3.15
Object
Local Plan 2040 Draft Plan - Strategy options and draft policies consultation
Representation ID: 3604
Received: 15/08/2021
Respondent: Mrs Leila Dodson
You keep loading houses into small villages and destroying the character of the villages. People moved to them because they are small and quiet and you are destroying that with no consideration to the local communities. Build the houses around the new stations, or build completely new developments on brown sites. Stop destroying what makes the local areas nice. My village has doubled in size since I moved in, it is no longer small, close knit or friendly and suffers a lot of crime now. And stop building on fields!
You keep loading houses into small villages and destroying the character of the villages. People moved to them because they are small and quiet and you are destroying that with no consideration to the local communities. Build the houses around the new stations, or build completely new developments on brown sites. Stop destroying what makes the local areas nice. My village has doubled in size since I moved in, it is no longer small, close knit or friendly and suffers a lot of crime now. And stop building on fields!
Object
Local Plan 2040 Draft Plan - Strategy options and draft policies consultation
Representation ID: 3708
Received: 21/08/2021
Respondent: Mrs Veronica Zwetsloot
The emerged options depend too heavily on the developments of new settlements especially Dennybrook which is proposed to be built on high grade agricultural land and reduce the capacity for food production in this area. The high dependence on new settlements can hinder and delay the new housing numbers needed and is a risky strategy. The location Dennybrook is on the extremities of the Borough and would benefit St Neots and not Bedford town centre . Bedford town centre is in desperate need of rejuvenation, Dennybrook would deprive the Bedford the opportunity of this happening.
The emerged options depend too heavily on the developments of new settlements especially Dennybrook which is proposed to be built on high grade agricultural land and reduce the capacity for food production in this area. The high dependence on new settlements can hinder and delay the new housing numbers needed and is a risky strategy. The location Dennybrook is on the extremities of the Borough and would benefit St Neots and not Bedford town centre . Bedford town centre is in desperate need of rejuvenation, Dennybrook would deprive the Bedford the opportunity of this happening.
Support
Local Plan 2040 Draft Plan - Strategy options and draft policies consultation
Representation ID: 3756
Received: 23/08/2021
Respondent: Carlton and Chellington Parish Council
2c creates the best transport infrastructure around which to develop.
The Wixams, Stewartby and Kempston Hardwick railway stations and links to East West rail will aid local employment and create new opportunities for commuting . The nearby existing road network and links from M1 to A1, will also aid employment opportunities.
Proximity to Bedford gives the best opportunity for the regeneration of Bedford centre as a workplace and for leisure and retail.
New settlements at Wyboston and Little Barford have excellent north/south access, as well as to the A421 for Milton Keynes and 428 for Cambridge.
2c creates the best transport infrastructure around which to develop.
The Wixams, Stewartby and Kempston Hardwick railway stations and links to East West rail will aid local employment and create new opportunities for commuting . The nearby existing road network and links from M1 to A1, will also aid employment opportunities.
Proximity to Bedford gives the best opportunity for the regeneration of Bedford centre as a workplace and for leisure and retail.
New settlements at Wyboston and Little Barford have excellent north/south access, as well as to the A421 for Milton Keynes and 428 for Cambridge.
Object
Local Plan 2040 Draft Plan - Strategy options and draft policies consultation
Representation ID: 3923
Received: 28/08/2021
Respondent: Mrs MARGARET TURNER
The local plan leaflet delivered to homes lists four options. Three of these include the massive new settlement at Dennybrook although the leaflet suggest that there will only be 2500 houses built here not the 10800 which is actually proposed. There is one line on the leaflet which suggests that 6 other options are available but doesn't list where they are or how to find out which they are. After all, there are over 900 sites listed on the call for sites map. This is not transparent consultation
The local plan leaflet delivered to homes lists four options. Three of these include the massive new settlement at Dennybrook although the leaflet suggest that there will only be 2500 houses built here not the 10800 which is actually proposed. There is one line on the leaflet which suggests that 6 other options are available but doesn't list where they are or how to find out which they are. After all, there are over 900 sites listed on the call for sites map. This is not transparent consultation
Support
Local Plan 2040 Draft Plan - Strategy options and draft policies consultation
Representation ID: 3979
Received: 29/08/2021
Respondent: Anne Dorber
The proposed new settlement(s) in options 2b,c,d are a concern as the proposed locations of Little Barford and Wyboston are both low-lying locations close to the river Gt Ouse. Due regard must be taken that “Areas at risk of flooding are likely to be at increasing risk in the future and the frequency of flooding will increase in such areas as a result of climate change.” (page iv of the Council's Strategic Flood Risk Assessment, 2020).
