1.4

Object

Representation ID: 3590

Received: 14/08/2021

Respondent: Mrs Hayley Morphew

The proposed Dennybrook site expanded by about 40% to engulf Honeydon after the call for sites had closed. Residents were only informed about this at the end of May - 8 months after the deadline.

Object

Representation ID: 3620

Received: 16/08/2021

Respondent: Great Barford Neighbourhood Plan Group

Many Call for Sites are unrealistic speculative wishes from over zealous promoters

Object

Representation ID: 3790

Received: 26/08/2021

Respondent: Mrs Gerardine Meola

The Call For Sites was flawed as the published deadline was not a deadline. Sites were added up to 8 months after the published deadline.

This is:

Not transparent.
Misleading

Object

Representation ID: 3838

Received: 26/08/2021

Respondent: Mr Stuart Ledwich

Why was this call for sites simply accepting of every piece of land irrespective of its origin, surely non farm land and brown field sites should be considered.

Object

Representation ID: 3884

Received: 28/08/2021

Respondent: Sir Graham Fry

This is misleading. We learnt only on May 2021 that the site boundary for Dennybrook had been extended to include virtually the whole of Honeydon. This was not known in autumn 2020. Duloe Field was also added after the deadline. Such sites, which missed the deadline, should not be considered.

Object

Representation ID: 3899

Received: 28/08/2021

Respondent: Mrs MARGARET TURNER

The councils decision to allow sites to be added or increased after the deadline of September 2020 was not transparent to the public and has resulted in a proposed new development being increased by 25% surrounding the Hamlets of Begwary & Honeydon and allowing the local residents very little time to respond. This is not a fair consultation

Object

Representation ID: 3938

Received: 29/08/2021

Respondent: Mr Keith Turner

You show all the sites on the map but don't show them grouped together for the 10 options not even showing which would be included in 2a,2b,2c and 2d this makes it hard to make an informed decision

Object

Representation ID: 3958

Received: 29/08/2021

Respondent: Mr Mark Potts

The site at Dennybrook expanded in area by around 25% after the call for sites closed to
engulf the hamlets of Honeydon and Begwary. We were informed only 8 months after the
call for sites closed about this expansion which left only 4 weeks for residents to consider this
and seek advice before the consultation on the Draft Local Plan openened. Duloe Field (site
3420) was also submitted after the deadline. I do not believe sites submitted after the
deadline should be considered and certainly not very large sites submitted 8 months after
the deadline.

Support

Representation ID: 4042

Received: 30/08/2021

Respondent: Ann Mills

Noted

Object

Representation ID: 4154

Received: 30/08/2021

Respondent: Mr paul giles

The site at Dennybrook expanded in area by around 25% after the call for sites closed to engulf the hamlets of Honeydon and Begwary. We were informed only 8 months after the call for sites closed about this expansion which left only 4 weeks for residents to consider this and seek advice before the consultation on the Draft Local Plan openened. Duloe Field (site 3420) was also submitted after the deadline. We do not believe sites submitted after the deadline should be considered and certainly not very large sites submitted 8 months after the deadline.

Object

Representation ID: 4178

Received: 30/08/2021

Respondent: Mrs Gail Browning

I do not believe this to be a fair consultation – how can sites be added 8 months after the closure deadline, resulting in a substantial increase of development to the local parish, giving local residents little time to respond.

Object

Representation ID: 4235

Received: 30/08/2021

Respondent: Mr Fletcher Giles

The councils decision to allow sites to be added or increased after the deadline of September 2020 was not transparent to the public and has resulted in a proposed new development being increased by 25% surrounding the Hamlets of Begwary & Honeydon and allowing the local residents very little time to respond. This is not a fair consultation..

Object

Representation ID: 4303

Received: 31/08/2021

Respondent: Miss Andrea Witham

See above

Object

Representation ID: 4316

Received: 31/08/2021

Respondent: Miss Helen Leach

The councils decision to allow sites to be added or increased after the deadline of September 2020 was not transparent to the public and has resulted in a proposed new development being increased by 25% surrounding the Hamlets of Begwary & Honeydon and allowing the local residents very little time to respond. This is not a fair consultation.

Object

Representation ID: 4350

Received: 31/08/2021

Respondent: Miss Helen Leach

The councils decision to allow sites to be added or increased after the deadline of September 2020 was not transparent to the public and has resulted in a proposed new development being increased by 25% surrounding the Hamlets of Begwary & Honeydon and allowing the local residents very little time to respond. This is not a fair consultation.

Object

Representation ID: 4449

Received: 31/08/2021

Respondent: Mrs Lucy Crawford

The site at Dennybrook expanded in area by around 25% after the call for sites closed to engulf the hamlets of Honeydon and Begwary. We were informed only 8 months after the call for sites closed about this expansion which left only 4 weeks for residents to consider this and seek advice before the consultation on the Draft Local Plan openened. Duloe Field (site 3420) was also submitted after the deadline. I do not believe sites submitted after the deadline should be considered and certainly not very large sites submitted 8 months after the deadline.

