Call for Sites

Back to document

Search form responses

Results for Executors of the late Nigel Alington search

New search

Form ID: 873

Interest in land

Other (please specify)

Specify 'other' land interest

Agent

If you are not the landowner of the site you are submitting, do you have permission to submit?

Yes

Address of site

Land east and west of Barford Road, Little Barford, St Neots

Location plan

Current use of land

Manor House and associated buildings and grounds, farm buildings and agricultural land

Adjoining use to the north

RWE power station and Alington Road Industrial Estate

Adjoining use to the south

Agriculture

Adjoining use to the east

Agriculture

Adjoining use to the west

River Great Ouse

Has the site been developed previously?

Yes

Proposed primary use

Housing

Other uses proposed

Employment

Number of dwellings proposed

270-340 subject to the proportion of mixed use area and setting of listed buildings.

Type of housing proposed

Family houses , Flats

Other type of housing

No answer given

Density proposed

30-35 dph away from listed buildings

Proposed tenures

Market housing - Owner occupied , Market housing - Private rented housing , Affordable Housing - Affordable rent , Affordable Housing - Shared ownership

Other tenures proposed

No answer given

Permanent or transit?

No answer given

Site privately owned?

Nothing chosen

Number of plots proposed

No answer given

Proposed type of employment

B1, B2 and B8

Gross floorspace proposed

B1: 9,616-20,244m2 or B2: 7,191-15,176m2 or B8: 6,568-13,861m2 or a mix of these uses (mix subject to employment evidence)

Proposed type of retail

No answer given

Net floorspace proposed

No answer given

Gross floorspace proposed

No answer given

Number of hotel rooms proposed

No answer given

Amount of development proposed

No answer given

Description

No answer given

Can suitable access be achieved for the site?

Suitable access is achievable

Where will the site’s access point(s) be?

Refer to drawing 60830-PP-005

Is the site available for development now?

Yes

Is the site currently subject to a planning application?

Is the site currently being marketed?

Are you aware of any issues that might affect the viability of developing the site?

1-5 years (2024/25-2028/29)

270-340

6-10 years (2029/30-2033/34)

No answer given

11-15 years (2034/35-2039/40)

No answer given

16+ years (2040 onwards)

No answer given

What year, post adoption of the plan, would you expect development to start on site?

2024

The council has declared a climate emergency. How the proposal will respond to climate change

The site promotes sustainable transport methods and will deliver an appropriate layout, design and landscaping to encourage walkable neighbourhoods, promote the use of renewable energy and/or energy efficiencies in the fabric of the buildings.

Attachments

File: Call for sites redacted

File: Promoter site assessment

Site size (ha)

20.23

Site size threshold

Above

Overriding constraint?

Site not in accordance with the emerging development strategy

Stage1 conclusion

Exclude from further assessment

Stage 2 Assessment of suitability, availability & achievability

Nothing chosen

Stage 2 conclusion

Exclude from further assessment

1a. Within or adjoining UAB SPA or built form of a small settlement

x The site is not within or adjoining the urban area or a defined settlement policy area, or within the built form of a small settlement

1b. Accessible on foot to a food store?

xx A site accessibility score of 0 is recorded where 0 is more than 30 minutes’ walk.

1c. Accessible on foot to a primary school?

xx A site accessibility score of 0 is recorded where 0 is more than 30 minutes’ walk.

1d. Accessible on foot or by bus to a major employer?

xx There is no public transport within 10 minutes’ walk to enable access to a major employer

1e. Outside, adjoining or within the air quality management area?

+ The site is not within or adjoining the air quality management area.

2a. Within or adjoining site of nature conservation importance

x The site is within or adjoining a site of nature conservation importance

2b. In an area where protected species are known or likely to exist?

xx Protected species recorded on the site

2c. Potentially able to achieve a net gain in biodiversity?

? Uncertain or insufficient information

2d. Able to link into the green infrastructure opportunity network?