The proposed new settlement(s) in options 2b,c,d are a concern as the proposed locations of Little Barford and Wyboston are both low-lying locations close to the river Gt Ouse. Due regard must be taken that “Areas at risk of flooding are likely to be at increasing risk in the future and the frequency of flooding will increase in such areas as a result of climate change.” (page iv of the Council's Strategic Flood Risk Assessment, 2020).
Object
Local Plan 2040 Draft Plan - Strategy options and draft policies consultation
Representation ID: 4008
Received: 29/08/2021
Respondent: Mr Keith Turner
The local plan leaflet delivered to homes lists four options. Three of these include the massive new settlement at Dennybrook although the leaflet suggest that there will only be 2500 houses built here not the 10800 which is actually proposed. There is one line on the leaflet which suggests that 6 other options are available but doesn't list where they are or how to find out which they are. After all, there are over hundreds of sites listed on the call for sites map. This is not transparent consultation
The local plan leaflet delivered to homes lists four options. Three of these include the massive new settlement at Dennybrook although the leaflet suggest that there will only be 2500 houses built here not the 10800 which is actually proposed. There is one line on the leaflet which suggests that 6 other options are available but doesn't list where they are or how to find out which they are. After all, there are over hundreds of sites listed on the call for sites map. This is not transparent consultation
Object
Local Plan 2040 Draft Plan - Strategy options and draft policies consultation
Representation ID: 4122
Received: 30/08/2021
Respondent: Mr paul giles
I believe that the summary leaflet sent round to all houses in the Borough is flawed in that it does not make it sufficiently clear that other options can be selected or proposed, it does not distinguish between Little Barford or Dennybrook (site 977) and it doesn’t make it clear that the 2,500 homes at Dennybrook would be the first phase of a 10,800 home development. This is a fundamental flaw which we believe undermines the value of the responses to this consultation.
I believe that the summary leaflet sent round to all houses in the Borough is flawed in that it does not make it sufficiently clear that other options can be selected or proposed, it does not distinguish between Little Barford or Dennybrook (site 977) and it doesn’t make it clear that the 2,500 homes at Dennybrook would be the first phase of a 10,800 home development. This is a fundamental flaw which we believe undermines the value of the responses to this consultation.
Object
Local Plan 2040 Draft Plan - Strategy options and draft policies consultation
Representation ID: 4199
Received: 30/08/2021
Respondent: Mrs Gail Browning
I did not feel that the leaflet delivered to homes was clear. The leaflet was aimed at four options, with three of these including Dennybrook (977). Even this led you to believe it was 2500 house, not 10800. I read the one line making you aware that there were several other options. There was little information about these options or the hundreds of sites on the call for sites map.
I did not feel that the leaflet delivered to homes was clear. The leaflet was aimed at four options, with three of these including Dennybrook (977). Even this led you to believe it was 2500 house, not 10800. I read the one line making you aware that there were several other options. There was little information about these options or the hundreds of sites on the call for sites map.
