Call for Sites

Search form responses

Results for C G Wallis & Co search

New search New search
Form ID: 458

Land owner

No answer given

N/A

Opposite Row Farm, Keysoe Row East, Keysoe, Bedford MK44 2JD

Map 1233

Agricultural

Agricultural

Residential

Residential

Agricultural

No

Housing

Housing

To reflect existing local context.

Family houses , Self-build/Custom build homes , Older people housing

No answer given

To reflect existing local context.

Market housing - Owner occupied , Affordable Housing - Affordable rent , Affordable Housing - Shared ownership

No answer given

No answer given

Nothing chosen

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

Suitable access is achievable

Various existing access points onto adopted highway - Keysoe Row East. These have been marked on the digital map.

Yes

No

Don't know

No

Development could take place within 1 - 5 years.

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

2024/2025

All properties would be constructed to meet or exceed current Local Plan requirements; by using the latest developments in building materials, insulation and heating to provide housing with the lowest possible carbon footprint and sustainable characteristics.

No uploaded files for public display

4.41

Above

Site not in accordance with the emerging development strategy

Exclude from further assessment

Nothing chosen

Nothing chosen

x The site is not within or adjoining the urban area or a defined settlement policy area, or within the built form of a small settlement

xx A site accessibility score of 0 is recorded where 0 is more than 30 minutes’ walk.

++ A site accessibility score of 8 is recorded where 8 is 0 – 10 minutes’ walk.

xx There is no public transport within 10 minutes’ walk to enable access to a major employer

+ The site is not within or adjoining the air quality management area.

+ The site is not within or adjoining a site of nature conservation importance

x Protected species could be affected.

? Uncertain or insufficient information

0 The site is not within or adjoining the green infrastructure opportunity network or the impact of the proposal is neutral.

++ Opportunity area for fewer than 3 ecosystem services.

0 No renewable energy generation scheme included and efficiency standards that meet normal standards.

? The site is within or adjoining a defined settlement policy area or within the built form of a small settlement.

xx A site accessibility score of 0 is recorded where 0 is more than 30 minutes’ walk.

++ A site accessibility score of 8 is recorded where 8 is 0 – 10 minutes’ walk.

xx There is no public transport within 10 minutes’ walk to enable access to a major employer.

x The proposal has the potential to cause harm to heritage assets. This harm may range from low to high. There may be options to avoid, reduce or mitigate this harm and where sites have not been ruled out altogether for other reasons, further assessment will be undertaken to more fully explore impacts on significance and options for harm reduction and mitigation. This further assessment may ultimately lead to the conclusion that the site should not be allocated.

0 Proposal is not employment related.

0 Proposal does not include a main town centre use.

x The proposal does not include and is not within 400m walking distance of a publicly accessible open space.

x The proposal does not include and is not within 800m of a publicly accessible sports facility

0 The proposal is likely to have a neutral effect on the landscape.

+ The site adjoins a defined settlement policy area or the built form of a small settlement.

x The site is not previously developed land as defined in the NPPF.

x All or a majority of the site is best and most versatile agricultural land as defined in the NPPF.

+ The site is not located in a source protection zone.

+ The site is within flood zone 1 (areas that have been shown to be at less than 0.1% chance of flooding in any year).

+ The site is likely to provide a mix of housing and include affordable housing.

+ The development will meet identified housing needs eg elderly, care, travellers.

x The site is not within 800m of a facility where cultural or social activities can be accessed.

0 Neutral.

+ The development is likely to increase public surveillance or increase activity.

? The site is within or adjoining a defined settlement policy area or within the built form of a small settlement.

xx A site accessibility score of 0 is recorded where 0 is more than 30 minutes’ walk.

++ A site accessibility score of 8 is recorded where 8 is 0 – 10 minutes’ walk

xx There is no public transport within 10 minutes’ walk to enable access to a major employer.

? Potential access requiring mitigation

? Potential capacity problem requiring mitigation

The site is located west of Keysoe Row E in Keysoe Village approximately 9.5 miles north of Bedford town centre. Access to the site is feasible off Keysoe Row E, which is a 30mph speed limit road.There is no traffic data available for Keysoe Row E however nearby roads do not appear to have significant congestion. The closest bus stop is located 950m southwest of the site on Kimbolton Road. There is a green verge in the frontage of the site, but there is not a concrete footway and no other footways in the vicinity. Cycling is feasible only along the road, with connections possible to other cycle-friendly roads in the vicinity. Footway connectivity not feasible given the scale of the development and the distance from other footways. Improved bus service with a closer bus stop, regular frequency and Real-Time information needed.

Nothing chosen

no noise concerns

Site does not fall within the boundary of a MSA.

The site has been excluded from further assessment at Stage 1 because its location is not in accordance with the development strategy.