+ The site is within or adjoining the green infrastructure opportunity network and able to enhance the network.

2e. Likely to impact on an area currently providing ecosystem services.

+ Opportunity area for 3 or more ecosystem services covers less than 25% of the site.

3a. Proposing a renewable energy scheme or extra energy efficiency standards?

0 No renewable energy generation scheme included and efficiency standards that meet normal standards.

3b. Within or adjoining the urban area, a defined settlement policy area or the built form of a small settlement?

x The site is not within or adjoining the urban area or a defined settlement policy area, or within the built form of a small settlement

3c. Accessible on foot to a food store?

xx A site accessibility score of 0 is recorded where 0 is more than 30 minutes’ walk.

3d. Accessible on foot to a primary school?

xx A site accessibility score of 0 is recorded where 0 is more than 30 minutes’ walk.

3e. Accessible on foot or by bus to a major employer?

xx There is no public transport within 10 minutes’ walk to enable access to a major employer.

4a. Likely to impact on designated or nondesignated heritage assets or their settings? For more detailed assessment see HELAA supporting document. www.bedford.gov.uk/LocalPlan2040

xx The proposal has the potential to cause very high harm (which may reach the level of substantial harm) to a heritage asset. Development with this level of impact will be removed from further consideration unless it can be demonstrated that the harm can be avoided, mitigated or outweighed by substantial public benefits.

5a. Likely to increase future economic and employment opportunities?

+ Proposal includes permanent economic and employment opportunities.

6a. Proposing a main town centre use in, on the edge or outside of a town centre?

0 Proposal does not include a main town centre use.

7a. Within 400m of an existing open space or proposing open space within it?

x The proposal does not include and is not within 400m walking distance of a publicly accessible open space.

7b. Within 800m of a sports facility or proposing a sports facility within it?

x The proposal does not include and is not within 800m of a publicly accessible sports facility

8a. Likely to have a significant adverse impact on the surrounding landscape?

? It is uncertain what effect the proposal is likely to have on the landscape / more information is required.

8b. Within the existing settlement form?

x The site is separated from a defined settlement policy area or the built form of a small settlement.

9a. On previously developed land?

x The site is not previously developed land as defined in the NPPF.

9b. On best and most versatile agricultural land ie grades, 1, 2 or 3a?

? The classification of the site is not known or it is not clear whether is classified as grade 3a or 3b.

10a. Within a groundwater source protection zone?

+ The site is not located in a source protection zone.

11a. At risk of flooding?

xx Development would be in flood zones 3a or 3b.

12a. Likely to provide a mix of housing, including affordable housing?

+ The site is likely to provide a mix of housing and include affordable housing.

12b. Able to address a particular housing need?

x The development will not meet identified needs eg elderly, care, travellers.

13a. Within 800m of a facility where cultural or social activities can be accessed?

+ The site is within 800m of a facility where cultural or social activities can be accessed.

14a. Likely to encourage social cohesion?

0 Neutral.

14b. Likely to help make the area safer? +

+ The development is likely to increase public surveillance or increase activity.

15a. Within or adjoining the urban area, a defined settlement policy area or the built form of a small settlement?

x The site is not within or adjoining the urban area or a defined settlement policy area, or within the built form of a small settlement

15b. Accessible on foot to a food store?

xx A site accessibility score of 0 is recorded where 0 is more than 30 minutes’ walk.

15c. Accessible on foot to a primary school?

xx A site accessibility score of 0 is recorded where 0 is more than 30 minutes’ walk.

15d. Accessible on foot or by bus to a major employer?

xx There is no public transport within 10 minutes’ walk to enable access to a major employer.

15e. Connect highway without constraint?

