Call for Sites

Search form responses

Results for Red Eagle Securities Ltd search

New search New search
Form ID: 513

Other (please specify)

Promoter

Yes

Land north of Lovell Road, Oakley

Map 1233

Canine dressage training

Mainline Railway

Lovell Road

Residential

Residential

No

Housing

Nothing chosen

23

Family houses , Flats , Other

Maisonettes

No answer given

Market housing - Owner occupied , Market housing - Private rented housing , Affordable Housing - Affordable rent , Affordable Housing - Shared ownership

No answer given

No answer given

Nothing chosen

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

Suitable access is achievable

No answer given

Yes

No

No

No

23

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

2024

Development at the site will address both adaptation and mitigation through water and energy efficiency, appropriate layout, design and landscaping, and the use of renewable energy

0.74

Above

Site not in accordance with the emerging development strategy

Exclude from further assessment

Nothing chosen

Nothing chosen

x The site is not within or adjoining the urban area or a defined settlement policy area, or within the built form of a small settlement

++ A site accessibility score of 8 is recorded where 8 is 0 – 10 minutes’ walk.

+ A site accessibility score of 6 is recorded where 6 is 11 – 20 minutes’ walk.

+ The site is within 10 minutes’ walk of a bus stop with a regular bus service (at least hourly) which enables travel 8am-6pm Monday to Friday to a major employer or it is possible to walk to a major employer within 10 minutes.

+ The site is not within or adjoining the air quality management area.

+ The site is not within or adjoining a site of nature conservation importance

? Uncertain or insufficient information.

? Uncertain or insufficient information

0 The site is not within or adjoining the green infrastructure opportunity network or the impact of the proposal is neutral.

+ Opportunity area for 3 or more ecosystem services covers less than 25% of the site.

0 No renewable energy generation scheme included and efficiency standards that meet normal standards.

x The site is not within or adjoining the urban area or a defined settlement policy area, or within the built form of a small settlement

++ A site accessibility score of 8 is recorded where 8 is 0 – 10 minutes’ walk.

+ A site accessibility score of 6 is recorded where 6 is 11 – 20 minutes’ walk

+ The site is within 10 minutes’ walk of a bus stop with a regular bus service (at least hourly) which enables travel 8am-6pm Monday to Friday to a major employer or it is possible to walk to a major employer within 10 minutes.

x The proposal has the potential to cause harm to heritage assets. This harm may range from low to high. There may be options to avoid, reduce or mitigate this harm and where sites have not been ruled out altogether for other reasons, further assessment will be undertaken to more fully explore impacts on significance and options for harm reduction and mitigation. This further assessment may ultimately lead to the conclusion that the site should not be allocated.

0 Proposal is not employment related.

0 Proposal does not include a main town centre use.

x The proposal does not include and is not within 400m walking distance of a publicly accessible open space.

x The proposal does not include and is not within 800m of a publicly accessible sports facility

0 The proposal is likely to have a neutral effect on the landscape.

x The site is separated from a defined settlement policy area or the built form of a small settlement.

x The site is not previously developed land as defined in the NPPF.

? The classification of the site is not known or it is not clear whether is classified as grade 3a or 3b.

0 The site is located within a source protection zone but the proposed use is unlikely to be a risk to water supplies.

+ The site is within flood zone 1 (areas that have been shown to be at less than 0.1% chance of flooding in any year).

+ The site is likely to provide a mix of housing and include affordable housing.

x The development will not meet identified needs eg elderly, care, travellers.

+ The site is within 800m of a facility where cultural or social activities can be accessed.

0 Neutral.

+ The development is likely to increase public surveillance or increase activity.

x The site is not within or adjoining the urban area or a defined settlement policy area, or within the built form of a small settlement

++ A site accessibility score of 8 is recorded where 8 is 0 – 10 minutes’ walk.

+ A site accessibility score of 6 is recorded where 6 is 11 – 20 minutes’ walk

+ The site is within 10 minutes’ walk of a bus stop with a regular bus service (at least hourly) which enables travel 8am-6pm Monday to Friday to a major employer or it is possible to walk to a major employer within 10 minutes.

+ No access constraints

+ No capacity issues

The site is located on land North of Lowell Road between Oakley and Clapham. Access would be provided via Lowell Road, an adopted and classified road comprising of a 6.4m wide single carriageway with grass verge outside the site but footway on the opposite side. Lowell Road normally carries light traffic. The footpath on the other side of the road is fairly wide but not of the best quality.There is no cycle path in the vicinity and the closest bus stop is 150m away from the site entrance, serving buses 25 and 51, three times per hour. Cycle connection improvements would be recommended as well as improvement of the pedestrian facilities, such as improving the quality of the footpath, but at the least providing safe crossing from the development.

Nothing chosen

predominant concern is railway noise

Site does not fall within the boundary of a MSA.

The site has been excluded from further assessment at Stage 1 because its location is not in accordance with the development strategy.

Form ID: 588

Land owner

No answer given

Yes

Land north of Roxton Road, Great Barford

Map 1233

Open storage of vehicles (Use Class B8) Previous underground storage.