Object
Local Plan 2040 Draft Plan - Strategy options and draft policies consultation
Representation ID: 4259
Received: 30/08/2021
Respondent: Mr Fletcher Giles
The local plan leaflet delivered to homes lists four options. Three of these include the massive new settlement at Dennybrook although the leaflet suggest that there will only be 2500 houses built here not the 10800 which is actually proposed. There is one line on the leaflet which suggests that 6 other options are available but doesn't list where they are or how to find out which they are. After all, there are over 900 sites listed on the call for sites map. This is not transparent consultation
The local plan leaflet delivered to homes lists four options. Three of these include the massive new settlement at Dennybrook although the leaflet suggest that there will only be 2500 houses built here not the 10800 which is actually proposed. There is one line on the leaflet which suggests that 6 other options are available but doesn't list where they are or how to find out which they are. After all, there are over 900 sites listed on the call for sites map. This is not transparent consultation
Object
Local Plan 2040 Draft Plan - Strategy options and draft policies consultation
Representation ID: 4345
Received: 31/08/2021
Respondent: Miss Helen Leach
The local plan leaflet delivered to homes lists four options. Three of these include the massive new settlement at Dennybrook although the leaflet suggest that there will only be 2500 houses built here not the 10800 which is actually proposed. There is one line on the leaflet which suggests that 6 other options are available but doesn't list where they are or how to find out which they are. After all, there are over 900 sites listed on the call for sites map. This is not transparent consultation.
The local plan leaflet delivered to homes lists four options. Three of these include the massive new settlement at Dennybrook although the leaflet suggest that there will only be 2500 houses built here not the 10800 which is actually proposed. There is one line on the leaflet which suggests that 6 other options are available but doesn't list where they are or how to find out which they are. After all, there are over 900 sites listed on the call for sites map. This is not transparent consultation.
Object
Local Plan 2040 Draft Plan - Strategy options and draft policies consultation
Representation ID: 4483
Received: 31/08/2021
Respondent: Mrs Lucy Crawford
I believe that the summary leaflet sent round to all houses in the Borough is flawed in that it does not make it sufficiently clear that other options can be selected or proposed, it does not distinguish between Little Barford or Dennybrook (site 977) and it doesn’t make it clear that the 2,500 homes at Dennybrook would be the first phase of a 10,800 home development. This is a fundamental flaw which we believe undermines the value of the responses to this consultation.
I believe that the summary leaflet sent round to all houses in the Borough is flawed in that it does not make it sufficiently clear that other options can be selected or proposed, it does not distinguish between Little Barford or Dennybrook (site 977) and it doesn’t make it clear that the 2,500 homes at Dennybrook would be the first phase of a 10,800 home development. This is a fundamental flaw which we believe undermines the value of the responses to this consultation.
Object
Local Plan 2040 Draft Plan - Strategy options and draft policies consultation
Representation ID: 4552
Received: 01/09/2021
Respondent: Mrs Kathryn Smith
The summary leaflet sent round to all houses in the Borough is totally flawed in that it does not make it sufficiently clear that other options can be selected or proposed, it does not distinguish between Little Barford or Dennybrook (site 977) and it doesn’t make it clear
that the 2,500 homes at Dennybrook would be the first phase of a 10,800 home development or that Dennybrook will be built on open countryside and not brownfield or under utilised land. This is a fundamental flaw which we believe undermines the value of the responses to this consultation.
The summary leaflet sent round to all houses in the Borough is totally flawed in that it does not make it sufficiently clear that other options can be selected or proposed, it does not distinguish between Little Barford or Dennybrook (site 977) and it doesn’t make it clear
that the 2,500 homes at Dennybrook would be the first phase of a 10,800 home development or that Dennybrook will be built on open countryside and not brownfield or under utilised land. This is a fundamental flaw which we believe undermines the value of the responses to this consultation.
Object
Local Plan 2040 Draft Plan - Strategy options and draft policies consultation
Representation ID: 4566
Received: 01/09/2021
Respondent: Miss Andrea Witham
But the emerging preference options are really misleading!! The summary leaflet sent round to all houses in the Borough is flawed
(a) it does not make it sufficiently clear that other options can be selected or proposed,
(b) It does not distinguish between Little Barford or Dennybrook (site 977) and
(c) it doesn’t make it clear that the 2,500 homes at Dennybrook would be the first phase of a 10,800 home development. The leaflet issued by Taylor Wimpey within the last week does do this.
