Call for Sites

Search form responses

Results for Clapham Park Farms Limited search

New search New search
Form ID: 447

Land owner

No answer given

N/A

Land at Wootton Park Farm Hall End Road Wootton Bedfordshire MK43 9HT

Map 1233

Agricultural

Wootton Upper School

Agricultural land

Agricultural land

Woodland

No

Housing

Employment , Retail

430-515 houses @ 25-30 dph.

Family houses , Self-build/Custom build homes , Older people housing , Flats

We suggest a mix of housing to meet local needs. This will include a range of house types and a range of unit size.

We have assumed a density of circa 25-30 residential units per hectare

Market housing - Owner occupied , Market housing - Private rented housing , Affordable Housing - Affordable rent , Affordable Housing - Shared ownership

We suggest the site will be predominantly a market housing scheme, however, any scheme will require to meet local policy in terms of affordable housing (rent and shared ownership) and private rented housing as required.

No answer given

Nothing chosen

No answer given

We suggest that there should be areas of employment use within the development. The type and size of the employment facilities could be determined to meet local need.

Type and size of the employment facilities could be determined to meet local need.

We suggest that there should be areas of retail use within the development. The type and size of the retail facilities could be determined to meet local need.

We suggest that there should be areas of retail use within the development. The type and size of the retail facilities could be determined to meet local need.

We suggest that there should be areas of retail use within the development. The type and size of the retail facilities could be determined to meet local need.

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

Suitable access is achievable

There are a number of accesses to the site. The accesses have been marked with the blue dots on the site plan. A description of each access is as follows: 1. Via an existing road to the north of the site on the western boundary of Wootton Upper School. This provides direct access to Hall End Road. 2. Via adjoining land to the east of the site which provides access to Cranfield Road. This adjoining land is within the ownership of Bedfordshire County Council and this land has previously been promoted for development. There are two fields which could provide access and these have been marked on the plan with blue dots, although the exact location of the access could be anywhere across these fields. 3. Via an access to the north east of the site which provides access to Church Row and Jenkyn Road.

Yes

No

No

No

430-515, dependant on land used for other uses (such as employment and retail)

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

The land is available and therefore the land could be developed immediately or it could be development in parts or as part of a phased development.

This site is adjacent to Wootton Wood which is designated as a County Wildlife Site. Wootton Wood extends to approximately 40 hectares (100 acres) of woodland which has historic and ecological importance. Wootton Wood is also within the ownership of Clapham Park Farms Limited, the same owner as this land which has been submitted. As part of any development of this land submitted, the adjoining woodland could be enhanced , for example the woodland could potentially be used as a site for carbon offsetting or to achieve net biodiversity gain. We would seek to ensure any building on the site is energy efficient and includes renewable energy where possible, for example installing solar PV energy and air source heat pumps. The design and construction of the buildings should utilise low embodied energy materials. If the whole site was developed we envisage some commercial development within the overall layout and design to encourage local employment opportunities to reduce travel to other areas of the Borough and further afield. The development of this site will provide direct access to Wootton Upper School (which forms the northern boundary) which will reduce traffic along Hall End Road and Church Road. A link road could extend through this site and then further east, through land within the ownership of Bedfordshire County Council to Cranfield Road. This link road could be utilised by the residents of the Berry Farm development which is situated to the east of Cranfield Road and the existing development to the north and south of Fields Road.

No uploaded files for public display

17.24

Above

Site not in accordance with the emerging development strategy

Exclude from further assessment

Nothing chosen

Nothing chosen

x The site is not within or adjoining the urban area or a defined settlement policy area, or within the built form of a small settlement

+ A site accessibility score of 6 is recorded where 6 is 11 – 20 minutes’ walk.

+ A site accessibility score of 6 is recorded where 6 is 11 – 20 minutes’ walk.

+ The site is within 10 minutes’ walk of a bus stop with a regular bus service (at least hourly) which enables travel 8am-6pm Monday to Friday to a major employer or it is possible to walk to a major employer within 10 minutes.

+ The site is not within or adjoining the air quality management area.

x The site is within or adjoining a site of nature conservation importance

x Protected species could be affected.

? Uncertain or insufficient information

0 The site is not within or adjoining the green infrastructure opportunity network or the impact of the proposal is neutral.

+ Opportunity area for 3 or more ecosystem services covers less than 25% of the site.

