Comment

Representation ID: 10162

Received: 28/07/2022

Respondent: Sir or Madam

I believe it very important to provide a view on the proposed science park development adjoining the village of Renhold . As a resident of one of the villagers that would be directly impacted, Renhold, I feel duty bound to raise my concern
Please advise me why existing allocated developments in the borough have not received the focus they should have and why this new site is being promoted? In November 2020, there were approximately 68,916 sqm of office units and 90,760 sqm of industrial units available in the Borough. Instead of allocating more 'strategic road network' employment sites, the Council should focus on managing and encouraging the development of the existing 3 allocated sites, being land at Medbury Farm (AD11), land west of 8530 (AD17) and Bedford River Valley Park (AD23), totalling 72 ha, where development has not yet even started.
The proposed sites are not even in sustainable locations, with a lack of footway and cycleway provision, infrequent public transport connection with a distinct lack of bus stops. Alternative modes of transport, including walking, cycling and public transport, should be promoted, however, the sites' access would be clearly dominated by vehicles due to their proximity to the A421. This therefore fails to meet the key, high-level objective ofthe NPPF of 'achieving sustainable development'?

There is direct competition with the proposed new settlement and related employment provision at Little Barford, which is only 7 miles/llkm to the north-east of the allocation sites, is an additional fact that requires attention.

Of main concern is the disregard for the Countries EHH strategic policy (England's Economic Heartland, where Bedford is located within). The strategy sets out to focus on decarbonisation of the transport system by harnessing innovation and supporting solutions which create green economic opportunities; and promote investment in digital infrastructure as a means of improving connectivity, in order to reduce the need to travel. These proposals contradict this strategy and fail to:

• Support the delivery of low carbon transport by working towards reduced congestion, digital connectivity, and a net zero carbon system by 20401
• Promote connectivity and accessibility in new development, and link new and existing communities
• Support opportunities for active travel and green infrastructure
• Promote and support infrastructure development which reflects the ambitions of the three preceding principles.

I am sure that when minds are better focused and all factors provided by all parties, a better decision in selecting this site can be arrived at by focusing on the outstanding development of existing approvals granted by the Borough.