed.

0 Neutral.

+ The development is likely to increase public surveillance or increase activity.

? The site is within or adjoining a defined settlement policy area or within the built form of a small settlement.

+ A site accessibility score of 6 is recorded where 6 is 11 – 20 minutes’ walk.

xx A site accessibility score of 0 is recorded where 0 is more than 30 minutes’ walk.

x The site is within 10 minutes’ walk of a bus stop with an infrequent bus service (less frequent than hourly each day) which enables travel 8am6pm Monday to Friday to a major employer.

+ No access constraints

+ No capacity issues

The site is located on the south side of Souldrop Road in the village of Souldrop approximately 10 miles north of Bedford town centre. Access to the site is feasible from Souldrop road, which has a 30mph limit adjacent to the site. The closest bus stop is located 80m west of the site with no frequent service. There are no footways serving the site and cycling is possible only on-road. Development of footway to the site to connect the existing bus stop west.

Nothing chosen

no noise concerns

Site does not fall within the boundary of a MSA.

The site has been excluded from further assessment at Stage 1 because its location is not in accordance with the development strategy.

Form ID: 1247

Land owner

No answer given

Yes

Land at Green End Road, Kempston

Map 1233

Agricultural

Residential development

Kempston Cemetery, and Kempston Nurserie

No answer given

No answer given

No

Housing

Housing , Employment , Retail

120

Family houses

No answer given

17.1 dph

Market housing - Owner occupied , Affordable Housing - Affordable rent , Affordable Housing - Shared ownership

No answer given

No answer given

Nothing chosen

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

Supermarket

TBC

TBC

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

Suitable access is achievable

Access can be achieved via Cemetery Road and Green End Road.

Yes

No

No

No

50

70

No answer given

No answer given

2024/25

The site is well related to the urban area of Kempston and the extensive range of services and facilities provided there and within the urban extension development area. This includes a broad range of retail facilities including supermarkets, doctors/dentist surgeries, schooling (primary and secondary) and a range of leisure uses. There is also access to public transport providing services to Bedford and the surrounding towns and villages. Therefore, the site is in a sustainable location and reduces reliance on the private car and is capable of supporting a range of development typologies. Development of this site would have particular regard to the environment and biodiversity within it and through suitable mitigation measures. Additionally, proposals would incorporate landscaping and open spaces, including suitable tree planting and through design, layout and orientation maximise the principles of sustainable design.

7.16

Above

Site not in accordance with the emerging development strategy

Exclude from further assessment

Nothing chosen

Nothing chosen

? The site is within or adjoining a defined settlement policy area or within the built form of a small settlement.

+ A site accessibility score of 6 is recorded where 6 is 11 – 20 minutes’ walk.

+ A site accessibility score of 6 is recorded where 6 is 11 – 20 minutes’ walk.

+ The site is within 10 minutes’ walk of a bus stop with a regular bus service (at least hourly) which enables travel 8am-6pm Monday to Friday to a major employer or it is possible to walk to a major employer within 10 minutes.

+ The site is not within or adjoining the air quality management area.

+ The site is not within or adjoining a site of nature conservation importance

xx Protected species recorded on the site

? Uncertain or insufficient information

+ The site is within or adjoining the green infrastructure opportunity network and able to enhance the network.

+ Opportunity area for 3 or more ecosystem services covers less than 25% of the site.

0 No renewable energy generation scheme included and efficiency standards that meet normal standards.

? The site is within or adjoining a defined settlement policy area or within the built form of a small settlement.

+ A site accessibility score of 6 is recorded where 6 is 11 – 20 minutes’ walk.

+ A site accessibility score of 6 is recorded where 6 is 11 – 20 minutes’ walk

+ The site is within 10 minutes’ walk of a bus stop with a regular bus service (at least hourly) which enables travel 8am-6pm Monday to Friday to a major employer or it is possible to walk to a major employer within 10 minutes.

x The proposal has the potential to cause harm to heritage assets. This harm may range from low to high. There may be options to avoid, reduce or mitigate this harm and where sites have not been ruled out altogether for other reasons, further assessment will be undertaken to more fully explore impacts on significance and options for harm reduction and mitigation. This further assessment may ultimately lead to the conclusion that the site should not be allocated.

+ Proposal includes permanent economic and employment opportunities.

0 Proposal does not include a main town centre use.

x The proposal does not include and is not within 400m walking distance of a publicly accessible open space.

x The proposal does not include and is not within 800m of a publicly accessible sports facility

? It is uncertain what effect the proposal is likely to have on the landscape / more information is required.