Form ID: 459

Land owner

No answer given

N/A

Situated to the South/East of The Butts/Rotten Row and adjacent to garden of 21 Rotten Row, MK44 1EJ

Map 1233

Agricultural

Residential

Agricultural

Residential

Agricultural

No

Housing

Housing

Approximately 30

Family houses , Older people housing

No answer given

Approximately 17/ha

Market housing - Owner occupied , Affordable Housing - Affordable rent , Affordable Housing - Shared ownership

No answer given

No answer given

Nothing chosen

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

Suitable access is achievable

Existing access points to the site are to The Butts/Rotten Row and are located on the western boundary adjacent to the adopted public highway. These have been marked on the digital map.

Yes

No

No

No

Development could take place within 1 - 5 years.

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

2024/25

All properties would be constructed to meet or exceed current Local Plan requirements; by using the latest developments in building materials, insulation and heating to provide housing with the lowest possible carbon footprint and sustainable characteristics.

No uploaded files for public display

1.69

Above

Site not in accordance with the emerging development strategy

Exclude from further assessment

Nothing chosen

Nothing chosen

? The site is within or adjoining a defined settlement policy area or within the built form of a small settlement.

+ A site accessibility score of 6 is recorded where 6 is 11 – 20 minutes’ walk.

x A site accessibility score of 4 is recorded where 4 is 21 – 30 minutes’ walk.

x The site is within 10 minutes’ walk of a bus stop with an infrequent bus service (less frequent than hourly each day) which enables travel 8am6pm Monday to Friday to a major employer.

+ The site is not within or adjoining the air quality management area.

+ The site is not within or adjoining a site of nature conservation importance

x Protected species could be affected.

? Uncertain or insufficient information

0 The site is not within or adjoining the green infrastructure opportunity network or the impact of the proposal is neutral.

+ Opportunity area for 3 or more ecosystem services covers less than 25% of the site.

0 No renewable energy generation scheme included and efficiency standards that meet normal standards.

? The site is within or adjoining a defined settlement policy area or within the built form of a small settlement.

+ A site accessibility score of 6 is recorded where 6 is 11 – 20 minutes’ walk.

x A site accessibility score of 4 is recorded where 4 is 21 – 30 minutes’ walk.

x The site is within 10 minutes’ walk of a bus stop with an infrequent bus service (less frequent than hourly each day) which enables travel 8am6pm Monday to Friday to a major employer.

x The proposal has the potential to cause harm to heritage assets. This harm may range from low to high. There may be options to avoid, reduce or mitigate this harm and where sites have not been ruled out altogether for other reasons, further assessment will be undertaken to more fully explore impacts on significance and options for harm reduction and mitigation. This further assessment may ultimately lead to the conclusion that the site should not be allocated.

0 Proposal is not employment related.

0 Proposal does not include a main town centre use.

x The proposal does not include and is not within 400m walking distance of a publicly accessible open space.

x The proposal does not include and is not within 800m of a publicly accessible sports facility

? It is uncertain what effect the proposal is likely to have on the landscape / more information is required.

+ The site adjoins a defined settlement policy area or the built form of a small settlement.

x The site is not previously developed land as defined in the NPPF.

? The classification of the site is not known or it is not clear whether is classified as grade 3a or 3b.

+ The site is not located in a source protection zone.

? Part of a site is within flood zone 2 or 3 but the area proposed for development is in flood zone 1.

+ The site is likely to provide a mix of housing and include affordable housing.

+ The development will meet identified housing needs eg elderly, care, travellers.

+ The site is within 800m of a facility where cultural or social activities can be accessed.

0 Neutral.

+ The development is likely to increase public surveillance or increase activity.

? The site is within or adjoining a defined settlement policy area or within the built form of a small settlement.

+ A site accessibility score of 6 is recorded where 6 is 11 – 20 minutes’ walk.

x A site accessibility score of 4 is recorded where 4 is 21 – 30 minutes’ walk.

x The site is within 10 minutes’ walk of a bus stop with an infrequent bus service (less frequent than hourly each day) which enables travel 8am6pm Monday to Friday to a major employer.

+ No access constraints

? Potential capacity problem requiring mitigation

The site is located on the east side of The Butts road in the village of Riseley, approximately 10.0 miles north of Bedford town centre. The site vehicular access is proposed off The Butts, which is a national speed limit road, just south of the property no. 21. The nearest bus stop is located approximately 450m east from the site entrance on High Street. No footways serve the site directly but pedestrian access can be achieved from College Dr. Cycling is feasible on-road. The proposal would require a road to adoptaed standards in which case the geometry of the design of the road need to be in accordance with Bedford Borough Council’s (BBC) highway standards. A comprehensive scheme can be implemented to include widening of the carriageway, provision of at least 2m footways and safe pedestrian crossing points and subject to reduction of the speed limit on The Butts being approved by BBC. Improve pedestrain access routes from College Drive with lighting and signage.

Nothing chosen

no noise concerns

Site does not fall within the boundary of a MSA.

The site has been excluded from further assessment at Stage 1 because its location is not in accordance with the development strategy.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.