Stepped Trajectory Topic Paper
Comment
Plan for submission evidence base
Representation ID: 9644
Received: 29/07/2022
Respondent: Arnold White Estates Ltd
Agent: Arrow Planning Limited
The Local Plan is not sound, as it is not justified or effective. To make the Plan sound the
trajectory should be amended. Reflecting the fact that the Local Plan may not be
adopted until 2023, and thus higher delivery in 2024 (compared to the Local Plan 2030),
the trajectory should be as follows:
2020/21- 2023/24: 970dpa
2024/25 – 2039/40: 1,423dpa
Object
Plan for submission evidence base
Representation ID: 9931
Received: 29/07/2022
Respondent: Rainier Developments Limited
Agent: Marrons Planning
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
OBJECT:
I. The ‘stepped trajectory’ against the minimum LHN of 1,355dpa is entirely unjustified. The exceptional circumstances to depart from the LHN – as required by NPPF61 – have not been demonstrated. This also goes against NPPF requirements for a positively prepared plan which helps boost the supply of homes.
II. Further detailed justification is provided in response to Policy DS2(S) and DS3(S).
Object
Plan for submission evidence base
Representation ID: 10101
Received: 29/07/2022
Respondent: Rainier Developments Limited - Bromham
Agent: Marrons Planning
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
OBJECT:
I. The ‘stepped trajectory’ against the minimum LHN of 1,355dpa is entirely unjustified. The exceptional circumstances to depart from the LHN – as required by NPPF61 – have not been demonstrated. This also goes against NPPF requirements for a positively prepared plan which helps boost the supply of homes.
II. Further detailed justification is provided in response to Policy DS2(S) and DS3(S).
Object
Plan for submission evidence base
Representation ID: 10111
Received: 29/07/2022
Respondent: Rainier Developments Limited - Roxton
Agent: Marrons Planning
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
OBJECT:
I. The ‘stepped trajectory’ against the minimum LHN of 1,355dpa is entirely unjustified. The exceptional circumstances to depart from the LHN – as required by NPPF61 – have not been demonstrated. This also goes against NPPF requirements for a positively prepared plan which helps boost the supply of homes.
II. Further detailed justification is provided in response to Policy DS2(S) and DS3(S).
Object
Plan for submission evidence base
Representation ID: 10239
Received: 29/07/2022
Respondent: Taylor Wimpey
Agent: Rapleys
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
TW object to the delivery rate assumptions for Little Barford as shown in the tables of the Stepped Trajectory Topic paper. The Delivery rates anticipated in the Stepped Trajectory Topic Paper are unrealistic and not achievable, irrespective of the uncertainty over the delivery of the EWR.
Please see attached representations…specifically paragraph 2.6, section 3 paragraphs 3.1-3.28, paragraph 5.6 bullet 4, section 6, Appendices A,B,C.