Call for Sites

Search form responses

Results for Axiom Great Barford Limited search

New search New search
Form ID: 819

Other (please specify)

Agent for agent: Please contact Mark Harris, Bidwells

Yes

Luton Road, Wilstead 3.18 ha

Map 1233

Vacant. Also, In part – was former campsite with shower block and access road

Residential and static home park

Open countryside

Static home park and open countryside

Residential and open countryside

Yes

Housing

Nothing chosen

69

Family houses , Flats

No answer given

No answer given

Market housing - Owner occupied , Affordable Housing - Affordable rent , Affordable Housing - Shared ownership

No answer given

No answer given

Nothing chosen

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

Suitable access is achievable

Please see submitted plans. Access to the public highway can be safely provided onto Luton Road with adequate forward visibility as demonstrated by a Road Safety Audit.

Yes

No

No

No

No answer given

69

No answer given

No answer given

2023

The site would contribute towards ensuring that the housing needs of the area can be met outside any of the more vulnerable areas of Bedford, including those at risk from flooding or in a more sensitive landscape. It has been assumed that only around 55% of the site would be developed for residential purposes with the remainder being given over to green infrastructure including landscape enhancements, open space and SUDS, which along with the retained woodland, as advocated by paragraph 150 of the NPPF. The development will be constructed to the highest standards with opportunities for the layout, building orientation and massing of the development, along with the landscaping, to be utilised to minimise energy consumption. Importantly, as is shown on the enclosed indicative masterplan, there is an opportunity for onsite play, helping to negate the need to travel, and the development would provide pedestrian routes onto Luton Road from which a number of day-to-day facilities can be accessed on foot or by regular bus connections.

3.19

Above

Site not in accordance with the emerging development strategy

Exclude from further assessment

Nothing chosen

Nothing chosen

? The site is within or adjoining a defined settlement policy area or within the built form of a small settlement.

+ A site accessibility score of 6 is recorded where 6 is 11 – 20 minutes’ walk.

+ A site accessibility score of 6 is recorded where 6 is 11 – 20 minutes’ walk.

x The site is within 10 minutes’ walk of a bus stop with an infrequent bus service (less frequent than hourly each day) which enables travel 8am6pm Monday to Friday to a major employer.

+ The site is not within or adjoining the air quality management area.

x The site is within or adjoining a site of nature conservation importance

? Uncertain or insufficient information.

? Uncertain or insufficient information

0 The site is not within or adjoining the green infrastructure opportunity network or the impact of the proposal is neutral.

xx Opportunity area for 3 or more ecosystem services covers more than 50% of the site.

0 No renewable energy generation scheme included and efficiency standards that meet normal standards.

? The site is within or adjoining a defined settlement policy area or within the built form of a small settlement.

+ A site accessibility score of 6 is recorded where 6 is 11 – 20 minutes’ walk.

+ A site accessibility score of 6 is recorded where 6 is 11 – 20 minutes’ walk

x The site is within 10 minutes’ walk of a bus stop with an infrequent bus service (less frequent than hourly each day) which enables travel 8am6pm Monday to Friday to a major employer.

x The proposal has the potential to cause harm to heritage assets. This harm may range from low to high. There may be options to avoid, reduce or mitigate this harm and where sites have not been ruled out altogether for other reasons, further assessment will be undertaken to more fully explore impacts on significance and options for harm reduction and mitigation. This further assessment may ultimately lead to the conclusion that the site should not be allocated.

0 Proposal is not employment related.

0 Proposal does not include a main town centre use.

x The proposal does not include and is not within 400m walking distance of a publicly accessible open space.

x The proposal does not include and is not within 800m of a publicly accessible sports facility

0 The proposal is likely to have a neutral effect on the landscape.

+ The site adjoins a defined settlement policy area or the built form of a small settlement.

x The site is not previously developed land as defined in the NPPF.

? The classification of the site is not known or it is not clear whether is classified as grade 3a or 3b.