? Potential access requiring mitigation

15f. Highway or junction capacity issues

+ No capacity issues

Highway comments. For more detailed assessment see HELAA supporting document. www.bedford.gov.uk/LocalPlan2040

Access at several points along Barford Road. Some widening work on Barford Road would be necessary, as well as new junction infrastructure and highway works for access. There are low-frequency bus services approx 1km from the site at a nearby supermarket. The closest footway is approx 250m from the north of the site on Barford Rd and is narrow (approx 1m wide). Widening and new junctions for access on Barford Road. For improved pedestrian and cycle connectivity it would be necessary to connect to the existing footway (approx 250m away). Widening of the existing footway and conversion to cycle/pedestrian route up to the A428 roundabout would be suggested. This would allow cycle/pedestrian access to the supermarket, bus services and further into the town.

Contaminated Land

Nothing chosen

Environmental Health note

close proximity to little barford power station and rail line

Mineral Safeguarding Area

Entire site falls within the boundary of a MSA.

Site assessment conclusions

The proposal of the scale proposed does not fit with the development strategy however the site falls within a larger site (Site 907) proposed for allocation HOU19 Little Barford new settlement.

Form ID: 892

Interest in land

Other (please specify)

Specify 'other' land interest

Agent

If you are not the landowner of the site you are submitting, do you have permission to submit?

Yes

Address of site

Land east and west of Barford Road, Little Barford St Neots

Location plan

Current use of land

Manor house and associated buildings and grounds, farm buildings and agricultural land

Adjoining use to the north

RWE power station and Alington Road Industrial Estate

Adjoining use to the south

Agriculture

Adjoining use to the east

Agriculture

Adjoining use to the west

River Great Ouse

Has the site been developed previously?

Yes

Proposed primary use

Housing

Other uses proposed

Employment , All other types

Number of dwellings proposed

1,115-1305 subject to proportion of mixed-used area and setting of listed buildings

Type of housing proposed

Family houses , Self-build/Custom build homes , Older people housing , Flats

Other type of housing

No answer given

Density proposed

30-35 dph away from listed buildings

Proposed tenures

Market housing - Owner occupied , Market housing - Private rented housing , Affordable Housing - Affordable rent , Affordable Housing - Shared ownership

Other tenures proposed

No answer given

Permanent or transit?

No answer given

Site privately owned?

Nothing chosen

Number of plots proposed

No answer given

Proposed type of employment

B1, B2 and B8

Gross floorspace proposed

B1: 9,616-20,244m2 or B2: 7,191-15,176m2 or B8: 6,568-13,861m2 or a mix of these uses (mix subject to employment evidence)

Proposed type of retail

No answer given

Net floorspace proposed

No answer given

Gross floorspace proposed

No answer given

Number of hotel rooms proposed

No answer given

Amount of development proposed

Refer to AL2 representation additional information sheets

Description

It is anticipated that a development of this scale would be supported by D1 uses. The exact nature and scale of these uses will evolve in parallel with Bedford Borough Council’s evidence base.

Can suitable access be achieved for the site?

Suitable access is achievable

Where will the site’s access point(s) be?

Refer to drawing 60830-PP-005

Is the site available for development now?

Yes

Is the site currently subject to a planning application?

Is the site currently being marketed?

Are you aware of any issues that might affect the viability of developing the site?

1-5 years (2024/25-2028/29)

885

6-10 years (2029/30-2033/34)

420

11-15 years (2034/35-2039/40)

No answer given

16+ years (2040 onwards)

No answer given

What year, post adoption of the plan, would you expect development to start on site?

2024

The council has declared a climate emergency. How the proposal will respond to climate change

Attachments

File: Call for sites redacted

File: Promoter site assessment

File: Highways and Development Parcels Parish Growth

File: Financial Viability Letter

File: Letter 25 May 2021

File: Heritage Impact Assmt

File: letter 29th Oct 2021

File: Landscape and Visual Statement

File: Botany Assessment CWS

File: Botany Assessment RWE power station

File: Prelim Ecological Assessment

File: Land promotion areas

File: SSFRA

File: Surface Water Drainage 1

File: Surface Water Drainage 2

File: Surface Water Drainage 3

File: Surface Water Drainage 4

File: Surface Water Drainage 5

File: Technical Note Utilities

File: Transport Assessment 1

File: Transport Assessment 2

File: Transport Assessment 3

File: Transport Assessment 4

File: Transport Assessment 5

Site size (ha)

87.46

Site size threshold

Above

Overriding constraint?