These are fundamental flaws which undermine the value of the responses to this consultation
But the emerging preference options are really misleading!! The summary leaflet sent round to all houses in the Borough is flawed
(a) it does not make it sufficiently clear that other options can be selected or proposed,
(b) It does not distinguish between Little Barford or Dennybrook (site 977) and
(c) it doesn’t make it clear that the 2,500 homes at Dennybrook would be the first phase of a 10,800 home development. The leaflet issued by Taylor Wimpey within the last week does do this.
These are fundamental flaws which undermine the value of the responses to this consultation
Object
Local Plan 2040 Draft Plan - Strategy options and draft policies consultation
Representation ID: 4598
Received: 01/09/2021
Respondent: Mrs Ruth Whiffin
I believe no additional houses should be built adjoining an urban area as I believe Bedford is already too large. I believe the additional houses should be built along the A6 corridor, so that this road is allocated it’s fair share of residential development. Unfortunately, none of the options provided show development targeted at the A6. For those options which include a choice of 2 new developments from the four suggested sites I believe Colmworth and Twinwoods should be selected. Considering the available options, I believe options 1a, 1b and 7 can be discounted as they do not fulfill the objective. I believe the best option is option 5 and the worst is option 2d. Placing the options in order from best to worst :- option 5, option 6, option 4, option 3a, option 3b, option 3c,option 2a, option 2b, option 2c, option 2d.
Object
Local Plan 2040 Draft Plan - Strategy options and draft policies consultation
Representation ID: 4619
Received: 01/09/2021
Respondent: Mr Denis Ivins
see comments on other items
see comments on other items
Support
Local Plan 2040 Draft Plan - Strategy options and draft policies consultation
Representation ID: 4624
Received: 01/09/2021
Respondent: Mr John Wait
I write in response to the pamphlet delivered to my home a month or so ago.
Having read the document and reviewed the 4 plans presented, option 2C is most definitely the preferred option. There are a couple of reasons in my opinion that makes this the perfect option.
Firstly, I believe existing village boundary lines must be maintained and not altered in order to accommodate opportunistic development. It is extremely likely that residents will have moved to a village either because of its charm or its defined size and structure and also its social environment. To ruin this with commercially driven development is always going to be to the detriment of some, or perhaps many, residents and must not be allowed. Bedford’s recognised commitment to preserving village life should be retained even though times and council employees change as the years progress. Clearly in-filling will always occur but with the council’s careful management and building approval process this has not in my experience, ever caused an issue.
Following on from the necessity to retain villages within their current boundaries and not allow overspill that allow neighbouring village to “creep” together what really makes clear sense is the building of new developments such as those identified as Wyboston and Little Barford. With the potential to fulfil all future housing requirements way beyond 2040 it is an environment where new resident have the knowledge that they are moving into an area where development will continue and therefore have no expectations that the area will never change.
Object
Local Plan 2040 Draft Plan - Strategy options and draft policies consultation
Representation ID: 4652
Received: 01/09/2021
Respondent: Mr Melvyn Chase
I believe that the summary leaflet sent round to all houses in the Borough is flawed in that it does not make it sufficiently clear that other options can be selected or proposed, it does not distinguish between Little Barford or Dennybrook (site 977) and it doesn’t make it clear that the 2,500 homes at Dennybrook would be the first phase of a 10,800 home development. This is a fundamental flaw which we believe undermines the value of the responses to this consultation.