+ The site adjoins a defined settlement policy area or the built form of a small settlement.

x The site is not previously developed land as defined in the NPPF.

? The classification of the site is not known or it is not clear whether is classified as grade 3a or 3b.

+ The site is not located in a source protection zone.

+ The site is within flood zone 1 (areas that have been shown to be at less than 0.1% chance of flooding in any year).

+ The site is likely to provide a mix of housing and include affordable housing.

x The development will not meet identified needs eg elderly, care, travellers.

+ The site is within 800m of a facility where cultural or social activities can be accessed.

0 Neutral.

+ The development is likely to increase public surveillance or increase activity.

? The site is within or adjoining a defined settlement policy area or within the built form of a small settlement.

+ A site accessibility score of 6 is recorded where 6 is 11 – 20 minutes’ walk.

+ A site accessibility score of 6 is recorded where 6 is 11 – 20 minutes’ walk

+ The site is within 10 minutes’ walk of a bus stop with a regular bus service (at least hourly) which enables travel 8am-6pm Monday to Friday to a major employer or it is possible to walk to a major employer within 10 minutes.

+ No access constraints

? Potential capacity problem requiring mitigation

The site is located on the east side of Green End Road at the corner with Cemetery Road and is approximately 4.5 miles south-west of Bedford town centre. Access to the site is feasible from Green End Road and Cemetery Road. Traffic generation from the potential residential development for residential units and retail would generate an increase in pedestrian and traffic movements. The nearest bus stops are on Cemetery Road just before the southbound approach to the roundabout junction with Martell Road approximately 1.1km in distance. Although a footway is present on the opposite side of the site, the width is below the minimum of 1.8m and there is no footway immediately outside the site. Cycling is possible only by using the road surface. Given the significant scale of proposals, a road to adoptable standards is required in accordance with Bedford Borough Council's highway standards in respect of width of carriageway, provision of footway/maintenance margins and radius kerbs at the junction. A Transport Assessment will be required to identify the impact of traffic and provision of satisfactory facilities for both pedestrians and cyclists. Any access off Cemetery Road will likely require a reduction in speed to 30mph, with the extent of reduction to be agreed with the highway authority.

Nothing chosen

no noise concerns

Part of the site falls within the boundary of a MSA.

The site has been excluded from further assessment at Stage 1 because its location is not in accordance with the development strategy.

Form ID: 1340

Other (please specify)

Agent

Yes

Land off Moor End Lane, Radwell, Bedford

Map 1233

Industrial

Agricultural

Agricultural

Agricultural and dwellings

Agricultural

Yes

Employment

Employment

No answer given

Nothing chosen

No answer given

No answer given

Nothing chosen

No answer given

No answer given

Nothing chosen

No answer given

Storage, office space, light industry

1,000 Sqm +

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

Suitable access is achievable

Access will be via the existing access off Moor End Lane.

Yes

Yes

No

No

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

2024

Sustainable Location The site is an existing small industrial/agricultural estate located just outside of Radwell and is within walking distance of two bus stops. This will provide potential future employees at the site the opportunity to use public transport to travel to work and reduces the reliance on the use of private transport. The buses also provide services into Bedford and the surrounding towns and villages should a wider range of services and facilities be necessary.

No uploaded files for public display

2.41

Above

Site not in accordance with the emerging development strategy

Exclude from further assessment

Nothing chosen

Nothing chosen

x The site is not within or adjoining the urban area or a defined settlement policy area, or within the built form of a small settlement

xx A site accessibility score of 0 is recorded where 0 is more than 30 minutes’ walk.

++ A site accessibility score of 8 is recorded where 8 is 0 – 10 minutes’ walk.

x The site is within 10 minutes’ walk of a bus stop with an infrequent bus service (less frequent than hourly each day) which enables travel 8am6pm Monday to Friday to a major employer.

+ The site is not within or adjoining the air quality management area.

+ The site is not within or adjoining a site of nature conservation importance

x Protected species could be affected.

? Uncertain or insufficient information

0 The site is not within or adjoining the green infrastructure opportunity network or the impact of the proposal is neutral.

++ Opportunity area for fewer than 3 ecosystem services.

0 No renewable energy generation scheme included and efficiency standards that meet normal standards.

x The site is not within or adjoining the urban area or a defined settlement policy area, or within the built form of a small settlement

xx A site accessibility score of 0 is recorded where 0 is more than 30 minutes’ walk.