Site not in accordance with the emerging development strategy

Stage1 conclusion

Exclude from further assessment

Stage 2 Assessment of suitability, availability & achievability

Nothing chosen

Stage 2 conclusion

Nothing chosen

1a. Within or adjoining UAB SPA or built form of a small settlement

x The site is not within or adjoining the urban area or a defined settlement policy area, or within the built form of a small settlement

1b. Accessible on foot to a food store?

xx A site accessibility score of 0 is recorded where 0 is more than 30 minutes’ walk.

1c. Accessible on foot to a primary school?

xx A site accessibility score of 0 is recorded where 0 is more than 30 minutes’ walk.

1d. Accessible on foot or by bus to a major employer?

xx There is no public transport within 10 minutes’ walk to enable access to a major employer

1e. Outside, adjoining or within the air quality management area?

+ The site is not within or adjoining the air quality management area.

2a. Within or adjoining site of nature conservation importance

x The site is within or adjoining a site of nature conservation importance

2b. In an area where protected species are known or likely to exist?

xx Protected species recorded on the site

2c. Potentially able to achieve a net gain in biodiversity?

? Uncertain or insufficient information

2d. Able to link into the green infrastructure opportunity network?

0 The site is not within or adjoining the green infrastructure opportunity network or the impact of the proposal is neutral.

2e. Likely to impact on an area currently providing ecosystem services.

+ Opportunity area for 3 or more ecosystem services covers less than 25% of the site.

3a. Proposing a renewable energy scheme or extra energy efficiency standards?

0 No renewable energy generation scheme included and efficiency standards that meet normal standards.

3b. Within or adjoining the urban area, a defined settlement policy area or the built form of a small settlement?

x The site is not within or adjoining the urban area or a defined settlement policy area, or within the built form of a small settlement

3c. Accessible on foot to a food store?

xx A site accessibility score of 0 is recorded where 0 is more than 30 minutes’ walk.

3d. Accessible on foot to a primary school?

xx A site accessibility score of 0 is recorded where 0 is more than 30 minutes’ walk.

3e. Accessible on foot or by bus to a major employer?

xx There is no public transport within 10 minutes’ walk to enable access to a major employer.

4a. Likely to impact on designated or nondesignated heritage assets or their settings? For more detailed assessment see HELAA supporting document. www.bedford.gov.uk/LocalPlan2040

5a. Likely to increase future economic and employment opportunities?

+ Proposal includes permanent economic and employment opportunities.

6a. Proposing a main town centre use in, on the edge or outside of a town centre?

0 Proposal does not include a main town centre use.

7a. Within 400m of an existing open space or proposing open space within it?

x The proposal does not include and is not within 400m walking distance of a publicly accessible open space.

7b. Within 800m of a sports facility or proposing a sports facility within it?

x The proposal does not include and is not within 800m of a publicly accessible sports facility

8a. Likely to have a significant adverse impact on the surrounding landscape?

? It is uncertain what effect the proposal is likely to have on the landscape / more information is required.

8b. Within the existing settlement form?

x The site is separated from a defined settlement policy area or the built form of a small settlement.

9a. On previously developed land?

x The site is not previously developed land as defined in the NPPF.

9b. On best and most versatile agricultural land ie grades, 1, 2 or 3a?

+ The site is not on best and most versatile agricultural land as defined in the NPPF.

10a. Within a groundwater source protection zone?

+ The site is not located in a source protection zone.