0 No renewable energy generation scheme included and efficiency standards that meet normal standards.

x The site is not within or adjoining the urban area or a defined settlement policy area, or within the built form of a small settlement

+ A site accessibility score of 6 is recorded where 6 is 11 – 20 minutes’ walk.

+ A site accessibility score of 6 is recorded where 6 is 11 – 20 minutes’ walk

+ The site is within 10 minutes’ walk of a bus stop with a regular bus service (at least hourly) which enables travel 8am-6pm Monday to Friday to a major employer or it is possible to walk to a major employer within 10 minutes.

x The proposal has the potential to cause harm to heritage assets. This harm may range from low to high. There may be options to avoid, reduce or mitigate this harm and where sites have not been ruled out altogether for other reasons, further assessment will be undertaken to more fully explore impacts on significance and options for harm reduction and mitigation. This further assessment may ultimately lead to the conclusion that the site should not be allocated.

+ Proposal includes permanent economic and employment opportunities.

0 Proposal does not include a main town centre use.

x The proposal does not include and is not within 400m walking distance of a publicly accessible open space.

x The proposal does not include and is not within 800m of a publicly accessible sports facility

? It is uncertain what effect the proposal is likely to have on the landscape / more information is required.

+ The site adjoins a defined settlement policy area or the built form of a small settlement.

x The site is not previously developed land as defined in the NPPF.

? The classification of the site is not known or it is not clear whether is classified as grade 3a or 3b.

+ The site is not located in a source protection zone.

+ The site is within flood zone 1 (areas that have been shown to be at less than 0.1% chance of flooding in any year).

+ The site is likely to provide a mix of housing and include affordable housing.

+ The development will meet identified housing needs eg elderly, care, travellers.

+ The site is within 800m of a facility where cultural or social activities can be accessed.

? Uncertain or insufficient information.

+ The development is likely to increase public surveillance or increase activity.

x The site is not within or adjoining the urban area or a defined settlement policy area, or within the built form of a small settlement

+ A site accessibility score of 6 is recorded where 6 is 11 – 20 minutes’ walk.

+ A site accessibility score of 6 is recorded where 6 is 11 – 20 minutes’ walk

+ The site is within 10 minutes’ walk of a bus stop with a regular bus service (at least hourly) which enables travel 8am-6pm Monday to Friday to a major employer or it is possible to walk to a major employer within 10 minutes.

? Potential access requiring mitigation

x Serious capacity constraint

The site proposes three accesses, via existing road to the north of the site on the western boundary of Wootton Upper School to Hall End Road, via adjoining land to the east to Cranfield Road and via an access to the north east of the site which provides access to Church Row and Jenkyn Road. This provides good access, however, the site is likely to generate a large amount of traffic, which, along with significant traffic already generated by the school, could cause congestion and safety issues on the existing road network. Hall End Road / Church Road and Cranfield Road are both on a bicyclefriendly route, but there are no designated cycle lanes. There are no footpaths on the short access roads that would connect the new development and Hall End Road and Church Road, but are footpaths on the other side of Hall End Road / Church Road and Cranfield Road. A Transport Assessment would be required to understand the impact on the local highway network as together with the other nearby sites in the vicinity, significant traffic generation can be expected. On the access roads directly off Hall End Road and Church Road, footpaths should be added with crossing facilities on Hall End Road / Church Road and Cranfield Road.

Nothing chosen

school to the north would need to be considered

Site does not fall within the boundary of a MSA.

The site has been excluded from further assessment at Stage 1 because its location is not in accordance with the development strategy.

Form ID: 449

Land owner

No answer given

N/A

Land off Molivers Lane Bromham Bedfordshire MK43 8LE

Map 1233

Agricultural

Agricultural

The Leslie Sell Scout Activity Centre and part agricultural land

Agricultural land

Woodland and agricultural land

No

Housing

Employment , Retail , All other types

Approx 250. This site is available in parts if a smaller site is required or as part of a phased development.

Family houses , Self-build/Custom build homes , Older people housing , Flats

We suggest a mix of housing to meet local needs. This will include a range of house types and a range of unit size.

We have assumed a density of circa 25 residential units per hectare.

Market housing - Owner occupied , Market housing - Private rented housing , Affordable Housing - Affordable rent , Affordable Housing - Shared ownership

We suggest the site will be predominantly a market housing scheme, however, any scheme will also meet local needs and policy in terms of affordable housing (rent and shared ownership) and private rented housing as required.