++ A site accessibility score of 8 is recorded where 8 is 0 – 10 minutes’ walk.

x The site is within 10 minutes’ walk of a bus stop with an infrequent bus service (less frequent than hourly each day) which enables travel 8am6pm Monday to Friday to a major employer.

0 The proposal appears to have no impact on heritage assets and their significance.

+ Proposal includes permanent economic and employment opportunities.

0 Proposal does not include a main town centre use.

x The proposal does not include and is not within 400m walking distance of a publicly accessible open space.

x The proposal does not include and is not within 800m of a publicly accessible sports facility

? It is uncertain what effect the proposal is likely to have on the landscape / more information is required.

x The site is separated from a defined settlement policy area or the built form of a small settlement.

+ All or a majority of the site is previously developed land as defined in the NPPF.

? The classification of the site is not known or it is not clear whether is classified as grade 3a or 3b.

x The site is located within a source protection zone and the proposed use could harm water supplies eg because it is an industrial use

+ The site is within flood zone 1 (areas that have been shown to be at less than 0.1% chance of flooding in any year).

0 Residential development not proposed.

0 Residential development not proposed.

+ The site is within 800m of a facility where cultural or social activities can be accessed.

0 Neutral.

? Uncertain or insufficient information.

x The site is not within or adjoining the urban area or a defined settlement policy area, or within the built form of a small settlement

xx A site accessibility score of 0 is recorded where 0 is more than 30 minutes’ walk.

++ A site accessibility score of 8 is recorded where 8 is 0 – 10 minutes’ walk

x The site is within 10 minutes’ walk of a bus stop with an infrequent bus service (less frequent than hourly each day) which enables travel 8am6pm Monday to Friday to a major employer.

+ No access constraints

+ No capacity issues

Access onto Moor End Lane, a private road that is part of the site, then connecting to Radwell Rd. There can be some congestion along Radwell Rd at times. Bus stop with approx 1 service per hour each direction (Rushden- Bedford) approx 1km from the site. Moor End Lane appears suitable for pedestrians and cycles, and connects to a pavement on Radwell Rd as well as a cycle-friendly PRoW. Surfacing improvements on Moor End Lane to improve access from the bus stop to the site.

Nothing chosen

proposed employmeny is near residential, whilst existing empolyment will need assessment to ensure no harm to amenity

Site does not fall within the boundary of a MSA.

The site has been excluded from further assessment at Stage 1 because its location is not in accordance with the development strategy.

Form ID: 3234

Other (please specify)

Agent

Yes

Land west of Milton Road, Clapham. 23.74ha.

Map 1233

Agricultural with B8 caravan storage and dwelling

Agriculture

Residential

Residential

A12 Road

Yes

Housing

All other types

500

Family houses , Older people housing

Education

30 - 35ha

Market housing - Owner occupied , Affordable Housing - Affordable rent , Affordable Housing - Shared ownership

No answer given

No answer given

Nothing chosen

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

Land for 2FE primary school

Land for 2FE Primary School

Suitable access is achievable

Two vehicular points to Milton Road and one cycle/pedestrian only access.

Yes

No

No

No

400

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

To form part of Clapham Neighbourhood Plan so pre adoption.

Sustainable location, provision of electric vehicle charging points, SuDs, 10% biodiversity net gain.

No uploaded files for public display

24.30

Above

Site not in accordance with the emerging development strategy

Exclude from further assessment

Nothing chosen

Nothing chosen

? The site is within or adjoining a defined settlement policy area or within the built form of a small settlement.

++ A site accessibility score of 8 is recorded where 8 is 0 – 10 minutes’ walk.

+ A site accessibility score of 6 is recorded where 6 is 11 – 20 minutes’ walk.

x The site is within 10 minutes’ walk of a bus stop with an infrequent bus service (less frequent than hourly each day) which enables travel 8am6pm Monday to Friday to a major employer.

+ The site is not within or adjoining the air quality management area.

x The site is within or adjoining a site of nature conservation importance

x Protected species could be affected.

? Uncertain or insufficient information

0 The site is not within or adjoining the green infrastructure opportunity network or the impact of the proposal is neutral.

x Opportunity area for 3 or more ecosystem services covers 25-50% of the site.

0 No renewable energy generation scheme included and efficiency standards that meet normal standards.

? The site is within or adjoining a defined settlement policy area or within the built form of a small settlement.

++ A site accessibility score of 8 is recorded where 8 is 0 – 10 minutes’ walk.