11a. At risk of flooding?

xx Development would be in flood zones 3a or 3b.

12a. Likely to provide a mix of housing, including affordable housing?

+ The site is likely to provide a mix of housing and include affordable housing.

12b. Able to address a particular housing need?

+ The development will meet identified housing needs eg elderly, care, travellers.

13a. Within 800m of a facility where cultural or social activities can be accessed?

+ The site is within 800m of a facility where cultural or social activities can be accessed.

14a. Likely to encourage social cohesion?

0 Neutral.

14b. Likely to help make the area safer? +

+ The development is likely to increase public surveillance or increase activity.

15a. Within or adjoining the urban area, a defined settlement policy area or the built form of a small settlement?

x The site is not within or adjoining the urban area or a defined settlement policy area, or within the built form of a small settlement

15b. Accessible on foot to a food store?

xx A site accessibility score of 0 is recorded where 0 is more than 30 minutes’ walk.

15c. Accessible on foot to a primary school?

xx A site accessibility score of 0 is recorded where 0 is more than 30 minutes’ walk.

15d. Accessible on foot or by bus to a major employer?

xx There is no public transport within 10 minutes’ walk to enable access to a major employer.

15e. Connect highway without constraint?

? Potential access requiring mitigation

15f. Highway or junction capacity issues

? Potential capacity problem requiring mitigation

Highway comments. For more detailed assessment see HELAA supporting document. www.bedford.gov.uk/LocalPlan2040

Access via several points along Barford Road. Widening of Barford Rd and new junctions would be required for access, and these would need to cater for far more vehicles than the above proposal for this site due to the drastically higher number of homes (compared to sites with IDs 872 & 873). Some light traffic can be seen in the area which could worsen with 1000+ houses. Situation re PT, pedestrians and cycles is the same as for the other proposal for this site (site ID: 872 & 873). Widening and new junctions for access on Barford Road. For improved pedestrian and cycle connectivity it would be necessary to connect to the existing footway (approx 250m away). Widening of the existing footway and conversion to cycle/pedestrian route up to the A428 roundabout would be suggested. This would allow cycle/pedestrian access to the supermarket, bus services and further into the town.

Contaminated Land

Nothing chosen

Environmental Health note

close proximity to little barford power station and rail line

Mineral Safeguarding Area

Part of the site falls within the boundary of a MSA.

Site assessment conclusions

The proposal of the scale proposed does not fit with the development strategy however the site falls within a larger site (Site 907) proposed for allocation HOU19 Little Barford new settlement.

Form ID: 907

Interest in land

Other (please specify)

Specify 'other' land interest

Agent

If you are not the landowner of the site you are submitting, do you have permission to submit?

Yes

Address of site

Top Farm, land east and west of Barford Road, Little Barford St Neots

Location plan

Current use of land

Manor house and associated buildings and grounds, farm buildings and agricultural land

Adjoining use to the north

RWE power station and Alington Road Industrial Estate

Adjoining use to the south

Agriculture

Adjoining use to the east

Agriculture

Adjoining use to the west

River Great Ouse

Has the site been developed previously?

Yes

Proposed primary use

Housing

Other uses proposed

Employment , Retail , All other types

Number of dwellings proposed

3,385-3,955 subject to proportion on mixed use area and setting of listed buildings

Type of housing proposed

Family houses , Self-build/Custom build homes , Older people housing , Flats

Other type of housing

No answer given

Density proposed

30-35 dph away from listed buildings

Proposed tenures

Market housing - Owner occupied , Market housing - Private rented housing , Affordable Housing - Affordable rent , Affordable Housing - Shared ownership

Other tenures proposed

No answer given

Permanent or transit?

No answer given

Site privately owned?