No answer given

Nothing chosen

No answer given

We suggest there should be areas of employment use within the development. The type and size of the employment facilities could be determined to meet local need.

The type and size of the employment facilities could be determined to meet local need.

We suggest there should be areas of retail use within the development. The type and size of the retail facilities could be determined to meet local need.

We suggest there should be areas of retail use within the development. The type and size of the retail facilities could be determined to meet local need.

We suggest that there should be areas of retail use within the development. The type and size of the retail facilities could be determined to meet local need.

No answer given

As part of the development of this site, an extension to the neighbouring activity centre to the south could be provided. We also recommend the northern area of the site is utilised for open space and landscaping to achieve a net gain in biodiversity. The amount can be determined depending on local need.

As part of the development of this site, an extension to the neighbouring activity centre to the south could be provided. We also recommend the northern area of the site is utilised for open space and landscaping to achieve a net gain in biodiversity.

Suitable access is achievable

The existing access to the site is to the south east of the site which provides access to Molivers Lane. There is the potential for further access to be provided through adjoining agricultural land to the south of site. We are aware this area of land to the south has previously been submitted to the Council for potential development as part of the Call for Sites exercise. There is the further potential for this site to be accessed through the adjoining agricultural land to the east to provide access to Oakley Road.

Yes

No

No

No

250

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

The land is available and therefore the land could be developed immediately or it could be development in parts or as part of a phased development.

We suggest that 50% of the site could be developed. The remaining 50% could be utilised for landscaping, carbon offsetting and achieving a net gain in biodiversity. The undeveloped area of land could be in the northern area of the site. The site is immediately adjacent to other woodland and the Scouts activity centre to the south. As part of the development of this site the additional land on this site could also be utilised to provide additional facilities for the village such as land for outside recreation / sports facilities if required and a potential extension to the existing neighbouring facilities. Any development of this site will include renewable energy technology such as solar PV and air source heat pumps. The construction of the development should utilise low embodied energy materials. We envisage commercial development within the development of the site to enable local employment opportunities to reduce travel. The site is immediately adjacent to a bridleway which provides access to a number of footpaths and open spaces for potential residents.

No uploaded files for public display

20.96

Above

Site not in accordance with the emerging development strategy

Exclude from further assessment

Nothing chosen

Nothing chosen

x The site is not within or adjoining the urban area or a defined settlement policy area, or within the built form of a small settlement

++ A site accessibility score of 8 is recorded where 8 is 0 – 10 minutes’ walk.

++ A site accessibility score of 8 is recorded where 8 is 0 – 10 minutes’ walk.

+ The site is within 10 minutes’ walk of a bus stop with a regular bus service (at least hourly) which enables travel 8am-6pm Monday to Friday to a major employer or it is possible to walk to a major employer within 10 minutes.

+ The site is not within or adjoining the air quality management area.

x The site is within or adjoining a site of nature conservation importance

? Uncertain or insufficient information.

? Uncertain or insufficient information

0 The site is not within or adjoining the green infrastructure opportunity network or the impact of the proposal is neutral.

+ Opportunity area for 3 or more ecosystem services covers less than 25% of the site.

0 No renewable energy generation scheme included and efficiency standards that meet normal standards.

x The site is not within or adjoining the urban area or a defined settlement policy area, or within the built form of a small settlement

++ A site accessibility score of 8 is recorded where 8 is 0 – 10 minutes’ walk.

++ A site accessibility score of 8 is recorded where 8 is 0 – 10 minutes’ walk.

+ The site is within 10 minutes’ walk of a bus stop with a regular bus service (at least hourly) which enables travel 8am-6pm Monday to Friday to a major employer or it is possible to walk to a major employer within 10 minutes.

x The proposal has the potential to cause harm to heritage assets. This harm may range from low to high. There may be options to avoid, reduce or mitigate this harm and where sites have not been ruled out altogether for other reasons, further assessment will be undertaken to more fully explore impacts on significance and options for harm reduction and mitigation. This further assessment may ultimately lead to the conclusion that the site should not be allocated.

+ Proposal includes permanent economic and employment opportunities.

x Proposal includes a main town centre use in an out of centre location.

x The proposal does not include and is not within 400m walking distance of a publicly accessible open space.

x The proposal does not include and is not within 800m of a publicly accessible sports facility

? It is uncertain what effect the proposal is likely to have on the landscape / more information is required.

x The site is separated from a defined settlement policy area or the built form of a small settlement.

x The site is not previously developed land as defined in the NPPF.