Agricultural land

Residential

Residential

Agricultural land

Yes

Housing

Nothing chosen

5

Family houses

No answer given

16 dph

Market housing - Owner occupied

No answer given

No answer given

Nothing chosen

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

Suitable access is achievable

Access to the site (existing) is taken directly off Roxton Road, running along the western boundary of the residential property at number 43. This is shown on the Location Plan (drawing no. PL01 Rev A).

Yes

Yes

No

No

5

No answer given

No answer given

No answer given

2023

The scheme’s design and proposal will respond to issues on climate change and will be in accordance with Policy 51S. The site is located within Flood Zone 1 as defined by the Environment Agency Flood Map, which means it has a low probability of flooding. The scheme is designed to respond to climate change and promote active living for all residents. It encourages sustainable modes of transport through walking and cycling. A public footpath connects the site to the centre of Great Barford, running along west of Roxton Road to the High Street. The scheme would not be reliant on the private car. The site is within reasonable walking distance from the main facilities, including the village Post Office (approximately 300m west) of the site. The site is able to accommodate residential development in a sustainable location on previously developed land.

0.47

Above

Site not in accordance with the emerging development strategy

Exclude from further assessment

Nothing chosen

Nothing chosen

? The site is within or adjoining a defined settlement policy area or within the built form of a small settlement.

++ A site accessibility score of 8 is recorded where 8 is 0 – 10 minutes’ walk.

++ A site accessibility score of 8 is recorded where 8 is 0 – 10 minutes’ walk.

+ The site is within 10 minutes’ walk of a bus stop with a regular bus service (at least hourly) which enables travel 8am-6pm Monday to Friday to a major employer or it is possible to walk to a major employer within 10 minutes.

+ The site is not within or adjoining the air quality management area.

+ The site is not within or adjoining a site of nature conservation importance

? Uncertain or insufficient information.

? Uncertain or insufficient information

Nothing chosen

++ Opportunity area for fewer than 3 ecosystem services.

0 No renewable energy generation scheme included and efficiency standards that meet normal standards.

? The site is within or adjoining a defined settlement policy area or within the built form of a small settlement.

++ A site accessibility score of 8 is recorded where 8 is 0 – 10 minutes’ walk.

++ A site accessibility score of 8 is recorded where 8 is 0 – 10 minutes’ walk.

+ The site is within 10 minutes’ walk of a bus stop with a regular bus service (at least hourly) which enables travel 8am-6pm Monday to Friday to a major employer or it is possible to walk to a major employer within 10 minutes.

x The proposal has the potential to cause harm to heritage assets. This harm may range from low to high. There may be options to avoid, reduce or mitigate this harm and where sites have not been ruled out altogether for other reasons, further assessment will be undertaken to more fully explore impacts on significance and options for harm reduction and mitigation. This further assessment may ultimately lead to the conclusion that the site should not be allocated.

0 Proposal is not employment related.

0 Proposal does not include a main town centre use.

x The proposal does not include and is not within 400m walking distance of a publicly accessible open space.

x The proposal does not include and is not within 800m of a publicly accessible sports facility

0 The proposal is likely to have a neutral effect on the landscape.

+ The site adjoins a defined settlement policy area or the built form of a small settlement.

x The site is not previously developed land as defined in the NPPF.

x All or a majority of the site is best and most versatile agricultural land as defined in the NPPF.

+ The site is not located in a source protection zone.

+ The site is within flood zone 1 (areas that have been shown to be at less than 0.1% chance of flooding in any year).

x The site is unlikely to provide a mix of housing and/or is unlikely to include affordable housing.

x The development will not meet identified needs eg elderly, care, travellers.

+ The site is within 800m of a facility where cultural or social activities can be accessed.

0 Neutral.

+ The development is likely to increase public surveillance or increase activity.

? The site is within or adjoining a defined settlement policy area or within the built form of a small settlement.

++ A site accessibility score of 8 is recorded where 8 is 0 – 10 minutes’ walk.

++ A site accessibility score of 8 is recorded where 8 is 0 – 10 minutes’ walk

+ The site is within 10 minutes’ walk of a bus stop with a regular bus service (at least hourly) which enables travel 8am-6pm Monday to Friday to a major employer or it is possible to walk to a major employer within 10 minutes.

? Potential access requiring mitigation

? Potential capacity problem requiring mitigation

Access off Roxton Road as existing. Will need to be widened. Some moderate traffic in the area however a development of this size is unlikely to worsen it. There are bus stops within 400m where the 905 bus provides a half-hourly service between Bedford and Cambridge. There is a pavement directly outside the site and a pedestrian crossing nearby on Roxton Road, it must be ensured that a pavement is constructed alongside the vehicular access to the site. There is no specific cycle connectivity however the national cycle network runs through the village of the Gt Barford giving easy and mostly off-road or quiet road connections to St Neots and Bedford. Widen the existing access point to allow two-way traffic plus a pavement connecting the site to the existing footway on Roxton Road. Possibly redesignate the pavement along Roxton Road as a shared cycle/pedestrian path to link up with the shared path further up Roxton Road (starting at the junction with Addingtons Road).

Nothing chosen

no noise concerns

Site does not fall within the boundary of a MSA.

The site has been excluded from further assessment at Stage 1 because its location is not in accordance with the development strategy.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.