Nothing chosen

Number of plots proposed

No answer given

Proposed type of employment

B1, B2 and B8

Gross floorspace proposed

B1: 9,616-20,244m2 or B2: 7,191-15,176m2 or B8: 6,568-13,861m2 or a mix of these uses (mix subject to employment evidence)

Proposed type of retail

Refer to AL3 representation (additional information sheets)

Net floorspace proposed

It is anticipated that a development of this scale would be supported by small scale convenience shops and cafes etc appropriate to support the scale of development. The exact nature and scale of these uses will evolve in parallel with Bedford Borough Council’s evidence base.

Gross floorspace proposed

No answer given

Number of hotel rooms proposed

No answer given

Amount of development proposed

Refer to AL3 representation (additional information sheets)

Description

It is anticipated that a development of this scale would be supported by D1 uses. The exact nature and scale of these uses will evolve in parallel with Bedford Borough Council’s evidence base.

Can suitable access be achieved for the site?

The current access is unsuitable/requires improvement

Where will the site’s access point(s) be?

Refer to drawing 60830-PP-005

Is the site available for development now?

Yes

Is the site currently subject to a planning application?

Is the site currently being marketed?

Are you aware of any issues that might affect the viability of developing the site?

1-5 years (2024/25-2028/29)

885

6-10 years (2029/30-2033/34)

1000

11-15 years (2034/35-2039/40)

1200

16+ years (2040 onwards)

870

What year, post adoption of the plan, would you expect development to start on site?

2024

The council has declared a climate emergency. How the proposal will respond to climate change

The site promotes sustainable transport methods and will endeavour to deliver an appropriate layout, design and landscaping to encourage walkable neighbourhoods, promote the use of renewable energy and/or efficiencies in the fabric of buildings.

Attachments

File: Call for sites redacted

File: 210310 Ltr - redacted.pdf

File: Financial Viability Letter

File: Letter 210525

File: 211029 HIA_Redacted.pdf

File: Letter 211029

File: Landscape and Visual Position Statement

Site size (ha)

284.58

Site size threshold

Above

Overriding constraint?

Nothing chosen

Stage1 conclusion

Include in next stage of assessment

Stage 2 Assessment of suitability, availability & achievability

Nothing chosen

Stage 2 conclusion

Nothing chosen

1a. Within or adjoining UAB SPA or built form of a small settlement

Nothing chosen

1b. Accessible on foot to a food store?

Nothing chosen

1c. Accessible on foot to a primary school?

Nothing chosen

1d. Accessible on foot or by bus to a major employer?

Nothing chosen

1e. Outside, adjoining or within the air quality management area?

Nothing chosen

2a. Within or adjoining site of nature conservation importance

Nothing chosen

2b. In an area where protected species are known or likely to exist?

Nothing chosen

2c. Potentially able to achieve a net gain in biodiversity?

Nothing chosen

2d. Able to link into the green infrastructure opportunity network?

Nothing chosen

2e. Likely to impact on an area currently providing ecosystem services.

Nothing chosen

3a. Proposing a renewable energy scheme or extra energy efficiency standards?

Nothing chosen

3b. Within or adjoining the urban area, a defined settlement policy area or the built form of a small settlement?

Nothing chosen

3c. Accessible on foot to a food store?

Nothing chosen

3d. Accessible on foot to a primary school?

Nothing chosen

3e. Accessible on foot or by bus to a major employer?

Nothing chosen

4a. Likely to impact on designated or nondesignated heritage assets or their settings? For more detailed assessment see HELAA supporting document. www.bedford.gov.uk/LocalPlan2040

Nothing chosen

5a. Likely to increase future economic and employment opportunities?

Nothing chosen

6a. Proposing a main town centre use in, on the edge or outside of a town centre?

Nothing chosen

7a. Within 400m of an existing open space or proposing open space within it?

Nothing chosen

7b. Within 800m of a sports facility or proposing a sports facility within it?

Nothing chosen

8a. Likely to have a significant adverse impact on the surrounding landscape?

Nothing chosen

8b. Within the existing settlement form?

Nothing chosen

9a. On previously developed land?