+ A site accessibility score of 6 is recorded where 6 is 11 – 20 minutes’ walk

x The site is within 10 minutes’ walk of a bus stop with an infrequent bus service (less frequent than hourly each day) which enables travel 8am6pm Monday to Friday to a major employer.

x The proposal has the potential to cause harm to heritage assets. This harm may range from low to high. There may be options to avoid, reduce or mitigate this harm and where sites have not been ruled out altogether for other reasons, further assessment will be undertaken to more fully explore impacts on significance and options for harm reduction and mitigation. This further assessment may ultimately lead to the conclusion that the site should not be allocated.

0 Proposal is not employment related.

0 Proposal does not include a main town centre use.

x The proposal does not include and is not within 400m walking distance of a publicly accessible open space.

x The proposal does not include and is not within 800m of a publicly accessible sports facility

? It is uncertain what effect the proposal is likely to have on the landscape / more information is required.

+ The site adjoins a defined settlement policy area or the built form of a small settlement.

x The site is not previously developed land as defined in the NPPF.

x All or a majority of the site is best and most versatile agricultural land as defined in the NPPF.

0 The site is located within a source protection zone but the proposed use is unlikely to be a risk to water supplies.

+ The site is within flood zone 1 (areas that have been shown to be at less than 0.1% chance of flooding in any year).

+ The site is likely to provide a mix of housing and include affordable housing.

+ The development will meet identified housing needs eg elderly, care, travellers.

+ The site is within 800m of a facility where cultural or social activities can be accessed.

+ The proposal is for or includes a community use or is likely to promote community collaboration and social interaction eg cultural, social, leisure and sporting uses.

+ The development is likely to increase public surveillance or increase activity.

? The site is within or adjoining a defined settlement policy area or within the built form of a small settlement.

++ A site accessibility score of 8 is recorded where 8 is 0 – 10 minutes’ walk.

+ A site accessibility score of 6 is recorded where 6 is 11 – 20 minutes’ walk

x The site is within 10 minutes’ walk of a bus stop with an infrequent bus service (less frequent than hourly each day) which enables travel 8am6pm Monday to Friday to a major employer.

+ No access constraints

? Potential capacity problem requiring mitigation

New vehicular access is proposed at two separate points onto Milton Road, both of which seem appropriate. There can be some light traffic in the area, however the site has excellent access to the A6, though this development and other neighbouring ones may contribute to congestion. There are a pair of bus stops directly outside the northern vehicular access where the 51 bus provides a roughly hourly service between Bedford and Rushden. Both proposed access points have a pavement on the opposite side of the road. Near the north of the site on Bedford Rd there is a shared cycle/pedestrian path running along the A6 to Milton Ernest. A Transport Assessment is required to assess cumulative impacts of this site and others proposed in the vicinity. Include pedestrian crossings at both proposed access points to ensure pedestrian access to the existing pavement on Milton Road.

Nothing chosen

noise concerns relate just to proximity to A6 twinwoods business park mat be a source of noise

Part of the site falls within the boundary of a MSA.

The site has been excluded from further assessment at Stage 1 because its location is not in accordance with the development strategy.

Form ID: 10551

Nothing chosen

No answer given

Nothing chosen

Milton Road, Clapham

Map 1233

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

Nothing chosen

Housing

Nothing chosen

100

Nothing chosen

No answer given

No answer given

Nothing chosen

No answer given

No answer given

Nothing chosen

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

Nothing chosen

No answer given

Nothing chosen

Nothing chosen

Nothing chosen

Nothing chosen

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No uploaded files for public display

No answer given

Nothing chosen

Nothing chosen

Nothing chosen

Nothing chosen

Nothing chosen

Nothing chosen

Nothing chosen

Nothing chosen

Nothing chosen

Nothing chosen

Nothing chosen

Nothing chosen

Nothing chosen

Nothing chosen

Nothing chosen

Nothing chosen

Nothing chosen

Nothing chosen

Nothing chosen

Nothing chosen

Nothing chosen

Nothing chosen

Nothing chosen

Nothing chosen

Nothing chosen

Nothing chosen

Nothing chosen

Nothing chosen

Nothing chosen

Nothing chosen

Nothing chosen

Nothing chosen

Nothing chosen

Nothing chosen

Nothing chosen

Nothing chosen

Nothing chosen

Nothing chosen

Nothing chosen

Nothing chosen

Nothing chosen

Nothing chosen

No answer given

Nothing chosen

No answer given

Nothing chosen

No answer given

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.