I have severe Parkinson’s and cannot type easily. Please duplicate all of Lucy Crawford’s responses for my views. Her email address is Lucy_crawford@hotmail.com and she lives at 33, Staploe PE19 5JA
Object
Local Plan 2040 Draft Plan - Strategy options and draft policies consultation
Representation ID: 4708
Received: 01/09/2021
Respondent: Mr Joshua Zwetsloot
Staploe Parish Council believe that the summary leaflet sent round to all houses in the Borough is flawed in that it does not make it sufficiently clear that other options can be selected or proposed, it does not distinguish between Little Barford or Dennybrook (site 977) and it doesn’t make it clear that the 2,500 homes at Dennybrook would be the first phase of a 10,800 home development. This is a fundamental flaw which we believe undermines the value of the responses to this consultation.
Object
Local Plan 2040 Draft Plan - Strategy options and draft policies consultation
Representation ID: 4758
Received: 01/09/2021
Respondent: Mr David Rawlins
But the emerging preference options are highly misleading!! The summary leaflet sent round to all houses in the Borough is flawed
(a) it does not make it sufficiently clear that other options can be selected or proposed,
(b) It does not distinguish between Little Barford or Dennybrook (site 977) and
(c) it doesn’t make it clear that the 2,500 homes at Dennybrook would be the first phase of a 10,800 home development. The leaflet issued by Taylor Wimpey within the last week does do this.
These are fundamental flaws which undermine the value of the responses to this consultation
But the emerging preference options are highly misleading!! The summary leaflet sent round to all houses in the Borough is flawed
(a) it does not make it sufficiently clear that other options can be selected or proposed,
(b) It does not distinguish between Little Barford or Dennybrook (site 977) and
(c) it doesn’t make it clear that the 2,500 homes at Dennybrook would be the first phase of a 10,800 home development. The leaflet issued by Taylor Wimpey within the last week does do this.
These are fundamental flaws which undermine the value of the responses to this consultation
Object
Local Plan 2040 Draft Plan - Strategy options and draft policies consultation
Representation ID: 4763
Received: 01/09/2021
Respondent: Mrs Francessa Frew
The Dennybrook/Wyboston development of 10,000 houses is on the 2400 acre site which is predominantly Grade A agricultural land, there is no brownfiel element to the site, a priority under the NPPF. The development would dominate the local environment and impact adversely on local communites during the construction period for the next 30 years. The site lies in a rural area with limited access by means of single track/narrow roads totally unsuited for construction traffic, an issue which has not been addressed by the develpoer according to literature they have sent to neighbouring villages.
The Dennybrook/Wyboston development of 10,000 houses is on the 2400 acre site which is predominantly Grade A agricultural land, there is no brownfiel element to the site, a priority under the NPPF. The development would dominate the local environment and impact adversely on local communites during the construction period for the next 30 years. The site lies in a rural area with limited access by means of single track/narrow roads totally unsuited for construction traffic, an issue which has not been addressed by the develpoer according to literature they have sent to neighbouring villages.
Object
Local Plan 2040 Draft Plan - Strategy options and draft policies consultation
Representation ID: 4776
Received: 01/09/2021
Respondent: Thurleigh Parish Council
Thurleigh Parish Council’s preference is for development alongside the A421 corridor as they already have the appropriate transport links between the A1 & M1 which also fits in with the Cambs/Oxford arc proposals.
The Parish Council supports option 2a which allows for road & rail infrastructure, and also allows growth with limited impact to Thurleigh and North Beds generally.
Should the Borough Council decide on options 2b-d with one/two new settlements then the Parish Council has concerns that Thurleigh would be used as an even bigger rat run than it currently is between the A6 and A1.
Following the recent adoption of the Thurleigh NDP one of the biggest concerns residents had was traffic, both volume and speed, and any new settlement will simply increase both.
It is noted that AECOM Bedford Borough Transport Model New Settlement West of Wyboston document point 2.5.2 mentions
A6-A1 Link Improvements to the route from the A6 to Eaton Socon through Thurleigh and Bolnhurst
However table 2.6 showing the proposed mitigations do not cover Bolnhurst and advise that only the junction of Milton Road/Mill Hill and Mill Road should be amended. What they fail to take into account is that if cars travel that way- we assume to the A421 and onwards towards Black Cat- they can’t access the A421 junction through Renhold due to traffic regulations between 7.30am and 9.30am and 3.30pm to we believe 5.30pm when through traffic is not permitted. This would mean travelling into Bedford, along Wentworth Drive and Norse Road to joining the St Neots Road to the A421 junction thus adding far more milage and time to the journey. They will simply travel, as they do now, through Thurleigh, Bolnhurst and onto Wyboston/Eaton Socon across country.