Nothing chosen

9b. On best and most versatile agricultural land ie grades, 1, 2 or 3a?

Nothing chosen

10a. Within a groundwater source protection zone?

Nothing chosen

11a. At risk of flooding?

Nothing chosen

12a. Likely to provide a mix of housing, including affordable housing?

Nothing chosen

12b. Able to address a particular housing need?

Nothing chosen

13a. Within 800m of a facility where cultural or social activities can be accessed?

Nothing chosen

14a. Likely to encourage social cohesion?

Nothing chosen

14b. Likely to help make the area safer? +

Nothing chosen

15a. Within or adjoining the urban area, a defined settlement policy area or the built form of a small settlement?

Nothing chosen

15b. Accessible on foot to a food store?

Nothing chosen

15c. Accessible on foot to a primary school?

Nothing chosen

15d. Accessible on foot or by bus to a major employer?

Nothing chosen

15e. Connect highway without constraint?

Nothing chosen

15f. Highway or junction capacity issues

Nothing chosen

Highway comments. For more detailed assessment see HELAA supporting document. www.bedford.gov.uk/LocalPlan2040

NOTE: This is a large site proposal for a new settlement with complex traffic and transport requirements. Further assessment of the transport impacts has been carried out and published as a supporting document found here www.bedford.gov.uk/LocalPlan2040 Access via several points along Barford Road. Widening of Barford Road and new junctions would be required for access, and these would need to cater for more vehicles than the Site 873 proposal for this site due to the higher number of dwellings (compared to sites with IDs 872 & 873). Some light traffic can be seen in the area which could worsen with 1000+ houses. Situation re PT, pedestrians and cycles is the same as for the other proposal for this site (site ID: 872 & 873) Widening and new junctions for access on Barford Road. For improved pedestrian and cycle connectivity it would be necessary to connect to the existing footway (approx 250m away). Widening of the existing footway and conversion to cycle/pedestrian route up to the A428 roundabout would be suggested. This would allow cycle/pedestrian access to the supermarket, bus services and further into the town. The proposal suggests a cycle route along the riverside but does not say where this could go - there could be potential for this to go in to the centre of St Neots.

Contaminated Land

Nothing chosen

Environmental Health note

close proximity to little barford power station and rail line

Mineral Safeguarding Area

Nothing chosen

Site assessment conclusions

This site is suitable for allocation in the Local Plan for a mix of uses including housing, employment, open space and other community uses. Allocation principles include: - delivery of 4,000 dwellings and employment land within a new settlement - preparation of a masterplan to deliver a sustainable community whilst - sustainable transport links to the East West Rail station - consideration of heritage assets - preparation of a site specific flood risk assessment - delivery of schools to support the pupils generated by the development - consideration of the high pressure gas and power lines crossing the site - areas in flood zone 3 adjacent to the River Great Ouse would not support development - multi user access route along the River Great Ouse. The site has been separately assessed - see New Settlement Site Assessments supporting document. Site is proposed for allocation HOU19 Little Barford new settlement.

Supporting documents

File: Highway Access and Development Parcels new settlement

File: Highway Access and Development Parcels Parish Growth

File: Promoter site assessment

File: Botany Assessment CWS

File: Botany Assessment Power Station

File: Land promotion areas

File: SSFRA

File: Surface Water Drainage 1

File: Surface Water Drainage 2

File: Surface Water Drainage 3

File: Surface Water Drainage 4

File: Surface Water Drainage 5

File: Technical Note Utilities

File: Transport Assessment 1

File: Transport Assessment 2

File: Transport Assessment 3

File: Transport Assessment 4

File: Transport Assessment 5

File: Archaeological Desk Based Assmt

File: Mineral Extraction Constraints Plan

File: Tree Constraints report

File: Letter 4th Jan 2022

File: Preliminary Ecological Appraisal redacted

File: Areas Available for Allocation Plan

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.