+ The site is not located in a source protection zone.

+ The site is within flood zone 1 (areas that have been shown to be at less than 0.1% chance of flooding in any year).

+ The site is likely to provide a mix of housing and include affordable housing.

x The development will not meet identified needs eg elderly, care, travellers.

+ The site is within 800m of a facility where cultural or social activities can be accessed.

0 Neutral.

+ The development is likely to increase public surveillance or increase activity.

? The site is within or adjoining a defined settlement policy area or within the built form of a small settlement.

+ A site accessibility score of 6 is recorded where 6 is 11 – 20 minutes’ walk.

+ A site accessibility score of 6 is recorded where 6 is 11 – 20 minutes’ walk

x The site is within 10 minutes’ walk of a bus stop with an infrequent bus service (less frequent than hourly each day) which enables travel 8am6pm Monday to Friday to a major employer.

+ No access constraints

+ No capacity issues

The Applicant claims that access to the public highway can be safely provided onto Luton Road with adequate forward visibility as demonstrated by a Road Safety Audit. Traffic congestion in the surrounding area is low/moderate. The closest bus stop is over 800m North of the site on Bedford Road. It serves bus routes 44 and 81, both with hourly services. There is no cycling infrastructure or routes in the area. Vehicle access appears to be feasible, but would require road works and removal of foliage. The site access is on a section of Luton Road that does not have any footway. This can be mitigated by providing one that would tie into the existing footpath just a few hundred metres north.

Nothing chosen

A6 road noise

Site does not fall within the boundary of a MSA.

The site has been excluded from further assessment at Stage 1 because its location is not in accordance with the development strategy.

Form ID: 855

Other (please specify)

Please contact the Agent:

Yes

Land West of Balls Lane, Willington 14 ha

Map 1233

Vacant

Residential

Bound by Bedford Road beyond which is residential development

Balls Lane and agricultural fields, beyond which is residential development

Hanson concrete factory

No

Housing

Housing

150

Family houses , Flats

No answer given

Net- 30-35 dph

Market housing - Owner occupied , Affordable Housing - Affordable rent , Affordable Housing - Shared ownership

No answer given

No answer given

Nothing chosen

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

Suitable access is achievable

Please see submitted location plan and Vision Document. Access would be created from Balls Lane.

Yes

No

No

No

150

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

2023

The site would contribute towards ensuring that the housing needs of the area can be met outside any of the more vulnerable areas of Bedford, including those at risk from flooding or in a more sensitive landscape. Importantly the site would contribute to realising the wider green infrastructure aspirations for the area set out in policies AD24-AD26 of the adopted Local Plan. As is set out in more detail in the accompanying Vision document, the site lies within a Green Infrastructure Opportunity Zone and the proposal presented sets out how a sensitive residential development would release a significant amount of land which could be improved as a multi-functional green space. Further, this area will provide opportunities for new tree planting, in line with the aspirations for the Marston Vale Forest which would help mitigate any climate change impacts. The development of 150 units would help to support local facilities, including the primary school and post office, which are essential to maintaining the sustainability of rural settlements. Without new development of an appropriate scale in rural areas, it is likely that facilities will not be able to be sustained and more people will need to travel for day-to-day services and facilities, to the detriment of the environment. The development will be constricted to the highest standards with opportunities for the layout, building orientation and massing of the development, along with the landscaping, to be utilised to minimise energy consumption.

14.21

Above

Site not in accordance with the emerging development strategy

Exclude from further assessment

Nothing chosen

Nothing chosen

? The site is within or adjoining a defined settlement policy area or within the built form of a small settlement.

++ A site accessibility score of 8 is recorded where 8 is 0 – 10 minutes’ walk.

++ A site accessibility score of 8 is recorded where 8 is 0 – 10 minutes’ walk.

+ The site is within 10 minutes’ walk of a bus stop with a regular bus service (at least hourly) which enables travel 8am-6pm Monday to Friday to a major employer or it is possible to walk to a major employer within 10 minutes.