Object

Representation ID: 4530

Received: 01/09/2021

Respondent: Mrs Kathryn Smith

See above

Object

Representation ID: 4605

Received: 01/09/2021

Respondent: Mr Melvyn Chase

The site at Dennybrook expanded in area by around 25% after the call for sites closed to engulf the hamlets of Honeydon and Begwary. We were informed only 8 months after the call for sites closed about this expansion which left only 4 weeks for residents to consider this and seek advice before the consultation on the Draft Local Plan openened. Duloe Field (site 3420) was also submitted after the deadline. I do not believe sites submitted after the deadline should be considered and certainly not very large sites submitted 8 months after the deadline.

Object

Representation ID: 4658

Received: 01/09/2021

Respondent: Mr Joshua Zwetsloot

Staploe Parish Council are very concerned that this call for sites initially showed Dennybrook (site 977) as a much smaller site beyond the boundaries of Honeydon. We were only informed in May 2021 (an astonishing 8 months after the call for sites closed) that the site boundary had expanded by approximately 25% to engulf the whole of the hamlet of Honeydon and Begwary. The new site showed many existing homes surrounded on all sides by housing estates. Therefore we believe that the call for sites was not conducted in an open and transparent manner. Residents only had one month to gather their thoughts about this enormous new development of up to 10,800 homes which engulfed their properties before the draft consultation opened. We do not believe this is a fair consultation for them.
Duloe Field (3420) was also added late. We do not believe sites submitted after the deadline should be considered.

Object

Representation ID: 4732

Received: 01/09/2021

Respondent: Mr David Rawlins

See above

Object

Representation ID: 4851

Received: 02/09/2021

Respondent: Ms Tara Skey

The site at Dennybrook expanded by around 25% after the call for sites closed to engulf the hamlets of Honeydon and Begwary. Residents were informed only 8 months after the call for sites closed about this expansion which left only 4 weeks for them to consider this and seek advice before the consultation on the Draft Local Plan opened. Duloe Field (site 3420) was also submitted after the deadline. I do not believe sites submitted after the deadline should be considered and certainly not very large sites submitted 8 months after the deadline.

Object

Representation ID: 4872

Received: 02/09/2021

Respondent: Mrs Julia Willison

The Dennybrook site expanded in area by 25% after the call for sites closed to engulf the Hamlets of Honeydon and Begwary. Duloe Field was also submitted after the deadline. Sites submitted after the the deadline should NOT be considered.

Object

Representation ID: 4911

Received: 02/09/2021

Respondent: Mr Chris Giles

Staploe Parish Council are very concerned that this call for sites initially showed Dennybrook (site 977) as a much smaller site beyond the boundaries of Honeydon. We were only informed in May 2021 (an astonishing 8 months after the call for sites closed) that the site boundary had expanded by approximately 25% to engulf the whole of the hamlet of Honeydon and Begwary. The new site showed many existing homes surrounded on all sides by housing estates. Therefore we believe that the call for sites was not conducted in an open and transparent manner. Residents only had one month to gather their thoughts about this enormous new development of up to 10,800 homes which engulfed their properties before the draft consultation opened. We do not believe this is a fair consultation for them.

Duloe Field (3420) was also added late. We do not believe sites submitted after the deadline should be considered.

Object

Representation ID: 5130

Received: 03/09/2021

Respondent: Mr Trevor Monk

The new sites being proposed are totally OTT for the area of Cotton End, Cardington and Cotton End. The area has been decimated with over development and this is just another nail in the coffin of the area. Heritage is being destroyed, wildlife is being wiped our and infrastructure to support what we already have is inadequate already. Then round the tri village area I spoke of earlier there is a lot of the extra housing plans put forward on the water table, a few balancing ponds will not deal with that, what will happen in times of heavy rain?

Object

Representation ID: 5473

Received: 06/09/2021

Respondent: Mr Stuart Ledwich

Staploe Parish Council are very concerned that this call for sites initially showed Dennybrook as a much smaller site beyond the boundaries of Honeydon. We were only informed in May 2021 (an astonishing 8 months after the call for sites closed) that the site boundary had expanded by approximately 25% to engulf the whole of the hamlet of Honeydon. The new site showed many existing homes surrounded on all sides by housing estates. Therefore we believe that the call for sites was not conducted in an open and transparent manner. Residents only had one month to gather their thoughts about this enormous new development of up to 10,800 which engulfed their properties before the draft consultation opened. We do not believe this is a fair consultation for them.

Object

Representation ID: 5570

Received: 06/09/2021

Respondent: Mrs Julie Kilby

I am very concerned that this call for sites initially showed Dennybrook (site 977) as a much smaller site beyond the boundaries of Honeydon. We were only informed in May 2021 (an astonishing 8 months after the call for sites closed) that the site boundary had expanded by approximately 25% to engulf the whole of the hamlet of Honeydon and Begwary. The new site showed many existing homes surrounded on all sides by housing estates. Therefore we believe that the call for sites was not conducted in an open and transparent manner. Residents only had one month to gather their thoughts about this enormous new development of up to 10,800 homes which engulfed their properties before the draft consultation opened. We do not believe this is a fair consultation for them.