+ The site is not on best and most versatile agricultural land as defined in the NPPF.

0 The site is located within a source protection zone but the proposed use is unlikely to be a risk to water supplies.

+ The site is within flood zone 1 (areas that have been shown to be at less than 0.1% chance of flooding in any year).

+ The site is likely to provide a mix of housing and include affordable housing.

+ The development will meet identified housing needs eg elderly, care, travellers.

+ The site is within 800m of a facility where cultural or social activities can be accessed.

+ The proposal is for or includes a community use or is likely to promote community collaboration and social interaction eg cultural, social, leisure and sporting uses.

+ The development is likely to increase public surveillance or increase activity.

x The site is not within or adjoining the urban area or a defined settlement policy area, or within the built form of a small settlement

++ A site accessibility score of 8 is recorded where 8 is 0 – 10 minutes’ walk.

++ A site accessibility score of 8 is recorded where 8 is 0 – 10 minutes’ walk

+ The site is within 10 minutes’ walk of a bus stop with a regular bus service (at least hourly) which enables travel 8am-6pm Monday to Friday to a major employer or it is possible to walk to a major employer within 10 minutes.

? Potential access requiring mitigation

? Potential capacity problem requiring mitigation

The site is located north of Northampton Road and Chestnut Avenue in the Bromham area approximately 3.5 miles west of Bedford town centre. The existing access to the site is to the southeast of the site which provides access to Molivers Lane, with a secondary potential access from Northampton Road. The scale of the development could cause cause significant traffic generation, however there is no current traffic data available for nearby roads. The closest bus stop is located approximately 400m east of the site on Springfield Drive. There is no footway and no formal cycle track on the approach to the site, however Molivers Lane has footways on both sides, and nearby roads are quiet and conducive to cycling. There is the potential for further access to be provided through adjoining agricultural land to the south of the site. A Transport Assessment would be needed to assess the impact of the development on the highway network. Construction of footways/pedestrian access to link to existing facilities would be required.

Nothing chosen

no noise concerns

Entire site falls within the boundary of a MSA.

The site has been excluded from further assessment at Stage 1 because its location is not in accordance with the development strategy.

Form ID: 450

Land owner

No answer given

N/A

Former PoW Camp The Baulk Clapham Bedford MK41 6AA

Map 1233

Agricultural buildings and storage (no grass or arable land on the site), brownfield site

Solar PV Farm

Residential properties and agricultural land

Residential properties and golf course

Agricultural land

Yes

Housing

Employment , Retail

Approx 32 dwellings. This site is available in parts if a smaller site is required or as part of a phased development.

Family houses , Self-build/Custom build homes , Older people housing , Flats

We suggest a mix of housing to meet local needs. This will include a range of house types and a range of unit size.

We have assumed a density of circa 25 residential units per hectare.

Market housing - Owner occupied , Market housing - Private rented housing , Affordable Housing - Affordable rent , Affordable Housing - Shared ownership

We suggest the site will be predominantly a market housing scheme, however, any scheme will also meet local needs and policy in terms of affordable housing (rent and shared ownership) and private rented housing as required.

No answer given

Nothing chosen

No answer given

There could be areas of employment use within the development. The type and size of the employment facilities could be determined to meet local need.

The type and size of the employment facilities could be determined to meet local need.

There could be areas of retail use within the development. The type and size of the retail facilities could be determined to meet local need.

There could be areas of retail use within the development. The type and size of the retail facilities could be determined to meet local need.

There could be areas of retail use within the development. The type and size of the retail facilities could be determined to meet local need.

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

Suitable access is achievable

The site is accessed direct from the Baulk. The blue dots on the plan show how the Baulk connects to the public highway network. The Baulk has sufficient capacity in width etc for this development.

Yes

No

No

No

32

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

The land is available and therefore the land could be developed immediately or it could be part of a phased development.

The development of this site should utilised low embodied energy materials. The design of the building should utilise renewable energy technology such as air source heat pumps and solar PV. The site is directly adjacent to an existing solar PV farm which is situated to the north. The site provides direct access to the Baulk which provides good access to other public rights of way. This site is a brownfield site. The site was previously used as part of a Prison of War camp and now the buildings are used for agricultural purposes. The development of this brownfield site will have minimal environmental impact and could be used to achieve net gain for biodiversity.