At present there is no road infrastructure in place to cope with traffic between the A1/A6, and as the Borough Council are aware our roads are already under pressure with no sign of long-term remedial action.
Should the Borough Council be minded implementing any of the options 2b-2d in the Local Plan 2040 Thurleigh would like to see documented within the plan the following mitigations
1. A by-pass of Thurleigh, and if that is not possible the following two mitigations
2. Average Speed cameras installed on the High Street and at Cross End
3. ANPR cameras installed to stop transporter lorries from accessing the village as a cut through from/to the A1/A6
Support
Local Plan 2040 Draft Plan - Strategy options and draft policies consultation
Representation ID: 4843
Received: 02/09/2021
Respondent: Ms Mary Delger
Agent: Robinson and Hall LLP
We support proposed Option 2d, whilst Renhold has not been listed as one of the parishes within this location, it is acknowledged that it is included within the figure provided at Option 2d.
Whilst the figures provided for each of the options are indicative at this stage, given Renhold’s location, it is felt the village should be included within an option proposing developing in and around the urban area and could support the Borough in the delivery of the required 25,500 dwellings over the plan period.
I write on behalf of our client, Mary Delger, in relation to the above consultation which forms part of the Bedford Borough Local Plan Review (Bedford Local Plan 2040). My client’s site, Land at the rear of The Old Forge, 33 Top End, Renhold (Site Reference 766) was submitted as part of the previous ‘Call for Sites’ Consultation in August 2020.
In respect of the options provided within the Draft Local Plan regarding where growth in the Borough should be located, we support Option 2d: Development in and around the urban area, plus A421 transport corridor with rail-based growth parishes, southern parishes, and east parishes, plus one new settlement. This option proposed 1500 dwellings adjoining the urban area and 750 dwellings to the east of the Transport Corridor. Whilst Renhold has not been listed as one of the parishes within this location, it is acknowledged that it is included within the figure provided at Option 2d.
Whilst the figures provided for each of the options are indicative at this stage, given Renhold’s location close proximity to the existing Urban Area (Policy AD41) as per the Allocations and Designations Local Plan 2013 and within the proposed Eastern Parishes area, it is felt the village should be included within an option proposing developing in and around the urban area and could support the Borough in the delivery of the required 25,500 dwellings over the plan period.
Object
Local Plan 2040 Draft Plan - Strategy options and draft policies consultation
Representation ID: 4891
Received: 02/09/2021
Respondent: Ms Tara Skey
I believe that the summary leaflet distributed in the Borough is flawed since it does not: make it sufficiently clear that other options can be selected or proposed, distinguish between Little Barford or Dennybrook (site 977), or make it clear that the 2,500 homes at Dennybrook would be phase one of a 10,800 home development. This is a fundamental flaw which I believe undermines the value of the responses to this consultation. In addition, none of the impact to St Neots residents in terms of amenities, access to rural land, quality of life, mental health, flood risk etc. are considered.
I believe that the summary leaflet distributed in the Borough is flawed since it does not: make it sufficiently clear that other options can be selected or proposed, distinguish between Little Barford or Dennybrook (site 977), or make it clear that the 2,500 homes at Dennybrook would be phase one of a 10,800 home development. This is a fundamental flaw which I believe undermines the value of the responses to this consultation. In addition, none of the impact to St Neots residents in terms of amenities, access to rural land, quality of life, mental health, flood risk etc. are considered.