+ The site is not within or adjoining the air quality management area.

+ The site is not within or adjoining a site of nature conservation importance

xx Protected species recorded on the site

? Uncertain or insufficient information

+ The site is within or adjoining the green infrastructure opportunity network and able to enhance the network.

x Opportunity area for 3 or more ecosystem services covers 25-50% of the site.

0 No renewable energy generation scheme included and efficiency standards that meet normal standards.

? The site is within or adjoining a defined settlement policy area or within the built form of a small settlement.

++ A site accessibility score of 8 is recorded where 8 is 0 – 10 minutes’ walk.

++ A site accessibility score of 8 is recorded where 8 is 0 – 10 minutes’ walk.

+ The site is within 10 minutes’ walk of a bus stop with a regular bus service (at least hourly) which enables travel 8am-6pm Monday to Friday to a major employer or it is possible to walk to a major employer within 10 minutes.

x The proposal has the potential to cause harm to heritage assets. This harm may range from low to high. There may be options to avoid, reduce or mitigate this harm and where sites have not been ruled out altogether for other reasons, further assessment will be undertaken to more fully explore impacts on significance and options for harm reduction and mitigation. This further assessment may ultimately lead to the conclusion that the site should not be allocated.

0 Proposal is not employment related.

0 Proposal does not include a main town centre use.

x The proposal does not include and is not within 400m walking distance of a publicly accessible open space.

x The proposal does not include and is not within 800m of a publicly accessible sports facility

0 The proposal is likely to have a neutral effect on the landscape.

+ The site adjoins a defined settlement policy area or the built form of a small settlement.

x The site is not previously developed land as defined in the NPPF.

+ The site is not on best and most versatile agricultural land as defined in the NPPF.

+ The site is not located in a source protection zone.

+ The site is within flood zone 1 (areas that have been shown to be at less than 0.1% chance of flooding in any year).

+ The site is likely to provide a mix of housing and include affordable housing.

x The development will not meet identified needs eg elderly, care, travellers.

+ The site is within 800m of a facility where cultural or social activities can be accessed.

0 Neutral.

+ The development is likely to increase public surveillance or increase activity.

? The site is within or adjoining a defined settlement policy area or within the built form of a small settlement.

++ A site accessibility score of 8 is recorded where 8 is 0 – 10 minutes’ walk.

++ A site accessibility score of 8 is recorded where 8 is 0 – 10 minutes’ walk

+ The site is within 10 minutes’ walk of a bus stop with a regular bus service (at least hourly) which enables travel 8am-6pm Monday to Friday to a major employer or it is possible to walk to a major employer within 10 minutes.

? Potential access requiring mitigation

+ No capacity issues

Access onto Balls Lane, which then connects to Bedford Rd. The section of Balls Lane between the site and Bedford would need to be widened to accommodate this scale of development. Occasional congestion on Bedford Rd. A bus stop is within 100m of the site entrance with the 73 bus providing a connection to Bedford approximately every 30 minutes. There is a public footpath running through the site however a separate hardstanding pedestrian access will need to be provided, likely onto Bedford Rd with a pedestrian crossing linking to the existing pavement. There is no specific cycle connectivity however cycling towards the A421 via Cardington connects to a traffic-free cycle route on the edge of Bedford taking you towards the centre. The stretch of Balls Lane between the proposed access point and Bedford Rd will need to be widened to accommodate for traffic from a development of this size. Pedestrian access will need to be provided, this is most likely through a separate access onto Bedford Rd, with a pedestrian crossing to the existing pavement. Better cycle signage directing residents towards the traffic-free cycle path starting on the outskirts of Bedford would be beneficial.

Nothing chosen

no noise concerns

Entire site falls within the boundary of a MSA.

The site has been excluded from further assessment at Stage 1 because its location is not in accordance with the development strategy.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.