No uploaded files for public display

1.69

Above

Site not in accordance with the emerging development strategy

Exclude from further assessment

Nothing chosen

Nothing chosen

x The site is not within or adjoining the urban area or a defined settlement policy area, or within the built form of a small settlement

+ A site accessibility score of 6 is recorded where 6 is 11 – 20 minutes’ walk.

+ A site accessibility score of 6 is recorded where 6 is 11 – 20 minutes’ walk.

x The site is within 10 minutes’ walk of a bus stop with an infrequent bus service (less frequent than hourly each day) which enables travel 8am6pm Monday to Friday to a major employer.

+ The site is not within or adjoining the air quality management area.

+ The site is not within or adjoining a site of nature conservation importance

? Uncertain or insufficient information.

? Uncertain or insufficient information

0 The site is not within or adjoining the green infrastructure opportunity network or the impact of the proposal is neutral.

+ Opportunity area for 3 or more ecosystem services covers less than 25% of the site.

0 No renewable energy generation scheme included and efficiency standards that meet normal standards.

x The site is not within or adjoining the urban area or a defined settlement policy area, or within the built form of a small settlement

+ A site accessibility score of 6 is recorded where 6 is 11 – 20 minutes’ walk.

+ A site accessibility score of 6 is recorded where 6 is 11 – 20 minutes’ walk

x The site is within 10 minutes’ walk of a bus stop with an infrequent bus service (less frequent than hourly each day) which enables travel 8am6pm Monday to Friday to a major employer.

x The proposal has the potential to cause harm to heritage assets. This harm may range from low to high. There may be options to avoid, reduce or mitigate this harm and where sites have not been ruled out altogether for other reasons, further assessment will be undertaken to more fully explore impacts on significance and options for harm reduction and mitigation. This further assessment may ultimately lead to the conclusion that the site should not be allocated.

+ Proposal includes permanent economic and employment opportunities.

+ Proposal includes a main town centre use in or on the edge of a town centre. , x Proposal includes a main town centre use in an out of centre location.

x The proposal does not include and is not within 400m walking distance of a publicly accessible open space.

+ The proposal includes or is within 800m of a publicly accessible sports facility.

? It is uncertain what effect the proposal is likely to have on the landscape / more information is required.

xx The site is more than 0.5 miles from a defined settlement policy area or the built form of a small settlement.

+ All or a majority of the site is previously developed land as defined in the NPPF.

x All or a majority of the site is best and most versatile agricultural land as defined in the NPPF.

+ The site is not located in a source protection zone.

+ The site is within flood zone 1 (areas that have been shown to be at less than 0.1% chance of flooding in any year).

+ The site is likely to provide a mix of housing and include affordable housing.

+ The development will meet identified housing needs eg elderly, care, travellers.

x The site is not within 800m of a facility where cultural or social activities can be accessed.

? Uncertain or insufficient information.

+ The development is likely to increase public surveillance or increase activity.

x The site is not within or adjoining the urban area or a defined settlement policy area, or within the built form of a small settlement

+ A site accessibility score of 6 is recorded where 6 is 11 – 20 minutes’ walk.

+ A site accessibility score of 6 is recorded where 6 is 11 – 20 minutes’ walk

x The site is within 10 minutes’ walk of a bus stop with an infrequent bus service (less frequent than hourly each day) which enables travel 8am6pm Monday to Friday to a major employer.

x Serious access constraint wider impacts

+ No capacity issues

Access is proposed onto The Baulk, however this is a PRoW with no right of way for vehicular traffic, not a highway. No traffic in the area. There is a bus stop just over 1km away however it has very irregular services. The only pedestrian access is The Baulk, a PRoW - however if this is used for vehicular access as proposed then there would then be no pedestrian access. There is no specific cycle connectivity however there are several paved PRoWs in the area which would be suitable for cycling. The Baulk is poorly surfaced and currently has no right of way for vehicular traffic. For this development to be feasible, The Baulk would need to become an adopted public highway with assoicated improvements in paving, width and maintenance. However even if this were possible, it would then remove the only pedestrian access available. The extent of the works required would be very large and require consultation with the council and highway authorities.

Likely to require contaminated land assessment and remediation if required.

some industrial activity immediately to the south east of the site

Site does not fall within the boundary of a MSA.

The site has been excluded from further assessment at Stage 1 because its location is not in accordance with the development strategy.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.