Support
Local Plan 2040 Draft Plan - Strategy options and draft policies consultation
Representation ID: 5166
Received: 03/09/2021
Respondent: Mr Chris Giles
Staploe Parish Council believe that the summary leaflet sent round to all houses in the Borough is flawed in that it does not make it sufficiently clear that other options can be selected or proposed, it does not distinguish between Little Barford or Dennybrook (site 977) and it doesn’t make it clear that the 2,500 homes at Dennybrook would be the first phase of a 10,800 home development. This is a fundamental flaw which we believe undermines the value of the responses to this consultation.
Support
Local Plan 2040 Draft Plan - Strategy options and draft policies consultation
Representation ID: 5203
Received: 03/09/2021
Respondent: Mrs Julie Sellers
I agree with your preferred options 2a/b/c/d. They are better served by existing transport corridors and the proposed east-west rail links compared with other alternatives, most specifically new settlements at Colworth and Twinwoods. A settlement at Colworth in particular has poor westbound (to Milton Keynes) transport links.
I agree with your preferred options 2a/b/c/d. They are better served by existing transport corridors and the proposed east-west rail links compared with other alternatives, most specifically new settlements at Colworth and Twinwoods. A settlement at Colworth in particular has poor westbound (to Milton Keynes) transport links.
Object
Local Plan 2040 Draft Plan - Strategy options and draft policies consultation
Representation ID: 5501
Received: 06/09/2021
Respondent: Mr Stuart Ledwich
Staploe Parish Council believe that the summary leaflet sent round to all houses in the Borough is flawed in that it does not make it sufficiently clear that other options can be selected or proposed, it does not distinguish between Little Barford or Dennybrook and it doesn’t make it clear that the 2,500 homes at Dennybrook would be the first phase of a 10,500 home development. This is a fundamental flaw which we believe undermines the value of the responses to this consultation.
Object
Local Plan 2040 Draft Plan - Strategy options and draft policies consultation
Representation ID: 5598
Received: 06/09/2021
Respondent: Mrs Julie Kilby
I believe that the summary leaflet sent round to all houses in the Borough is flawed in that it does not make it sufficiently clear that other options can be selected or proposed, it does not distinguish between Little Barford or Dennybrook (site 977) and it doesn’t make it clear that the 2,500 homes at Dennybrook would be the first phase of a 10,800 home development. This is a fundamental flaw which we believe undermines the value of the responses to this consultation.
Object
Local Plan 2040 Draft Plan - Strategy options and draft policies consultation
Representation ID: 5649
Received: 07/09/2021
Respondent: Mr Phillip Yockney
I believe that the summary leaflet sent round to all houses in the Borough is flawed in that it does not make it sufficiently clear that other options can be selected or proposed, it does not distinguish between Little Barford or Dennybrook (site 977) and it doesn’t make it clear that the 2,500 homes at Dennybrook would be the first phase of a 10,800 home development. This is a fundamental flaw which we believe undermines the value of the responses to this consultation.
Object
Local Plan 2040 Draft Plan - Strategy options and draft policies consultation
Representation ID: 5700
Received: 07/09/2021
Respondent: Miss amber scally
Staploe Parish Council believe that the summary leaflet sent round to all houses in the Borough is flawed in that it does not make it sufficiently clear that other options can be selected or proposed, it does not distinguish between Little Barford or Dennybrook (site 977) and it doesn’t make it clear that the 2,500 homes at Dennybrook would be the first phase of a 10,800 home development. This is a fundamental flaw which we believe undermines the value of the responses to this consultation.
Object
Local Plan 2040 Draft Plan - Strategy options and draft policies consultation
Representation ID: 5761
Received: 07/09/2021
Respondent: Miss Hannah Hambleton-Jewell
I believe that the summary leaflet sent round to all houses in the Borough is flawed in that it does not make it sufficiently clear that other options can be selected or proposed, it does not distinguish between Little Barford or Dennybrook (site 977) and it doesn’t make it clear that the 2,500 homes at Dennybrook would be the first phase of a 10,800 home development. This is a fundamental flaw which we believe undermines the value of the responses to this consultation.