Support

Representation ID: 8866

Received: 29/09/2021

Respondent: Mrs Alison Myers

6. Environmental Net Gain para 7.30
This approach is supported , and that the Oxford -Cambridge Arc target of 20% net gain will be used.
It is a concern that the Ecosystem Services Report does not assess Agricultural Land Value as a key asset. Soils underpin the environment and quality soils need to be valued and conserved. It is stated that Natural Capital "is the stock of natural assets, including soil".

My key concern with the Biodiversity Net Gain is the metric requires staff able to assess the data. Bedford Borough Council will need to employ an Ecologist to work with the Applicant's to achieve net gain. Space has to be designed in at the concept stage for this to be realised.
I would like the need for net gain to apply for all developments, not just Major developments over 10 dwellings.
Every development has an environmental impact - whether it is a house extension or a redevelopment on plot. In Ravensden there has been a steady loss of trees and hedges as buildings are adapted and front gardens lost to parking. To benefit climate change, biodiversity and general amenity, an approach which requires replacement of trees and hedges should apply to all scales of development.