Duloe Field (3420) was also added late. We do not believe sites submitted after the deadline should be considered.

Object

Representation ID: 5673

Received: 07/09/2021

Respondent: Miss amber scally

Staploe Parish Council are very concerned that this call for sites initially showed Dennybrook (site 977) as a much smaller site beyond the boundaries of Honeydon. We were only informed in May 2021 (an astonishing 8 months after the call for sites closed) that the site boundary had expanded by approximately 25% to engulf the whole of the hamlet of Honeydon and Begwary. The new site showed many existing homes surrounded on all sides by housing estates. Therefore we believe that the call for sites was not conducted in an open and transparent manner. Residents only had one month to gather their thoughts about this enormous new development of up to 10,800 homes which engulfed their properties before the draft consultation opened. We do not believe this is a fair consultation for them.

Duloe Field (3420) was also added late. We do not believe sites submitted after the deadline should be considered.

Object

Representation ID: 5709

Received: 07/09/2021

Respondent: Miss Hannah Hambleton-Jewell

At the same time the Council issued a 'call for sites' to update information received during 2014 and 2015 about land that owners wish to make available for development. Around 430 sites were submitted to the Council and similarly these have been available to view on the Council's web site since autumn 2020.

My home is in the very centre of the Dennybrook development site and in some of Taylor Wimpey documentation is even included as part of the development which is very misleading. I live in an isolated farmhouse surrounded by fields of wheat which could one day be housing…..how does that not change the character of the environment and a permanent change for future generations. The wildlife and flora of this area contains some protected species which there can be no mitigation measures which will achieve anything like appropriate protection of the rural character or natural gems which these fields and hedgerows promote.
I am very concerned that this call for sites initially showed Dennybrook (site 977) as a much smaller site beyond the boundaries of Honeydon. We were only informed in May 2021 (an astonishing 8 months after the call for sites closed) that the site boundary had expanded by approximately 25% to engulf the whole of the hamlet of Honeydon and Begwary. The new site showed many existing homes surrounded on all sides by housing estates. Therefore we believe that the call for sites was not conducted in an open and transparent manner. Residents only had one month to gather their thoughts about this enormous new development of up to 10,800 homes which engulfed their properties before the draft consultation opened. We do not believe this is a fair consultation for them.

Duloe Field (3420) was also added late. We do not believe sites submitted after the deadline should be considered.

Object

Representation ID: 5743

Received: 07/09/2021

Respondent: Mrs Gillian Tagg

I am very concerned that this call for sites initially showed Dennybrook (site 977) as a much smaller site beyond the boundaries of Honeydon. We were only informed in May 2021 (an astonishing 8 months after the call for sites closed) that the site boundary had expanded by approximately 25% to engulf the whole of the hamlet of Honeydon and Begwary. The new site showed many existing homes surrounded by housing estates. Therefore, I believe that the call for sites was not conducted in an open and transparent manner. Residents only had one month to gather their thoughts about this enormous new development of up to 10,800 homes which engulfed their properties before the draft consultation opened. I do not believe this is a fair consultation for them.
Duloe Field (3420) was also added late. I do not believe sites submitted after the deadline should be considered.
100-word Summary
The site at Dennybrook expanded in area by around 25% after the call for sites closed to engulf the hamlets of Honeydon and Begwary. We were informed only 8 months after the call for sites closed about this expansion which left only 4 weeks for residents to consider this and seek advice before the consultation on the Draft Local Plan opened. Duloe Field (site 3420) was also submitted after the deadline. I do not believe sites submitted after the deadline should be considered and certainly not very large sites submitted 8 months after the deadline.

Object

Representation ID: 5832

Received: 08/09/2021

Respondent: Mr Norman Hoy

I am very concerned that this call for sites initially showed Dennybrook (site 977) as a much smaller site beyond the boundaries of Honeydon. We were only informed in May 2021 (an astonishing 8 months after the call for sites closed) that the site boundary had expanded by approximately 25% to engulf the whole of the hamlet of Honeydon and Begwary. The new site showed many existing homes surrounded on all sides by housing estates. Therefore we believe that the call for sites was not conducted in an open and transparent manner. Residents only had one month to gather their thoughts about this enormous new development of up to 10,800 homes which engulfed their properties before the draft consultation opened. We do not believe this is a fair consultation for them.
Duloe Field (3420) was also added late. We do not believe sites submitted after the deadline should be considered.
100 word summary
The site at Dennybrook expanded in area by around 25% after the call for sites closed to engulf the hamlets of Honeydon and Begwary. We were informed only 8 months after the call for sites closed about this expansion which left only 4 weeks for residents to consider this and seek advice before the consultation on the Draft Local Plan openened. Duloe Field (site 3420) was also submitted after the deadline. We do not believe sites submitted after the deadline should be considered and certainly not very large sites submitted 8 months after the deadline.